PropellerEar
Member
What are you talking about, I said there are more 120FPS games on XSS. than 8K games on PS5, wtf are you saying...
That's not what you said...
And if that's the win you want, take it by all means.
What are you talking about, I said there are more 120FPS games on XSS. than 8K games on PS5, wtf are you saying...
What are you talking about, I said there are more 120FPS games on XSS. than 8K games on PS5, wtf are you saying...
Then again PS5 has 8K somewhere in the box, perhaps series x as well.
But yeah, lol.Now they only need to add a bluray drive option or solution for physical retrocompat with xbox 360 and One.
That's the main reason I'm not buying one. I don't need an Xbox Series X and can't justify the premium for it, but I would if I could play my existing library on Series S.
A solution should have happened years ago.
If a digital-only PS5 Slim is $300, this really isn't going to look appealing at all. I mean, aren't most of the Series S demographics young or very casual people? Why would they care about this over the original SKU?
Storage costs dropped massively since 512GB version was releasedHow 50$ for the double of storage is price increase ?
More than 8K or 4K120 games on PS5.
Of course it means nothing. 8K games basically don't exist it's what I mean, and 120FPS are almost the same... The PS4 Pro too had a "4K" mention on the box, even though I don't even know if 1 native 4K game exists on PS4 Pro, and I still have one.I don't know if it means anything to be honest. In either case.
You can't use the Touryst to prove that the PS5 is an 8K console and you can't use a list of 120FPS games to prove thet the XSS is more powerful than the PS5.
Of course it means nothing. 8K games basically don't exist it's what I mean, and 120FPS are almost the same... The PS4 Pro too had a "4K" mention on the box, even though I don't even know if 1 native 4K game exists on PS4 Pro, and I still have one.
I don't even know why we're speaking about this in fact, those mentions on the box just means that the machines are CAPABLE of outputting it, that's all.
THIS
HDMI Video Output resolution is not the same as the rendering resolution
The problem with Series S is that they sold it as:
"THE SAME AS SERIES X, just at 1440p/60 up to 120 fps"
We know now it was a blatant lie by MS
Time Stamped
THIS
HDMI Video Output resolution is not the same as the rendering resolution
The problem with Series S is that they sold it as:
"THE SAME AS SERIES X, just at 1440p/60 up to 120 fps"
We know now it was a blatant lie by MS
Time Stamped
Skyrim.The PS4 Pro too had a "4K" mention on the box, even though I don't even know if 1 native 4K game exists on PS4 Pro, and I still have one.
It was a thread about a picture of a box, how good was it realistically going to be?Another Series X|S thread gone to shit.
Here is even how much more stupid the deal is. If Microsoft decided not to lock the internal SSD so you could replace it, you could get a PCIe gen4 2TB M.2 2230 SSD for $120 and replace the internal 512GB one. But of course, they locked it, so you have to buy the expansion card that is overpriced.Yeah, instead of paying $350 for S, might as well grab X on sale for $450, used X for $400 (maybe less) or new PS5 DE for 400 (maybe less on sale now days).
$350 for XSS 1TB is a terrible deal.
My brain is singing that "911 Is A Joke" style.might pick one up. 512GB was a joke and I didn't like the black/white look.
Presumably they've done market research and found that Series S users want more storage and are prepared to pay a bit more for it.i cant even figure microsoft strategy here,
PS Fanboys on this forum cant just have a thread without goading on about the PS5 and how shit MS isAnother Series X|S thread gone to shit.
Its really stupid then, already coz of 2:1 worldwide sales xbox console version is never lead platform for those multiplat games, so best strategy would be to lower series s price to 200$ and shovel them all into ppl throats so they can catch up in terms of instal base, if trend continues sony wont only keep current ratio but even can increase it with inevitable ps5 slim and ps5pr0 next year, so easier time for them and harder for ms(more expensive to make exclusive deals, cheaper for sony).Presumably they've done market research and found that Series S users want more storage and are prepared to pay a bit more for it.
That would be my wild guess.
What the fuck am I reading?Its really stupid then, already coz of 2:1 worldwide sales xbox console version is never lead platform for those multiplat games, so best strategy would be to lower series s price to 200$ and shovel them all into ppl throats so they can catch up in terms of instal base, if trend continues sony wont only keep current ratio but even can increase it with inevitable ps5 slim and ps5pr0 next year, so easier time for them and harder for ms(more expensive to make exclusive deals, cheaper for sony).
MS knows instal base and mindshare is big in favour of sony(and games sales too, often 80/20 or 70/30) so if they dont fix that, even by taking some loss on the hardware or at least not make profit, i expect some srs graping happening, market/customers is merciless, especially casual console players, they dont have strong feelings towards any brand and just follow the flock... ;/
Just me critiquing stupid microsoft move of baseless price hike of a product that doesnt get much sales anyways.What the fuck am I reading?
Yeah, external drive should be cheaper than that. $50 is what it's worth tbh.I'd take a add on drive for the XSS.
[Side tangent incoming]
However, that would likely result in a monkey paw wish being granted, as it would probably cost at least $100 for the disk drive by itself. Which would essentially make it pointless getting an XSS + disk drive (mainly because the total for those two would be a $100 difference in price between the XSS and XSX).
With 2 controllers for co-op?I'm surprised the new Series S isn't a Baldur's Gate 3 special edition.
Intuition tells me Series S probably sells more than Series X, but I'd say not at this price.Just me critiquing stupid microsoft move of baseless price hike of a product that doesnt get much sales anyways.
If u dont call out stupid shit like that u will have platform holder keep repeating mistakes like this one, then we will get those staged interviews with phil crying xbox cant beat playstation even if starfield is amazing, aka 0 selfawarness and responsibility for their own stupid strategy.
The black one is bigger (storage)
Forced diversity
Thats a given but its in microsofts best interest to have by now not 21m combined x+s but 50m+, that would increase gamepass subs by a lot, so lets say we got currently 5m X and 16m S , and they bumping S price by 50 instead of lowering it by 100.Intuition tells me Series S probably sells more than Series X, but I'd say not at this price.
it has more 120fps games then the other camp so.....120 fps??
Don't say that, Xbox is dead silent. Tbh, give it some service with SSD upgradeI might get this for downstairs, the One X sounds like a jet engine now and it's freakin me out.
? Not gonna lie, I'm a bit confused about this. Are you saying I should replace the internal hard drive with an SSD? If so, nah, I remember finding that annoying with the PS4, so I just don't wanna dick with it, and I figure it'd just be easier to replace the One X with a Series S. It used to be pretty quiet though, yeah, but these days it's disturbingly loud. Even my daughter was perturbed by it.Don't say that, Xbox is dead silent. Tbh, give it some service with SSD upgrade
The problem with Series S is that they sold it as:
"THE SAME AS SERIES X, just at 1440p/60 up to 120 fps"
We know now it was a blatant lie by MS