Speedymanic
Banned
Guess what? They lied about RROD's, so it's not impossible or even out of the realm of truth for them to lie about this.
RROD was a different issue. Lying about this would be suicide.
Guess what? They lied about RROD's, so it's not impossible or even out of the realm of truth for them to lie about this.
That is some damning evidence. Well done.Someone on here lost his account after he hacked. Can't remember who it was unfortunately.
reading various threads about the issue on this and other forums. Do you have any figures to dispute my claim?
Social engineering, phising, poor security practiced by the user, keyloggers, etc, etc, etc.
Someone on here lost his account after he hacked. Can't remember who it was unfortunately.
They have acknowledged the issue.
I disagree, They would lie about this if it happened, I don't have any faith that they wouldn't lie about it, I would like to see proof either way.RROD was a different issue. Lying about this would be suicide.
reading various threads about the issue on this and other forums. Do you have any figures to dispute my claim?
RROD was a different issue. Lying about this would be suicide.
So you're basing your arguement on ONE GAFfer who you can't remember? Just wanted to be clear?
As for MS acknowledging the issue, the only acknowledgement they've made is that it is user's choosing weak passwords, despite claims of users choosing insanely unique passwords still getting hacked.
Listen, I get it, you love Microsoft. You can still be a fan, and call bullshit when you see it. They're not mutually exclusive.
I don't recall Microsoft publicly acknowledging the problem.
Yes. What's wrong with that?
Heh, I don't love MS and you only show your ignorance by thinking I do. And there is no proof that MS have been breached, so I tend to believe the official line as people always lie about their personal security measures when they are hacked.
oh wow. naw man, I wouldnt challenge that kind of quality verifiable source
I disagree, They would lie about this if it happened, I don't have any faith that they wouldn't lie about it, I would like to see proof either way.
Not exactly.
RROD= Users not being able to use a product that they paid for in the way it was advertised.
XBL HACK= Users not being able to use a service that they paid for in the way it was advertised.
Yes. What's wrong with that?
Heh, I don't love MS and you only show your ignorance by thinking I do. And there is no proof that MS have been breached, so I tend to believe the official line as people always lie about their personal security measures when they are hacked.
This payment option cannot be removed at this time. Go to the Payment method information page to view services associated with this payment option.
Cmon....do i need to quote your handle again?
You should probably read the links before you post them....
http://www.insidegamingdaily.com/2011/10/20/microsoft-responds-to-fifa-12-hacks/
Like they say, Microsoft basically are saying that people are having problems, but hey, its not them, that isn't really acknowledging anything.
Yes. What's wrong with that?
Well, we are only getting one side of the story...
Not saying the guy is leaving info out, but something doesn't really add up when the majority get their accounts back with zero problems.
So one forum post is damning evidence for Sony? But when it comes to thousands of posts about MS security issues, you tow the company line.
This is some Grade A trolling here folks. This is how it's done! Bravo!
You know what I love? The fact that we get a story from a random guy on the internet about losing his MS account and you say this:
And then you read some story from a random guy on the internet about losing his PSN account, who you can't remember at all, and take it as gospel fact.
Help me understand that, Speedy.
And how many people have been permanently banned from their paid for content with MS? Sure they have to kick up a fuss, but they eventually get their accounts back.
Sony on the other hand outright refuse, if you dare to get any money lost in a hack back from your bank, they ban your account and you lose all content you've paid for. No recourse, that's it.
....
You asked for a link that had an official acknowledgement, I'm sorry it wasn't specifically what you were looking for. Perhaps in future you could use Google to search for whatever it is you're looking.
Crazy, I know.
The fact that MS won't add essential 2 step vitrifaction for live accounts both windows and xbox when it's so plainly obvious makes me want to shy away from every getting a MS product again. Sure you can add a mobile number, but that only helps getting your account back after the fact. Just frick'n give us 2 step codes like everyone else out there who's sensible does.
And how many people have been permanently banned from their paid for content with MS? Sure they have to kick up a fuss, but they eventually get their accounts back.
Sony on the other hand outright refuse, if you dare to get any money lost in a hack back from your bank, they ban your account and you lose all content you've paid for. No recourse, that's it.
I asked you for the public acknowledgement of these hacks, yet you provided me with links to statements that claim that there is nothing wrong with their system.
In the future you should use Google before making any claims.
Which is them acknowledging the issue. What more were you expecting? Them to call the issue a hack?
Spouting such hard facts like that, im SURE you have a link to back it up that has the exact number of people who have had this happen, as well as the Official Sony response saying that yes that is how they do business..??
Again, besides this one forum post that you can't seem to find, show me any sort of proof of this happening. This story had nothing to do with Sony, but you decided that you had an axe to grind. Time to step up!
Devil's advocate.
And how many people who have been breached have had to suffer through something like this? Two by my count.
That's not even the point. The point is that when it comes to this subject you do everything short of accusing the complainant of being a liar, but the amount of good-will you have towards MS is without end. It's hardly being devil's advocate when you advocate for a single side consistently.
Actually, he did accuse the OP of being a liar.
That's not even the point. The point is that when it comes to this subject you do everything short of accusing the complainant of being a liar, but the amount of good-will you have towards MS is without end. It's hardly being devil's advocate when you advocate for a single side consistently.
Don't need numbers or an official, I was relaying info that was posted on this very forum. I hadn't realized we needed to quality everything so people don't start with the semantics argument.
Don't need numbers or an official, I was relaying info that was posted on this very forum. I hadn't realized we needed to quality everything so people don't start with the semantics argument.
Step up to what? I was relaying my disappointment that MS had decided to follow in Sony's shoes. It's relevant to the topic at hand.
Don't need numbers or an official, I was relaying info that was posted on this very forum. I hadn't realized we needed to quality everything so people don't start with the semantics argument.
Step up to what? I was relaying my disappointment that MS had decided to follow in Sony's shoes. It's relevant to the topic at hand.
I know, and he's done it in other threads on the matter, but I meant to say that he doesn't just come out and say it. It's always more in a weaselly "well, that's your side of the story, which may not the truth".
Exactly who I was trying to think of but couldn't remember.Maybe you were thinking of this NeoGAF user, who's PSN account was banned despite the fact that someone gained access to his account. I think this is exactly the user you're thinking of.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=415603
Fun fact: his account was fully restored two days later. So there ya go, in case you didn't read that update.
He must be lying!Fun fact: his account was fully restored two days later. So there ya go, in case you didn't read that update.
Actually, he did accuse the subject of the* OP of being a liar.