• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Suggest the next comic super hero Sony should get exclusively for PS.

mansoor1980

Gold Member
infamous.gif


Why not an Infamous sequel?
simply brilliant dude , you can be the hero or you can be the villian
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I understand the logic old friend, I just don't agree with it.

In the end, it matters not. The era of exclusive games is slowly coming to an end.

It will never come to an end. Having some PS games on PC doesn't mean every game is coming there. So far only 2 major PS4 games and most of the ones coming would be PS4 games according to Jim Ryan. Paying thousands on PC and then complaining about console exclusivity isn't sensible. If you're talking about a console gamer on a competing platform then yes if he/she is on a tight budget and can't afford the luxury of owning more than one console.

But that's how business is run, you need exclusives to tempt customers to invest inside your ecosystem, which brings million times more money than the sales of the exclusives themselves. If steam wasn't too dominant you'll see the same practice on PC as well, even though the craziest thing so far is many steam fanboys refuse to play any game outside steam even if that will not cost them any extra money, that is the most pathetic form of gamers.
 
Last edited:

Jack Videogames

Gold Member
After doing great with Spiderman, SONY just showed they can do great super hero games.
So who would you want they GET next & who is the developer?

For me I'd like Naughty Dog to take on Old Superman game.

alex-ross-instagram.jpg


Nobody has ever done a good Superman game from what I know & maybe only Naughty Dog can do him justice.
Superman has to be old & not that too powerful so they can confine him game play wise.
Or you have other better ideas you'd like to share.

Maybe they could confine him in a virtual city full of kryptonite fog. Oh, and make him fly through rings for no reason!
 

Hoppa

Member
There’s no reason why they can’t just make another original super hero franchise like infamous.
Shit yeah I'd be down for a new Infamous! New character though.

OP - I think they could do some interesting things with the Dualsense in a Daredevil game
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
maybe a villian in spider-man 2 hopefully.

Would work great, although I don't feel him as an evil by nature in the movie. Not familiar with the comics though.

But would love a standalone or at least a spinoff of Venom as the protagonist. Pretty comedic.
 

gamer82

Member
Iron-Man or Captain America or an actual Avengers game that's good.
i still havent played avengers i picked it up at xmas cheap and was waiting for the ps5 drop, now i have backlog of other ps4 games still not got time to play it. is it really that bad, is the campaign at least enjoyable.?
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
i still havent played avengers i picked it up at xmas cheap and was waiting for the ps5 drop, now i have backlog of other ps4 games still not got time to play it. is it really that bad, is the campaign at least enjoyable.?

A friend told me that the campaign is good enough.
 

gamer82

Member
im in the middle of playing res 8 and then finishing of Spiderman remastered so i think i should give avengers story mode a go next as it did look good graphically .if its only a few hours of button mashing it was a cheap buy , online stuff just doesn't interest me i don't play enough to get invested in online .

not enough hours in the day lol this year would be nice to complete some of my titles before i get anymore.

i wouldn't mind a fantastic four game or a new hulk game and on dc side how about a wonder woman (cat woman got here own game even though that movie was mediocre )or justice league game since were are getting suicide squad it makes sense.
 
Last edited:

Nickolaidas

Member
It will never come to an end. Having some PS games on PC doesn't mean every game is coming there. So far only 2 major PS4 games and most of the ones coming would be PS4 games according to Jim Ryan. Paying thousands on PC and then complaining about console exclusivity isn't sensible. If you're talking about a console gamer on a competing platform then yes if he/she is on a tight budget and can't afford the luxury of owning more than one console.

But that's how business is run, you need exclusives to tempt customers to invest inside your ecosystem, which brings million times more money than the sales of the exclusives themselves. If steam wasn't too dominant you'll see the same practice on PC as well, even though the craziest thing so far is many steam fanboys refuse to play any game outside steam even if that will not cost them any extra money, that is the most pathetic form of gamers.
I think the most pathetic form of gamer is the ps fanboy who destroys their room when they learn that horizon will come to steam, but now we're just arguing over semantics.

Not wanting to invest on consoles is not about being cheap, it's about wanting your game to look as sharp and vibrant as possible and as fast as possible. Why do people want to limit a game on 30-60 fps and sub-par 4k is beyond me.

In the end, I don't want to have three-four different game machines in my room, those days are long past. If more console games get ported to pc, all the better for people who want options. If not ... I'm not losing any sleep. More than enough games on Steam for ten lifetimes.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
ALL gamers.

5cdi6r.jpg


I think the most pathetic form of gamer is the ps fanboy who destroys their room when they learn that horizon will come to steam, but now we're just arguing over semantics.

Not wanting to invest on consoles is not about being cheap, it's about wanting your game to look as sharp and vibrant as possible and as fast as possible. Why do people want to limit a game on 30-60 fps and sub-par 4k is beyond me.

In the end, I don't want to have three-four different game machines in my room, those days are long past. If more console games get ported to pc, all the better for people who want options. If not ... I'm not losing any sleep. More than enough games on Steam for ten lifetimes.

Then mate you need to ask Steam to make those games in that case. Why not ask Nintendo to release their games on PC as well?
 
Last edited:

KungFucius

King Snowflake
It could not be a major one. The only reason they have Spider-Man is due to an ancient deal with Marvel that includes the movies.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
5cdi6r.jpg




Then mate you need to ask Steam to make those games in that case. Why not ask Nintendo to release their games on PC as well?
Yeah, sure. All games are welcome everywhere. I'd love to see Zelda on PC. I'd love to see Halo on PS5. I'd love to see Baldur's Gate 3 on x series x.

No one loses except petty fucks who want Bloodborne as a ps exclusive in order to make memes out of halo fanboys and mock them for not having games.

And now ps only gamers will never again play an elder scrolls or doom game ever again.

So ... congrats, I guess?
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Yeah, sure. All games are welcome everywhere. I'd love to see Zelda on PC. I'd love to see Halo on PS5. I'd love to see Baldur's Gate 3 on x series x.

No one loses except petty fucks who want Bloodborne as a ps exclusive in order to make memes out of halo fanboys and mock them for not having games.

And now ps only gamers will never again play an elder scrolls or doom game ever again.

So ... congrats, I guess?

Why are you so angry, mate? If PS fans don't play Elders Scrolls or Doom that's just business, buy an xbox or a PC.
 
Last edited:
i still havent played avengers i picked it up at xmas cheap and was waiting for the ps5 drop, now i have backlog of other ps4 games still not got time to play it. is it really that bad, is the campaign at least enjoyable.?

It feels like a gen 6 game, repetitive combat, copy pasta bad guys, it's honestly such a disappointment, I'm such a big comic book fan and it cant hold my attention at all.
 

Heimdall_Xtreme

Jim Ryan Fanclub's #1 Member
After doing great with Spiderman, SONY just showed they can do great super hero games.
So who would you want they GET next & who is the developer?

For me I'd like Naughty Dog to take on Old Superman game.

alex-ross-instagram.jpg


Nobody has ever done a good Superman game from what I know & maybe only Naughty Dog can do him justice.
Superman has to be old & not that too powerful so they can confine him game play wise.
Or you have other better ideas you'd like to share.
I want a Gravity Rush cómic

And a Crossover with Spiderman
 

acm2000

Member
sony has over 900 marvel comic characters to play with, they dont need to spend money making others exclusive.
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Would work great, although I don't feel him as an evil by nature in the movie. Not familiar with the comics though.

But would love a standalone or at least a spinoff of Venom as the protagonist. Pretty comedic.

Venom is one of Spidermans most famous Villains.
He has changed to a sort of Anti-Hero these days in the comic....but by and large hes spent most of his life as a Villain, and most comic book fans would first see him as a villain.
When the Venom movie was announced I was fully expecting it to be a Joker-esc situation where we are watching a villains origin story.
Hell now i even worried about the Mobius movie....are they gonna make him a "hero" in that too?

That said I would love to see Insomniac tackle a Venom game, hes bigger than Spiderman so even his webswinging and combat would have a totally different feel to it, and he has some other abilities that Spiderman and Miles dont have.
 
all of them? not gonna happen
Pretty sure it's only be a matter of time. Covid, lack of hardware, Herman and Jim's past/recent announcements, etc. At least those two are trying to make Sony more money and expand their "exclusives" Only Nintendo can really continue to put out exclusives that'll never be on other platforms.
 
Spider-man is the only superhero basically that can exist by itself - its universe is very fleshed out. All other heroes are not that developed and by itself are relatively boring.
 
Last edited:

Animagic

Banned
After doing great with Spiderman, SONY just showed they can do great super hero games.
So who would you want they GET next & who is the developer?

For me I'd like Naughty Dog to take on Old Superman game.

alex-ross-instagram.jpg


Nobody has ever done a good Superman game from what I know & maybe only Naughty Dog can do him justice.
Superman has to be old & not that too powerful so they can confine him game play wise.
Or you have other better ideas you'd like to share.
Solar: Man of the Atom
X-O Manowar
Bone
Sandman Mystery Theatre
Blade of the Immortal
Usagi Yojimbo

Those are some good comics that need big games
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
They should turn Infamous into an open world action RPG, where the player creates his own super hero and is hounded by the press at every turn.
 
Last edited:

NahaNago

Member
Spider-man is the only superhero basically that can exist by itself - its universe is very fleshed out. All other heroes are not that developed and by itself are relatively boring.
Spiderman is a lot easier to do simply because folks have a lot of history with the character from comics, to cartoons, and then movies. All you really need for a super hero game is an evil organization and a couple of unique bosses to fight. Pretty much any street level hero could work from luke cage, to iron fist, bat girl, nightwing, captain america, blade, punisher , and bloodshot.
 

Zeroing

Banned
Superman is the most boring character ever! He is immune to everything expect kriptonite.

ok, mmm 🤔 a stand-alone game of mystique from xmen! By naughty dog but people would complain Neil drunkman would ruin the game so he will do what he does, use as much woke in the game for the meltdowns. I wouldn’t mind!

I think it would play well with the narrative potential and fight scenes etc.

although x-men are own by WB right?
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
Spider-man is the only superhero basically that can exist by itself - its universe is very fleshed out. All other heroes are not that developed and by itself are relatively boring.

You what love?

Spiderman wasnt even top 5 solos last year.....heck he almost didnt even make the top 10.

  1. Wolverine
  2. Wonder Woman
  3. Thor
  4. Spider-Woman
  5. Batman
  6. The Flash
  7. Gwen Stacy
  8. Immortal Hulk
  9. The Amazing Spider-man
  10. Star - Basically a Captain Marvel offshoot...but still it was a solo book.
Most comicbook characters have existed for years and years, you think they got solo runs but werent able to carry their own books?
Heck Miles Morales couldnt carry his own book but they still managed to make a good game out him.
Now with characters who can actually carry their own books you have a plethora of stories and a decent rouges gallery to build from.

Spider-man is still considered like the most popular character around overall....but in a year like 2020 when people were basically stuck at home and actually decided to catchup on comics and shit.
Spider-man almost failed to make the top 10 solo runs.

Since we already have a Spider-man game, we could pick near literally anyone from the top 10 and make a really good game out it.

P.S The Wonder Woman comic is actually really good, and has been good for a while.

P.P.S Star also has a really good book and its pretty short....if a big studio is handling the game it would be the perfect avenue to get more people to realize star is quite a complex character and as shes so new the studio would have quite some free reign to tell the story they want to tell based on the information we have of Star.
 
Top Bottom