Ascend
Ascend
Reading all these 'sources' you are posting over and over again its like you want to convince us XSX is going to have 116GB ram
Obviously, the system has 16GB of physical RAM. But the CPU/GPU see 100GB of the SSD as RAM. It is not actual RAM, but they would see the system as having 116GB total. So accessible as RAM would be 10GB @ 560GB/s, the 6GB @ 320GB/s, and the 100GB @ SSD speed.
The PS5 equivalent would be 16GB @ 448GB/s and the full SSD size at SSD speed, if what people have been saying is true.
and also Texturestreaming is going to be 2-3 times (SFS!!!!!!!!) more effective then PS5's.
It might be more
efficient in some cases, not more effective. That's exactly what the Tweet said too. If their SSD speeds were equal, the XSX one would be better. Except they are not equal. The PS5's is faster. That means that the gap between them is (partially) diminished, but the PS5 would probably still be stronger.
If you were actually interested in reading rather than reacting and mocking, you would have understood that.
Do you even understand what the fuck you are talking about? This virtual memory bullshit has been there for ages.
Of course I know it has been there for ages. One of the tweets is using Mario as an example of the same thing.
If you were actually interested in reading rather than reacting and mocking, you would have understood that.
You can use the same harddrive storage alloccation stuff on pcs. By your logic or those twitter smartasses I could allocate 1TB of storage to a game on pc. Thing is though - it won't boost your game performance at all.
I never said anything like that.
If you were actually interested in reading rather than reacting and mocking, you would have understood that.
It will only reduce cpu overhead by a small margin.
The faster the storage the more the CPU overhead will be reduced.