Bernkastel
Ask me about my fanboy energy!
If they can make Surface Pro with Core i7, then they can definitely pack the OG Xbox One APU inside a tablet.
Ya but they cost about $2000 here in Canada, no way anybody is paying anywhere near that for a portable Xbox One.
Thats were cloud gaming comes into place.
Seriously! All I want is an Xbox controller that can split in half and look like a pair of JoyCons. I could throw that on a small tablet and be set. Either that, or they put the app on the Switch. That would work too.
I'm going to repeat myself from the xbox-PC thread, which was equally well thought out :
With the advent of Xcloud, WHY ??
Any portable device is going to be an Xbox, and many non-portable devices too
OG Xbox One APU is probably way cheaper then whatever is inside current Surface Pro. Maybe with Surface Go 2 they can design it Xbox One APU instead.Ya but they cost about $2000 here in Canada, no way anybody is paying anywhere near that for a portable Xbox One.
Touchscreens aren't a viable alternative to a controller.
That's why you can link your Xbox one controller to any BT compatible device. All you need is a Gameclip for your phone or perhaps a stand for your tablet.
Imo, lockhart is a handheld device.
I am not talking about competing. They should not be making a handheld console, but a handheld version of a home console.Microsoft should stick to consoles. Handheld is a completely different beast and I don't think they would be able to outcompete mobile and Nintendo.
If they can make Surface Pro with Core i7, then they can definitely pack the OG Xbox One APU inside a tablet.
There is def room for portable consoles from both Sony and MS they just need to learn from the Switch.
The portable consoles must share the same library as the main console. Clearly this wouldn't be possible with PS4 and Xbox One which is why only the XBLA and PSN games would work on the portable. I'm talking games like:
Xcloud streamingConsidering the Xbox One didn't exactly light the world on fire, I don't know why they wold go down this route.
How would this work? Celeste is using the same hardware, SDKs, etc. as RDR2.
>get a phoneyou likely already have one. sign up for the xcloud beta or wait for full release, get a phone clip to attach to your controller, and grab a carrying case. done deal.
gotcha. well, then you're outta luck.>get a phone
No thanks.
Streaming will alway be inferior to Local hardwareThere's no need for it. Streaming will take care of that.
And I don't think they can compete against Nintendo in the handheld market.
I agree 100%Streaming will alway be inferior to Local hardware
MS learned from Sony's mistakes.
Leave handheld consoles to Nintendo and Mobile.
The portable consoles must share the same library as the main console. Clearly this wouldn't be possible with PS4 and Xbox One which is why only the XBLA and PSN games would work on the portable. I'm talking games like:
Celeste
Inside
Dead Cells
Stardew Valley
Ori
Minecraft
Thumper
Resogun
Alienation
I 100% agree steaming is inferior.Streaming will alway be inferior to Local hardware
Anything that is not AAA will still release on Xbox One though. Series X is just a Xbox One with much better specs.I 100% agree steaming is inferior.
The Xbox One is old tech by this point though. Who in their right mind wants a portable version of this when a new gen is nearly here?
Streaming is a reasonable compromise for when you want to play on the go every now and then.
Me personally, I’d save shooters, platformers, fighters, etc for when I’m at home.
I 100% agree steaming is inferior.
The Xbox One is old tech by this point though. Who in their right mind wants a portable version of this when a new gen is nearly here?
Streaming is a reasonable compromise for when you want to play on the go every now and then.
Me personally, I’d save shooters, platformers, fighters, etc for when I’m at home.
They did and its call a mobile phone.
They did invent smartphones with Windows Mobileoh sheeet MS invented mobile phone...