Tears For Fears
Banned
Needs a price drop, should of launched at $150 like I said.
Lol, I imagine you continuing to go back and edit this post over and over until it becomes ridiculous and eventually nonsensical.
I hope all of your GIFs from now until the end of time are NBA JAM related.
Moving goalposts is a popular argument tactic on GAF.
Needs a price drop, should have launched at $150 like I said.
What do they mean by stay straight deviljho?
Needs a price drop, should of launched at $150 like I said.
Is that even possible? The GamePad itself is already expensive to make.
Why are you in this thread, then?
lol.Iwata testified to that extent at an investors meeting during E3.
You can apparently get a 7" Android tablet for £50; so I really can't see this.The gamepad, duh. That thing is half the cost of the system.
Expecting the same degree of learning curve from the Wii U as from the transition from PS2-XBOX to PS360 is setting oneself up for disappointment..Very pleasant. All we have to go on as of now are launch ports. Did anything of the caliber of Uncharted 2 or 3, Killzone 2 or 3, Gears, or Halo 4 show up on the platforms this early?
So PS360 level visuals by year two.I dunno, it remains to be seen. I remain hopeful and actually expect to see visuals on par with the Bird and Zelda tech demos by year two of the console's lifespan.
Have you played it?!? It's brilliant. I took back Mario and found ZombiU pretty boring, But Nitnendoland? Awesome.
Pretty sure you haven't played it.
Nintendo Land should be $20 max
That doesn't matter. No minigame collection with mii graphics can justify a $60 price tag. That's just nickel and diming the customer.
80 dollars is still expensive for a system that "should" sell for $150. I mean I doubt the Wii U's system itself cost 70 dollars.I refuse to believe the controllers are that expensive to make. Companies seem to be able to sell 7" capacitive touch screen tablets with wifi radio for $80 retail.
How much would you price it?
HI I'M MONITA AND YOU CAN'T SKIP ALL THIS DIALOGUE.Nintendo Land is fun as hell.
How much would you price it?
That doesn't matter.
Back on topic of marketing; I think NOA's TV advertising has been atrocious and a pretty much invisible product launch campaign. Even the original DS launch was better and more "buzz-worthy" than the Wii U efforts. Nintendo should beg Leo Burnett to take them back on as a client.
How much would you price it?
hahaha
Nintendo Land should be $20 max
$30 at most. Not everything can or should be full price, that's something we've all been complaining about this generation with games that have more content and higher budgets than a minigame collection. I'll say the same thing about Sly 4 coming out soon, it should be $40 on PS3.
80 dollars is still expensive for a system that "should" sell for $150. I mean I doubt the Wii U's system itself cost 70 dollars.
Or am I not understanding where you're getting
another quality wario thread, eh
have you played it? it's actually really fun
I have gotten more fun and content out of Nintendoland than what you think is worth $60. And I bought the basic bundle so I had to pay full price for it.
You dismiss them as minigames, but theyre really not. Balloon Trip could be released standalone no problem, and as far as budget concerns, this game has been in the works for like 2 years, it does not have a small budget. Its gorgeous, it has great music, its really deep and has a lot of brilliant game design ... what about it isnt worth $60?
$80 retail means it probably costs less than half that to make. At $150 Nintendo would likely break even in at worst.
Should be free.
Nintendo seperated the two SKU's too much. Storage differences or bundles are ok, but color being tied to it and all those other extras. Not surprising that the standard isn't selling too well.
Yep. The Basic being white is the biggest knock against it for me. White electronics are ugly.
There goes another Wii U thread in flames.
People just hate bargains.
I dunno, I really doubt the system is really that cheap to build. Didn't Nintendo say they're selling at a loss here?
So are glossy fingerprint magnets, at least to me.
But didn't Nintendo actually say they're selling at a loss here though?
Companies ALWAYS say that to make you think you're getting a deal. No one wants to admit they sell something at a profit.
Quality has nothing to do with what a game should be priced at.
Hasn't Nintendo claimed they made profits off of their systems up until that 3DS price cut though?Companies ALWAYS say that to make you think you're getting a deal. No one wants to admit they sell something at a profit.
AND those costs don't just include manufacturing, but also long-term R&D to invent it.
The numbers are always cooked.
I think Reggie said that and he says a lot of bullshit.
I can't say much about this but I suppose that's a possibility.Nintendo didn't base retail pricing off how much the units cost to make, they claim its a secret. Instead they said price is base off what consumers would find as a deal. The same bullshit they pulled with 3DS.
They most likely overpriced it hoping to milk consumers based off the wii name. It would also give them room for a larger price drop if need be when the next gen consoles arrive.
Their marketing in the west has been so abysmal lately.Too bad for them their strategy backfired.
Mega threads are banned.Is there no Wii U OT? Since the launch thread got locked.
Back on topic of marketing; I think NOA's TV advertising has been atrocious and a pretty much invisible product launch campaign. Even the original DS launch was better and more "buzz-worthy" than the Wii U efforts. Nintendo should beg Leo Burnett to take them back on as a client.
I'm shocked at the lack of advertising for the WiiU. I've watched a fat chunk of tv during the last week (tons of xmas, family stuff) and never saw a commercial for it. Maybe they think word of mouth and internet buzz will do the job.
Well, if the nextgen brings Planetside 2 type persistent multiplayer gaming and world maps, then I'll eat my hat...
I'm not against an increase in graphical fidelity or better specs. I just don't want publishers to continue to consolidate products and release the same old games over and over. Which I think is a plausible reality, at least for some pubs/franchises.
I'm shocked at the lack of advertising for the WiiU. I've watched a fat chunk of tv during the last week (tons of xmas, family stuff) and never saw a commercial for it. Maybe they think word of mouth and internet buzz will do the job.
Companies ALWAYS say that to make you think you're getting a deal. No one wants to admit they sell something at a profit.
AND those costs don't just include manufacturing, but also long-term R&D to invent it.
The numbers are always cooked.
While two ads aren't shoved down your throat every commercial break like apple products you are bound to see a wiiu ad every 30 minutes. Sure the ads are terrible(wub, wub, wub) and they should be slightly more clear that its a new system but i think the main problem is no one wants one. There's nothing there to interest casual consumers and the hardcore know better. That's why wiiu made pretty much no holiday lists, it's not appealing to anyone at the moment.
I honestly can't tell if you are serious.
So is this still a good deal with it being 8gb? Will I be wishing I got the 32gb anyway? Can you upgrade the memory?
Google seems to tell me any will work as long as it's under 2TB. Is that accurate?You can use External Hard drives for more space
Google seems to tell me any will work as long as it's under 2TB. Is that accurate?