Same. It feels like he is parodying himself.I really liked the school scene at the beginning. Perfect parody!
But after 5 minutes it's getting lame. This guy gets on my nerves pretty fast.
I watched this the other day, great review as always. 6/10 is kinda low, but it is what it is.
For me it’s currently an 8/10 game on PS5
I don’t even really care about all the bugs or crashes, I just want an overhaul of the AI. It’s immersion breaking.
I think a lot of low scores from reviewers boil down to being disappointed with how the game turned out vs. expectations, not really about the merits of the game. At the same time a review is a personal opinion, so he has the right to score it however he wants.
Joe has mastered the far-too-common practice of taking a good joke and stretching it to its absolute limit, killing the comedy in the process.I really liked the school scene at the beginning. Perfect parody!
But after 5 minutes it's getting lame. This guy gets on my nerves pretty fast.
Well I can't see giving this game more than 6/10 tbh. My main grip is that beside cool story and outstanding world the game is medicore in every other aspect (progression, shooting, role-playing, riding) and core gameplay is broken because of very bad AI - I am really bored with any kind of fights because enemy AI is so bad that I feel like i'am using cheats. Using stealth build (without any kind of optimization of gear) is no challange because AI can't react at all. Or using tech weapon that shoots through walls - AI cant react. Or using hacks - AI cant react.
So much time spent complaining about bugs. I get it, but after every other review already doing the same thing it’s hard to get through this one weeks later. I skimmed past a lot of it. Some of the footage he used is even the same YouTube bug clips we’ve seen used over and over in a dozen other reviews. I know he puts a lot more effort into his reviews then most, but this isn’t really a good watch this late.
I think a lot of low scores from reviewers boil down to being disappointed with how the game turned out vs. expectations, not really about the merits of the game. At the same time a review is a personal opinion, so he has the right to score it however he wants.
For a game with so many cool weapons and implants the AI is definitely disappointing. The enemies don't react when you use advanced weapons/hacks and don't surprise you with anything except for the overheat hack, but even that can be easily made less problematic thanks to a tracking perk.what open world rpgs have you played where you liked the enemy ai? because i think cyberpunk's enemy ai is fine. i guess not bethesda's because progression shooting/combat are way worse in those games.
Well I can't see giving this game more than 6/10 tbh. My main grip is that beside cool story and outstanding world the game is medicore in every other aspect (progression, shooting, role-playing, riding) and core gameplay is broken because of very bad AI - I am really bored with any kind of fights because enemy AI is so bad that I feel like i'am using cheats. Using stealth build (without any kind of optimization of gear) is no challange because AI can't react at all. Or using tech weapon that shoots through walls - AI cant react. Or using hacks - AI cant react.
For a game with so many cool weapons and implants the AI is definitely disappointing. The enemies don't react when you use advanced weapons/hacks and don't surprise you with anything except for the overheat hack, but even that can be easily made less problematic thanks to a tracking perk.
But the police in the game is definitely the worst. The game just makes them pop out of nowehere when you gain police stars, it's clear they're not capable of arriving at the scene and hunting down V. Losing the cops is also a joke, there aren't even police chases in the game.
what open world rpgs have you played where you liked the enemy ai? because i think cyberpunk's enemy ai is fine. i guess not bethesda's because progression shooting/combat are way worse in those games.
he is just riding the hate wave.
I think a lot of low scores from reviewers boil down to being disappointed with how the game turned out vs. expectations, not really about the merits of the game. At the same time a review is a personal opinion, so he has the right to score it however he wants.
I watched this the other day, great review as always. 6/10 is kinda low, but it is what it is.
Who can stand 40 minutes of this?!
bootlicking is kinda buying most of these games with no real ambition at all.not sure whats more tiresome, joe's schtick or your bootlicking
not sure whats more tiresome, joe's schtick or your bootlicking
I think a lot of low scores from reviewers boil down to being disappointed with how the game turned out vs. expectations, not really about the merits of the game. At the same time a review is a personal opinion, so he has the right to score it however he wants.
And the game is 90% looking at npcs talk. You start a mission talking with an npc, you go in another location to talk some more, you go to 2 or 3 more locations to talk yet some more, maybe have 3 minutes of actual gameplay then you talk some more to complete the mission. Its a poorly designed game. Even if its had zero bugs
joe's schtick i guess because my bootlicking is non existent
like i said a month ago
AC Valhalla: solid entry. we knew what to expect every game is the same. 8/10
Cyberpunk: didn't end the pandemic 6/10
God, this. Characters just talking talking talking. This game is a conversation simulator more than anything else.
you must've really not liked the witcher 3 then...
like I said bunch of bro gamers gravitating towards this not realizing the same people that made the witcher 3 made this fucking game lol
No, the difference was that the talking in Witcher was actually interesting and Geralt was a fucking fantastic character.
God, this. Characters just talking talking talking. This game is a conversation simulator more than anything else.
yeah. that's a role playing game. don't play disco elysium.
so suddenly CDPR doesn't know how to write interesting context? it suddenly went away with cyberpunk? lol that's not how talent works buddy.
such bro takes, for people that enrolled on a gaming forum.
I expect a fraternity brother to say "too much talking" lol not a gamer who actually knows wtf he's playing.
Yep, clearly they struggled without the Witcher source material and characters. Talent isn't magic, "buddy," just because you have success once doesn't guarantee it again.
so you're going to act like the panam quests, river quests, main quest content weren't better written than the majority of open world rpg's right now lol okay.
let me guess, skyrim killed it though with it's kill draugrs in caves quests lol
I'm not "acting like" anything. The quests and characters in this game eventually bored me the longer I played. Different opinions, people have them.
I'm not "acting like" anything. The quests and characters in this game eventually bored me the longer I played. Different opinions, people have them.
I don't have to give you an essay on what games are better to offer up an opinion on this one. This conversation has run its course.
doesn't have to be an essay, just the name of the game lol surely you have insight to reference from?
and in other words, you can't fucking give me one so now it's time to run away xD
doesn't have to be an essay, just the name of the game lol surely you have insight to reference from?
and in other words, you can't fucking give me one so now it's time to run away xD