Wait so the first graph shows it being equal(ish, depending on the game) in performance to the 3060, and yet the ray tracing benchmark screenshot has it competing with the 3060 Ti? That doesn't make any sense at all. Plus the 3060 Ti is much more expensive.
I suppose the question is whether we can really get it for the advertised price. If I can get it for $400 then yeah it's a good deal against the 3060 (which is more like $600 where I live). If it's going to be more like $600 then fuck it I'll just wait as I have been doing.
A thing he didn't mention is
That the card is only 8x pcie 4.0. which means if you drop it in a pci-e 3.0 slot it will only have half the bandwidth.
butwhy.gif?A thing he didn't mention is
That the card is only 8x pcie 4.0. which means if you drop it in a pci-e 3.0 slot it will only have half the bandwidth.
butwhy.gif?
Pretty sure everything sits on the board and can be connected, it almost feels they did it on purpose for some reason. Maybe to make PCI-4.0 look more useful? who knows.
They did something like this for 5600XT too.
6600XT:
- high price
- ~5700XT performance
- abysmal RT performance
- shit memory BW (worse than 5700XT in memory limited scenarios)
- limited PCIE bus
Yet, for some people AMD will always remain saint
I can't forgive them Ryzen 5xxx pricing...
Wait so the first graph shows it being equal(ish, depending on the game) in performance to the 3060, and yet the ray tracing benchmark screenshot has it competing with the 3060 Ti? That doesn't make any sense at all. Plus the 3060 Ti is much more expensive.
I suppose the question is whether we can really get it for the advertised price. If I can get it for $400 then yeah it's a good deal against the 3060 (which is more like $600 where I live). If it's going to be more like $600 then fuck it I'll just wait as I have been doing.
But are they advertising the card as 8x or is this like Nvidia with the 970 "4GB"?Probably cheaper to produce.
But are they advertising the card as 8x or is this like Nvidia with the 970 "4GB"?
Card is sometimes limited by poor memory bandwidth and x8 PCIE interface:
RT performance is just LOL worthy
They did something like this for 5600XT too.
6600XT:
- high price
- ~5700XT performance
- abysmal RT performance
- shit memory BW (worse than 5700XT in memory limited scenarios)
- limited PCIE bus
Yet, for some people AMD will always remain saint
I can't forgive them Ryzen 5xxx pricing...
Does this thing have infinity cache?
Just 32mb.... :/
3060Ti FE is $399 chief, 6600XT is $380, they're as close to direct competitors as you can possibly get. It's simply a trash product like all of AMDs GPUs, quite possibly their worst of all time given its more than 3x lower performance in real world scenarios 99% of people buying new $400 GPUs would be looking to play these games in.
They did something like this for 5600XT too.
6600XT:
- high price
- ~5700XT performance
- abysmal RT performance
- shit memory BW (worse than 5700XT in memory limited scenarios)
- limited PCIE bus
Yet, for some people AMD will always remain saint
I can't forgive them Ryzen 5xxx pricing...
Is he coming around or has Nvidia been extra nice? Personally I believe people with no morals don't develop morals overnight.Also i must say the dude is really coming around with his video's. he finally starts to include stuff like DLSS benchmarks and even goes as far as native + dlss without raytracing which i don't even see other people do.
Gamer nexus lately is dropping the ball a bit with his reviews, they are empty of content.
next to nobody is picking them up for $399 though, and now all you can get is AIB cards which are absolutely not $399.
Hash rate is 32 mhash ETH at 55w.
Oxymoron?Fucking hell this card should be like $320 tops. Not to mention it will never even be in stock.
I wouldn't even put these in the same category. Turing is almost three years old at this point and you're basically getting the same performance for the same price.AMD's Turing moment as mentioned in the video. Dark times indeed.
Card is sometimes limited by poor memory bandwidth and x8 PCIE interface:
RT performance is just LOL worthy
Next to nobody is able to buy GPU's period, but Best Buy does routinely drop FE's at MSRP. If people are too rich to give a fuck or too childishly impatient to wait, getting reamed by AIB's is on them, they're willfully paying an artificially inflated price. $380 is the price of a 6600XT full stop, there is no $280 AMD edition that's perpetually sold out.
32 CUs at 2.589 Ghz = 10.6 Tflops. This 'shit' is the PS5 GPU. ;p Or as close as the PS5 GPU we are going to get with a desktop RDNA 2.0 card.$400 for this shit?
32 CUs at 2.589 Ghz = 10.6 Tflops. This 'shit' is the PS5 GPU. ;p Or as close as the PS5 GPU we are going to get with a desktop RDNA 2.0 card.
We need Alex to do a comparison here with XSX, the PS5 and the 6600xt and 6700xt which is a 13 tflops card to see just how they compare.
The Ass Creed comparison is very interesting because it is on par with the 3070 Ti in this AMD sponsored game. Alex found that the PS5 was somewhere between the 2080 Ti (3070 equivalent) and 2080 Super. I doubt Alex's stress test here is very accurate because the PS5 should be performing much better if the 6600xt is any indication.
sncvsrtoip TheThreadsThatBindUs Any thoughts?
I know. I am comparing the AMD cards here.Its pointless to look at ac valhalla, the game is striaght up compeltely butchered on nvidia hardware. Any comparison in it is useless.
I know. I am comparing the AMD cards here.
32 CUs at 2.589 Ghz = 10.6 Tflops. This 'shit' is the PS5 GPU. ;p Or as close as the PS5 GPU we are going to get with a desktop RDNA 2.0 card.
We need Alex to do a comparison here with XSX, the PS5 and the 6600xt and 6700xt which is a 13 tflops card to see just how they compare.
The Ass Creed comparison is very interesting because it is on par with the 3070 Ti in this AMD sponsored game. Alex found that the PS5 was somewhere between the 2080 Ti (3070 equivalent) and 2080 Super. I doubt Alex's stress test here is very accurate because the PS5 should be performing much better if the 6600xt is any indication.
sncvsrtoip TheThreadsThatBindUs Any thoughts?
I know. I am comparing the AMD cards here.
Is he coming around or has Nvidia been extra nice? Personally I believe people with no morals don't develop morals overnight.
According to TechPowerup's charts, the 6600 XT is only slower than the 5700 XT at 4K. At 1080p it's 6.5% faster, and at 1440p it's 3% faster.PS5 GPU is somewhere between 5700 and 5700XT and so is 6600XT but I guess in memory limited scenarios (4K) PS5 should blow this GPU out of the water.
According to techpowerup in 1440 faster than 5700xt and similar to 2070super but slower in 4k (probably bandwidth linitation), in rt little above 2060 and slower than 2060super32 CUs at 2.589 Ghz = 10.6 Tflops. This 'shit' is the PS5 GPU. ;p Or as close as the PS5 GPU we are going to get with a desktop RDNA 2.0 card.
We need Alex to do a comparison here with XSX, the PS5 and the 6600xt and 6700xt which is a 13 tflops card to see just how they compare.
The Ass Creed comparison is very interesting because it is on par with the 3070 Ti in this AMD sponsored game. Alex found that the PS5 was somewhere between the 2080 Ti (3070 equivalent) and 2080 Super. I doubt Alex's stress test here is very accurate because the PS5 should be performing much better if the 6600xt is any indication.
sncvsrtoip TheThreadsThatBindUs Any thoughts?
Good idea.32 CUs at 2.589 Ghz = 10.6 Tflops. This 'shit' is the PS5 GPU. ;p Or as close as the PS5 GPU we are going to get with a desktop RDNA 2.0 card.
We need Alex to do a comparison here with XSX, the PS5 and the 6600xt and 6700xt which is a 13 tflops card to see just how they compare.
The Ass Creed comparison is very interesting because it is on par with the 3070 Ti in this AMD sponsored game. Alex found that the PS5 was somewhere between the 2080 Ti (3070 equivalent) and 2080 Super. I doubt Alex's stress test here is very accurate because the PS5 should be performing much better if the 6600xt is any indication.
sncvsrtoip TheThreadsThatBindUs Any thoughts?