• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Is refusing to date people of certain races racist?

Status
Not open for further replies.

KmA

Member
By equating them to what gender people are attracted to.
And you actually expect people to take your "argument" seriously.

And it's so funny when people make this argument because as a gay person of color I can tell you that gay men are the biggest perpetrators of sexual racism.

Honestly if you just keep asking "why" to every reason a person brings up to not being attracted to a race, you're gonna end up with a pretty racist answer.

I'm not attracted to Asians.
Why?
They just aren't attractive to me.
How so? Why?
I don't like their features.
Which ones?
Their eyes are too squinty.

... Ok cool.
 

JordanN

Banned
9 times out of 10, someone being vocal about they don't date "x" race is bound to be for douchebag reasons.

I've seen black people who have very light skin that they border on looking white, and I see white people who have dark tans that they wouldn't be classified as pale. To date someone on "race" really stretches the definition of what exactly race is. For example, if you date only white people does that apply to the very light skin Nordic white people or does it also included the tanned or olive skin Mediterranean whites?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Denying your baby/child a medical procedure that can vastly increase their quality of life because you're afraid of cultural drift is completely unacceptable to me. The point is "maintaining culture" can lead to a lot of morally reprehensible decisions and this is just one of them. I don't even want to get into, for example, arranged marriages or coerced polygamy, and those are cultural too.

I'm big on cultural relativism by the way, but I have spent a lot of time thinking about these things and I have lines in the sand drawn all over the place so I can't and won't grant people a blanket "well it's their culture" license.

You're right. Denying your kid that medical procedure is wrong. I was only talking about the deaf adults in your example.

But again I'm saying it's okay if the person "ONLY" applies it to themselves and no one else. The second you apply those sensibilities onto another person it turns into straight up BS and it's wrong.
 

NewGame

Banned
Sexual desires secretly decry your total undeniable racism, sexism, nazism, probably other isms.

Like for example people who are sexually attracted to japanese cartoons.

They hate reality.

Open and shut case.
 

Cocaloch

Member
You're attempting to argue that it's OK to refuse to date a gender (I think you mean ”sex", gender is something enteriely) due to physical attributes, but it's NOT OKAY when those physical attributes belong to a race.

I don't see how having a sexual preference is much difference than a physical preference, when both are pretty similar.

Lets take a stab in the dark and suggest there might be a history surrounding race, not to mention current implementations of racist systems, that makes it different. The key failing that's coming up again and again in this thread, with no justifications, is reducing race to a physical attribute.

Absolutely not. It's not a choice.

Some people in this thread are trying to say you can change what you're attracted to, by I assume, some sort of ”conversion therapy".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy

Which is sickening.

No, people in this thread are saying that attraction can have a social basis. Which is demonstrably true, your petty attempts at childish strawman moralizing aside.

Saying we should critically reflect on why people are vastly more likely to be unattracted to certain marginalized groups in order to find a way to create a culture that is less prone to socializing people to dislike them has very little in common with conversion therapy.

Of course all of this is irrelevant because you've still yet to even attempt to establish why not having control over something would make it not racist anyway.
 

KmA

Member
Absolutely not. It’s not a choice.

Some people in this thread are trying to say you can change what you’re attracted to, by I assume, some sort of “conversion therapy”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy

Which is sickening.

Oh mY GOD you're intentionally being dense. No one is fucking saying that, they are saying take a few steps back and ANALYZE why you are attracted to certain characteristics. This is not conversion therapy are you kidding? This is called being self reflective and realizing not everything is as innate as you want it to be. There's literally a 27 page thread about this with people explaining this 100 times in so many different ways but you're bringing it up again as if it's this unique point.
 
And I argued that you can’t control what skin color nor physical features you’re attracted to.

I just don’t see how that makes you a racist.

Your skin color preference is a factor of environment. If you spent the next 5 years of your life in West Africa you think that you wouldn't gain any sort of attraction to darker skin tones just through a dramatically increased exposure to more black people? Of course you fucking would. Attraction and standards of beauty have a large environmental portion.

Your sexual orientation is not shaped by your environment. It's pretty damn set in stone early in your life. People's attraction to different types changes as they age and see more of the world in people living in it. You don't like men more because you see see more men. You don't like men in the absense of women if you are a heterosexual male.

You literally do not know what you're talking about.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
You can't force someone to change who they find attractive.

This goes for more than just race. This is not a just racism issue.

It's ridiculous. Some of the things in this thread sound like they're coming from hyper conservatives which is something I did not expect from this forum.

There is a thing where people can do hyper-liberal too and to a fault of not being able to understand the nuances of this conversation. Like Neece below absolutely explains literally WORD FOR WORD how I feel about black woman and relationships and why I have always stuck to dating them without it being racist.

Now how many of them will reach out to Neese and I, and honestly say a simple "I get it"?

This is something that's difficult to articulate but I do get it.

I'm open to dating anyone that I'm attracted to. But I do admit that when I date non-black (and particularly, black american) I do miss the solidarity aspect of being with a black woman. There are certain shared experiences as black people living in the south that we joke about, talk about, and communicate to each other non-verbally that is comforting and even romantic/attractive.

And yes the example you listed about you both having nappy hair is something me and my black girlfriend also joke about and share together. Just yesterday she had a story about her job, pay, and her natural hair (where she is the only black woman) that she could unload in a way that didn't involve a lot of explanation. And there are probably 1000 other little every day things that she has never had to explain to me academically about her experience, and vice versa. We just get it. And it's comforting to come home and have that.

The free flowing, 'you're in my head' conversations we have after watching Insecure, or Get Out, or a black comedy special, or see Viola win best actress, or see a police car behind us, and the way we communicate using shorthand words, phrases, black movie quotes, looks, grins, contextual use of the n-word or other black slurs like jigaboo etc is just something I really enjoy. And it's something that, in my experience with dating non-black women, has been something I missed. Sure I could get it from friends and family, but it's just different not having it as strongly with your partner.


Again that's not to say I wouldn't date non-black women. I have. I would. And it's also not saying all experiences with a black woman would be the same (I dated a Nigerian girl and we didn't really share what I just listed above). My relationship with my current girlfriend is largely dependent on her as an individual, not solely because she's black. But I'm not going to act like I don't get what you're saying.
 
Absolutely not. It’s not a choice.

Some people in this thread are trying to say you can change what you’re attracted to, by I assume, some sort of “conversion therapy”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy

Which is sickening.

So, becoming more tolerant and open to the world around you is the same as "gay conversion therapy"?
Man, some people just really want to dig their heels in about being racist.
 
Lets take a stab in the dark and suggest there might be a history surrounding race, not to mention current implementations of racist systems, that makes it different. The key failing that's coming up again and again in this thread, with no justifications, is reducing race to a physical attribute.



No, people in this thread are saying that attraction can have a social basis. Which is demonstrably true, your petty attempts at childish strawman moralizing aside.

Of course all of this is irrelevant because you've still yet to even attempt to establish why not having control over something would make it not racist anyway.

I already discussed in my original post that it’s okay to refuse to date a race based on physical attributes, but it’s not okay, and pretty racist, to refuse a race based on the rest of the definition.
 

Cocaloch

Member
Oh mY GOD you're intentionally being dense.

I'll give people the benefit of the doubt at first, but when he keeps on coming back to this point I can only assume he's throwing out cries of homophobia in order to distract from not only his own racism but his lack of willingness to confront it, regardless of whether or not he is aware of it.

I already discussed in my original post that it's okay to refuse to date a race based on physical attributes, but it's not okay, and pretty racist, to refuse a race based on the rest of the definition.

You've already tried to get around the reality of the situation by disentangling things that can't be disentangled. How are we abstracting the physical attributes associated with a specific racial category from the history behind it. That's actually impossible to do. This is ignoring the problem of categorization that I've refereed to many times in this thread.
 
when he keeps on coming back to this point I can only assume he's throwing out cries of homophobia in order to distract from not only his own racism but his lack of willingness to confront it, regardless of whether or not he is aware of it.

Yeah, either he sees them as the same thing, or is disingenuously presenting them as the same thing - both of which are horrible looks.

EDIT: Decided to edit out my response to him, because it's not even worth the effort.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
Absolutely not. It’s not a choice.

Some people in this thread are trying to say you can change what you’re attracted to, by I assume, some sort of “conversion therapy”.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversion_therapy

Which is sickening.

What's sickening is you equating conversion therapy to... whatever it is you're accusing others of.

No one in the history of the world has ever been subjected to conversion therapy for attraction to a physical feature, whereas conversion therapy on gays is a real thing that happens even now. When you draw an equivalence between a hypothetical and something real, you fucked up somewhere along the way.
 
So, becoming more tolerant and open to the world around you is the same as "gay conversion therapy"?
Man, some people just really want to dig their heels in about being racist.

You keep name calling, but you have no facts.

You can’t force someone to be attracted to someone else.
 
Culturally, I can accept that. Racially, no. I don't see why dating someone of a different race should require extra time and energy vs same race. Unless race is a big part of your life and you make a big deal about it at every opportunity, then again I'd have to ask why it's so important to you.


This I can accept, I guess, but at the same time, the path of least resistance often means maintaining the status quo, and if the status quo is racism then...

While there has been tremendous progress over the last fifty years on this front, let’s not pretend that it’s all roses out there for interracial couples. And not everyone is built to want to endure looks, harassment, weird questions etc that comes with the territory, not to mention the challenges of raising a mixed/bi racial child. Not everyone has the strength to carry that mantle and I don’t think we should disparage them for that. Not that the ops friend has put any thoughts like that into this, I would wager.



Hypothetically, yes, but when generic white girl/white guy on Tinder has "no blacks" on their profile, I would have to stretch my imagination to think that they're really interested in keeping alive their minority culture (like, what, Irish? Italian?, Germanic?) and not just blatantly shallow or prejudiced. Also, if they really were interested in, you know, keeping the culture alive, they wouldn't use "no PoC", they'd use "only <my race here>", but how often do you see this versus the opposite?

I used the word minority for a reason to exclude cases like what you bring up. I just don’t see a problem with folks in a minority cultures not wanting to fully assimilate into generic americans, wanting to maintain some sense of their homeland. Shared struggles can bind people together. Some do, god for them, some don’t want to, what’s the big deal if they aren’t harming anyone? And I like eating interesting foods, so I am a bit selfish there &#128521;.
 

Cyanity

Banned
Over 1,300 comments over a topic that should be pretty cut and dry. Of course it's racist. You're disregarding an entire segment of the population due to skin color. That's racist.
 

TaterTots

Banned
I'd say its racist. If a white man chose to not date a woman of color because she had color or a person of color refusing to date a white man because of being white....yea...that's racist.
 
How arent they racist again?

Please tell me youve seen Boondocks and are familiar with uncle ruckus.

If your calling my nephews racist self hating house nuggaz your ignorant too. It is what it is. I won't date white women not bc I'm racist it's just not my preference at all. I have slept with white women but dating and trying to build a relationship is a whole other thing. The first girl dated back in JHigh was white, ever since then has been black, Hispanic and Asian. Am I racist or my nephews racist for their preference? Absolutely not.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Over 1,300 comments over a topic that should be pretty cut and dry. Of course it's racist. You're disregarding an entire segment of the population due to skin color. That's racist.

But it's not as cut and dry for some people. That's why this thread is the length that it is. It's okay for people to converse with others and share ideas.
 

Cyanity

Banned
But it's not as cut and dry for some people. That's why this thread is the length that it is. It's okay for people to converse with others and share ideas.

I think this is just an extremely uncomfortable question for a lot of people, right? Because we all have our preferences, but when it comes to it, I think the average person is at least willing to date people they engage with on a certain level. The title of this thread, however, leaves little ambiguity. OP is asking if "refusing" to date people because of their race is racist. Which it is. Because you are saying that you 100% will not date someone based on their skin color. That's racism.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
Nope nope nope

yes yes yes

5RaZ05n.png
 
I think people have lost track of what this thread is actually about.

We’re discussing refusing to date people of a certain race.

Race meaning a number of things;

A classic definition:

“an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, especially formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.” via Dictionary.com

Many people are saying it’s racist to not date people based on these attributes:

“any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape”

Usually, when dating someone, you find them attractive, no?

I find it odd are trying to force the “you have to find all races attractive, or you’re racist!” in here. People are allowed the freedom of liking different things.

It doesnt have to be so black and white. (No pun intended)

Unless you are using a superficial modern definition where it means literal bloodline, which is of course racist.

But we aren’t discussing that.
 

Haly

One day I realized that sadness is just another word for not enough coffee.
While there has been tremendous progress over the last fifty years on this front, let's not pretend that it's all roses out there for interracial couples. And not everyone is built to want to endure looks, harassment, weird questions etc that comes with the territory, not to mention the challenges of raising a mixed/bi racial child.

You could say the same for early white allies of civil rights movements, or straight allies for queers today. You don't want to be an outspoken ally because it's too hard on yourself? Fine, sure, self preservation comes first. I get it.

But you bear some modicum of responsibility for that passivity. Maybe it doesn't warrant the label of racism, or something as harsh as "coward", but there's probably something mild in between that fits.
 

Sai-kun

Banned
I think people have lost track of what this thread is actually about.

We're discussing refusing to date people of a certain race.

Race meaning a number of things;

A classic definition:

”an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, especially formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups." via Dictionary.com

Many people are saying it's racist to not date people based on these attributes:

”any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape"

Usually, when dating someone, you find them attractive, no?

I find it odd are trying to force the ”you have to find all races attractive, or you're racist!" in here. People are allowed the freedom of liking different things.

It doesnt have to be so black and white. (No pun intended)

Unless you are using a superficial modern definition where it means literal bloodline, which is of course racist.

But we aren't discussing that.

god your post is so annoying

the topic is about whether or not it's racist to not date people because of their race, and you're being annoyingly pedantic about it.

it's not that deep
 
god your post is so annoying

the topic is about whether or not it's racist to not date people because of their race, and you're being annoyingly pedantic about it.

What’s “race” to you then?

It seems like everyone has their own definition of it.

I’m using the ones straight out of the English dictionary.
 

Cocaloch

Member
god your post is so annoying

the topic is about whether or not it's racist to not date people because of their race, and you're being annoyingly pedantic about it.

it's not that deep

He isn't even being pedantic about it, about three seconds of thought can poke some massive holes in that definition and I hardly feel like dictionary.com should be taken as an authority on racism. Especially not when he's acting like it's some platonically true definition.

It seems like everyone has their own definition of it.

It's almost like it's a really complicated concept that requires a pretty well thought out and argued for understanding. But we don't actually need to define race that tightly for this topic. We just need to establish what counts as racism, and what the person in the OP is doing.

I'm using the ones straight out of the English dictionary.

There is no "the English dictionary".
 
He isn't even being pedantic about it, about three seconds of thought can poke some massive holes in that definition and I hardly feel like dictionary.com should be taken as an authority on racism.

When someone isn't arguing in good faith I just ignore them. You should do the same.
 
He isn't even being pedantic about it, about three seconds of thought can poke some massive holes in that definition and I hardly feel like dictionary.com should be taken as an authority on racism.

Since we’re not using official definitions, what’s your personal definition of race?

Maybe that’ll explain why you’re not understanding my post
 

gfxtwin

Member
Even having race preferences in partners is racist, though a more socially accepted form of racism because of how common it is w/ everyone.
 

Cocaloch

Member
Since we're not using official definitions

Where are these "official definitions" coming from?

what's your personal definition of race?

Race refers to an imagined social group category, people are placed into these categories for a wider variety of reasons but they are generally understood to be theoretically based on presumed familial connection to an some ideal type member of the group. Of course that isn't true in practice. All races are at the end of the day is social labels that people place on themselves and each other. They have meaning only insofar as they are given operative social meaning. If you push too far on race you find nothing but the people that have been identified as members of that group.

Maybe that'll explain why you're not understanding my post

I understand your posts, I don't think I've said anything that would indicate I do not. I disagree with both your understandings of these topics and your arguments.
 
Where are these "official definitions" coming from?



Race refers to an imagined social group category, people are placed into these categories for a wider variety of reasons but they are generally understood to be theoretically based on presumed familial connection to an some ideal type member of the group. Of course that isn't true in practice. All races are at the end of the day is social labels that people place on themselves and each other. They have meaning only insofar as they are given operative social meaning. If you push too far on race you find nothing but the people that have been identified as members of that group.



I understand your posts, I don't think I've said anything that would indicate I do not. I disagree with both your understandings of these topics and your arguments.

The definitions are from dictionary.com

But by your definition, it is 100% racist.

That’s why I think this thread is so mixed and argrued; because everyone is using a different definition of race.

I agree with you though, that makes it 100% racist.
 

Cocaloch

Member
The definitions are from dictionary.com

I know that's where the definition you are using comes from. I mean the supposed "official definitions".

But by your definition, it is 100% racist.

It does not have a clear antecedent here. What is it, the action of the OP's friend? If so then yes. Well done.


That’s why I think this thread is so mixed and argrued; because everyone is using a different definition of race.

That's not the only thing going on here, but sure people are using different definitions. The issue is some actually address what goes on with race, and some do not. Separating out physical attributes associated with specific racial groups is simply not possible. Not because of the definition of race, but because how the concept actually works in the real world.
 
You keep name calling, but you have no facts.

You can’t force someone to be attracted to someone else.

No one is trying to.

We're just accurately stating that refusing to date an entire race is racist

Btw race ain't from the same splace as sex and gay/bi... know how I know? Any fertile couple capable of reproduction can have a cis boy or a girl, or a trans child or a gay or bi child. Not every fertile couple can give birth to a black child.
 

Theonik

Member
Culturally, I can accept that. Racially, no. I don't see why dating someone of a different race should require extra time and energy vs same race. Unless race is a big part of your life and you make a big deal about it at every opportunity, then again I'd have to ask why it's so important to you.
Conjecture: Segregation is a self perpetuating phenomenon as the isolation creates cultural rifts between the segregated peoples which in turn acts as a further barrier to them intermingling which in turn means they drift further and further apart by each generation.

Conjecture #2: Equality in rights does not equal equivalence. We differ from one another and classify one another as such, if it were not so, there would be no need to have this kind of discussion. This isn't limited to appearance of course. Humans have segregated themselves in arbitrary lineages and castes for years after all even within their own race.

Conjecture #3: If you are raised in that environment, this kind of mentality is ingrained in you and you will develop preferences based on your early experiences. This will typically be a passive and not conscious effort, I don't think there is real malice intended and I think the expectations that people should date people they aren't attracted to is… Bizarre?
 

LordKasual

Banned
Jesus these threads just drivel on and on and on with scemantics


"REFUSING" = most definitely fueled by some racist ideology, if it is indeed refusal and not...:

"PREFERRING" = a personal preference

"NOT ATTRACTED TO" = also a personal preference, and there's about a 95% chance there is an exception case with the person. Proceed to post pictures of celebrities until they say "yes of course I would".

This shit really aint that deep, unless you're trying to argue that

"PREFERRING" = racist, but in a condemning way, not in a "we're all a little racist" way.

in which case, you should probably just learn to deal with the fact that everyone doesn't (and won't be made to) think how you think or like what you like. Every subject concerning race doesn't need to be a racist witch hunt.

Purely idealistic views like "nobody should ever discriminate ever based on anything concerning race" is far too much work and is honestly a bit pointless because as long as cultures exist, people will always think this way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom