• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Smart choice! What size? Join us here:


And this interesting comparison came as well lately:



65” got a steel on it.

Pretty neat video, I too was impressed at the black levels on the Sony set. I also came from a 120Hz 4K IPS Sony set in the game room to this one, so it was literally night and day.

I prefer Sony’s color accuracy over the LGs personally as well.
 
Last edited:
I keep coming across RTX PC crap over here in this thread. This thread is all about next gen consoles that's Xbox and PS5. Please refrain from posting anything PC related here, thanks!

To be fair these consoles use similar parts as PCs so it's probably appropriate to discuss some PC stuff here. Like when the RDNA2 cards get the white paper released that would be appropriate for this thread since both systems are based off RDNA2.

If there's one thing that I agree with is that we shouldn't bring PCMR type stuff here.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
65” got a steel on it.

Pretty neat video, I too was impressed at the black levels on the Sony set. I also came from a 120Hz 4K IPS Sony set in the game room to this one, so it was literally night and day.

I prefer Sony’s color accuracy over the LGs personally as well.

Yup, I personally believe if you try Sony colors and image accuracy it's hard to go for other brands where they tend to crush details or have inaccurate colors. Also it's critical for photo/video editing as I use it as a monitor. My budget is already choking with a7S III, $800 for 2 memory cards, and 3-5 lenses or I would've went for 85"! Now I'll wait and see and might settle for 65" (550 OMR currently, $1,430) , or even worse 55" (350 OMR, $910).:lollipop_crying: No VAT though, final prices. I'll wait and see what Black Friday will cut.


 
Last edited:

Md Ray

Member
so its morning now and I can check what you are saying

other than the two videos of fs2020 (3080/3090)
and the linus video for 8k


and the marques video for 8k


both showing rather solid results for 3090 @8k
I hadn't bothered much more.

it was you who brought the "3080 vs 3090 is 6TF and the difference is such and such, therefore consoles" argument.


so, now drinking my coffee I did look a little bit into it.

first of all 3090 is mainly a workstation card, with all that ram aiming to help the creators, with fast viewports etc, and I guess since you quoted for me the gamer nexus pitch, you already knew that, yet you chose to falsely provide an argument for teraflop difference in games using 3090 as an example.
Am I right here? I think I very well am. Here is the nexus video you use as proof where they clearly state the facts you somehow omitted:



So I will knock 10 points off your score for deliberately presenting pretentious and false examples

But wait, there's more. Upon looking it up, I found out what it seems to me that most 3080-3090 cards have trouble with their boost functions.
Yeap, the thing that will give them the performance advantage, even compared to each other just seems to not work great at this point of time.

Here's a quickie from Jayz2Cs about it:


and a more technical article for those that care:


Overall, I'd say that you presenting the 3080-3090 situation as a way to compare the consoles , given that you already knew at least some of the above, is a sneaky little piece of you know what way to present an argument just to say "BULLSHIT! THE DIFFERENCE WILL BE 7% BECAUSE 3080-3090 BLAH BLAH BLAH"

So I will knock another 10 points out of you just for composing this entire thing into an argument for xbox and ps5.


Overall points standing: Not good!

Next time you try to a) be more honest and b) talk nicer.
You are not as smart as you think you are.

It doesn't change the fact that PS5/XSX's "~1.85 TF" GPU difference is much smaller than X1X/Pro and PS4/X1 GPUs have.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't change the fact that PS5/XSX's "~1.85 TF" GPU difference is much smaller than X1X/Pro and PS4/X1 GPUs have.
Surely you shouldn't even be using this wording ("fact") after what you did.
Here are some SAD facts for you:
The fact that you on purpose chose something misleading as an example
The fact that you were manipulative in the way you presented your "data"
The fact that you are using irrelevant things in order to come to a "conclusion" that you like about something completely different, etc, etc.

Now here are the real facts:
-xbox and ps5 have the same targets
-xbox has ~145% the ps5 CUs
-xbox has ~125% the ps5 bandwidth
-xbox has this ~2 teraflop advantage. and on top of these
-xbox output is constant, not boosted like ps5

How are the above factors going to play out? those that can understand h/w some, they may have a slight peek into the future.
those that don't, and don't care to listen, well, they'll simply have to wait and see.

