Like what happened last time right?
Wow, I didn't know Wii was an HD console that was closer in power to its competition! THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING.
Not the same situation, not the same result, dude. Nice try though.
Work fine for them last time. With the $500+ ipad....$600 doesnt seem that much.
I will happy to paid $600 for each to have a super powerful console that will last 7-8 years. Rather then pay $400 for a simple upgrade.
I think $500 for one version and $600 for another would sell fine.
This would give the wiiu some room at $300-$400.
The problem here is that game consoles are in your hands and used for far less than a $500 iPad. Value is often determined by legit use. To a major enthusiast gamer, they know they'll play it incessantly, so $500-600 for a console isn't that expensive, especially based on what it offers.
However, the problem lies that that level of enthusiasm for gaming doesn't exist for the vast majority of console purchasers. We can look at PS3 sales in the first 2-3 years to pretty well confirm this. Microsoft inherited a lot of sales from Sony by virtue of being the ONLY HD game console that wasn't priced out of reach, and the way the generation played out pretty much confirms this to be the case.
This time, Nintendo is coming in with an HD console that can go all the way to 1080p, putting it in the same league as their competitors (albeit on the bottom rung of the ladder power-wise), and no matter how much extra whizz-bang the newer consoles from MS and Sony pack in, it's going to be a matter of Nintendo offering JUST enough to be valued appropriately for the vast amount of consumers, which MS and Sony simply can't offer by comparison.
Price isn't really what is a big factor, it's valuation. And while they seem like similar topics, they have major distinctions that are rarely discussed here.