Did you complain when DF made a video about a buggy DMC5 Remastered?
Where did they call it a bug?The devs literally confirmed that it was a bug.
The Series X goes at 900p as well and that is only at the 120 mode. On the quality mode 60fps it has higher overall res. And like said before. It's slightly less res but all the assets are higher res than Series, it has tesselation which is absent on X, better anysotropic filtering, better LOD, more details, better foliage, and so on.You guys clowned Series S for going 720p in a game with a 3rd of the power and here we have the PS5 at sub-HD and noone bats an eyelid? You guys can't be serious right now.
If it was a bug it would be patched a day after .its now 3 weeks. Still waitingThe devs literally confirmed that it was a bug.
That's because this game goes 560p in some modes on Series S.You guys clowned Series S for going 720p in a game with a 3rd of the power and here we have the PS5 at sub-HD and noone bats an eyelid? You guys can't be serious right now.
We can when xsx looks like early x360 game in that mode and its 1080pYou guys clowned Series S for going 720p in a game with a 3rd of the power and here we have the PS5 at sub-HD and noone bats an eyelid? You guys can't be serious right now.
No, because the video didn't come out weeks after someone already made a video about that buggy version.
So reduced resolution, reduced geometry, reduced lod, reduced texture filtering, reduced foliage all the same "confirmed" bug? Please bear in mind that the dev was only talking about 120hz mode, all other modes that have lower settings than PS5 are apparently working as expect.The devs literally confirmed that it was a bug.
Also pretty brutal to DF who neglected to mention any of the other differences during their analysis. in quality and resolution modes.This one is a particularly brutal head to head for Xbox. Ouch. I'm sure it will be patched to get a little closer to PS5 but the difference is too big to not expect compromises elsewhere to reach parity like with Valhalla.
Thing is, different takes from many outlets is necessary.....There is a lot we miss on when it's only one Sheriff in town, especially when that Sheriff is DF....Just look at how much more information NX has given us on the game.......Many things DF did not and they clearly missed or their eagled eyes was asleep......This is a larger gap between PS5 and XBOX than we thought...Clearly I have also highlighted better effects and settings in DMC 5, COD and even Dirt with background textures....I highlighted it all in those specific threads, but you need tech channels to pick this up too, so more persons can be in the know....No, because the video didn't come out weeks after someone already made a video about that buggy version.
Wait till next e3 and u will regret what u saidL after L after L.
518400 pixels(540p) v 1440000 pixels (900p). That's, what, something like 177% more pixels?You guys clowned Series S for going 720p in a game with a 3rd of the power and here we have the PS5 at sub-HD and noone bats an eyelid? You guys can't be serious right now.
Yeah and we wait for VGA. I expect at least one MEGATON or imma tweet mean shit to GeoffWait till next e3 and u will regret what u said
- A bug can make the game run at 45~50fps on XSX. To solve this restart the console
- Texture detail, anysotropic filtering, foliage density, all lower on Series X
- Resolution in Quality mode tends to hover between native 4K and 1800p on PS5, goes down to 1440p often on Series X
- Reduction in LODs on XSX.
- 120Hz mode turns Tesselation off on Series X completely. All the rest becomes even worse than the PS5 version. LOD is reduced significantly.
- 120Hz mode runs at 1080p on X versus 900p on PS5, but there are lots of graphical details simply gone in X.
- 120Hz mode seems to run about 1 to 2% better on Series X. 117 vs 115 fps on one track, 116 x 115 on the other. In general performance is great on both.
- Performance seems identical or slightly favoring PS5 in 60FPS mode.
XSX 120Hz Mode: High Resolution 1080p, Average Resolution 1080p, Low Resolution 900p.
Are the calculations correct ?
Why do this video before the announced patch is implemented? Easy clicks?
It's been 3 weeks since the last version, why do a video now when the dev has confirmed that things are fucky and a patch is coming? Makes no sense lmao
Same with SX in quality mode average resolution and low resolution same numbers?
Calculations are wrong numbers are wrong, redo
How else will NXGamer get the Sony fanboys to view all his videos?Why do this video before the announced patch is implemented? Easy clicks?
How else will NXGamer get the Sony fanboys to view all his videos?
How else will NXGamer get the Sony fanboys to view all his videos?
Haven't you learned yet? A new challenger arrives. No longer is the "Waitstation" by Sony.3 weeks and no patch. How long are we meant to wait?
We already counted this as a win for PS5 right? Double dip then?
Uhh.. that's not the only messed up one.
XSX 120Hz Mode: High Resolution 1080p, Average Resolution 1080p, Low Resolution 900p.
Are the calculations correct ?
I believe the 1920x1080 in the avg. res is a human error.
XSX 120Hz Mode: High Resolution 1080p, Average Resolution 1080p, Low Resolution 900p.
Are the calculations correct ?
Why not wait until the patch is out to do this? When the devs themselves said the XSX has bugs that lowers performance and needs updates. Again, I know why but lets hear the excuse you makeVideo seems pretty fair to me.
Why not wait until the patch is out to do this? When the devs themselves said the XSX has bugs that lowers performance and needs updates. Again, I know why but lets hear the excuse you make
The SX Quality, 120hz PS5 and 120hz SX numbers just don't make sense. And they don't make sense.. differently... 2 of them have the low as the average and one the high as the average. He may be doing some odd "rounding" of sorts but it just seems like a mistake.
But from the video, it sounds like PS5's averages were higher across the board?
The analysis is done before the patches that the devs said they will implement.The analysis is way beyond what digital foundry showed and your complaining, it's so sad the lengths people will go to try and discredit something.
I understand it's not leaning the way you want it to, but the video is factual and well done, perhaps you need to stop being so over-sensitive about your favorite piece of plastic.
Facts matter, i am sorry they are upsetting you and a few other xbox fanboys around here, maybe don't watch them and put gears 5 on loop, that way you can feel safe in your err Safe space.
Yeah I assume it's from taking samples.The average resolution number is just an estimate. I wonder how many times he did pixel counts to arrive at those "averages".
Yes we need a look at DMC5 Special Edition next...Balanced mix of data and narration. Good improvement with each video - even the voice pacing. Nice to see data summaries at the end... a bit more expanded works even better - which should be a standard for other outfits. NXGamer any chance we may get a DMC5:SE face-off?
Depends on the results you know that. He won't post a negative Sony video and hurt viewership. Smart to make money that way there is millions of potential new viewers for him. Good business.The analysis is done before the patches that the devs said they will implement.
If the patch comes in 2 weeks, you think NXGamer is gonna make a video about it?