As I said, you are not as smart as you think you are. Next time you try to pull my leg -or talk in a offending way- you are getting the list treatment.

Have a nice day
 

Aceofspades

Banned
Surely you shouldn't even be using this wording ("fact") after what you did.
Here are some SAD facts for you:
The fact that you on purpose chose something misleading as an example
The fact that you were manipulative in the way you presented your "data"
The fact that you are using irrelevant things in order to come to a "conclusion" that you like about something completely different, etc, etc.

Now here are the real facts:
-xbox and ps5 have the same targets
-xbox has ~145% the ps5 CUs
-xbox has ~125% the ps5 bandwidth
-xbox has this ~2 teraflop advantage. and on top of these
-xbox output is constant, not boosted like ps5

How are the above factors going to play out? those that can understand h/w some, they may have a slight peek into the future.
those that don't, and don't care to listen, well, they'll simply have to wait and see.

As I said, you are not as smart as you think you are. Next time you try to pull my leg -or talk in a offending way- you are getting the list treatment.

Have a nice day

You strangely ignored awful lot of metrics , but hey whatever floats your boat
 
8K is a bit of a silly thing to preach, in my opinion. The sheer amount of power required to reach that resolution is massive, much less run things effectively.

I would say 8K gaming is quite some time away, probably 2 or 3 years on PC before its fairly common?

I could see the consoles capable of running movies at that resolution, but nothing more than that.

I doubt even mid-gen refreshes of the PS5 and XSX could do it. Maybe--guess it depends how fast technology advances again.

Also, aren't 8K TVs still exorbitantly expensive these days? Even OLED 4Ks are still very pricey depending what you choose out there.
 

Vae_Victis

Banned
In light of media reports about Jim Ryan saying PS5 is not backwards compatible with PS1, 2 and 3, HipHopGamer’s doubling down didn’t make sense to me initially; but after pondering over the contradiction and giving the spec sheets of PS4/pro and PS5 another glance over to see what was different about their optical drives, something struck me as peculiar. Look at the optical drives for each system...

PS4/pro
Optical Drive:
- BD x6 CAV
- DVD x8 CAV

PS5
Optical Drive:
- Ultra HD Blu-ray (66G/100G) ~10xCAV
- BD-ROM (25G/50G) ~8x CAV
- BD-R/RE (25G/50G) ~8x CAV
- DVD ~3.2x CLV

Doesn’t it seem odd to you that SIE would replace PS4/pro's faster DVD 8x CAV mode with a much slower DVD ~3.2x CLV mode?...

It seems odd to me because PS1 reads CDs at 2x speed in CLV mode only. And on top of that, according to some very old posts by two devs (inpHilltr8r and Falafada (the latter is said to be an SCE dev)) on another forum, PS2 reads DVDs at 2x speed in CLV mode (in CAV mode PS2 reads DVDs at 4x speed). Here's some of what they had to say about PS2’s drive...

(note: If you care to read the threads in full, search the following: ‘PS3 vs 360 Drive Speed Question’, the first result that pops up should be from Beyond3D. If you only care to read the dev posts, jump to pg.4)…

"The PS2 drive can operate in either CAV or CLV mode. CAV is faster, but less stable, and only works on one layer of a dual layer disc. We ran the drive in CLV mode, and I don't want to revisit the amount of time I spent laying out the 8GB of data we crammed onto the disc." -- inpHilltr8r

"From what I remember CLV defaults to minimum CAV speed, meaning you get 2xDVD across the whole disc, instead of only inner layer." -- Falafada

And there’s more. What's with the addition of a BD-R/RE ~8x CAV mode for PS5? This also seems odd to me because in the same forum thread a post was made (on pg. 5) by a third dev who in reply to a forum-goer's assumption that PS3's BD drive was CLV, said...

"Nope, we have an 8x BD-R/RE drive that's P-CAV..." -- archie4oz

As I’ve come to understand, P-CAV is a derivative of CAV that can run in both CLV and CAV modes. The drive spins the disc in CAV mode when reading (or writing) near the inner part of the disc, then switches to CLV mode for the outer part of the disc.

