• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

All The Last of Us 2 leaks/spoilers in here and nowhere else.

Paracelsus

Member
YW4QzAg.png
 
S

Steve.1981

Unconfirmed Member
Looks like you and I have different opinion in Joel. The hospital scene, it wasn't a morally ambiguous choice for me at all.

First of all, he was lied, hurt and betrayed by Firefly & Marlene - that he was beaten and captured. Second of all, by that time - almost a year of traveling together - Joel is fully projecting Ellie as his daughter, even though he fully aware that she's not. Nevertheless, he deeply cares for Ellie. He deeply cares that she "lives". Yes, it wasn't her choice - but you are talking about 14 year old girl. Not even fully grown adult. He chose to save Ellie so that she can live her life.

Would you let your 14 year old daughter to have an operation that's guaranteed to kill her for an unlikely chance of a vaccine? That's the bottom line.
As a father of a similar aged daughter, I don't blame Joel at all.

He was deceived, betrayed, and was about to lose his metaphorical daughter all over again. If I was in his shoes, I would do the same. Only difference would be that I would not kill them all and talk them out of it - but it was clear that they were not going to listen to him - by holding him gunpoint. If you remember, at the last encounter with Marlene down the elevator - she, a militant leader of Firefly, was holding gun squarely at him, threatening and persuading him to let Ellie to be killed, for her own desperate cause. The tumor in Ellie's brain had to be removed and she can't live? I mean, that's the lamest excuse to be honest - that a mere sample would be sufficient - but the storytellers never gave that as an option conveniently.

As per Ellie's choice - it's never clearly answered whether she wanted to die to save the humanity. She was obviously conflicted and afraid by that time she nears the hospital. In the end, she's a kid. If you are an adult who sees a conflicted child in similar situation - are you the one to push the child over the edge for assisted suicide for the "good" of humanity? I am not. I am certain Joel wasn't either. Why is it a selfish choice to let your loved one to live another day for the future, and possible cure other than involving her untimely death?

Some say that the ending shows that she wanted to die. It could go both ways, as she was definitely conflicted. But my point of view, is that she knows that there's something Joel is hiding. However she doesn't know to the extent of 100% losing her life.

At least that's my point of view. I don't think Joel was a selfish asshole. He was a good man and a good father in times of desperation and survival, especially to Ellie, who lost everything and lost everyone she cared for.

Other than that - I agree that the judgement should be held at the final product, which shouldn't take too long as it's gone gold now. I'm sure it would be a beautifully made game as seen in the trailers and all. My biggest and only main gripe, as I said before is being forced to play as Abby, not because what she looks like or what she may be, but because she killed Joel, a character that I personally liked and related very much.

I am, interested in what Abby's side has to say. But at this point of time - it's very difficult to play in her shoes, because I don't know anything about Abby, but I know a lot about Joel as character - and I'm sure I'm not alone who feels like that. It's ND's job to really persuade the players to be in her shoes... but to be honest, whatever the intention is - they don't seem to be interested in doing so. So I will wait. I will wait for others to play and will decide if the story is told well enough to join the side of killing Joel with a golf club and spitting on the corps. Honestly, pulling it off would be like pulling a rabbit out of hat - and I know they are great storytellers, so if they can... I would be pleasantly surprised, and buy the game and play. I guess that's the downside of being accidentally exposed to the spoilers - but at the same time, it gave me a choice, whether good or bad - I don't know. It's just a game.

Indeed it's a cycle of vengeance - fans vs ND at the moment - calling each other names and all. :/


ozK0kjR.gif
 

ZehDon

Gold Member
From an article posted in August 2019...

Try harder.
What does the date of the article have to do with "trying harder"?
What's your statute of limitations on people saying things in interviews and articles on a game that isn't out yet?
What should I try harder at?
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
Indeed it's a cycle of vengeance - fans vs ND at the moment - calling each other names and all. :/

I don't see ND calling fans names, and I doubt the people calling out ND are real fans either. Scratch the surface and its just layers of stupid people hearing what they want to hear and seeing what they want to see all the way down.

And all for what exactly? When you get people unironically claiming that TLOU2 is going to damage gaming for years to come, its obvious that we're way off the map in terms of projection and catastrophization. Its truly mind-boggling.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
What does the date of the article have to do with "trying harder"?
What's your statute of limitations on people saying things in interviews and articles on a game that isn't out yet?
What should I try harder at?

Because it shows a transparent ploy on your part to conflate old news with current controversy in order to try and prove a point.

Whereas the actuality, as demonstrated by the reaction from some quarters to the leaks, is that it VALIDATES Troy Baker's comment. Some people clearly weren't ready and have lost their shit over it.
 

ZehDon

Gold Member
Because it shows a transparent ploy on your part to conflate old news with current controversy in order to try and prove a point.

Whereas the actuality, as demonstrated by the reaction from some quarters to the leaks, is that it VALIDATES Troy Baker's comment. Some people clearly weren't ready and have lost their shit over it.
“Transparent plot”? Do you often assume everyone is lying and deceitful all the time? I quoted - and linked - the article I was referring to. If I was trying to be dishonest, why would I have done that?

Troy Baker clearly wasn’t referring to most people thinking the plot was utterly terrible and garbage, as has been the majority of t he backlash. Unless you’re insinuating he thinks this as well? I believe he, like ND and their “You have been warned” comments, are obviously tying to present this game as something incredibly affecting that gamers aren’t psychologically prepared to “endure”. I think it’s hollow torture porn based on everything we’ve seen. Hence my post.

I quoted those comments to demonstrate a pattern of representation.
 

Jon Neu

Banned
Whereas the actuality, as demonstrated by the reaction from some quarters to the leaks, is that it VALIDATES Troy Baker's comment. Some people clearly weren't ready and have lost their shit over it.

So it demonstrates that ND and Troy Baker knew the game was going to cause a huge controversy among fans given the nature of it’s plot.

Sometimes, you damage control so hard you go full circle.
 

ZehDon

Gold Member
Ploy, not plot.

/facepalm

Fucking hell, why is that l find myself having to teach basic English to half the muppets who try and argue with me?
Check the layout of a qwerty keyboard, friend. Typing on mobile results in easy typos - such as hitting “t” instead of “y”. If you removed your head from your ass you might realise this. In any case, you’re a walking grammar nazi joke from early 2000s. Best of luck in the real world.
 
I read the Reset thread on it because of news sites referencing it and my God, those betas are eating this bullshit up. This is fucking garbo. Why would anyone want to play as some manboy looking woman nobody? This is so disappointing. As a huge fan of ND who has been buying their games day 1 since Uncharted 2, I've sorely disappointed.

"Why does the character need to look like you for you to relate?" - People telling anyone who doesn't want to play as boring white guy they should be okay with it.
 

lachesis

Member
I don't see ND calling fans names, and I doubt the people calling out ND are real fans either. Scratch the surface and its just layers of stupid people hearing what they want to hear and seeing what they want to see all the way down.

And all for what exactly? When you get people unironically claiming that TLOU2 is going to damage gaming for years to come, its obvious that we're way off the map in terms of projection and catastrophization. Its truly mind-boggling.

I admit that I was reaching out as Naughty Dog as a company did not officially called anyone names - just few employees, including Druckmann's Kurt Cobain tweet - whatever his intention was.... and I've seen plenty of fans - only themselves know how much of fan they are, but I say a lot of them are like me who really enjoyed the first game and other ND games - attack them being SJW agenda driven in recent years.

Being a fan doesn't mean you have to suck up to everything they do, in my case I was pretty disappointed on the case of Last Jedi as a being a long time Star Wars Fan.

As a creator, though - you don't always have to sacrifice your creative choices for the audience - if you stick to the safe route to please, it will eventually backfire. However as a creator, you have to be at least a step ahead and fully anticipate the audience's limits when pushing it too. From what I've seen on the leaks though... it's a bit too much for me that I wrote in detail in my couple of posts. I can't really speak for the others reason. Some for the pushing the progressive agenda, or some for not delivering what they expected etc - in my case I was expecting something more in between, new enough yet familiar enough. Yes, much easier to be said than done - and you can't satisfy everyone. It's impossible. That's why being a creator is such a hard job. But I've seen the success going into their heads, making them arrogant and holier-than-thou attitude too.

