Just put Eimi Fukada in charge and I'll buy it.Money grubbing managers fucking it up for everybody.
Let's move away from the one thing people come to our game for and make it as unoriginal as possible by being a clone of more popular already established games nobody will leave for our game.
Yep..Its NOT an miserable experience, that's your opinion. Generally when I'm playing online most people actually love the game..but they agree it needs patches...seems like most people just want the same game every year...god forbid innovation..any game that steps outside of the normal yearly formula (Fortnite, FIFA, Madden, COD) is blasted, but yet gamers scream for innovation...Its always accounts with no pfp swarming in with hyperbolic takes and aggressive tones pretending EVERYONE shares the same sentiment.I’m not surprised in the least. If you played the game for just 10 minutes, you would get all of this information too.
I’ve basically got no words for 2042. It’s such a miserable experience outside of Portal (which has its own, less annoying issues) that is completely void of personality and lacks any soul.
EA and DICE can honestly do one after this release. Now I’ll just wait for the BF defence force to show up and tell me how wrong I am and how the game is actually great underneath the bugs.
Just put Eimi Fukada in charge and I'll buy it.
More importantly isn't he also tied into apex legends? Which is what ea wants to turn BF into?The future thing proper makes me laugh. One of the creators of CoD is in charge of BF now and people think that's a good thing. When it's fundamentally different game styles.
I have to ask, what exactly is innovative in BF2042? The player count? Even DICE found increased player counts didn't make the game "more fun".Yep..Its NOT an miserable experience, that's your opinion. Generally when I'm playing online most people actually love the game..but they agree it needs patches...seems like most people just want the same game every year...god forbid innovation..any game that steps outside of the normal yearly formula (Fortnite, FIFA, Madden, COD) is blasted, but yet gamers scream for innovation...Its always accounts with no pfp swarming in with hyperbolic takes and aggressive tones pretending EVERYONE shares the same sentiment.
Think of games like Overwatch, R6 Siege and Valorant whereby different characters have abilities or weapons exclusive to them and a higher focus on teamwork and coordination.What the hell is a hero shooter?
Ahh I see...thanksThink of games like Overwatch, R6 Siege and Valorant whereby different characters have abilities or weapons exclusive to them and a higher focus on teamwork and coordination.
It not being a miserable experience is also your opinion that apparently very few people actually share.Yep..Its NOT an miserable experience, that's your opinion. Generally when I'm playing online most people actually love the game..but they agree it needs patches...seems like most people just want the same game every year...god forbid innovation..any game that steps outside of the normal yearly formula (Fortnite, FIFA, Madden, COD) is blasted, but yet gamers scream for innovation...Its always accounts with no pfp swarming in with hyperbolic takes and aggressive tones pretending EVERYONE shares the same sentiment.
+ Insurgency Sandstorm.People who complain should just play military shooters from small and dedicated devs, from teams which really love their product and want the players to actually have -sit down folks- fun. CoD and BF started kind of small themselves and became so huge that too many head-ofs want to have their piece of cake. I remember playing CoD, United Offensive, BF1942, Vietnam and and BF2 and felt how much love and dedication went into them. Today I can recommend
Hell Let Loose
Squad
Arma
Post Scriptum
over all AAA studio dead births
+ Insurgency Sandstorm.
It has some fun battlefield-esq modes.
Although I toyed with the idea of getting the game, I'm a bit put off by this:+ Insurgency Sandstorm.
It has some fun battlefield-esq modes.
Agreed. It’s a really fun time on console too!By far my favorite military fps this year.
Although I toyed with the idea of getting the game, I'm a bit put off by this:
I played insurgency when it was a source mod (2005/2006 or something?) and really enjoyed it, and I think I'd like the current game as well. But passes like this completely turn me off.
That are some good news. I should consider buying it - if I ever feel the urge to leave my beloved WWII battle scenario in the future.Those are just skins that don't affect the game in any way.
You only need to buy these packs if you want to support the developers.
You get all the maps, guns and gameplay features.
The base game has a ton of suits and camos to choose, without buying any of those packs.
Yep..Its NOT an miserable experience, that's your opinion. Generally when I'm playing online most people actually love the game..but they agree it needs patches...seems like most people just want the same game every year...god forbid innovation..any game that steps outside of the normal yearly formula (Fortnite, FIFA, Madden, COD) is blasted, but yet gamers scream for innovation...Its always accounts with no pfp swarming in with hyperbolic takes and aggressive tones pretending EVERYONE shares the same sentiment.
That are some good news. I should consider buying it - if I ever feel the urge to leave my beloved WWII battle scenario in the future.
Do the purchasable skins fit naturally into the game, or are they particularly good, in the sense of being better camouflaged, or silly like the brightly colored CoD clown-skins?
It's been out since 2018, unless you mean on consoles.By far my favorite military fps this year.
I too played the mod back in the day. I think it came out in 2008.Although I toyed with the idea of getting the game, I'm a bit put off by this:
I played insurgency when it was a source mod (2005/2006 or something?) and really enjoyed it, and I think I'd like the current game as well. But passes like this completely turn me off.