Big Hollywood filmmaking is like a machine, with thousands of moving parts. Sometimes that machine produces well structured, profitable and critically well received films like Ghostbusters and Robocop. Sometimes, it makes critically reviled, poorly structured and unprofitable films like Ghostbusters and Robocop.
Plinkett should review Boyhood next
It took 12 years to make
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
He backed up everything he pointed out.
How is bitching about egregious product placement like that bad? When it gets to the level it did in movies like this or jack and jill, it deserves to be called out.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
Product Placement is usually one of those things that everyone likes to harp on when it's in a movie they already don't like, but no one gives a shit about when it's in a film that they're on board with.
Like Casino Royale is an example of a film that's just as egregious. Yet, no one really gives a shit about it.
He backed up everything he pointed out.
How is bitching about egregious product placement like that bad? When it gets to the level it did in movies like this or jack and jill, it deserves to be called out.
Having some shots of phones or laptops passing by is not on the level of sitting down eating at papa johns or standing there eating pringels.
still better than 2 though
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing.
Product Placement is usually one of those things that everyone likes to harp on when it's in a movie they already don't like, but no one gives a shit about when it's in a film that they're on board with.
Like Casino Royale is an example of a film that's just as egregious. Yet, no one really gives a shit about it.
James Bond has been one long commercial for awhile now. TMNT, Back to The Future, Minority Report, and many other films were also filled with product placement. It doesn't seem like much of a problem to me.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
Did Casino Royale drop the tagline of a product in dialogue like this movie did for Pringles?
Serious question. I never watched that movie.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
Dude mr plinkett is a character not a real person...
NervousXtian
Thought Emoji Movie was good. Take that as you will.
Mike was happy with TFA and didn't feel like being too harsh. It shows in the Plinkett review.
BTW, this review is overly long, spends too much time trying to talk about how OG GB was a masterpiece and they didn't like the type of humor GB16 was using. Also, who really gives a fuck about product placement.
I mean bitching about product placement is like sharp knees level of discourse.
They discounted the homages, like they were a bad thing. They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
I can see that you are still beating this dead horse in coming into this thread complaining about people beating a dead horse.At this point its just angry nerds hate fucking a dead horse
Lmao.I can see that you are still beating this dead horse in coming into this thread complaining about people beating a dead horse.
I can see that you are still beating this dead horse in coming into this thread complaining about people beating a dead horse.
No, if you watch the review and want to discuss problems you have with the review itself, there is nothing wrong with that and discussion is welcome.Are people who think the video is good the only ones who are allowed to post in here or something?
No, but people complaining about the videos existence is what I meant by my comment. Yes, you can argue about what is in the video, but complaining that the video was made in the first place is different.Are people who think the video is good the only ones who are allowed to post in here or something?
They seemed upset it was a reboot instead of a continuation
Are people who think the video is good the only ones who are allowed to post in here or something?
NervousXtian
Thought Emoji Movie was good. Take that as you will.
Weren't most fans?
I mean the reveal trailer talked about the events of the original like they were cannon going forward.
Then they use the original actors in new roles... they should've went full reboot or full homage, not this wishy washy half & half.
Are people who think the video is good the only ones who are allowed to post in here or something?
They did. Trailers aren't canon.
They didn't provide much of anything to back anything up. You don't think it's funny, fine. Good for you.
I mean, comedy is subjective or whatever, but this review has better comedic timing than the actual film it's reviewing. There's no denying that, because one is all improv bullshit and the other has crafted jokes.
Plinkett should review Boyhood next
It took 12 years to make
I mean, comedy is subjective or whatever, but this review has better comedic timing than the actual film it's reviewing. There's no denying that, because one is all improv bullshit and the other has crafted jokes.