• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Is Support For VITA already dying? [Use the new thread]

Status
Not open for further replies.

FoneBone

Member
The vita doesn't have the problem of no games though like the 3ds had, it has many games and is only a month old. I think the price is the factor in this equation. When it drops to 200 or less I see it selling well.

There were a lot more problems with the 3ds then just no games, sub-par hardware, graphics were not that great, and the 3d wasn't used well until mario came out. Plus it was 249$.

If a $50 price drop were all it took to turn those games into system sellers... well, I think Vita would be doing better than it is now.
 

njean777

Member
I don't think any games the Vita has right now, besides Uncharted in some cases, are going to make people buy it. That's the problem. The Vita had a good launch, yes. But I see no true system sellers on the horizon.

And all those 3DS problems, sans price and games, still exist and aren't hindering it at all.

And price mattered for the 3ds, it had all these problems and people saw them. When the price dropped the sales went up.


If a $50 price drop were all it took to turn those games into system sellers... well, I think Vita would be doing better than it is now.

You may be right, but only time will tell.
 

Alchemy

Member
I just see no market for the Vita. The super casual gamers play on their smartphone, the hardcore gamers play on their console and the kids/parents go for a Mario system (3DS).

Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

Also, if I were a gamesdeveloper why would I spend money on developing a Vita game instead of just waiting this initial salesperiod out. Or go for Android/iOS instead with a huge potential audience.

Vita is easy to develop for and port to and has a completely different market than the smartphone crowd. You're not going to want to blow a shit load of money developing exclusively for the Vita, but even at its current install base can be profitable for developers who actually know how to manage finances and scope of their projects.
 

Kyoufu

Member
Vita needs Monster Hunter.

Can't stress enough how important this one franchise is to a system's life, but yeah...

If Kaz doesn't want to go down in history as the "Vita failure guy" then he needs to pour a bottle of gold in Capcom's cups.

Also get Black Ops 2 on par with the PS3 version and you may be able to save the system in the west too.

These games will breed more third party support.
 

Boney

Banned
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

0.jpg
 

axisofweevils

Holy crap! Today's real megaton is that more than two people can have the same first name.
The thing about Monster Hunter is... it was a big title and a massive success for the PSP precisely because its rival, the DS, wasn't capable of running it.

Things are different this time around. The 3DS already has two Monster Hunters. If the PSV ends up having a Monster Hunter, the same success isn't guaranteed because the 3DS already has 2 of that series. It's no longer as special.

It's also worth nothing that the DS ended up outselling the PSP in Japan - even without MH.
 

see5harp

Member
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

It's way too early to say anything about the Vita and third party support but "they can't afford it" is completely uncalled for.
 
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

Ah, the old "you're not good enough for this tech" argument.

Always so convincing.
 

Kyoufu

Member
The thing about Monster Hunter is... it was a big title and a massive success for the PSP precisely because its rival, the DS, wasn't capable of running it.

Things are different this time around. The 3DS already has two Monster Hunters. If the PSV ends up having a Monster Hunter, the same success isn't guaranteed because the 3DS already has 2 of that series. It's no longer as special.

It's also worth nothing that the DS ended up outselling the PSP in Japan - even without MH.

It won't have the same success in terms of raw sales figures, but the point of MH is to get the public to use their Vita outside with others. That sparks interest in the device. PSP blew up in Japan because of this.

So right now, there is nothing better than MH as a system seller. It's not even debatable and I'm sure Sony knows that. Of course, it's all down to Capcpom.
 

Tookay

Member
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

Or maybe, just maybe, it has no software that interests me. The Vita hardware itself is impressive, but I don't pick up consoles just on the basis of technological affirmative action.

This thread feels like memento, everything has to reboot every 50 posts and people repost the same thing again.

Been noticing that a lot on GAF recently. It's like some people literally drop in on the last page of a thread, think that nobody could have possibly said the same thing they said, drop their two cents, and then leave.
 
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.
:lol, good god

Broader library? Too rich for my blood? whaaaattttt
 

Diablos54

Member
Sony need to be in panic mode in Japan at least, and put all their A-teams on Vita games. 3rd parties aren't saving them this time so they've got to rely on themselves if they want to compete with the 3DS. Sadly I don't see this happening, but I'll give them to E3/TGS before I start saying it's anywhere near dead.
 

yurinka

Member
Regarding the it haz no gamez, this device had maybe the best launch line up ever seen in a game device. There are a lot of great announced games from a lot of popular IPs, and even major developers like Rockstar who didn't announced anything said they are working on Vita games. Obviously we'll see announcements in TGS, E3, etc.

1 unique title every other month > 2 ports every month

I'm however very disappointed they didn't partner with Google / Android. That PlayStation Suite stuff is crap and is taking ages, why not simply allow Android apps ?

PS Suite are basically Android apps optimized for PS Certified devices. These apps are approved and certified by Sony, but other than that, they are/will be just Android games (in addition to the PSOne emulator). All major mobile phone publishers support it.
 
A memory card needs to be packed in as well since it is required to boot games or use internal features of the machine.

Even if that would be great, I don't think that the sales of Vita are bad because of the lack of memory card pack, or that bundle a memory card will enhance their sales.
 

DCharlie

Banned
It's a favorite because it's in line with what we've seen in the past, which is the ONLY indicator we have for what'll come out in the future! We've already seen a B-team Uncharted, and we've had a heartless Gran Turismo. A LBP port that didn't really make a blip in the radar. Third parties carried the PSP through its times (and even there, we mostly got ports especially early on), and that's the only indication we have of its future until Sony decides to show us the goods, both in numbers and in quality. Gravity Daze might be a good start, but what next from there? Can you really provide solid proof, aside from empty reassurances, that any more effort is being put in to keep the Vita alive?

Right - just to add - Mario Land 3DS is "technically" b-team and Monster Hunter 3G is outsourced, so ... C team? (i know this is a huge discredit, but i'm just playing the "knobber" game).

Can i give solid proof ? of course i can't. But the alternative is that Sony literally have nothing, the third parties literally have nothing, and that everyone has decided that the platform is dead and we'll have a Nuon/sidetalking level failure of a major *SONY* platform. In the realms of probabiliy it's unlikely - it may struggle for sure, the PSP wasn't exactly a garden of win, but this whole notion that we have to *prove* that the Vita isn't a barren wasteland from now until it gets canned next month ? I dunno , seems unrealistic.


I guess it comes down to this : do even the biggest Vita/Sony haters think that Sony will continue to let the Vita wallow and do you think there's literally nothing of interest ever coming to the Vita.

IF you do - you're a fucking idiot. Simple as that.
Fuck all this "you are attacking other peoples thought out opinions!"

NO - if you think there's literally NOTHING coming to the Vita, nothing that would be of ANY interest. You ARE a fucking idiot. Take up knitting or something, because you've no fucking clue what you are talking about.
 

Agent X

Gold Member
Of course the 3DS' situation was dismal pre-price drop. Nobody disputes that. What's disingenuous is to say "well, Vita can recover the same way 3DS did," while apparently ignoring how 3DS recovered (and ignoring Vita's much worse performance at the same price point, in spite of a better software lineup).

I don't think people are expecting an identical path to recovery. People brought up the slow start of the 3DS to illustrate how a system can overcome the obstacles and pitfalls that occur during the launch period. Regardless of how much better the 3DS sales were than the Vita, there was still some genuine concern about it.

The Vita may have a steeper hill to climb, and might never reach the heights of previous systems like the DS or even the PSP, but I certainly don't think it's "unsalvageable" like some of the drive-by trolls want to portray it.

I wasn't saying that Vita can recover in the SAME way, just that it's not 100% fair to count it out just yet. Sony has a good track record with supporting their hardware. I don't expect that it would recover in the same way as the 3DS, of course, but it could still improve.

Yes, that's what I think.

I'm just surprised at the number of people that seem to WANT it to tank. I just can't imagine why.

Yeah, I've noticed that too. There are a few drive-by trolls that allegedly hate Sony and their systems with every fiber of their being...yet at the same time have enough of an obsession with them that they feel the urge to barge into Sony-focused threads and trot out their little sales charts.

It continues to be repeated because people continue to try to equate the Vita's abysmal sales with the 3DS's abysmal sales, ignoring the same crucial differences and variables every single time. Not to mention there's not much to say against it, other than a vague "there's more stuff somewhere at some time." Oh really?

There's no doubt that there are differences (both in favor of and against Sony), and the Vita has challenges ahead, but they're not insurmountable. If people are truly interested in constructive conversation, then it would be great for them to acknowledge these differences, and suggest what path(s) of action Sony could take to steer the ship on what they believe would be the right course. We've seen some people do that, but the other "drive-bys" are just interested in posting graphs and charts and ducking out of the thread again.
 

FoneBone

Member
Yeah, I've noticed that too. There are a few drive-by trolls that allegedly hate Sony and their systems with every fiber of their being...yet at the same time have enough of an obsession with them that they feel the urge to barge into Sony-focused threads and trot out their little sales charts.



