You accused people of manipulating the timer to produce a misleading result. That was simply, plainly, demonstrably untrue. That's the issue here and that's what you refuse to address. If you'd timed it yourself you would've seen that the video posted by Thegreatwhiteshark was correct.
Now you say you didn't time it and rather than address that, you post another video that proves you were wrong. Yet, somehow, you still cling to the idea that the original video was 'BS'?
You've got to be kidding. BTW, this new video says the sequence in question is nine seconds rather than six. 50% longer than GWS said. So, I guess you're spreading FUD now?
Look, let's try and salvage something from this shit-show.
The video you posted shows on-rail sequences that claim very short loading times, however the only gameplay to gameplay section shows the loading to be something like six to nine seconds.
Now take a breath before you react. Is six to nine seconds disappointing to you? Is it not good enough? When you get your PS5 on launch day, plug it in and fire up the first game, are you going to take it back if it takes six seconds to load?
Just relax.
Six to nine seconds to load an entire next-gen level is fantastic.
If someone says that it might be more realistic to expect six seconds rather than .08 seconds, they're not saying that the PS5 is junk. They're just suggesting that maybe you should temper your expectations.
Look at the evidence given to you by Sony themselves. Forget what other people say, forget what the PR is, look at the official video.
For what it's worth, the Series X will likely be slower, OK? You'll always have that.
HeisenbergFX4
cred? i always see people asking him for insight, but so far havent seen anything he has "revealed"
twinfinite.net
