Gamasutra had a pretty good article coming out against this the other day, basically arguing that by taking part in this talk people would be admitting that the games industry was part of the problem, therefore making them a de facto part of the problem. Can't say I disagree. Talking with Biden about this just gives the uninformed the impression that the video game industry is admitting culpability when it's been proven time and time again that there's no concrete link between violent games and actual violence. I understand that 'industry leaders' want to put the industry in a positive light and appear as wanting to solve the problem, but it's all just set up to backfire. The people that blame video games are never going to have their mind changed, especially by the people that make video games.
"Video Game representatives"
?
Lol. What? Who?
It is a shame that they are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else.
Read the OP.The vice president, who is leading a task force that will present recommendations to President Barack Obama on Tuesday, met with other representatives from the entertainment industry, including Comcast Corp. and the Motion Picture Association of America, on Thursday.
It is a shame that they are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else. The media are as usual have been glorifying these last few shootings more than ever to almost disgusting levels (Interviewing children in their house the day they are heading back to school in that Newtown). I guess if it has to happen though at least Biden is going to sit down and listen hopefully not just some smear campaign like usual.
Because video games is a medium?
Read the OP.
From the OP:
The White House isn't singling out anyone.
Edit: Beaten.
It is a shame that they are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else. The media are as usual have been glorifying these last few shootings more than ever to almost disgusting levels (Interviewing children in their house the day they are heading back to school in that Newtown). I guess if it has to happen though at least Biden is going to sit down and listen hopefully not just some smear campaign like usual.
The vice president, who is leading a task force that will present recommendations to President Barack Obama on Tuesday, met with other representatives from the entertainment industry, including Comcast Corp. and the Motion Picture Association of America, on Thursday.
Lets talk with Hot Wheels about car safety.
Hell, if Biden can convince developers to stop pumping out a plethora of violent FPS's then I see that as a win for everybody regardless if it has an impact on real-world violence.
On the other hand how would it look when you have comcast and mpaa accepting the invitation while having representatives of the video game industry turn it down?
While I don't think there is any convincing evidence right now that consumption of violent media causes or triggers violent behaviour, I do think that gaming has a real problem with violence nonetheless. One that starts with the fact that most gamers and people in the industry seem completely unwilling to even discuss the level of violence present in video gaming, and how dominant violent games are both commercially and critically. Yes, there are of course major exceptions, and film share the problem to a degree, but it's certainly worth having the discussion rather than making dismissive remarks and ignoring it yet again.
Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?
Yeah.People thinking that the hot wheels analogy is clever is a more pressing matter than gun control right now.
Discussing the matter is an admission of guilt. It's like the trick question "Do you still beat your wife?". To answer it at all is a problem. This is a situation where "we don't comment on specualtion" is the best answer.
Of course, when the White House comes calling....
Discussing the matter is an admission of guilt.
The only way this could turn into a positive is if the industry walks into the meeting and immediately says fuck you to everyone. .
Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?
Discussing the matter is an admission of guilt. It's like the trick question "Do you still beat your wife?". To answer it at all is a problem. This is a situation where "we don't comment on specualtion" is the best answer.
Of course, when the White House comes calling....
The only way this could turn into a positive is if the industry walks into the meeting and immediately says fuck you to everyone. If they're not going to do that, then they shouldn't be there. The first amendment is infinitely more important to this country than the archaic second.
Fix the gun laws and then maybe the gaming industry can look at stricter restrictions, labels or other attempts to limit access of M rated games to minors.
Just as Ms. Lanza put a gun in her child's hands, you can't stop shitty parent from buying M rated games for their kids. But to compare the two as equals is about the most asinine thing I've ever heard.
No it isn't.
Thank god you people don't in any way represent the video game industry.
And here I am expecting him to talk to the gun industry about guns. Silly me.
There's a quite obvious link, no matter how big or small it may be, in regards to video games and violence.
That's a brilliant argument. How much time did you spend on it?
No it isn't.
Lets talk with Hot Wheels about car safety.
People thinking that the hot wheels analogy is clever is a more pressing matter than gun control right now.
Thats pretty much all the argument that subject needs.
Thats pretty much all the argument that subject needs.
Yes it is. It implies that games are just as responsible for gun violence as those who sell guns.
The only way this could turn into a positive is if the industry walks into the meeting and immediately says fuck you to everyone. If they're not going to do that, then they shouldn't be there. The first amendment is infinitely more important to this country than the archaic second.
Fix the gun laws and then maybe the gaming industry can look at stricter restrictions, labels or other attempts to limit access of M rated games to minors.
Just as Ms. Lanza put a gun in her child's hands, you can't stop shitty parent from buying M rated games for their kids. But to compare the two as equals is about the most asinine thing I've ever heard.
I grew up playing violent games, and I have never really seen the issue with them until recently during E3 2012 when I felt utterly disgusted by the amount of people cheering at the extremely graphic shotgun blast to the face in the gameplay demo of The Last of Us. However, I believe violent games are merely a symptom of an already violent society, not the other way around. Restricting the consumption of violent games is not going to help alleviate the underlying problem. Conversely, that can not be the full explanation either given the general popularity of violent games around the world, yet the varying degree of actual violence by region.
And here I am expecting him to talk to the gun industry about guns. Silly me.
It seems to be largely driven by emotion rather than scientific research. I'd hope that the subject needs a better argument than that.
Do you in fact have a side-business manufacturing and selling flaming torches and pitchforks, or something?
While I don't think there is any convincing evidence right now that consumption of violent media causes or triggers violent behaviour, I do think that gaming has a real problem with violence nonetheless. One that starts with the fact that most gamers and people in the industry seem completely unwilling to even discuss the level of violence present in video gaming, and how dominant violent games are both commercially and critically. Yes, there are of course major exceptions, and film share the problem to a degree, but it's certainly worth having the discussion rather than making dismissive remarks and ignoring it yet again.
Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?
Wow good job IGN. That piece was really good, I'm impressed. I agree with Casey 100%.And a contrasting view from IGN's Casey Lynch: http://www.ign.com/blogs/kamicasey/...er-to-gamasturas-kris-graft-youre-dead-wrong/
They're not going to take away your precious video games.
Jesus. It's like we've turned into NeoGUN going crazy over the imaginary taking away of our rights. Togunsvideogames.
So did I. Same with the God of War presentation. Those two instances definitely opened my mind to the possibility that there may a cultural issue within gaming itself. That in itself may not even suggest any kind of links between gun violence and on-screen violence, but it did perhaps suggest that maybe as gamers we have been getting a little too comfortable with the idea of seeking pleasure out of disturbing imagery.
The whole Comics Code Authority thing... happened. I think it's reasonable to at least be wary if you're interested in a newish medium that many people still view with distrust.
The whole Comics Code Authority thing... happened. I think it's reasonable to at least be wary if you're interested in a newish medium that many people still view with distrust.
I think the problem with what Joe Biden is doing is it leads to misplace blame and creates a very easy target. Having a 'discussion' on violent video games after a school shooting is like putting a bandaid on a gaping head wound.
I mean what are they going to discuss? Biden: "Hey guys why so many guns?"
Why not discuss how people with mental health issues can get guns so easily or why is it that guns are tied to patriotism in America? Why is it the rest of the world can enjoy violent content and not shoot each other up? What is different about them vs. America?
I think the problem with what Joe Biden is doing is it leads to misplace blame and creates a very easy target. Having a 'discussion' on violent video games after a school shooting is like putting a bandaid on a gaping head wound.
I mean what are they going to discuss? Biden: "Hey guys why so many guns?"
Why not discuss how people with mental health issues can get guns so easily or why is it that guns are tied to patriotism in America? Why is it the rest of the world can enjoy violent content and not shoot each other up? What is different about them vs. America?