There's no doubt that there are differences (both in favor of and against Sony), and the Vita has challenges ahead, but they're not insurmountable. If people are truly interested in constructive conversation, then it would be great for them to acknowledge these differences, and suggest what path(s) of action Sony could take to steer the ship on what they believe would be the right course. We've seen some people do that, but the other "drive-bys" are just interested in posting graphs and charts and ducking out of the thread again.

Here's the thing, as much as you don't like it: "graphs and charts" are more substantive than the aforementioned "there's more stuff somewhere at some time" - which really does seem to be the gist of the argument for Vita optimism.
 
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

I can afford a Vita.

I have no interest in buying a Vita because the line-up really isn't robust.

Different opinions, how do those work.
 

Data West

coaches in the WNBA
So I've been thinking about this stuff. Let's say we live in a magical world where the Vita and 3DS don't exist anymore. That people are only willing to play phones/pc/consoles/tablets, whatever.

What happens to the kind of games you get on these things? Do they just stop making them? I could see something like Sound Shapes or Rhythm Thief end up on phones/tablets, but does something like Bravery Default or Kid Icarus just stop existing? Maybe it leads to Japan embracing more of the PSN/XBLA/NintendoWare route?(Which would be amazing but doesn't seem to be the case)
 

jrDev

Member
I'd say the actual equivalent titles are already out (Sony blew their load early). Sony came right out of the gate with some of their big franchises while Nintendo spread them out over the course of a year.

We don't really know what's on the horizon, to be honest, but do you truly expect Sony to completely just drop the system that quickly? Unlike Nintendo, it's not always known which properties you'll be getting from first party SCE studios.

The situation is definitely different but there's simply no answer yet. We just don't know what the system has in store.

Funny thing you say that they blew their load with all their big franchises. The lineup is "amazing" but why are hardware and software sales so abysmal??? If those games released were that big, they would be selling Vitas like crazy...what I am getting at is you seem to overestimate Sony's franchises, which obviously the public thinks otherwise.

Sony has absolutely nothing released or known to release that will sell this system on the levels the 3DS is doing now. All I know is the price has to come down too before I ever set eyes on a Vita.
 

Metallix87

Member
Funny thing you say that they blew their load with all their big franchises. The lineup is "amazing" but why are hardware and software sales so abysmal??? If those games released were that big, they would be selling Vitas like crazy...what I am getting at is you seem to overestimate Sony's franchises, which obviously the public thinks otherwise.

I think even Sony overestimates their own franchises.
 

Agent X

Gold Member
Funny thing you say that they blew their load with all their big franchises.

Those are some of their big franchises. There are still many others like Gran Turismo, God of War, and LittleBigPlanet that haven't made an appearance on Vita yet. We know LBP and Resistance are coming, but don't know what other surprises are in the pipeline. E3 isn't too far off, and I'm sure that their plans for the second half of the year will be revealed there.
 
Those are some of their big franchises. There are still many others like Gran Turismo, God of War, and LittleBigPlanet that haven't made an appearance on Vita yet. We know LBP and Resistance are coming, but don't know what other surprises are in the pipeline. E3 isn't too far off, and I'm sure that their plans for the second half of the year will be revealed there.

It will be totally dependent on what first party teams Sony puts on these franchises. If they farm them out or get their top teams on them. So far, none of Sony's top tier dev teams have committed to working on the Vita.
 

patsu

Member
Yeah, exactly - Sony at one time did have a reputation for very high quality products. But they've lost it to other companies

Their h/w are still great, but price is not so competitive. Software used to be terrible but they have improved these days. Still some ways to go in usability though.

Their marketing is not doing a great job positioning and pitching Sony's brands.

EDIT: If you look at Vita, some of the things actually surprised me in a pleasant way. Some more polish and the thing will shine.
 

Agent X

Gold Member
Their marketing is not doing a great job positioning and pitching Sony's brands.

With regard to the Vita, I'm starting to get sick of seeing the same few commercials over and over again.

I was watching WWE Raw the other day, and the Vita was advertised at almost every commercial break. That's definitely a good thing. The problem is that they literally showed the same commercial repeatedly every time! They have three ads right now (none of which are spectacular to begin with), and they just repeated one of them all throughout the show. Who approves of this?

At this point, it's time for some fresh new ads. I'd love if they had at least one or two game-centric ads. For example, an ad dedicated solely to Uncharted: Golden Abyss would make it seem like a real "event" (on the level of other Uncharted games), and legitimize the game in people's eyes. For a 30 second commercial, I'd focus on the game footage itself for the first 20-25 seconds, with no mention of the system at all...then in the last few seconds pull the camera back, show the game running on the portable device, and then flash "PS Vita" and the tagline. That's how I'd do it.
 
With regard to the Vita, I'm starting to get sick of seeing the same few commercials over and over again.

I was watching WWE Raw the other day, and the Vita was advertised at almost every commercial break. That's definitely a good thing. The problem is that they literally showed the same commercial repeatedly every time! They have three ads right now (none of which are spectacular to begin with), and they just repeated one of them all throughout the show. Who approves of this?

At this point, it's time for some fresh new ads. I'd love if they had at least one or two game-centric ads. For example, an ad dedicated solely to Uncharted: Golden Abyss would make it seem like a real "event" (on the level of other Uncharted games), and legitimize the game in people's eyes. For a 30 second commercial, I'd focus on the game footage itself for the first 20-25 seconds, with no mention of the system at all...then in the last few seconds pull the camera back, show the game running on the portable device, and then flash "PS Vita" and the tagline. That's how I'd do it.

It also doesn't help that Vita looks a hell lot like psp (same problem with 3ds I bet), and it's hard to show off the smexy screen on tv.
 

patsu

Member
I just don't think Sony should keep relying on PD and ND on everything. They are great at home consoles, but I prefer Sony to cultivate new teams for Vita.

The Gravity Rush dude seems great. If so, surround him with good people. In fact, I think Jenova Chen, the Rayman Origins people, Mutant Blobs put up an admirable effort too. It may take some time, but the new teams will be better for us in the long run.
 
Eh? As a hardcore gamer I've played more Vita then I have 3DS. If anything the Vita is a more hardcore machine because of its online features and broader library. Any hardcore gamer not interested in the Vita is a fool or forcing a negative opinion on a device because they can't afford it.

I could walk into the store and buy a Vita right now but I'll pass because I don't think the Vita has very compelling software. Almost all of Sony's first party efforts are outsourced. And the two titles that I am looking forward to the most on Vita, Bioshock and the new Cave shmup, are at best in pre-production and are a year or two off at the earliest.

It's not an issue of being "hardcore" (whatever that means), its an issue of actually being worth the money.
 

patsu

Member
Gah, I actually have more fun on Vita than PS3 since I bought the little unit.

I *thought* it's just like a better PSP, but in practice, it's one of the most satisfying machine I have ever bought.
 

Agent X

Gold Member
Yeah, but repetition is part of the trick. ^_^

But they should not overdo it too often.

Believe me, they overdid it. I'm not really a fan of the current crop of Vita commercials, but after the fourth or fifth time I was wishing they would at least alternate one of the other commercials just to liven things up.

It also doesn't help that Vita looks a hell lot like psp (same problem with 3ds I bet), and it's hard to show off the smexy screen on tv.

It's true. That's why they may want to start going with game-centric ads. Put the game out there front and center, get people salivating over the game, then at the end of the ad flash "PS Vita" on the screen and have a voiceover saying "Only on PlayStation Vita". That'll almost assuredly get the point across.

If someone sees the ad and still thinks after that, "Oh, this game is for my PSP!", then when he gets to the store he'll see "PS Vita" on the package, and perhaps inquire about it then.
 
Right - just to add - Mario Land 3DS is "technically" b-team and Monster Hunter 3G is outsourced, so ... C team? (i know this is a huge discredit, but i'm just playing the "knobber" game).
3D Land was developed by the same team as Galaxy 2 (EAD Tokyo Group 2). If that's B team, then everyone at SCEWWS are Z team.

Tri G was in fact outsourced to Eighting (who also did G Wii btw), but I maintain that the initial plans for it were probably quite a bit less than what it's turned into. Really, it's just a warm up for MH4, the fact it's solidified as an evergreen and (likely) multimillion seller in itself is a little beside the point.
 
Also when Vita architecture was reveled to be like smartphones i was hopeful that many ios and android ports will be coming to vita like gameloft ,rivio etc but we are seeing that ios is getting mass effect game not even a vita port! Angry birds space is released for every platform including microwaves and fridges but no vita Port is seen? I was also expecting a lots of apps but its another story!
So will Sony be the only company making games for Vita in the future?

Oh my god no. The last thing I want is for my dedicated handheld gaming device to get an influx of throw-away cell-phone games. I'm sure just like the DS/3DS, Vita will get its fair share of shovelware as it is.
 
Oh my god no. The last thing I want is for my dedicated handheld gaming device to get an influx of throw-away cell-phone games. I'm sure just like the DS/3DS, Vita will get its fair share of shovelware as it is.

idk. There are a ton of really good platformers for ios that are limited due to virtual controls.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom