• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ResetEra Discussion -- Stay civil. Don't get personal. Keep it in here.

Status
Not open for further replies.

JordanN

Banned
The nuance of what’s a state and what’s a city? You didn’t have anything to debunk. Try again with your gun free city logic.
No, the nuance that I listed 5 cities with strict gun control that are undoubtedly more dangerous than any Boomerville.

And at least 3 of those cities have Democrats running things at the state level.
 
No, the nuance that I listed 5 cities with strict gun control that are undoubtedly more dangerous than any Boomerville.

And at least 3 of those cities have Democrats running things at the state level.
Those cities don’t have gun control laws divergent to their states though do they? So why aren’t you looking at it from a state level?
 

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
Those cities have strict gun control as a way to empower local law enforcement. The criminals there can just drive an hour into the next state and load up on all the guns they want, then resell them back home. That's the obvious problem without having federal laws restricting guns.

As for one party or another running things and thinking that matters? That's not how it works on the local level. It's not like a republican mayor could magically solve decades old gang violence.
 

JordanN

Banned
As for one party or another running things and thinking that matters? That's not how it works on the local level. It's not like a republican mayor could magically solve decades old gang violence.
Probably because it was the Democrats before them that caused it in the first place? And they are still voted back in power even after their failure is known?

I keep bringing up Detroit but it's an excellent example of what happens when you appeal to feelings and not facts. They got the mayor they wanted and it's never been the same.
 
Last edited:

BadBurger

Many “Whelps”! Handle It!
Probably because it was the Democrats before them that caused it in the first place?

I keep bringing up Detroit but it's an excellent example of what happens when you appeal to feelings and not facts. They got the mayor they wanted and it's never been the same.

Politics and policing are more complex than citing some wikipedia article. I won't change your mind and I'll just quit, because this a thread about making fun of the lunacy of Ree and not gun related violence among impoverished people in some random city, which is basically a given.
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
Of course this was going to be a good one...



S55pwah.png
Wait, lemme think a second about what propaganda outlets I know that rant every. single. day about how the country is constantly under attack...


Aha! There it is.

Seriously, this thing about there being a tyrant in office will never not be funny.


Spoiler alert


comp-1588865558.png


They just can't wait to hate on "Karen's" & whitey can they?
OH SNAP!

Just how many narratives were torn to pieces with this single image?

”Karen” is basically a racial slur according to Era’s rules for judging and regolating words. But it’s racist against whites so it’s OK, mmmmm?

I gotta say, they seem to assume a lot for people who profess their hate for stereotypes.





I don't know what "drooling" exactly means, but she need to shot people, she is idiot. Not that I agree with this write up, but come on, where does shooting people is not an idiotic thing to do? Am I such an Eurofag to understand or what?
You can’t even say a black woman is “angry” on Era these days, because apparently it’s racist as it may imply it’s a dogwhistle referring to the “angry black woman” stereotype.

Now... an angry, DROOLING, armed black woman? They’d chase you to the ends of the Internet if you’d write half of that on their forum in any other context. Except in this case, this was written before the woman was revealed to be black, so they’re gonna pretend it was never written at all. Just par for the course.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
see, it's fine to call countries "shitholes" only if you are doing that to America

also it's fine to belittle places as "third world countries". provided, of course, it's America, again.

but yes, no doubt the next time Trump has something bad to say about Kenya or whatever, these same jackasses will be on the frontlines furious that he called those other countries "shitholes"
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
so do these idiots not know how a 401k works? do they not know that most Americans have their retirement fund in the stock market?

QhjjKde.png


"the stock market isn't connected to the real economy" "someone else is getting rich" lol go fuck yourselves

tbf these people probably don't live in the US and are simply ignorant foreigners

my parents have always kept an eye on the stock market because that is their retirement money. the same goes for millions of Americans. what a stupid fucking take
 
Last edited:

Ymir

Member
so do these idiots not know how a 401k works? do they not know that most Americans have their retirement fund in the stock market?

QhjjKde.png


"the stock market isn't connected to the real economy" "someone else is getting rich" lol go fuck yourselves

tbf these people probably don't live in the US and are simply ignorant foreigners

my parents have always kept an eye on the stock market because that is their retirement money. the same goes for millions of Americans. what a stupid fucking take
You have to have a job to have a 401k, how could they possibly know how one works?
 
OH SNAP!

Just how many narratives were torn to pieces with this single image?

”Karen” is basically a racial slur according to Era’s rules for judging and regolating words. But it’s racist against whites so it’s OK, mmmmm?

I gotta say, they seem to assume a lot for people who profess their hate for stereotypes.

I am sure if you asked them, they'd say "oh but Karen just means an angry or bossy person" or "it's just a haircut, jeez!"

It is ironic because if you used any other term to group WOMEN into a category, you'd get banned. If you used any other term to group COLORED WOMEN into a group, you'd get banned for life.

White women? Fuck 'em! They're not allies enough anyway. They're basically Nazis.
 

Ymir

Member
I am sure if you asked them, they'd say "oh but Karen just means an angry or bossy person" or "it's just a haircut, jeez!"

It is ironic because if you used any other term to group WOMEN into a category, you'd get banned. If you used any other term to group COLORED WOMEN into a group, you'd get banned for life.

White women? Fuck 'em! They're not allies enough anyway. They're basically Nazis.

It's the same thing with all the black shooter threads. Could you imagine the unhinged anger if you went into one of those thread and said how entitled black people are or how black people just want to kill everyone, or they're all homicidal or any of the other shit that MercuryFred was hand waving away as white fragility? They'd start doxing you like everyone else they dox.

You'd think after all the time their stupidity slapped them in the face they would become more gun-shy with their made up narratives but magically it seems to embolden them.
 
Last edited:
The term Islamophobia is an asinine term to begin with. There's nothing wrong with "fear" or general dislike of any ideology. Notice how a phobia term isn't used like that for any other religion. There is no Mormonophobia or Greekgodsophobia.
Yes, but it also stems from a stereotype that has nothing to do with actual Islam, my wife's mother was staying with us for thanksgiving and she didn't know I was muslim, the first thing she said was that muslims are not good because we are terrorists, like fuck off with that shit. I'm afraid of conservative christians shooting up a mosque am I right?
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
What's extremely ironic about this story is that anyone should remember last year, there were already people being shot over Popeyes Chicken sandwiches.

So Reset trying to blame the guns and lockdown on this shows how extremely out of touch and disingenious they are.

Or even looooooooooooooong before that, go shopping in the inner city of detroit. They already had bullet proof glasses up before the pandemic existed.

j27VRVU.png

When you reach this level for a fast food joint, it's time to stop voting in the very same assholes that got you into this position, yeah?
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
Yes, but it also stems from a stereotype that has nothing to do with actual Islam, my wife's mother was staying with us for thanksgiving and she didn't know I was muslim, the first thing she said was that muslims are not good because we are terrorists, like fuck off with that shit. I'm afraid of conservative christians shooting up a mosque am I right?

Then that's not Islamophobia, that's Muslimophobia or just plain prejudice or xenophobia.

The term "Islamophobia" is a dumb term on so many levels. The ideology is in the word, not the people, so it's extremely misleading for one. There's a difference between having dislikes against an ideology and the people who believe in it. And the term racism or xenophobia would do just fine to describe instances where Muslims are targeted.

The term "Islamophobia" is only used by people on the far left to try to brand good people as bad for disagreeing because it's a catch word that captures attention. If a Muslim is discriminated against, just call it racism like any other person being discriminated against for no reason. Why don't we ever hear the word "phobia" attached to any other acts of racism against other demographics? It's just called racism. Against Muslims, it's really the only one that has a unique specific term with "phobia" attached to it.

The term "Islamophobia" is used way more for things that are perfectly acceptable than for things that aren't. The number of times it's used for someone who disagrees with Islamic teachings compared to it being used for sickos who say beat up an innocent Muslim person on the street for no reason is like 10 to 1. It shows that the whole existence and usage of the word is totally backwards as is the word itself. There's a reason it's used though. They want to be able to point to people who simply criticize an ideology and cry "bigot" because it reinforces that agenda they're trying to push on the far left.
 
Last edited:
Then that's not Islamophobia, that's Muslimophobia or just plain prejudice or xenophobia.

The term "Islamophobia" is a dumb term on so many levels. The ideology is in the word, not the people, so it's extremely misleading for one. There's a difference between having dislikes against an ideology and the people who believe in it. And the term racism or xenophobia would do just fine to describe instances where Muslims are targeted.

The term "Islamophobia" is only used by people on the far left to try to brand good people as bad for disagreeing because it's a catch word that captures attention. If a Muslim is discriminated against, just call it racism like any other person being discriminated against for no reason. Why don't we ever hear the word "phobia" attached to any other acts of racism against other demographics? It's just called racism. Against Muslims, it's really the only one that has a unique specific term with "phobia" attached to it.

The term "Islamophobia" is used way more for things that are perfectly acceptable than for things that aren't. The number of times it's used for someone who disagrees with Islamic teachings compared to it being used for sickos who say beat up an innocent Muslim person on the street for no reason is like 10 to 1. It shows that the whole existence and usage of the word is totally backwards as is the word itself. There's a reason it's used though. They want to be able to point to people who simply criticize an ideology and cry "bigot" because it reinforces that agenda they're trying to push on the far left.
I see your point, thanks for explaining.
 

Dick Jones

Gold Member
Not allowed to dislike the work of someone who is trans.
Well Jason Schreirer had tweet issues with her so using their logic (ha ha, I know right) means Schreirer is a transphobe and should be banned for Transphobic comments involving offsite drama.

If the banned poster said he was voting Democrat first then he would be allowed to have an opinion on a transperson's work.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
Most of them probably end up just making new accounts and going back under different names, it's incredibly easy.

I bet most "new users" are just banned users under different names :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

GymWolf

Gold Member
They banned me for this post...

What a bunch of retarded cunts they are, holy fuckity fuck...


Before it was jap instead of japanese but i edited my post like 30 sec after i wrote it because people was busting my balls.
 
Last edited:

Coolwhhip

Neophyte
Ree gives themselves and extra special touch tonight.
re1C2q7.png


RljXv3Z.png


c8UwzKx.png


KaeHM3L.png


mI3NjNH.png


And the special guest star return of that fan favorite ban reason Inflammatory support"

Cy38KOZ.png

They are harmless miserable cunts. But it would be great if people brought that hate site to the attention of the fbi. They would soil themselves so fast.

Anyone from the industry posting there should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Last edited:

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
They banned me for this post...

What a bunch of retarded cunts they are, holy fuckity fuck...


Before it was jap instead of japanese but i edited my post like 30 sec after i wrote it because people was busting my balls.
They banned you because they know you post here, chum. Simple as that. They were just looking for a passable excuse.
 

GymWolf

Gold Member
They banned you because they know you post here, chum. Simple as that. They were just looking for a passable excuse.
I posted here a lot of times and they never banned me tho...and onestly i don't think they need an excuse to ban people in that place...

And for the record my full name is chum bucket

450px-Chumbucket.png
 
Last edited:

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
I posted here a lot of times and they never banned me tho...
You’d never typed some word that could be considered racist in fantasy land before, then.

They still need to make up some reason to ban people apparently, even if it’s completely arbitrary and nonsensical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom