lol, no.
He is right though. There were two terrible Crash movies
He didn't really get into the debate about what art is.He comes off as a pretentious twat. Who gives a shit what people consider to be "art"? I honestly hate that entire debate.
You don't need to run for liking that Crash.This man directed Crash.
I liked Crash. *runs*
No, he is not right.
And duh.
I don't think he's slamming the movie at all, just those who call it high-budget art house - like Mark Kermode did in his review.
He has a point. It's like when people say a video game has a great story. Yeah it does have a great story - for a game. The Dark Knight Rises is a great comic book movie.
(
How is his statement that Paul Haggis directed Crash wrong. The context is wrong in this thread.
and duh what
He's not wrong.
Cronenberg is topic. Thus CRASH, itt, is not a Haggis loaf.
"Duh" is in response to there being two movies with that title.
He didn't really get into the debate about what art is.
so you could have simply said he had his movies mixed up, instead of laughing at him.
lol, no.
For his part, Cronenberg did acknowledge that he respected Nolan's mastery of IMAX technology, calling it "really tricky and difficult to do." But he added that the movie was "boring." "A superhero movie, by definition, you know, it's comic book. It's for kids. It's adolescent in its core."
Oh he can fuck right the hell off with shit like this. This completely negates his entire opinion on TDKR. Comics are for kids? Is he stuck in 1950?
Christopher Nolan's best movie is 'Memento,' and that is an interesting movie.
One of of his best films is adapted from a comic book, a bit hypocritical really.
A game designer on the run from assassins must play her latest virtual reality creation with a marketing trainee to determine if the game has been damaged.
This man directed Crash.
I liked Crash. *runs*
Pretty sure he's talking about superhero comics. 'He's calling immature oh no fuck him'
So can I say that his new movie is for tween girls due to Robert Pattinson being the star?
For kids might be a bit strong but it is adolescent. Nothing wrong with enjoying that as an adult though.
The anti-hero in AHOV didn't have a cape, therefore it was adult lol.
How is that any better? I guarantee that at one point all of the things he said about superhero comic books were said about his films. "Oh, horror? That's adolescent, for kids."
Dismissing an entire medium is laughably closed-minded and I really hope that his comments were taken out of context in this interview, because it doesn't sound like him.
The poster even says that the Matrix is child's play! Adolescent at its core.
I love that goddamn movie.
I just don't think it's elevated. (Director) Christopher Nolan's best movie is 'Memento,' and that is an interesting movie. I don't think his Batman movies are half as interesting though they're 20 million times the expense."
Graphic novel is just a pretentious way of saying comic book.Isn't that a graphic novel?
Just wanted to bring this out because fuck this termIsn't that a graphic novel?
Writer Neil Gaiman, responding to a claim that he does not write comic books but graphic novels, said the commenter "meant it as a compliment, I suppose. But all of a sudden I felt like someone who'd been informed that she wasn't actually a hooker; that in fact she was a lady of the evening."
The pull-quote is correct.
Graphic novel is just a pretentious way of saying comic book.
What lies. the man speaks the truth. Some people prefer to have a thoughtful script that makes you think, than 250 mill thrown at the screen.
Well . . . . Cronenberg makes some good movies . . . but he also makes a lot of shit.Or maybe an active imagination. His movies have dudes growing cancer guns, typewriters that grow boners and Jeff Goldblum turning into a giant fly.