Agreed. I don't see why there are people who think that this is a bad business move.
Not a bad business move, money still money. But I find super cute this culture of what we call 'gaming'. I like how those business only affect Sony and Microsoft, but not Nintendo.
I like when Sony and Microsoft get bashed by launching a game at a higher price and eventually have to reduce the price not in the same way Nintendo does.
I like when port begs are fine when Nintendo maintain their exclusives on their machine and no one call 'anti-consumer'.
I like when every other gaming company reduce hardware prices, reduce games prices, while Nintendo still find being expensive Nintendo.
Its a fucking nerd culture. Nobody is saying for Sony should not making money. Capitalism speaks for himself. If everyone want to make money, release exclusives in every damn plataform for everyone play. Good for consumers, right?
Now, the reality is Nintendo get the pass while Sony and Microsoft need to be honest for making money, being a 'friendly consumer' company, making their online service works like a dream, give me games at free, while Nintendo is almost 100 years old behind. It seems like yesterday I was reading people complaining about Sony giving away free games.
BTW, why Nintendo don't do this? I don't see why there are people who think that this is a bad business move.
The amount of people around the internet/twitter/etc taking the stance of being a 'neutral gamer' is enormous. Inside, they don't want Nintendo games in any other plataform, but want other companies to stop being greedy and release their games in Nintendo plataform.
If you want company 'X' to release a game on PC, at least don't be selective. Ask 'X', 'Y' and 'Z' as well. Because, as much people saying 'I want more perfomance IDK why people are complain', this statment works for every plataform, including Nintendo Switch.