I will not be the judge of that until the final product is delivered, and how Naughty Dog reacts to the criticism officially. At this point their hands are tied, as they are still trying to hide the whole MGS Raiden thing as much as possible. Maybe because it's the key point to the game, or not worth enough mentioning - and we'll see what it would be after the release.... and I'm afraid it's not going to be pretty, imho.

And I do agree that we are way off the map in terms of projection and making things even worse by going at each other politically over a mere video game too. It's certainly a strange time to live, as we are so disconnected at the same time, so connected over just a few clicks on the keyboard, and sensationalism is easier route for money and attention... and we are all part of it one way or another.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
I don't see ND calling fans names, and I doubt the people calling out ND are real fans either. Scratch the surface and its just layers of stupid people hearing what they want to hear and seeing what they want to see all the way down.

And all for what exactly? When you get people unironically claiming that TLOU2 is going to damage gaming for years to come, its obvious that we're way off the map in terms of projection and catastrophization. Its truly mind-boggling.
ND doesn't call them names. They tell people to fuck off.

As for people calling out ND not being fans either, lol. So anyone who calls out ND aren't fans?

So for any gamer who doesn't like LoU2 due to Joel being killed, too much lesbian soap opera scenes, being forced to play Joel's killer in the game aren't real fans huh? LOL

We get it. You think LoU2 is a perfect game that can't be criticized.

27e.jpg
 
Last edited:

joe_zazen

Member
Huh I see. Just that specific example threw me. There’s so little in common between them - aside from violence and not holding back. I feel like there are countless films and tv shows that have happened since that would be far easier to state this was the gaming equivalent of. Like game of thrones is closer than a clockwork orange, the walking dead show is closer.

iirc Kubrick regretted that movie and pulled it from UK theatres after some irl people began using it as inspiration.
 

Woggleman

Member
The main ones who are mad about this are the ones who already hated ND games for being so called movie games. I am sorry but it is true. Many of them were not going to buy it anyway. There are a small section of gamers who think that a game having a story and cinematics somehow takes away from the gameplay and Sony have been increasingly the target of that anger. Combine that with anger over so called wokeness and you have the backlash to TLOU2.
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
So why are Nate & Elena allowed to have ”soap opera“ scenes, but it’s made a thing when Ellie & Dina have the exact same shit? It’s the exact same fucking thing, except it’s a straight couple vs. a gay one.
Oh forgot..... Hey Ellie, I'm pregnant. Think of the family.

You'd think a game with zombies and thugs every few blocks would be more important for story and gameplay than Young and the Restless scenes.

You also purposely deleted the part where I said some gamers don't like Joel getting killed, or needing to play as his killer. What do you say to gamers who don't like that part of the new game?
 
Last edited:

xrnzaaas

Member
The dogs in the game should be pitbulls and amstaffs so even more people would get upset about killing these "harmless puppers".
 

Anya7890

Neo Member
Oh forgot..... Hey Ellie, I'm pregnant. Think of the family.

You'd think a game with zombies and thugs every few blocks would be more important for story and gameplay than Young and the Restless scenes.

You also purposely deleted the part where I said some gamers don't like Joel getting killed, or needing to play as his killer. What do you say to gamers who don't like that part of the new game?
Firstly, I didn’t purposely delete it and I do get people being upset about Joel dying and playing as his killer, those are legit gripes after all. But your whole argument about the relationship stuff falls flat because that’s basically a pillar of the series & that it’s not the only series that does it: the walking dead does the exact same thing. It’s a genre thing actually, the real focus is characters & relationships, while zombies & other humans serve as window dressing.
 

krampus

Neo Member
So why are Nate & Elena allowed to have ”soap opera“ scenes, but it’s made a thing when Ellie & Dina have the exact same shit? It’s the exact same fucking thing, except it’s a straight couple vs. a gay one.

So, would it be the exact same fucking thing if say the "soap opera" scenes involved a brother and a sister?

I am just curious.
 

Anya7890

Neo Member
So, would it be the exact same fucking thing if say the "soap opera" scenes involved a brother and a sister?

I am just curious.
I guess it depends on what you mean by soap opera? Like if your just talking emotional scenes or banter, then yeah it could be the same.
 

Grinchy

Banned
This is the last picture I have on my imgur account that hasn't been pulled down for DMCA reasons. I wonder how long it'll last if I post it. I can't believe they are going after random image sharing accounts :messenger_tears_of_joy:

hU56GFt.png
 
yeeeeeezy yeeeeeezy Here you go.
No, it isn't realistic to be that muscular... Especially in that situation... at all. Just gonna quote myself when I answered someone else...

"First off, lets just put aside the fact that I think that most UFC female fighters juice in some way or another...

Do you know how hard it is for females to gain muscle mass? Let alone men? Women actually have to work far harder than men to get the same exact mass as a man... If they even can. Men have far more muscle density, pound for pound. Larger bones and tendons and ligaments < where real, lasting strength comes from since bulky muscle fatigues much faster than tendons. To achieve this without juicing they would need to be on a very strict rigorous workout regime. There would be lots of downtime during recovery. Finally, you would need a very specific, HIGH quality diet to reach and maintain that mass. Those women in that pic, if they aren't juicing are most definitely taking the highest quality sups and vitamins on the market. Let alone an abundance of specific healthy foods and a strict meal plan.

In todays world of abundance where these things are easily available, this could be doable. But in a post apocalyptic world where the world and environment make the plans, not you? Where you need to be on your game and can't spare recovery days due to zombies and other crazy people and any other emergencies that would come up in that kind of situation? Where because of all of that you wouldn't be able to train those specific muscle groups as rigorously as you would need to because you need to be ready? IMO, I absolutely don't think so.

Go find me a real world example of tribes, or people who live in an environment where it is survival of the fittest, where the women are big and muscular. It costs a lot of fuel to maintain that mass. Truth is, that females function MUCH more efficiently in survival situations with less muscle mass and at much less of a fuel intake than they do with more mass. This is why all these tribal women who actually do stuff men do, look slender or less bulky. Because their bodies naturally perform MUCH more efficiently this way and it is dangerous for them to try to unnaturally perform outside of that range.

If you want some real world examples in real time, go watch Alone. There are several female participants from the second season on. Watch how they just melt away and their muscles become much leaner and FAR less bulky even though they are in a survival of the fittest situation and literally have to struggle every day to stay alive. You can easily compare to the men here, who lose mass as well, but on average not nearly as much. And due to having more muscle mass in general, and being able to pack it on faster when they DO have food due to the way testosterone works where it increases mass by increasing protein muscle synthesis, you'll see how they can last longer than females who are wasting away along with them. They can just produce far more muscle for their body to devour. Which I believe is why people aren't fussed about Joel so much since it is far more believable for him to look bigger. In fact, speaking on his forearms which I've seen brought up, hand strength in men is a particular area where men excel greatly.


Your forearms are a huge contributor to your grip strength. So for Joel it makes sense. Especially when you think about it in context with everything I've said. Men grow muscle faster due to testosterone. The one thing that men do workout ALL the time, even if they aren't training, is their hands. They are constantly moving them and gripping things. More activation in that area is going to mean more mass. More muscle mass, especially continual repetitive movements which would also strengthen tendons as well are going to cause more vasculature, which also grow easier in men. Thing is, our bones keep growing all our life. But areas with more vasculature are going to grow even more. So men who do more with their hands, even when not on a training regime, are just going to continue to have larger forearms and hands throughout their life because that area is going to keep growing faster than others. If you look around you at some of the older service men or manual labor workers who otherwise look unfit, you'll see this. Which is why Abby's forearms alone look so frigging ridiculous. Not even to mention everything else... To achieve that would be crazy hard for a real woman today, living in a world of abundance. Let alone maintaining it in that environment."

So I'm assuming you are talking to me here since we had that convo in the other thread. You should really learn to quote me though since you where calling me out in that thread to come here...

First off, roids aren't going to get you jacked all on their own. You are still going to need all the other sups and quality foods and a strict diet and exorcise. Especially given all the potential side effects of roids... Going to need lots of food to maintain that mass you pack on as well unless you have some sort of lifetime supply of roids...

Secondly, Anabolic steroids are what we are talking about here, not that crap you can get at Walmart that doesn't directly have anything to do with testosterone... and they are a banned substance. So they would already be very rare to find, even today let alone an apocalypse, especially in any significant quantities that you would need to keep taking for the years it would take a woman to bulk up that much...

Thirdly, and most important of all... The start of the cordyceps brain infection happened canonically in TLOU's timeline in 2013. This is when everything would have started to become abandoned. The events where the doctor, Abby's father, was killed by Joel happened in 2034... That's 21 years in-between. This is apparently what set Abby off on "her" revenge trip. So if we are to say she started looking for Steroids at this point... Anabolic steroids have an expiry date of about 1 year. But they actually last much longer. Around 5 years. Then they start to degrade immensely in potency... And this is ONLY if they where actually properly stored at room temperature... If they've separated due to cold temps, then they would degrade even faster. Average winter temp in Utah, just guessing that's where Abby was since that's where the fireflies where, is 21°. But even in the best case scenario, if it was in a fridge that was insulated... after 21 years the roids would certainly have lost all their potency. The oldest roids I've ever heard anyone taking was around 10 years. That's freaking ballsy as it is considering what taking spoiled roids could do to you, let alone fresh ones... But it was still already not very potent. So 21 years? Yeah, that's going to be a big ol nope from me dawg.

And I'd like to say something about the gym as well...

Man, I can't think of... working out... at the gym... in an apocalyptic situation... as being anything but selfish. Unless you are in physical therapy... maybe.

I've slept on this one for a while but it still bothers me. There would be absolutely NO shortage of work in that world. No shortage of crucial projects and people needing things done. This is how you would be "working out." On top of the fact that danger can strike at any moment and you need to be ready to face it. It's not like you have entire army's worth of people to replace you if you can't. When you work out you go through a recovery phase where your muscles are trashed. During this phase you aren't going to be very effective at all for physical labor. This is why many people with very physical jobs, in this relatively carefree present day full of abundance, don't ever go to the gym because they stay busy and can't afford the downtime for recovery since their job provides enough of a workout for them anyway. But In TLOU kind of world?... I just can't imagine actually having the time. Unless you are being selfish and letting other important things go to waist.

I don't know man, that's just something that's just really unbelievable to me. I have to believe that the world would go back to being like the Amish sort of, but actually more intense and with more to do. And I've never seen one of them just sitting around not doing something. Like, Ever. And they certainly don't go to the gym and work out. But good Lord the dudes are some of the physically strongest people I've ever known because they get their workout from their environment. Much like the pioneers, which the Amish take after.
 
Last edited:

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
ND doesn't call them names. They tell people to fuck off.

I don't have an issue with telling avowed racists. misogynists and homophobes to fuck off. Its not "punch a nazi" silly-bollocks posturing, it concisely communicates a feeling.

To be honest. telling people with the intellect of tree stumps to just fuck off i a helluva time saver. :D

I mean I waste so much time on here diligently rebutting the bilge spouted by idiots like yourself, knowing full well that you lack the wit to know when you are being schooled, or the character to admit that you were wrong in the first place...

And no, I don't believe TLOU2 or ND are above criticism, its just that so much of the criticism I see leveled is so ignorant, inane and pathetically easy to dismiss, I can't help but feel compelled to respond out of duty to show there are still sane people posting on the topic.
 

joe_zazen

Member
.
I don't have an issue with telling avowed racists. misogynists and homophobes to fuck off. Its not "punch a nazi" silly-bollocks posturing, it concisely communicates a feeling.

To be honest. telling people with the intellect of tree stumps to just fuck off i a helluva time saver. :D

I mean I waste so much time on here diligently rebutting the bilge spouted by idiots like yourself, knowing full well that you lack the wit to know when you are being schooled, or the character to admit that you were wrong in the first place...

And no, I don't believe TLOU2 or ND are above criticism, its just that so much of the criticism I see leveled is so ignorant, inane and pathetically easy to dismiss, I can't help but feel compelled to respond out of duty to show there are still sane people posting on the topic.

admit it, you like feeling like the smartest, most righteous guy in the room. And arguing on a games forums lets you do that.

or is that me
 
Last edited:

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
.


admit it, you like feeling like the smartest, most righteous guy in the room. And arguing on a games forums lets you do that.

or is that me

We can share the "glory" LOL

Honestly, I try not to be mean to people for no reason and Ideally I'd prefer to be more enthusiastic and positive.

Some of this stuff just gets on my tits though, videogames have been a huge part of my life for the last 40 years and I genuinely, deeply care about the medium. Seeing great work getting shredded for no good reason... I give zero respect to those with no respect for the talent and effort involved in its creation.
 

Niked

Member
Addressing a few of his points...
1) "Corporations don't care as much as the creator" It's the same writer director as the first one. - Its the first time Bruce Stanley is not in the picture. Also Amy Hennings influence is gone.
2) The christian homophobic cult thing isn't even confirmed. It was part of a fake leak a month ago that people threw in with everything else. - the "fake leak" is 99% confirmed by the real leak that is what I understood confirmed this.
3) It's not confirmed whether Ellie dies. - i guess you did not see the picture..
4) Joel and Ellie are not heroes just because we like them, the game asking us to question that is not bad writing. - they might not be heroes in the context of the actions they do but they are the main characters that we all love and are one of the main reasons we play and love the game.
5) Abby is not Trans. - the real leaks seems to say otherwise and Niel is trying hard to push the full rainbow eventhough Its not fitting in a Clickers-filled world with shortages of supplies and doctors.
6) Plenty of people like both the gameplay and the story. - Yes, but the story is the main reason as gameplay is not anything that stands out. Its the story, level design, animation, voice acting, sound and caracter design that does it.
7) No, they aren't asking you for more of the first game, they ask for whatever the trailers show. Which is a revenge story with TLOU gameplay. - no, this is not what a sequal implies. This is a far reach for you to take. A bit silly. This is not a stand alone game Its a sequal. Please stop disregarding what a sequal is. :)
8) Cycle of violence was already a part of the first game in someways, kicking off a story based on what Joel is actually one of the most honest ways to approach it. - cycle of voilence Yes, but that does not mean you kill of the characters and play the murderer If you care about the fans. If the story main character was on voilence you could argue that characters only surved as the vessel.
9) How the player feels towards Abby or Ellie while playing as them is not something leaks or even out of context footage can answer. - true to some degree but it must be a revolutionary story telling to feel anything for abby. Come on... She fucking calls Joel! Joel must be revealed to be Hitler to meet the need to feel anything for Abby
Thank you, lets desect this, shall we. See my comments after your answer.
 

joe_zazen

Member
Accurate. Honestly, after how perfect part 1 was, I'm good. I didn't even play the DLC for part 1 since the base story was that good, I deemed it unnecessary. To me the Last of Us will always be Joel's story.

in all seriousness, if you can get into a mindset from before the critical theorists took over, you might enjoy it. You know, the time before the people who believe everything we think, say, or do is political, and therefore everything we think, say, and do must be controlled, and began cancelling and mobbing dissenters. And how everything is about oppression and the oppressed, and the self righteous calls for real and metaphorical violence against those who haven't taken or bought into those first year theory courses, and therefore do not understand reality and the need for cleansing the entire world and every culture and system of belief in order to bring about a utopia.

The dlc story is sweet and you dont have to spend 90% of your time murdering people, dogs, zombies, etc. It is way better than the main game and is the best walking sim ever. You really can inhabit the body of a 14 year old lesbian with feelings of first love, masterful as far as ps3 era interactive entertainment can be anyway.

However, if you can‘t wind the clock back from before millennial theory mobs and their fascistic language policing, then yeah, dont bother as it will just be irritating.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom