OP is misleading, they're only changing one model.
Nudity is allowed under an M rating.
The back of the game case states nudity in one of its content descriptions for the rating.
It's only when you get into pornographic type of nudity that it would kick it into an AO rating.
Both what? There are no male NPC walking around with hole on his pants to begin with.
I've edited in the quote from Eurogamer. Fact remains, they are censoring a (the? how many are there?) female model, while leaving male genitalia unchanged.
Guys, they only patched that model that wasn't supposed to show it. Don't worry, you're virtual vaginas are still intact.
Seriously, the overreaction from some people for 1 digital pussy is kind of amazing.
Why?
I've edited in the quote from Eurogamer. Fact remains, they are censoring a (the? how many are there?) female model, while leaving male genitalia unchanged.
I've edited in the quote from Eurogamer. Fact remains, they are censoring a (the? how many are there?) female model, while leaving male genitalia unchanged.
I saw a video of a full nude man pissing on a wall. So yeah.
It's a stupid knee jerk, retro-active decision from Ubi to censor this, just panders to the tabloid notion that games are evil.
Forget the vagina, it sets a poor president, especially in an 18 / M rated piece of media.
Because Sony banned a guy for tweeting a screenshot of vagina via live for Playstation.
Shits happened, Sony unbanned the guy and Ubisoft now has to cover the vagina up.
What's so special about this one pussy?
Wouldn't the correct reaction be to leave it in and for Sony to tell PSN users not to share images with full frontal nudity?
They should patch out both or keep both in. More the former cause this isn't a GTA style game
why? they have female nude models. Thing is that model wasn't supposed to show that, so they patched it. This is not about censoring sexual content, it's about correcting something that wasn't supposed to show.
If it really was about not showing any nude females they would have patched them all.
Why?
Full nude women are still in the game.
It's a tad more invasive. The logic would be that the woman doesn't want her genitals to be seen, the only way to do that is murder her and peep under her skirt. That's slightly different to nudist models.So full nude is fine, but 'special' underwear isn't.
Why? I'm seriously a tiny bit perplexed. But Sony stopped making sense to me when they decided to not include an UHD drive to the pro so whatever.
It's a tad more invasive. The logic would be that the woman doesn't want her genitals to be seen, the only way to do that is murder her and peep under her skirt. That's slightly different to nudist models.
Fuck.
That.
Ubisoft were just rebuilding trust. Now this.
Embarrassing post.b-b-but EQUALITY!! TRIGGERED!!!
Watch Cocks
b-b-but EQUALITY!! TRIGGERED!!!