On the surface, it appears PS5's optical drive has modes to read PS1, 2 and 3 discs. For me, this lends credence to HHG’s claim. Now here’s the conundrum: HHG said PS5 is backwards compatible with PS1, 2 and 3; Ryan said it isn’t… or so the media says…

I interpreted Ryan’s words differently. Before I get into them, here’s the half-decent machine translation of the Q&A I read…

-- In the story, I was surprised that PS4 titles are 99% compatible. By the way, is it compatible with PS1, PS2, and PS3 titles? -- Famitsu
Ryan We have been building devices with a focus on PS5-specific engineering. Among them, PS4 already has 100 million players, so I thought that I would like to play PS4 titles on PS5 as well, so I introduced PS4 compatibility. While achieving that, we focused on incorporating high-speed SSDs and the new controller "DualSense" in parallel. So, unfortunately, compatibility with them has not been achieved. -- Jim Ryan

My interpretation of Ryan: PS4 compatibility is a PS5-specific ”device”. The high-speed SSD and DualSense are also PS5-specific devices; so unfortunately, PS1, 2 and 3 titles will not be compatible with them (the high-speed SSD and DualSense).

If my interpretation is correct, then HHG will have been proven right about PS1, 2 and 3 backwards compatibility for PS5 working in conjunction with PS Now, and Jim Ryan will have maintained the element of surprise. In any event, we’ll find Soon’y enough…

“we are cloud-gaming pioneers, and our vision should become clear as we head toward launch” -- Mark Cerny
This is beyond wishful thinking, and you are only setting yourself and a lot of other people up for disappointment.


1) If the drive could read CDs, it would absolutely state so in the tech sheet to begin with.

The fact PS5 reads DVDs in CLV rather than in CAV in no way means it can also read CDs in CLV. CAV and CLV are simply referring to two different spinning methods (Constant Angular Velocity and Constant Linear Velocity), and say absolutely nothing about the formats supported. Different disc formats require different laser frequencies to be read (CD = 780 nm; DVD = 650 nm; Blu-Ray = 405 nm), and there is no way around that.

So if the laser emitter in the PS5 disk drive is compatible (as per official specs) with DVDs and Blu-Ray discs, you can make it spin a CD in CLV, CAV, upside-down, sideways or to the beat of Michael Jackson's Thriller, it won't read it because the laser is too thin to perceive the data pits correctly.


2) Famitsu asks the question very directly and clearly: "Is PS5 backwards compatible with PS1, PS2 and PS3 games?" Ryan goes on a bit of a PR tangent, but he is answering to that question, and he says that since they focused on PS5 and PS4, sadly PS1, PS2 and PS3 were not supported. If he had said specifically that only the SSD and the DualSense were not supported for older consoles, the Famitsu journalist would have immediately asked for clarification, because that would have been a very ambiguous answer to the question.


3) If PS5 were backwards compatible with older consoles, by now they would have said it. There is literally no reason to keep it secret, let alone lie or deceive about it. Pre-orders are out, what you see is what you get, this is their hand come November. If PS5 were compatible with older generations Sony would be screaming it out loud, they know it's something a lot of vocal people online have kept asking for years, and it would be a massive PR shot against Microsoft's constant mantra of the 4 generations of games supported by Xbox.


4) The only reason why social media clowns like HipHopGamer come come out with such bold statements is because they know they will always find someone whose confirmation bias is stronger than their common sense. It's the same shit as FoxyGames saying he was invited to a super secret Sony press event where they showed him games upon games nobody knew about and he could absolutely not talk about despite he was talking about them, or that other psycho on Twitter posting random re-edited 3-second-long CGI videos and saying they are PlayStation games about to be announced.

It's kindergarten-level bullshit, but since saying it is somebody on the other side of a screen and you see they have some kind of following, you shut off your critical thinking and jump to the conclusion that they must have some kind of authority. They don't. They are either con-artists, or the head honchos of a pack of retards (and are being conned in turns by some fake insiders sending them nonsense they will eat up).
 
Last edited:
You strangely ignored awful lot of metrics , but hey whatever floats your boat
what "metrics"? the SSD and the ..scrubbers? :messenger_tears_of_joy:
yes, I ignored a lot of metrics, especially those that have to do with rdna2 architecture and affect performance, while we know them for a fact for xbox, and we know diddly squat for ps5.
My comparison is supposing rdna2 featureset equality
 

Aceofspades

Banned
what "metrics"? the SSD and the ..scrubbers? :messenger_tears_of_joy:
yes, I ignored a lot of metrics, especially those that have to do with rdna2 architecture and affect performance, while we know them for a fact for xbox, and we know diddly squat for ps5.
My comparison is supposing rdna2 featureset equality

Pixel fillrate, rasterization .. etc

The difference between the two machines is the smallest we have ever seen in history not including areas that PS5 is actually better at like SSD .

This is the only fact that you can never accept.
 
Pixel fillrate, rasterization .. etc

The difference between the two machines is the smallest we have ever seen in history not including areas that PS5 is actually better at like SSD .

This is the only fact that you can never accept.
source.gif
 

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
so its morning now and I can check what you are saying

other than the two videos of fs2020 (3080/3090)
and the linus video for 8k


and the marques video for 8k


both showing rather solid results for 3090 @8k
I hadn't bothered much more.

it was you who brought the "3080 vs 3090 is 6TF and the difference is such and such, therefore consoles" argument.


so, now drinking my coffee I did look a little bit into it.

first of all 3090 is mainly a workstation card, with all that ram aiming to help the creators, with fast viewports etc, and I guess since you quoted for me the gamer nexus pitch, you already knew that, yet you chose to falsely provide an argument for teraflop difference in games using 3090 as an example.
Am I right here? I think I very well am. Here is the nexus video you use as proof where they clearly state the facts you somehow omitted:


So I will knock 10 points off your score for deliberately presenting pretentious and false examples

But wait, there's more. Upon looking it up, I found out what it seems to me that most 3080-3090 cards have trouble with their boost functions.
Yeap, the thing that will give them the performance advantage, even compared to each other just seems to not work great at this point of time.

Here's a quickie from Jayz2Cs about it:


and a more technical article for those that care:


Overall, I'd say that you presenting the 3080-3090 situation as a way to compare the consoles , given that you already knew at least some of the above, is a sneaky little piece of you know what way to present an argument just to say "BULLSHIT! THE DIFFERENCE WILL BE 7% BECAUSE 3080-3090 BLAH BLAH BLAH"

So I will knock another 10 points out of you just for composing this entire thing into an argument for xbox and ps5.


Overall points standing: Not good!

Next time you try to a) be more honest and b) talk nicer.
You are not as smart as you think you are.
Maybe you should look at Linus' other video.



Linus
But wait, double the video memory? Why? Well, aside from giving it much better compute capabilities and more importantly, the ability to render much more complex 3d scenes in software like blender. AS it turns out, gaming at 8k also genuinely demands this much video memory.

You're only talking about 8K gaming because you think it proves your point. What you don't understand is that the RTX 3080 has less than half of hte video memory of the RTX 3090.
 
Last edited:
Maybe you should look at Linus' other video.



Linus


You're only talking about 8K gaming because you think it proves your point. What you don't understand is that the RTX 3080 has less than half of hte video memory of the RTX 3090.

3090 is being pitched as a 8k gpu, so your point is moot.
and I wasn't the one to bring the gtx cards into play here.
 
My point is not moot.

You're trying to use the 8K benchmarks to prove that TF difference is huge, but when its actually the result of a lack of VRAM on the 3090 card.
I am sure that if you test 3080 and 3090 at 720p, results will be identical to the frame.
You are getting way out of focal point here.
3080-3090 comparison was used by a person to demonstrate that 6teraflops mean nothing.
maybe you should focus on that instead?
 

Redlight

Member
Yup, I personally believe if you try Sony colors and image accuracy it's hard to go for other brands where they tend to crush details or have inaccurate colors. Also it's critical for photo/video editing as I use it as a monitor. My budget is already choking with a7S III, $800 for 2 memory cards, and 3-5 lenses or I would've went for 85"! Now I'll wait and see and might settle for 65" (550 OMR currently, $1,430) , or even worse 55" (350 OMR, $910).:lollipop_crying: No VAT though, final prices. I'll wait and see what Black Friday will cut.


So it's not just Sony consoles? Now only Sony TV's are worth considering? Wow. That a really small world you're living in. Samsung and LG often rank higher in independent rankings. BTW, TV's are a very, very poor choice for photo/video editing.
 

TrippleA345

Member
Jesus...

You guys are still on this?

Just accept ps5 is a 2019 hardware rdna1, no raytracing accelerators, 7-8tf

The evidence is all around you. Thats the reason why You got games like Demons Souls, ratchet etc running 4k, 60fps with RT no problem, while the almighty XSX runs Craig and its getting RT on patch later.

Actually, the PS5 is 6 TF. 10Tf boosted - 3TF Heat issue. Don't know where you got the 7-8 TF you moron. lolololol.
 
Last edited:
Xbox fans are now on attack mode every where after this Bethesda acquisition 😂😂😂
Please, someone tell them to cooldown. Every big move by Phil was nothing but smoke and mirrors. Once the craze settles down they will be back to Craig. Also please tell them that the ES and fallout has a history worse than craig. The Slowness architecture won't do anything to help out.
 

FunkMiller

Gold Member
Jesus...

You guys are still on this?

Just accept ps5 is a 2019 hardware rdna1, no raytracing accelerators, 7-8tf

The evidence is all around you. Thats the reason why You got games like Demons Souls, ratchet etc running 4k, 60fps with RT no problem, while the almighty XSX runs Craig and its getting RT on patch later.

I love how Demon's Souls has basically destroyed all of these old arguments.

"Yes, but have you seen Demon's Souls?" essentially ends every single argument about the Ps5 being underpowered now :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
I am sure that if you test 3080 and 3090 at 720p, results will be identical to the frame.
You are getting way out of focal point here.
3080-3090 comparison was used by a person to demonstrate that 6teraflops mean nothing.
maybe you should focus on that instead?

We know what you posted. lol

He pointed out the difference between the two cards and then you told him to go up to 8K,

He wasn't saying the TF difference meant nothing, he was saying it's not a big gap. Even people who reviewed both cards said it when you're reviewing up to 4K gaming.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
So it's not just Sony consoles? Now only Sony TV's are worth considering? Wow. That a really small world you're living in. Samsung and LG often rank higher in independent rankings. BTW, TV's are a very, very poor choice for photo/video editing.

Buy me Sony's $50-30K monitor then. And experts all agree that Sony TV's have the best color and picture accuracy, upscaling, and processors. Go fight them.

Yup, I'm also a Sony phone user since 2005, next Sony mirrorless camera and lenses, and car system, headsets, etc.

Future: Sony car.:messenger_smiling_hearts:

sony-vision-s-concept-3.jpg


Sony_Vision-s.jpg
 
Last edited:
I love how Demon's Souls has basically destroyed all of these old arguments.

"Yes, but have you seen Demon's Souls?" essentially ends every single argument about the Ps5 being underpowered now :messenger_tears_of_joy:

But haven't you seen the real Demon Souls? What Sony showed is just the game on a high end PC. The real PS5 version looks more like this.

demons-souls-maiden-in-black.jpg


So the PS5 is an underpowered next gen console. There's no denying that.

Just a joke BTW
 
Last edited:

Elysion

Banned
Btw, when do we expect Sony to release their next-gen VR headset? I hope we see it next year, especially since Resident Evil 8 will come out next year as well. Unfortunately it seems Sony is treating VR still like an exotic niche product. Here‘s what I said in this regard in another recent thread:

I don‘t know if Sony plans to make VR a true mass market product, but if they do, then the way they‘ve been handling it so far hasn‘t been particularly conducive to this goal.

They‘ve been making things way more complicated than they need to be. I‘m especially disappointed that the PS5 controller is just another regular controller; I think it should instead have been a controller that can be broken up, so it can be used as a dual motion controller like the Switch joycons (Sony even has patents about such a dual-purpose controller, so we know they‘ve been thinking about this).

That way, every PS5 owner would already have a VR-ready controller from day one, and would only need to buy a VR headset to get started (or use the PS4 headset). The userbase would be unified as far as control schemes go, which makes it easier for developers to make VR games. But as things are now, PS5 owners would have to buy not only a headset, but also a new set of VR controllers. Sony could sell their next gen headset and VR controllers in a bundle of course, but that would make it much more expensive. But if they‘re selling them separately, then not all PS5 owners will have the new VR controllers, which means developers will have to make their VR games compatible with both normal and VR controllers.

I also suspect that Sony (as well as other companies making VR hardware) feel that it‘s necessary to have super complex VR controllers that are capable of finger tracking and all kinds of fancy stuff. But I believe that‘s a mistake; normal motion controllers with good tracking and nice haptic feedback should be more than enough for now. Finger tracking strikes me as kind of a dead end, at least until we reach a point where proper VR gloves are possible. Finger tracking sounds nice on paper, but without some kind of physical resistance you‘re just grabbing empty air anyway.

But more than that, if all PS5 controllers could be used as motion controllers, then it would be possible for VR players and non-VR players to play certain games online together, since they would still use the same control scheme (I‘m mainly talking about shooters here, where motion/pointer controls are superior both with and without VR). This would make VR part of the broader gaming market, instead of letting it occupy its current niche, which is more or less separate from the rest.

Instead of treating VR as some exotic oddity, Sony should treat it as they did the original dualshock controller on PS1: Make it optional, but also something that‘s supported by most of the games that come out. There would still be VR exclusive games of course, but I see no reason why ‚normal‘ games shouldn‘t have an optional VR mode. Is it really that hard to have a VR mode in your typical Assassin‘s Creed game, for example, where the player looks the main character over the shoulder?
 

Redlight

Member
Buy me Sony's $50-30K monitor then. And experts all agree that Sony TV's have the best color and picture accuracy, upscaling, and processors. Go fight them.

Yup, I'm also a Sony phone user since 2005, next Sony mirrorless camera and lenses, and car system, headsets, etc.

Future: Sony car.:messenger_smiling_hearts:

sony-vision-s-concept-3.jpg


Sony_Vision-s.jpg
If that makes you happy then off you go with my best wishes. :)
 
Bethesda Softworks founder says "Sony won't get what Microsoft owns"

 
Pixel fillrate, rasterization .. etc

The difference between the two machines is the smallest we have ever seen in history not including areas that PS5 is actually better at like SSD .

This is the only fact that you can never accept.
Nope, the difference in the GPU is huge xbox has 1000+ more Shading Units and 18 more CUs, 5 billions more transistors
Some might say the clock speed can compensate that, no it won't clock speed yield follows a logarithmic function it's very known among overclocking enthusiasts.
At the end of the day we'll see comparisons very soon, and I'm ready to bet my house that the difference will be significant
 
Surely you shouldn't even be using this wording ("fact") after what you did.
Here are some SAD facts for you:
The fact that you on purpose chose something misleading as an example
The fact that you were manipulative in the way you presented your "data"
The fact that you are using irrelevant things in order to come to a "conclusion" that you like about something completely different, etc, etc.

Now here are the real facts:
-xbox and ps5 have the same targets
-xbox has ~145% the ps5 CUs
-xbox has ~125% the ps5 bandwidth
-xbox has this ~2 teraflop advantage. and on top of these
-xbox output is constant, not boosted like ps5

How are the above factors going to play out? those that can understand h/w some, they may have a slight peek into the future.
those that don't, and don't care to listen, well, they'll simply have to wait and see.

As I said, you are not as smart as you think you are. Next time you try to pull my leg -or talk in a offending way- you are getting the list treatment.

Have a nice day

You forgot

- xbox series x have ∞% less real exclusives

Have a good day
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Bethesda Softworks founder says "Sony won't get what Microsoft owns"


tenor.gif


And Bethesda won't get what Sony owns, massive install base. :lollipop_tears_of_joy: Good luck with the 1$ Gamepass spammers.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom