• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ac odyssey will no longer run on external hard drives on xbox series x.

Umbasaborne

Banned
So after the 60 fps update, it seems that ac odyssey is officially series x enhanced, recieving the label on my games and apps as well. However now its forcing me to transfer the game over to my ssd which has precious little space. If all they did was unlock the frame rate, i dont understand why it needs to use my ssd to run properly. It was running fine at 60 fps on my external hard drive just a week ago.
 

cormack12

Gold Member
That's odd, although wasn't it only using fps boost previously?

Must just be using the label as a requirement for an ssd like a wmi filter summat.

Anyone else complaining about it? Figured it might affect a lot of people?
 

Jaysen

Banned
That's odd, although wasn't it only using fps boost previously?

Must just be using the label as a requirement for an ssd like a wmi filter summat.

Anyone else complaining about it? Figured it might affect a lot of people?
I don’t think it ever had boost support. I remember months ago considering buying it but didnt because it didn’t have a 60fps option. Glad I waited because now it’s gorgeous and runs great, and I only paid 15 bucks.
 
Last edited:

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
The label probably acts as some sort of filter. Most likely ubisoft unlocked the framerate and then went "voila, enhanced" so it got the sticker and basically banned it from your hdd
It's not label, game have to be compiled with GDK and flag set to Gen9 (only). Then you are required to have it on SSD, even if it does not use any of the new APIs.
 
Last edited:

JimboJones

Member
Makes sense, one of the biggest bottlenecks of Odyssey is asset streaming. The IO is extremely stressed at 60 fps.
Set Icaros flying could burst your external HDD into flames
🤨
At worst you will probably get some asset streaming related framedrops.

Nothing wrong with this, if you want the game to perform better whats the problem?
Because it's probably totally playable from HDD and SSD space is limited
 

Umbasaborne

Banned
Nothing wrong with this, if you want the game to perform better whats the problem?
Its just weird because it was running fine at 4k 60 fps on series x while running off an external hdd just a few days ago. I dont think they enhanced anything else other than unlocking the framerate so i dont get why the ssd is now required. Its frustrating because even with tge expansion card ssd space is very limited. But i have a 5 tb external hdd hooked up to the console that i run all my xbox one/360/og games on
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
I don't understand why you guys need to have a bunch of games installed at once.
Mix of online games and single player? I always have MCC, Sea of Thieves and Rocket League installed on my external SSD and I’ll be adding Infinite and Battelfield 2042 to the internal SSD soon. Forza Horizon is also semi-live service these days so I’ll have that installed for a year or 2 also.
 
Last edited:
Unlike the switch, other systems have more than 2 games worth playing
I'll ignore the console war bait.

But, really, games like AC Odyssey. After you play it and beat it, why do you care if it's installed? How often are you going back to play games like that.

I'll only keep a handful of games permanently installed, such as Rocket Leauge, Tetris Effect, etc. I'll erase single player games even before memory becomes a concern. Redownloading them months or years later if I want to replay them, is not a difficult process.
 

ManaByte

Member
After you play it and beat it, why do you care if it's installed?

Well you see AC Odyssey (and Valhalla for that matter) aren't 10 hour cinematic over-the-shoulder games that you finish and never play again. They are, at minimum, 110-120 hour open world action-RPGs and the playtime can get upwards of 200 hours if you want to do every single thing in the game. So they stay installed for quite a while.
 

RoadHazard

Gold Member
Makes sense, one of the biggest bottlenecks of Odyssey is asset streaming. The IO is extremely stressed at 60 fps.
Set Icaros flying could burst your external HDD into flames

What does asset streaming have to do with framerate? It's not like you move faster through the world just because the framerate is higher.
 

mhirano

Member
What does asset streaming have to do with framerate? It's not like you move faster through the world just because the framerate is higher.
Maybe you are right but in my experience slow IO equals to FPS stutter on PC on asset-streaming-heavy games (AC Odyssey, Cyberpunk 2077).
It shows on fast traversal occasions (driving, horseback riding, Icaros flying).
 

RoadHazard

Gold Member
Maybe you are right but in my experience slow IO equals to FPS stutter on PC on asset-streaming-heavy games (AC Odyssey, Cyberpunk 2077).
It shows on fast traversal occasions (driving, horseback riding, Icaros flying).

Yeah, maybe such stutters would be more frequent if the frames are shorter.
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
I am actually surprised why more people are not complaining about the insane tiny storage we get.. and that expanding it is no longer 70 bucks for 4TB .. but more like 600 dollars for 4tb 🤣
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
I am actually surprised why more people are not complaining about the insane tiny storage we get.. and that expanding it is no longer 70 bucks for 4TB .. but more like 600 dollars for 4tb 🤣
Still 50gb ish or less for single player, unbloated games. Even next gen games like Battlefield 2042 are only 60gb. Storage is plenty.
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Still 50gb ish or less for single player, unbloated games. Even next gen games like Battlefield 2042 are only 60gb. Storage is plenty.
270GB for next gen cod ..
You better not think 1TB or 680GB is enough this gen 🤣
 
Last edited:

Banjo64

cumsessed
270GB for next gen cod ..
You better not think 1TB or 680GB is enough this gen 🤣
Simple solution, don’t play that trash.


deal-dog.gif
 
Last edited:

Banjo64

cumsessed
Just wait until all AAA games are huge you want better Textures? Next gen shit? Better prep for it 🤣
I don’t think they will all end up huge, absolute worst case scenario in my mind is that they all end up 100-150gb this gen with a few ridiculous outliers like CoD. That would still be 5 games on my PS5 SSD.
 

JimboJones

Member
Progress, you do have a choice to play the game on a Xbox one or one X.

They are also perfectly working.
But there is no "progress" in this particular game, I get that some games will require it but this game works with a HDD, there is no reason to put a SSD requirement on it.
Imagine making Final Fantasy IX or Undertale require an SSD because it was a "native Series app" it would be silly.
These systems should be flexible enough to allow granularity in their requirements.
 
Last edited:
But there is no "progress" in this particular game, I get that some games will require it but this game works with a HDD, there is no reason to put a SSD requirement on it.
Does it look and play better than on Xbox one? I'm not a fan of the series so I dont know if they upgraded the FPS or resolution.
 

01011001

Banned
this has to be a bug. first of all, you can't patch an Xbox One title to be a native Series X|S game, if there is a native version you will be prompted to "upgrade" which means the whole game gets reinstalled as the Gen9 version, and only native games need to be on the SSD. so it's impossible that this even happens... my bet is that Ubisoft somehow fucked up the update and added a flag that tells the console that it needs to be on the SSD even tho it doesn't.

contact ubisoft/make this issue more public, I bet they will patch it so it works again.
 
Last edited:

RoboFu

One of the green rats
hmm even if there a new version it would never patch up to SERIES version if its installed on external HD.

edit: yeah the guy above explained it better. lol
 
Last edited:
Nothing wrong with this, if you want the game to perform better whats the problem?
Why so defensive?

The insecurity of some of you makes you needlessly hostile when its totally not warranted.

The OP never said there's anything inherently wrong with it. He's just questioning why the limitation was imposed when the update seems superficial at best. It's a legit question.
 
Top Bottom