i am so glad someone knows that quote
And he and Johhny Ringo were magnificent in that film
Just that you seem pretty intense about people complaining about DF. It’s ok man. You know who lives rent free in my head? The New England Patriots. Hate those guys!
Is this a sure thing or could they be confusing the exclusivity of it as a preorder bonus and immediate unlock?
I hate that they get brought up endlessly... it's annoying, and the mods have literally warned/banned people from this thread over it multiple times. I ignore 90% of it but occasionally chime in to tell people to stop sounding so butthurt over them.
Lucid flux is an educated man. Now I really hate him
Sounds good. And I’m sure we agree about the a Patriots.I hate that they get brought up endlessly... it's annoying, and the mods have literally warned/banned people from this thread over it multiple times. I ignore 90% of it but occasionally chime in to tell people to stop sounding so butthurt over them.
I want my fellow Sony fans to stop sounding like the whiniest persecution complex babies on the planet is all lol I'm just here to help you guys be better
Definitely agree there lolSounds good. And I’m sure we agree about the a Patriots.
www.polygon.com
As a giants fan. I approve of this postSounds good. And I’m sure we agree about the a Patriots.
They said this, but I don't know how to take it:Demon’s Souls on PS5: Here’s what’s changing
New details on photo mode, multiplayer, World Tendency, and more
well said. but to me, if someone is truly curious, the more interesting part is how PS5 manage to run games like DS, R&C and even spiderman on a supposedly weaker machine. the reconstruction technique. the RT tricks are all interesting talking points. but no, people fixated on RDNA1.5
Bo_Hazem
was right about Demons Souls resolution and DF were wrong
Mans a rebel
Say hwhen!
i felt it necessary to add that h in front of when
Im buying one. I'd love the OLED but its $3k in Australia and the Sony TV is $1500
What if 60 FPS mode has no or lower quality/amount of RT, did you include that to the equation?
no, but they didnt mention anything about the performance mode not having RT. This game only has shadows RT which again does not have a large impact on power. In CoD MW, it had maybe a 10% hit on performance so 6 fps for a 60 fps game.
due to this news:
Xbox Series S & X Are the Only Next-Gen Consoles Featuring the Full AMD RDNA 2 Architecture, Says Microsoft
Microsoft proudly boasts that its Xbox Series S and X are the only next-generation consoles featuring the full AMD RDNA 2 architecture.wccftech.com
After a lot of time i understand:
What I thought was complete RDNA2 should include all the hardware, not just the functions to be developed:
Next AMD presents what are the characteristics that have led it to achieve a 54% improvement compared to RDNA1. Broken down:
The first corresponds to the increase in frequency which does not seem to be very present on Xbox.
The second Improvement Holisty Design that corresponds to the following slide:
Variable clocks per CU (there is no such thing in SX)
Restructuring of the pipeline (as we can see in the 80 CU GPU in the photo it only has Shaders Arrays of 10 CU maximum) There is no such thing in Xbox either
And greater efficiency of data movement. (Who knows).
The last point is that RDNA2 has Infinity cache (the brilliance of the photo):
And yet I'm still trying to find it here:
In which it is neither mentioned nor appears.
And last and foremost is dedicated RT Hardware without using TMUs as calculation units:
In front of this:
Where can you see that if you activate the RT a TMU (there are 2 actually and I hope because as it has 2 TMUs per RDNACU they are managed) to become an RT accelerator.
So what have we been discussing? If RDNA2 architecture is not hardware because it is clear that it is not, then what is RDNA2?
VRS, Mesh Shaders and Direct RT ??? So what have we been discussing all this time for software functions compatible with hardware?
I just know one thing, I think no console can afford all that hardware on the GPU for 500 Euros (~ $ 500). And that of course I think that the word RDNA2 architecture simply refers to VRS, Mesh Shaders AND directX RT. I think we are getting a ton of weird marketing that is not letting us see with our eyes the hardware that we are buying which is really important.
VRS, Mesh Shaders or DXRT are functions that other companies without RDNA2 have, for example Nvidia. So we can assure that they are not exclusive to RDNA2 but rather that it is a way of using hardware that will have to be compatible.
Conclusion:
That certifies you as RDNA2.0 full: it is a set of API characteristics that must be compatible with your system. But it is not tied to hardware development.
I think we've gotten a ton of unnecessary marketing and swallowed it. RDNA2 has nothing to do with concrete hardware architecture.
But I finally understood.
The RDNAX word is just marketing and does not assure you of hardware. So from my Geek point of view it is a word that is worthless.
It's this bit that makes me wonder:
