Nah
Look, people trying to call Trey & Matt's brand of "all sides are dumber than we are" libertarianism "alt-right" are 100% wrong. They're fumbling around with terms they don't really understand, and they're not letting that stop them from swinging em wildly like a 2x4.
But that misguided and mistaken assertion isn't fucking radicalizing anyone.
Apart from the fact I never had to do that because I never said it was the majority, you said I said that.
They are scared and I can understand why. Trump is president and has the power to go after them. And he crazy enough to actually do so.
You seem as agitated as he is. I'm annoyed by some of the posts ITT and spending more time than I should reading replies (as is philosophy and you). Don't see the point in unconvincingly acting like laid back cool guy when you're as committed and rechecking this thread as everyone else.
I guess add it to the pile of made up crap in this thread. No one has said a majority of gaffers or "all of GAF" is outraged at South Park. Just a disturbing number of people who keep repeating the same silly lies about the show and its creators because they're still upset by the PC Principal season.
Nah, Veep can stay.cancel House of Cards,
cancel Veep,
cancel South Park
reality has ruined fiction
Difference is I'm laughing. I'm not acting..why would I need to? Who am I trying to impress? The outrage outrage gives me the giggles..why wouldn't I keep popping in? 😕
Yeah..that's what it is lol. You kids are adorable..
Honestly the debates only were more entertaining than last season South Park
Jabroni marks don't know it's a work when they try to work a work, and end up working themselves into a shoot.when you call south park alt-right, it makes overly sensitive people outraged
in their outrage they make a fool out of themselves and prove me right
#SouthParkQualityHumour
cancel House of Cards,
cancel Veep,
cancel South Park
reality has ruined fiction
So you aren't trying to have an active decent discussion what you are actually doing is trolling and baiting for outraged reactions?
Sounds productive.
You're coming across as trying too hard after all the initial anti-SP positions were squashed and going with this weird angle at that one poster (philosophy). I guess, keep at it? Whatever.
So you aren't trying to have an active decent discussion what you are actually doing is trolling and baiting for outraged reactions?
Sounds productive.
I would argue there is nothing productive about the arguments that happen on GAF because nobody will change their mind or budge on anything.
What? Why? People say this?
How has he given a platform to Milo by pointing out the truth? Anyway, this is unrelated, feel free to PM me and discuss why and I will be happy to debate with you on this issue and change my perspective if you convince me, I just posted the video because I thought the other poster would be interested as it was related to what he was saying.
I would think that now more than ever, South Park should be making fun of the president.
I would think that now more than ever, South Park should be making fun of the president.
Yup.
It's gotten to the point where whether or not criticising Trump or anything else they've satirised recently was a good idea doesn't matter, the decision to stop is just for the good of the show long-term.
I miss the non-continuity and off-the-wall episodes. Don't get me wrong some of the greatest moments have included satirising real life but the very best haven't, in my opinon. Episodes like Butters' Very Own Episode, for example, just couldn't happen in the current climate, I feel. It's kind of sad because I honestly believe Matt & Trey tried to do the recent storylines in a good way, and believe me I wanted them to attempt a 'serialised'/continuous season for a while, but I just think they failed in their aims.
Look, if people liked the latest stuff, that's great. I just didn't find any of the recent stuff funny, like at all. It's not a political leaning thing, I just didn't enjoy it and that's that. For some context, I'm not American and have been watching and enjoying South Park since the 90's. I know SP is an American show with American creators on an American network for an American audience but you can run this stuff into the ground. It's only my opinion but I've seen it echoed quite a few times in various places; the best South Park content in recent years was The Stick of Truth.
It's a fruitless endeavour honestly.
I would go one step further and contend that modern day Simpsons has been BETTER than the most recent season of South Park.
That is real classy. Being so reactionary and self-righteous is exactly what I'm talking about. Maybe don't barrel into a conversation with insults?The inside of your ass must smell fantastic.
Talking down to people who have a genuine reason to be angry, scared, and reactionary doesn't seem to be a genuine attempt at dialogue. This attitude seems to be common among moderates. They aren't winning anyone over with that shit.
it's going to be really hard to take a House of Cards Season 5 seriously now with a Trump's assention to power out of fuckery nullifies all the careful scheming that the Underwoods did
it's going to be really hard to take a House of Cards Season 5 seriously now with a Trump's assention to power out of fuckery nullifies all the careful scheming that the Underwoods did
I hope they make an episode about everybody bitching and moaning over this.
I always knew they were cowards right when they refuse to directly make fun of Trump last season.
Fuck 'em.
Some embarrassing over-reactions in here.
Because if you aint 100% against Trump and dont attack him any chance you get, you are pro Trump.
People get outraged at nonsense opinions? Who would have thought? How damn clever! My god, you're the master troll of the master troll!when you call south park alt-right, it makes overly sensitive people outraged
in their outrage they make a fool out of themselves and prove me right
#SouthParkQualityHumour
I would think that now more than ever, South Park should be making fun of the president.
Sounds like some people itt are getting triggered.People get outraged at nonsense opinions? Who woukd have thought? How damn clever! My god, you're the master troll of the master troll!
Some embarrassing over-reactions in here.
Aren't you sitting a bit in a glasshouse?Sounds like some people itt are getting triggered.
I can't believe I was ever into this show. Cowardly fucks. Fuck them and that godawful pc principal meme.
Cowards.
Sounds like some people itt are getting triggered.
Guy, whatever it is you think about me is all you. This "try hard" stuff is, again, just you. I'll agree tho, whatever..not sure why I ruffled your feathers. I'll try harder to do better, I guess..
You sure, tiger? 😏
They've gone further making fun of Trump then probably anyone else in the world, but somehow are still cowards...
I always knew they were cowards right when they refuse to directly make fun of Trump last season.
Fuck 'em.
Damn, you sure got me. I guess, in a sense, both sides are pretty alike. Not like any of this matters.Aren't you sitting a bit in a glasshouse?
That is real classy. Being so reactionary and self-righteous is exactly what I'm talking about. Maybe don't barrel into a conversation with insults?
But you don't have any good reasons to be scared or angry at South Park who are already on the right side of social justice most of the time. It's the idea that sometimes you have to think about their messages or they don't jive 100% with your social philosophy 100% of the time that you need to cast them out as an enemy to the movement. When I said online radicalization I meant that the younger generations have grown up in echo chambers(yes, all sides do this), looking online for people who agree with their point of view from the start, so much so that they've been tainted with the idea of judging someone by their absolute philosophical purity or choosing to purge them outright from the conversation. You're obviously on the "good side" in the culture war, but your inability to see past any slight difference in opinion or representation is ultimately self-defeating. I'm guessing the idea is that anyone "moderate" or somewhere-in-the-middle is considered not worth your time because they're not on the same page as you, which means they aren't considered a part of your movement. What you need to understand is that most of those moderates agree with you on the basics, that love triumphs over hate and inclusion is superior to separation, so you are generally putting your energy into the wrong places when you start going off on people who were with you from the start.
Purity tests will be the death of liberal organization because in only accepting peers that think exactly like you, you put up insurmountable walls between allies. I bet you and I are the same in all the places that matter, but you will ignore it because I think just a bit differently.
It's the problem with allies arguing in this thread and it has been a huge problem in threads all over GAF, most noticeably cropping up in the last year or two.
Still don't get why you've removed yourself from the discussion at hand and have decided to do this weird "why u mad tho *laughing smiley*" angle. (😕 Yeah, some people are invested and annoyed by this topic and arguing their positions vehemently. And? Move on from it and contribute. You're the only one doing this and it's frankly a shit way of engaging with others.
See? Yeah, I'm triggered, he's triggered, you and Bronx-Man are triggered. You have basic skills of deduction. That's nice. Anything else you wanna add?
How has he given a platform to Milo by pointing out the truth? Anyway, this is unrelated, feel free to PM me and discuss why and I will be happy to debate with you on this issue and change my perspective if you convince me, I just posted the video because I thought the other poster would be interested as it was related to what he was saying.
But you don't have any good reasons to be scared or angry at South Park who are already on the right side of social justice most of the time. It's the idea that sometimes you have to think about their messages or they don't jive 100% with your social philosophy 100% of the time that you need to cast them out as an enemy to the movement. When I said online radicalization I meant that the younger generations have grown up in echo chambers(yes, all sides do this), looking online for people who agree with their point of view from the start, so much so that they've been tainted with the idea of judging someone by their absolute philosophical purity or choosing to purge them outright from the conversation. You're obviously on the "good side" in the culture war, but your inability to see past any slight difference in opinion or representation is ultimately self-defeating. I'm guessing the idea is that anyone "moderate" or somewhere-in-the-middle is considered not worth your time because they're not on the same page as you, which means they aren't considered a part of your movement. What you need to understand is that most of those moderates agree with you on the basics, that love triumphs over hate and inclusion is superior to separation, so you are generally putting your energy into the wrong places when you start going off on people who were with you from the start.
Purity tests will be the death of liberal organization because in only accepting peers that think exactly like you, you put up insurmountable walls between allies. I bet you and I are the same in all the places that matter, but you will ignore it because I think just a bit differently.
It's the problem with allies arguing in this thread and it has been a huge problem in threads all over GAF, most noticeably cropping up in the last year or two.
Dude..you really might just wanna put me on ignore. You seem real tense and I'd hate for you to have a bad day based on some person on the internet. You'd think I ate your cat for fuck sakes. Good grief lol..