• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NeoGAF Ban Review/Justice Project

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mod of War

Ω
Staff Member
I get that, but with all the peeps at war for flops it was a simple comment that I even explained with another user. It was even done and over with. It just seemed immature coming from a mod.

Totally get your point though and that would of been a fair warning, not what the sorry of a comment I posted
Some mods are mortal, they too can get tired of console war bickering and move through reports and respond with that sass. I will pass this along to our feedback department.

As for me-
BHxYDc7.gif
 

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
EviLore EviLore

Can a mod explain to me why I was thread banned in the Georgia Election hearing thread? I posted nothing that to my knowledge was against the ToS or the rules of the section. My posts were exclusively about the personal history of the "expert" that was used in the hearings themselves. None of the information I provided was untrue in any way to my knowledge.


The "expert's" name is Jovan Hutton Pulitzer who is a known conman and wild theorist. I was trying to point out that he is obviously not a reliable source and that people should not take him seriously. He is a "treasure hunter" who has authored several books about "hidden treasure" and how people can get rich off of it. As well as having claimed that the romans discovered America before Columbus. To me that reads as an unreliable source. And I was under the assumption that if a source of information is unreliable or questionable in anyway that we were allowed to demonstrate that fact.








Literally anyone can google this themselves to double check my information.
 
Last edited:

Nobody_Important

“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
That Pulitzer guy's credibility appears to be directly relevant to his testimony in the hearing. Not seeing a problem with bringing it up. Lifting your reply ban Nobody_Important Nobody_Important .
Thank you. I don't blame the mods. I assume they just saw multiple reports and acted accordingly. Its what I would have done in the same situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom