• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

CDProjectRed (GOG) appropriates popularity of #WontBeErased to make point about PC games

ruvikx

Banned
This whole mob mentality on social media is fucking annoying.

They're modern day communists... with all the baggage that entails. Their Bolshevik forefathers literally wrote the book on repressions & PC thought policing (the Soviet Union was their real first playground), so people really shouldn't be surprised when these "SJW" (actually SIW i.e. social injustice warriors) behave like a 1920's commie politburo & demand the erasing/censoring of any ideas, groups & people contrary to the party doctrine.

Also, weaponizing pro-trans activism to such an extent is also quite a normal progression on their own slippery slope towards tyranny, i.e. normal people are getting assaulted by these neo-red agitators because their new "utopia" demands the constant shifting of goalposts & destruction of anyone or anything which might hinder their neo-religion (Tyler Malka himself was targeted in the same manner as the CD project red guy last year, i.e. by an enraged red mob with a bloodlust & zero self-awareness, honor or morals).

Let's put it this way: if a real transgender person wants what's best for himself/herself, they'll stay far, far away from the restera types who're just using them as a weapon against the "normies" they wish to either destroy or lord over like power hungry psychos.
 

Nikodemos

Member
The rainbow haired social justice queer brigade don't actually buy video games anyway, they just pretend to be indie game developers. Just ignore the outrage mob like you say. Sales will be fine.
That's just some Mongolian basket weaving forum shit meme. "They're nothing like me, so they can't possibly like anything I like!"
Truth is, they do buy games. Though, admittedly, it's mostly weebshit err I mean designed according to Japanese aesthetics.
 
Last edited:

Azurro

Banned
Are you sure you didn't post it on wrong forum ? That's some of the most hilarious things I've ever read about my country.

The hate we get because we didn't want to clear Merkel mess is really amazing.

Another rep for Poland. It's bullshit when people call all Polish people fascists. I'm visibly Latino and it's one of my favorite countries to go on a weekend trip, 95% of the people there have always been super nice to me.
 

Dunki

Member
That's just some Mongolian basket weaving forum shit meme. "They're nothing like me, so they can't possibly like anything I like!"
Truth is, they do buy games. Though, admittedly, it's mostly weebshit err I mean designed according to Japanese aesthetics.
The last thing they would buy is weebshit XD

All Japanese games are racist, sexist and have problematic costumes and designs.
 

Cato

Banned
I will buy CDPR games even harder going forward. Sign me up for three copies. One for me, one for my son and one to give away.

Let all the robots that lack any kind of humor be outraged. Normal humans can enjoy and laugh at a joke even if some hysterically oversensitive people find it in poor taste.
 
Last edited:

Nikodemos

Member
The last thing they would buy is weebshit XD

All Japanese games are racist, sexist and have problematic costumes and designs.
There's a shitload of fujoshit that doesn't have loli fapbait I mean 1000 year old dragons. After all, where do you think the lolhaircolor meme originated from, if not animu/jrpg?
 

Paracelsus

Member
There's a shitload of fujoshit that doesn't have loli fapbait I mean 1000 year old dragons. After all, where do you think the lolhaircolor meme originated from, if not animu/jrpg?

Here's a rule of thumb: pandering is like racism, so you can't be racist against white men, you can pander to everybody except white straight men.
 

MilkyJoe

Member
Just popped by Era. The counterpart to this thread is both comedy gold & unbearable cringe in equal measures. Some tit is asking how he can have all his CDPR games purged from his PS account. :messenger_grinning_sweat:
 

Cosmogony

Member
I've got to side with the "mob" there. The fact that for example as a white person you wouldn't give a shit about a racist or antisemitic joke, doesn't mean people who are the target of it will just cave into your aggressions,

A joke is not an aggression. It is not violence. If you do not understand the nature of humour, just say so. It will be explained to you.

that's the game. Attack people under any form, be ready for a defense.

A joke is not an attack. If you're poked fun at, poke fun back at them. If you cannot understand the fundamental difference between violence and a joke, you are completely unprepared for any mature debate. Then again, you did start by saying you were siding with the mob.

I'm not bothered by everything the US president does, mostly don't care, but this issue is grave and real enough, that the joke is actually tasteless and aggressive

Are you having trouble understanfding what aggressive means, especially in the context of a most elliptic tweet?

unlike their previous "did you assume their gender" joke which simply mocks an opinion.

There is no substantitive difference between the two. You're grasping at straws here.

