• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Is Phil Spencer actively hurting the Xbox brand at this point?

Is Phil Spencer hurting the Xbox brand at this point?

  • Yes

    Votes: 256 40.8%
  • No

    Votes: 156 24.9%
  • I don't give a shit

    Votes: 128 20.4%
  • Yes but I love it!

    Votes: 87 13.9%

  • Total voters
    627

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
I actually agree with this. If this was Bethesda's only goof/semi-goof (Starfield is not much worse than this), we could put more blame on Microsoft. After Fallout 76 though, it seems like they've lost their way a bit.
Yeah, pretty much. Bethesda just refuses to get on with the times. There's no reason other than that awful engine for Starfield not to be a seamless experience and have better technology than this. I also believe Id helped them with the combat design and gunplay and Starfield is vastly superior to Fallout in that regard so Microsoft did give them full support, including delaying another year.

Microsoft has a lot to be blamed for but Starfield isn't on them. Blame them for the mismanagement of 343 and turning The Coalition, one of their 5 best studios, into a Gears machine but Bethesda was acquired exactly because they're some of the best in the business. They're supposed to be a top 3 dev under Microsoft if not the undisputed number 1.
 
Last edited:

Misterhbk

Member
By every metric we traditionally use to measure the success of a video game console brand, he’s done nothing to actually improve their position in the market.

He's made it so they can hide their failures behind words like engagement and player count. Which I guess has been enough to hold off shareholder anger, but as someone who owned multiple Xbox 360. I couldn’t be further removed from the brand.

Starfield almost brought me back until the reviews showed it wasn’t really something worth a 600 dollar investment.

I don’t think he’ll be around much longer. At some point he has to actually improve things beyond what was accomplished in the past.
 

Deerock71

Member
He's sure an easy punching bag when Microsoft's gaming division is down, but I'd manage that just in case the AB deal goes through. Then, he'll be in charge of a division in MS that by itself would be EA-sized by comparison.
 

Putonahappyface

Gold Member
This needed a thread? I thought it was obvious!

x9ghiS2.gif
 

truth411

Member
I fully moved away from PC gaming to consoles during the ps360 period for reasons not related to the topic and to be honest I don't have any real nostalgic memories about it. Just a box under my TV that I played 7-8 games per year on it. Now, with XSX is different. After selling Ps5 that is my only console now and even though I barely have any free time, I'm more passionate about gaming than I ever was thanks to discoveries I found on Game Pass. I also love silly stuff like Quick Resume, Fps boost, auto-HDR and so on. I wish they didn't drop the plan of res upscaling xbox one era games and it's a bummer BC updates stopped coming.

That's why it's great to have a choice.
But it's Literally not the best Xbox Console, your free to have your opinion, but the first half of the 360 was objectively better in every way.
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
Phil Spencer's biggest mistake is allowing incompetent morons like Bonnie Ross, Adam Greenberg and (worst of all) Matt Booty to keep their job. I used to like him as a figurehead, but he has done NOTHING to turn the brand around in terms of sales and marketshare. They prefer to win internet points.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
I don't think so. He's certainly a lightning rod for criticism but that goes with the territory. I actually think he cares about games and is passionate about Xbox, but has his hands tied by a corporate culture that defines success much differently than the average company.
That corporate culture gave him 70bln to buy ABK, he never would have gotten even a fraction of that at a purely game company.
It also doesn’t matter if he is passionate, doesn’t help him succeeding at his job or seems.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Maybe you should get a series console and see what your missing before making judgment. The S or X will be fine both excellent consoles in my opinion.
I had Xbox, 360, and One and not only do not have a Series, but have never raelly had any desire to get one. I think that by itself is indicative of how MS has been doing, but I'm not going to drop $500+ just to score some internet argument points.
 

King Dazzar

Member
Whist Phil loves to put his foot in his mouth. I'm not sure if its just Phil at fault or Microsoft and Xbox as a whole. i.e I'm not convinced different leadership will win back my trust/like/respect for the brand. One thing is for sure, as someone who pre ordered an XSX for launch. This Xbox generation has been an absolute shit show.
 
Last edited:

NickFire

Member
That corporate culture gave him 70bln to buy ABK, he never would have gotten even a fraction of that at a purely game company.
It also doesn’t matter if he is passionate, doesn’t help him succeeding at his job or seems.
Subjectively, I was giving him the benefit of the doubt, assuming he was handcuffed from focusing on great individual games in search of something far bigger to appease the enterprise side of the company.

But after considering the objective reality of the resources he had available to him, I simply cannot argue against you.
 

tryDEATH

Member
No, Phil has done a great job. The public's perception of Xbox is much healthier than it was and is only getting better, only in pockets on the internet is he perceived as a failing leader. That perceptiom among a certain group of people is due to their complete lack of understanding of corporate culture and how such institutions work in REAL LIFE. His charisma and approachability as a public figure for MS is one of his main assets as a leader, that in part has played great deal in getting MS to significantly invest into their Xbox/Gaming division with the obvious pending acquisition of ABK. If as some here claim that he's ineffective or even detrimental to a corporation like MS he would not be backed by the CEO of the company.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Banjo64

cumsessed
Looking at sales, he’s certainly not helping it.

From a personal POV I’ve gone from being an Xbox fan from 2006 until earlier this year and now I never want to buy another Xbox console, game or product in my life and I’m moving from a windows PC to Mac so yeah. Pretty much as disastrous as it gets on a personal level.

This is due to Spencer’s failure to deliver and the ABK situation re-revealing Microsoft’s true and ever prevailing greedy destructive nature.
 
Last edited:

NickFire

Member
No, Phil has done a great job. The public's perception of Xbox is much healthier than it was and is only getting better, only in pockets on the internet is he perceived as a failing leader. That perceptiom among a certain group of people is due to their complete lack of understanding of corporate culture and how such institutions work in REAL LIFE. His charisma and approachability as a public figure for MS is one of his main assets as a leader, that in part has played great deal in getting MS to significantly invest into their Xbox/Gaming division with the obvious pending acquisition of ABK. If as some here claim that he's ineffective or even detrimental to a corporation like MS he would not be backed by the CEO of the company.
What makes you say that the public's perception is getting better? The sale figures information we get suggests that is not true.
 

tryDEATH

Member
Because CEOs are those infallible figures that can do no wrong?
If the CEO is making wrong moves his own position would also be in danger, so unless you're now also claiming the CEO of MS isn't doing his job and supporting Phil could be a death sentence to him by supporting MS largest acquisition ever you're questioning MS as a organization then, which would be insane.
 

Withnail

Member
The MS board of directors told him to stay humble (spoiler: he didn’t) so they obviously think he needs some oversight. His record is not exactly stellar. I think they only keep him in post because he has a cult following among Xbox fanboys.
 

Duellist

Member
Yes and I love it. Fuck Phil, fuck x-box and fuck Microsoft. Fuckers are going to ruin this industry. Only saving grace is by the time those dumbasses accomplish it I will be well out of gaming.
 

Daneel Elijah

Gold Member
Yeah, pretty much. Bethesda just refuses to get on with the times. There's no reason other than that awful engine for Starfield not to be a seamless experience and have better technology than this. I also believe Id helped them with the combat design and gunplay and Starfield is vastly superior to Fallout in that regard so Microsoft did give them full support, including delaying another year.

Microsoft has a lot to be blamed for but Starfield isn't on them. Blame them for the mismanagement of 343 and turning The Coalition, one of their 5 best studios, into a Gears machine but Bethesda was acquired exactly because they're some of the best in the business. They're supposed to be a top 3 dev under Microsoft if not the undisputed number 1.
I think that even if they are not to blame they still are ultimately the ones responsible. When Nintendo was making Breath of The Wild, they found out that they were not ready to make a open world game. Their solution: bring in the Xenoblade devs and use their knowlege to make it a GOTY. When Sony was making The last Guardian with the ICO team, they found out that the game was being made at a snail pace. They took the 10 years needed to make it happen. Xbox could have done the same. They choose not to. As for Phil, I think that Microsoft is the problem and that he is just a symptom of their culture.
 

reinking

Gold Member
Yes. Not because of the leaks. All that did is expose his "aw shucks, I'm a gamer too" persona is as fake as many people thought it was. He is hurting the brand because he is focused on the wrong thing. He still doesn't seem to understand that the games and customers should be the focus. The Xbox problem with Phil (and his cast of misfit characters) is they have tried to buy culture instead of creating it. They are still trying to buy their acceptance with the purchase of developers, publishers, fans and paid influencers. They could be great if they actually did focus on the stuff that they pretend to focus on.
 
Last edited:

tryDEATH

Member
What makes you say that the public's perception is getting better? The sale figures information we get suggests that is not true.
Sale's figures aren't the only thing you go off. He has done plenty of positive things to improve Xbox's perception from giving gamers a cheaper option with the Series S to supporting backwards compatibility, cross play on the beginning, the adaptive controller and creating GamePass, which is the best gaming deal out there. These are all things that have contributed to a better perception of Xbox/MS. The actual public will even see the ABK aqusition as possitive as GamePass will be an even better deal and casual Nintendo fans will attribute Xbox/MS for bringing them more ABK games. What hardcore gamers percive and what the public percives are two completely different things and as a corperation they're more concerned about the public, which Phil has aced.
 

Gaiff

SBI’s Resident Gaslighter
I think that even if they are not to blame they still are ultimately the ones responsible. When Nintendo was making Breath of The Wild, they found out that they were not ready to make a open world game. Their solution: bring in the Xenoblade devs and use their knowlege to make it a GOTY. When Sony was making The last Guardian with the ICO team, they found out that the game was being made at a snail pace. They took the 10 years needed to make it happen. Xbox could have done the same. They choose not to. As for Phil, I think that Microsoft is the problem and that he is just a symptom of their culture.
Bethesda should have figured this out. Who at Microsoft could just go in there and tell the guys at Bethesda how it's done? Your example actually validates this since Nintendo themselves saw that they didn't have the chops to do an open-world and brought in people with open-world experience. Bethesda or Microsoft figured they could use some help at designing combat/gunplay and brought in Id who are masters at that.

The open-world is supposed to be Bethesda's specialty. If they fumble the ball on what they're supposed to be the masters of, who are you supposed to call to help them?
 
Last edited:

Robb

Gold Member
Not really. Maybe for you or me in our gaming-bubble, but the general public have no idea who he is and probably haven’t ever seen him. Same with Jim Ryan and Shuntaro Furukawa.
 

Cyberpunkd

Member
Sale's figures aren't the only thing you go off. He has done plenty of positive things to improve Xbox's perception from giving gamers a cheaper option with the Series S to supporting backwards compatibility, cross play on the beginning, the adaptive controller and creating GamePass, which is the best gaming deal out there. These are all things that have contributed to a better perception of Xbox/MS. The actual public will even see the ABK aqusition as possitive as GamePass will be an even better deal and casual Nintendo fans will attribute Xbox/MS for bringing them more ABK games. What hardcore gamers percive and what the public percives are two completely different things and as a corperation they're more concerned about the public, which Phil has aced.
And all of these should result in higher sales figures. It’s why you are in business, not running a charity.
 

Spyxos

Member
Why are people here so fixated on Phil Spencer and Jim Rayn? Before I started reading here, I never heard of them and so do most players.
 

Kdad

Member
The head of Xbox (past and present) seem to think they need to be Steve Jobs out as the pitchman (Sony used to do this too). It needs to stop, you don't need to be a human mascot (thats what hes good at) you need to manage (what he is not good at).

As a MS shareholder, clean house, get to work, get quiet. Let Satya talk about xbox as a product at his events.
 

hinch7

Member
Hes shown us time and time again that he is clueless and can't judge what makes good quality games from not; see Redfall and Halo Infinite. And no idea how to manage Xbox and their studios.. more that just buy out more studio's and developers. And then you look at the leaks and you can't help but feel a bit of second hand embarrasment.

The only good thing is that with their focus of multiplatform releases.. and as mostly someone who games on PC its been fine on my end. MS games usually release on Steam and don't use Denuevo which is good considering how fecked PC ports are these days. Otherwise for consoles alone, there's no reason for me to own an Xbox whatsoever.
 
Last edited:

reinking

Gold Member
For those saying most people do not know who Phil Spencer is, it does not matter. "Most people" are not going to care about what leaks happened but at the end of the day, sales show that he is not helping bring Xbox to a point that MS/he is happy with the results. I will say it again, his failure is that he has tried to buy culture instead of creating it. Sure, people don't care to know his name but the market is proving that many don't care to know his products either. He is hurting Xbox and will continue to do so as long as they rely on an echo chamber of paid "customers" instead of actually listening to what the market wants.
 

Arsic

Loves his juicy stink trail scent
I liked Phil and gave him the benefit of the doubt until this year.

He is a giga moron and needs to go. The guy thinks making good games isn’t enough to compete. Which is so wrong because games sell consoles. It’s why I got my PS5 and Switch.

When you constantly put out nothing or mediocrity like RedFall and Infinite, what do you think will happen to sales?

Xbox 360 was peak gaming. Everyone I knew had one and would buy them again despite red ring of death.

Under Phil I got gamepass pc which is an amazing value.

But I’m also under the impression he is going to allow for more RedFall tier products to shovel out under him. I think stalker 2 is on the path to be the next big stinker under him and I’m now wary of hell blade 2…
 
Top Bottom