The problem is that CPDR is based in of the world's most racist country,

Do you have evidence for that?
Would you be incurring in a guilty-by-association fallacy?

today and yesterday, Poland which is one of the rare and first western country that turns to extreme-right wing.

It's not, regardless of what any us thinks on the matter. More importantly, though, it says absolutely nothing about the alleged CDPR's misconduct. Absolutely nothing. It is completely beside the point. To rational people, that is.

Now if you're racist it's not a problem, but for CPDR it means their company will not hold off in the global market and especially not in the future.

Nothing in CDPR's conduct, tweets included, has ever remotely suggested or hinted at racism, sexism or xenophobia. It'd take a specially convoluted and intellectually dishonest mind to assert otherwise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ozrimandias

Member
Second time in less than 3 months that CDPR had to apologize for a social media misstep?
Anyway, i dont think its offensive in anyway. But this its the millenials era: its agressive, its offensive, we demand an apology
 
Second time in less than 3 months that CDPR had to apologize for a social media misstep?
Anyway, i dont think its offensive in anyway. But this its the millenials era: its agressive, its offensive, we demand an apology

Millennial outrage culture has finally made me understand Zodiac Motherfucker's obsession with wanting nuclear war.
 

petran79

Banned
Just popped by Era. The counterpart to this thread is both comedy gold & unbearable cringe in equal measures. Some tit is asking how he can have all his CDPR games purged from his PS account. :messenger_grinning_sweat:

Most users there are pretending due to reign of terror. They have to be....
 

MilkyJoe

Member
Most users there are pretending due to reign of terror. They have to be....

Oh yeah totally, i posted that there too. I won't be at all surprised if I am banned for doing so. The place reminds me of the Milgram experiment. They are terrified of being banned to the point that not only do they not say what they really think, but they post stuff just to reinforce the pitiful facade.
 

MilkyJoe

Member
Seeing people asking for their gog accounts to be deleted, boycotting cyberpunk etc. Lmao.

It's fecking hilarious, those nobbers posting screenshots of their closed accounts, like they are going to get a pat on the head from whoever the tyrannical bastard is that runs the place, these days :messenger_grinning_squinting:
 

Dunki

Member
Second time in less than 3 months that CDPR had to apologize for a social media misstep?
Anyway, i dont think its offensive in anyway. But this its the millenials era: its agressive, its offensive, we demand an apology
They should not have apologized for any of it. This is what you get when you always try to react instead of ignoring this mob.

First Time: It was a gravestone With the world games journalism and with the date of all the "gamers are dead " articles.
Second Time was the "Did you just assume my gender" meme
Third time now was using a hashtag for 3 minutes and then deleting the tweet because they knew it was wrong

None of this is or was worth the fake outrage by these mobs. n fact every time they removed and apologized the backlash to the apology was much bigger in the end.
 

Javthusiast

Banned
But yeah, cdpr and other who make such jokes should simply completely ignore these outcries. Don‘t apologize, let them ree and move on. They will still sell games on gog and make mega bank with cyberpunk etc.

SJWs have zero power if you dont bow down to them in anyway.
 

Horns

Member
This thread is full of SJWs ranting about SJWs. Too many whining people making generalizations to make any sense of this thread.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
I will buy CDPR games even harder going forward. Sign me up for three copies. One for me, one for my son and one to give away.

Let all the robots that lack any kind of humor be outraged. Normal humans can enjoy and laugh at a joke even if some hysterically oversensitive people find it in poor taste.

CDPR's plan is working.

1. Post something on Twitter to create a controversy that makes one set of people mad.
2. Watch the other side get mad at the first group of people that are mad.
3. ????????
4. Profit


Rinse repeat every 2 months.


This thread is full of SJWs ranting about SJWs. Too many whining people making generalizations to make any sense of this thread.

It's all a shell game at this point. None of it feels real by either side. CDPR included.
 
Last edited:

Dr. Claus

Vincit qui se vincit
A joke is not an aggression. It is not violence. If you do not understand the nature of humour, just say so. It will be explained to you.



A joke is not an attack. If you're poked fun at, poke fun back at them. If you cannot understand the fundamental difference between violence and a joke, you are completely unprepared for any mature debate. Then again, you did start by saying you were siding with the mob.



Are you having trouble understanfding what aggressive means, especially in the context of a most elliptic tweet?



There is no substantitive difference between the two. You're grasping at straws here.



Do you have evidence for that?
Would you be incurring in a guilty-by-association fallacy?



It's not, regardless of what any us thinks on the matter. More importantly, though, it says absolutely nothing about the alleged CDPR's misconduct. Absolutely nothing. It is completely beside the point. To rational people, that is.



Nothing in CDPR's conduct, tweets included, has ever remotely suggested any hints of racism, sexism or xenophobia. It'd take a specially convoluted and intellectually dishonest mind to assert otherwise.

Wonderful post, Cosmology - but sadly it will most likely fall on deaf ears. I had a similar conversation with a... miserable person on a Discord server I used to be on. They told me to "shut up", "you don't know anything", and "you lack perspective". Apparently, because they called themselves "trans", they had the final word on what was objectively offensive and no one can discuss such. Shortly after, I got a warning and then later that night I was banned (for reasons stating I had insulted ResetEra and SJWs back in June, because they knew I was in the right on the argument they had to find a reason to remove me). Lucid is very much of the same ilk.
 

Pagusas

Elden Member
I wish CDR and all other companies/people I like would just get off social media. The chance of negative PR is far greater than any potential positives.

Personally, I dont see any negative intent in the tweet, I think it was a stupid tweet with a lack of tact for the current political enviorment and the stupid "everything is drama" culture we are currently in.
 

bigedole

Member
"You can't say "boo Dice, don't insult your customers" one minute and "grow a thicker skin" the next, all because of who was offended by the business in question. Well, you CAN, but I think it's a little hypocritical."

Agreed. Glad someone has pointed this out as this publisher speaks out of both sides of their mouths.

The thing you're missing is that in all likelihood, raging IdPol minded SJWs were probably not going to be CDPR customers in the first place. I would argue the vast majority of people who bought, say The Witcher 3, find this to be a really harmless attempt at hashtag humor. This isn't a binary situation, where you either offend everyone or you offend no one. EA pissed off a lot of people who are actually fans and consumers of the Battlefield franchise. GOG pissed off a lot of really fragile individuals who likely do not buy their kinds of games in the first place.
 

Fbh

Member


Have never heard about them and they don't even have a wikipedia entry so I'm going to assume they aren't very big/popular. Looking at their site they seem to make Youtube tier "tv shows"?.

So I'm going to guess they are betting that the big PR boost this will give them with a certain crowd outweighs the loss of sales from not being on GOG. Depending on who they have defined as their target audience that could actually work for them, so this isn't all too dumb .

Bigger companies though seem to have slowly started to realise that bowing down to the demands of people that don't buy their games to begin with (or don't make up the majority of the audience) is not the way to go, so I doubt we will see anyone relevant following this example
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Have never heard about them and they don't even have a wikipedia entry so I'm going to assume they aren't very big/popular. Looking at their site they seem to make Youtube tier "tv shows"?.

So I'm going to guess they are betting that the big PR boost this will give them with a certain crowd outweighs the loss of sales from not being on GOG. Depending on who they have defined as their target audience that could actually work for them, so this isn't all too dumb .

Bigger companies though seem to have slowly started to realise that bowing down to the demands of people that don't buy their games to begin with (or don't make up the majority of the audience) is not the way to go, so I doubt we will see anyone relevant following this example

I did not know the chicken would be in response to that one, I thought it would show his main post on it. The chicken was cute, lol.
 
Last edited:

Airbus Jr

Banned
Neogaf vs Resetera is like Khabib vs Mcgregor

The one is cool and the other one is too loud and angry

Eventually....

Bam!

Bam !!!

BAAAAAAAAAMMMMM!!!

Reset got hit in the face !

One jab after another! By Neogaf😝

Gaf is winning , like a champ! 😃

The winner get Soul Calibur VI, Red Dead Redemption 2 and Cyberpunk 2077

The looser ended up getting triggered and constantly constipating 😂😂
 
Last edited:
This thread is full of SJWs ranting about SJWs. Too many whining people making generalizations to make any sense of this thread.

Yeah. Fanatic sounding people accusing the "other side" of fanaticism without a hint of self-awareness is astonishing.
 

Cosmogony

Member
Yeah. Fanatic sounding people accusing the "other side" of fanaticism without a hint of self-awareness is astonishing.

And people talking in generalities, in such vague terms they cannot possibly be called out is truly, what's the expression?, on purpose?

This tiresome attempt to establish an equivalence between Resetera and NeoGAF cannot survive even passing scrutiny. It is completely artificial. On one hand you have authoritarian, even autocratic moderation, on the other you do not. On one hand you have a significant percentage of members who despise rational discourse and debate, on the other you have a marginal fringe group who also cannot stand free rational inquiry.

And this is why people trying the same old same old trick of depicting the two forums as twins brothers must resort to the vaguest, most abstract language. If they were to get one millimetre more specific, they'd get called out immediately and their hollow rhetoric exposed.
 

JokerMM

Gay porn is where it's at.
just saw the Era thread

tenor.gif


my fucking god

those are mentally fucked people that i wish i'll never encounter in real life
 
Era's mod policy is insane on this topic, as I expected.

That said, CDPR needs to get a non-douche bag on their twitter feed. Trolling a transmovement when they're in the middle of a serious political situation is really stupid.

But I'm still going to buy CyberPunk.

I think trolling wasn't author intention. But as someone working in PR he should have realised that using # connected to American social issues is entering the minefield and he put his company in a no-win situation. Now whatever they choose to do will piss off group of their customers.

Also for context - we just had elections on Sunday in Poland - for last few days every form of media talked about it's results and I haven't noticed anyone even reporting about Trump admin changing sex definitions (I only know because I browse here and check what's the latest outrage on era)
 
Last edited:

Redneckerz

Those long posts don't cover that red neck boy
This thread is full of SJWs ranting about SJWs. Too many whining people making generalizations to make any sense of this thread.
What is a generalization to you? Are we enablers if we attempt and establish nuance? Or, even point out that there are voices to get CDPR shut down from talking on other places?

There are a few things to be established here:
  • Platforms advocating for a shut down regarding talking about these games have little effect since even users on the platform itself want the game.
  • Boycotting the game en-masse (And not as a personal stance) has little to no effect on sales. It is therefore only effective in imagination to do this, and platforms like Twitter and elsewhere pick this every time and it has little to no effect either.
  • Accusations of doxxing/doxxing attempts in order to vilify the game.
The whole problem with this tweet is not so much that its problematic, its that people are already in doubt because of CDPR's earlier tweet and look at how that went. The real issue is that all these platforms talk a lot, but actually say very little of actual merit.

I wish i could link the pictures from an post in another thread, but that would be a duplicate, so ill just link to the post. (And this one.) We aren't talking about groups and movements pertaining to have a dialogue - We are talking about movements who operate on the ''eye for an eye'' mentality: They feel they are wronged/hurt, so they will get back at them.

Ironically, when that gets back at them, staff members close down their Twitters. I wonder why..

Wonderful post, Cosmology - but sadly it will most likely fall on deaf ears. I had a similar conversation with a... miserable person on a Discord server I used to be on. They told me to "shut up", "you don't know anything", and "you lack perspective". Apparently, because they called themselves "trans", they had the final word on what was objectively offensive and no one can discuss such. Shortly after, I got a warning and then later that night I was banned (for reasons stating I had insulted ResetEra and SJWs back in June, because they knew I was in the right on the argument they had to find a reason to remove me). Lucid is very much of the same ilk.
This is literally my story + additionally i got banned without explanation from 3 site-related Discords because i was banned on the main site... like 4 months ago. The only other Discord, focussed on Xbox remained open, but as soon as i said anything, i get told that i was just ''jelly/hurt'' that i got banned and i should STFU. Kept my cool the entire convo because it was just inane to deal with. Saved it aswell.

Then there was a now staff membr who was exactly like you. And there is also another user i value highly for his graphics stuff but is more and more involved with things outside that. I mean, telling someone that you dislike the word cocksucker when the user's house got robbed and he obviously is upset...
 
Last edited:

ISee

Member
"Classic PC games #wontBeErased on our watch"

If they would say something like: Transgender have no rights. We don't want them. They should be imprisoned.
That would be terrible! I'd delete my GOG account as well. No matter what you think about gender and you may even disagree with the idea of there being more then two. You still have to understand two things:
1.) Transgender will continue to exist, males will be born and live as females and vice versa. People will cross dress, people will take hormones. It's not good, it's not bad; that's just how it is. Transgender people were always there and they won't stop existing. It's not an illness and not dangerous.
2.) Transgender aren't citizens 2nd class and promoting hate, violence or dehumanizing them is a no go. Their lives are just as important and worth living as everybody's else.
End of story.

But this wasn't targeted at them, this didn't take a stance, it wasn't a commentary or an attack. It was something the GOG-Twitter does all the time. They take trending hashtacks out of context and use them as a meme to promote their service. They do the same with memes. The outrage about this is a bit ridiculous.


While we are at it:

GOG.com also called black men CHEAP. Those racists!
unbenannt5uiih.jpg




They made fun of YouTubers not being able to earn money. Don't they know how hard the Addpocalypse hit YouTubers?
unbenannt337e4o.jpg



A Swat Team, an apartment... They promote SWATTING! WTF!
unbenannt4i0iw7.jpg



Promoting that game? No way, that game is being used to brainwash our kids!
unbenannt53pchr.jpg


Existence is serious business GOG!
unbenannt2frdiz.jpg



Edit:
BTW: I can't make this post on ERA. Disagreeing = ban
 
Last edited:

Redneckerz

Those long posts don't cover that red neck boy
"Classic PC games #wontBeErased on our watch"

If they would say something like: Transgender have no rights. We don't want them. They should be imprisoned.
That would be terrible! I'd delete my GOG account as well. No matter what you think about gender and you may even disagree with the idea of there being more then two. You still have to understand two things:
1.) Transgender will continue to exist, males will be born and live as females and vice versa. People will cross dress, people will take hormones. It's not good, it's not bad; that's just how it is. Transgender people were always there and they won't stop existing. It's not an illness and not dangerous.
2.) Transgender aren't citizens 2nd class and promoting hate, violence or dehumanizing them is a no go. Their lives are just as important and worth living as everybody's else.
End of story.

But this wasn't targeted at them, this didn't take a stance, it wasn't a commentary or an attack. It was something the GOG-Twitter does all the time. They take trending hashtacks out of context and use them as a meme to promote their service. They do the same with memes. The outrage about this is a bit ridiculous.


While we are at it:

GOG.com also called black men CHEAP. Those racists!
unbenannt5uiih.jpg




They made fun of YouTubers not being able to earn money. Don't they know how hard the Addpocalypse hit YouTubers?
unbenannt337e4o.jpg



A Swat Team, an apartment... They promote SWATTING! WTF!
unbenannt4i0iw7.jpg



Promoting that game? No way, that game is being used to brainwash our kids!
unbenannt53pchr.jpg


Existence is serious business GOG!
unbenannt2frdiz.jpg



Edit:
BTW: I can't make this post on ERA. Disagreeing = ban
I mean, its not like popular games also make questionable decisions, but somehow this was not addressed by the outraged and shameless. I reckon people don't know their histories very well though.

Y25QHRU.png
 

EDMIX

Member
The thing you're missing is that in all likelihood, raging IdPol minded SJWs were probably not going to be CDPR customers in the first place. I would argue the vast majority of people who bought, say The Witcher 3, find this to be a really harmless attempt at hashtag humor. This isn't a binary situation, where you either offend everyone or you offend no one. EA pissed off a lot of people who are actually fans and consumers of the Battlefield franchise. GOG pissed off a lot of really fragile individuals who likely do not buy their kinds of games in the first place.

". GOG pissed off a lot of really fragile individuals who likely do not buy their kinds of games in the first place. "

Ok, how do you know that doesn't apply to EA s well?

Both can equally apply bud, you are basically trying to saying you know the exact people that are mad, when both of us don't really know.

So EA very much could have pissed off a lot of really fragile individuals who likely do not buy their kinds of games in the first place just like CDPR
and CDPR could have pissed off a lot of people who are actually fans JUST like EA.

Both could have pissed off both demographics please, stop making it seem as if ONLY ONE is attracting "fragile individuals" that have no intent on even buying the game.

BOTH have folks that exist like that on both sides. So "SJWs were probably not going to be CDPR customers in the first place" same can be stated about EA and BFV.... Nothing is stopping both situations from applying to both parties.
 

bigedole

Member
". GOG pissed off a lot of really fragile individuals who likely do not buy their kinds of games in the first place. "

Ok, how do you know that doesn't apply to EA s well?

Both can equally apply bud, you are basically trying to saying you know the exact people that are mad, when both of us don't really know.

So EA very much could have pissed off a lot of really fragile individuals who likely do not buy their kinds of games in the first place just like CDPR
and CDPR could have pissed off a lot of people who are actually fans JUST like EA.

Both could have pissed off both demographics please, stop making it seem as if ONLY ONE is attracting "fragile individuals" that have no intent on even buying the game.

BOTH have folks that exist like that on both sides. So "SJWs were probably not going to be CDPR customers in the first place" same can be stated about EA and BFV.... Nothing is stopping both situations from applying to both parties.

Guess we'll find out if I'm right in a month or so when BFV releases.
 

petran79

Banned
Edit:
BTW: I can't make this post on ERA. Disagreeing = ban

If they were computer game players in the 80s and 90s, they'd take all of this in a less serious way. But thats what you get when you praise Zoe Quinn and Annita Sarkesian more than Roberta Williams
 
Top Bottom