• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Joe Biden Seeking Video Game Industry Input on Gun Violence

Kabouter

Member
While I don't think there is any convincing evidence right now that consumption of violent media causes or triggers violent behaviour, I do think that gaming has a real problem with violence nonetheless. One that starts with the fact that most gamers and people in the industry seem completely unwilling to even discuss the level of violence present in video gaming, and how dominant violent games are both commercially and critically. Yes, there are of course major exceptions, and film share the problem to a degree, but it's certainly worth having the discussion rather than making dismissive remarks and ignoring it yet again.

Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?
 

Alucrid

Banned
Gamasutra had a pretty good article coming out against this the other day, basically arguing that by taking part in this talk people would be admitting that the games industry was part of the problem, therefore making them a de facto part of the problem. Can't say I disagree. Talking with Biden about this just gives the uninformed the impression that the video game industry is admitting culpability when it's been proven time and time again that there's no concrete link between violent games and actual violence. I understand that 'industry leaders' want to put the industry in a positive light and appear as wanting to solve the problem, but it's all just set up to backfire. The people that blame video games are never going to have their mind changed, especially by the people that make video games.

On the other hand how would it look when you have comcast and mpaa accepting the invitation while having representatives of the video game industry turn it down?
 

Cmagus

Member
It is a shame that the news media are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else. The media are as usual have been glorifying these last few shootings more than ever to almost disgusting levels (Interviewing children in their house the day they are heading back to school in that Newtown). I guess if it has to happen though at least Biden is going to sit down and listen hopefully not just some smear campaign like usual.
 

Kabouter

Member
It is a shame that they are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else.

The vice president, who is leading a task force that will present recommendations to President Barack Obama on Tuesday, met with other representatives from the entertainment industry, including Comcast Corp. and the Motion Picture Association of America, on Thursday.
Read the OP.
 

Alucrid

Banned
It is a shame that they are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else. The media are as usual have been glorifying these last few shootings more than ever to almost disgusting levels (Interviewing children in their house the day they are heading back to school in that Newtown). I guess if it has to happen though at least Biden is going to sit down and listen hopefully not just some smear campaign like usual.

movies were blamed, music was blamed, it's just that video games are what's popular, which is why most media is giving it the most attention. it doesn't help when the most popular title is call of duty either. anyways i don't see why ya'll are up in arms about this, i mean it's not like talking to biden can do any harm.
 
It is a shame that they are singling out video games though. I mean all week the news has had all these experts talking about this subject and it has been mental illness and video games, video games and more video games and next to no mention of movies, music or anything else. The media are as usual have been glorifying these last few shootings more than ever to almost disgusting levels (Interviewing children in their house the day they are heading back to school in that Newtown). I guess if it has to happen though at least Biden is going to sit down and listen hopefully not just some smear campaign like usual.

From the OP:

The vice president, who is leading a task force that will present recommendations to President Barack Obama on Tuesday, met with other representatives from the entertainment industry, including Comcast Corp. and the Motion Picture Association of America, on Thursday.

The White House isn't singling out anyone.

Edit: Beaten.
 
I swear some of the people on the internet(including here) have such a ridiculous persecution complex in regards to this whole ordeal. Nobody is going to take your precious video games. The Hot Wheels thing is fucking disengenious.

Anyways, I think this is a great idea. Would love to hear more details. There's a quite obvious link, no matter how big or small it may be, in regards to video games and violence.
 
While I don't think there is any convincing evidence right now that consumption of violent media causes or triggers violent behaviour, I do think that gaming has a real problem with violence nonetheless. One that starts with the fact that most gamers and people in the industry seem completely unwilling to even discuss the level of violence present in video gaming, and how dominant violent games are both commercially and critically. Yes, there are of course major exceptions, and film share the problem to a degree, but it's certainly worth having the discussion rather than making dismissive remarks and ignoring it yet again.

Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?

Discussing the matter is an admission of guilt. It's like the trick question "Do you still beat your wife?". To answer it at all is a problem. This is a situation where "we don't comment on specualtion" is the best answer.

Of course, when the White House comes calling....
 
People thinking that the hot wheels analogy is clever is a more pressing matter than gun control right now.
Yeah.
Discussing the matter is an admission of guilt. It's like the trick question "Do you still beat your wife?". To answer it at all is a problem. This is a situation where "we don't comment on specualtion" is the best answer.

Of course, when the White House comes calling....

Yeah, no.
 

GQman2121

Banned
The only way this could turn into a positive is if the industry walks into the meeting and immediately says fuck you to everyone. If they're not going to do that, then they shouldn't be there. The first amendment is infinitely more important to this country than the archaic second.

Fix the gun laws and then maybe the gaming industry can look at stricter restrictions, labels or other attempts to limit access of M rated games to minors.

Just as Ms. Lanza put a gun in her child's hands, you can't stop shitty parent from buying M rated games for their kids. But to compare the two as equals is about the most asinine thing I've ever heard.
 
Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?

There have been some that expressed concerns over the level of violence that more recent games have shown. This especially started becoming a talking point after E3. I know that Warren Spector has said that "ultraviolence has to stop".

But Europe does largely play the same games as the US, and the amount of violence there (gun violence in particular) is tiny compared to the US. After the Sandy Hook shooting there was a report that said that 15 of the 25 worst mass shootings over the past 50 years have taken place in the US. Finland with 2 was the only other country that had more than one. So, I think reports like that make it hard to point the finger at entertainment.
 
Discussing the matter is an admission of guilt. It's like the trick question "Do you still beat your wife?". To answer it at all is a problem. This is a situation where "we don't comment on specualtion" is the best answer.

Of course, when the White House comes calling....

The only way this could turn into a positive is if the industry walks into the meeting and immediately says fuck you to everyone. If they're not going to do that, then they shouldn't be there. The first amendment is infinitely more important to this country than the archaic second.

Fix the gun laws and then maybe the gaming industry can look at stricter restrictions, labels or other attempts to limit access of M rated games to minors.

Just as Ms. Lanza put a gun in her child's hands, you can't stop shitty parent from buying M rated games for their kids. But to compare the two as equals is about the most asinine thing I've ever heard.

Wow. No.

It's best to go in and have a meaningful discussion about the issue. That doesn't mean these "representatives" can't stand firm about the major points regarding gaming's impacts on the mentally ill, shootings, etc.
 

JNT

Member
I grew up playing violent games, and I have never really seen the issue with them until recently during E3 2012 when I felt utterly disgusted by the amount of people cheering at the extremely graphic shotgun blast to the face in the gameplay demo of The Last of Us. However, I believe violent games are merely a symptom of an already violent society, not the other way around. Restricting the consumption of violent games is not going to help alleviate the underlying problem. Conversely, that can not be the full explanation either given the general popularity of violent games around the world, yet the varying degree of actual violence by region.
 

SteveWD40

Member
There's a quite obvious link, no matter how big or small it may be, in regards to video games and violence.


oxtWI.gif
 
Thread title should read "gun violence" instead of just "guns." It really does make a difference. The majority of popular video games depict gun violence in some form so the industry should definitely have a seat at the table when it comes to this discussion.

I'm shocked at people who would rather just have the industry sit on their hands instead of going to the White House and engaging in meaningful discussion on the issue. That isn't an admission of guilty. It's telling the WH, President and Vice President that they are willing to be actively involved in discussing the issue. That's always a positive.
 

mclem

Member
Thats pretty much all the argument that subject needs.

It seems to be largely driven by emotion rather than scientific research. I'd hope that the subject needs a better argument than that.

Do you in fact have a side-business manufacturing and selling flaming torches and pitchforks, or something?
 
Yes it is. It implies that games are just as responsible for gun violence as those who sell guns.

The world is not that binary. In politics you bring together stakeholders. Seeing as though the NRA has already attempted to demonize videogames, I think it is incredibly important that the ESA be at the table during the discussions. This allows them to present evidence to refute the claims of the NRA and other extremists.

The ESA thinks it is important enough to send the CEO as opposed to a low level policy analyst.
 

Alucrid

Banned
The only way this could turn into a positive is if the industry walks into the meeting and immediately says fuck you to everyone. If they're not going to do that, then they shouldn't be there. The first amendment is infinitely more important to this country than the archaic second.

Fix the gun laws and then maybe the gaming industry can look at stricter restrictions, labels or other attempts to limit access of M rated games to minors.

Just as Ms. Lanza put a gun in her child's hands, you can't stop shitty parent from buying M rated games for their kids. But to compare the two as equals is about the most asinine thing I've ever heard.

They're not going to take away your precious video games.

Jesus. It's like we've turned into NeoGUN going crazy over the imaginary taking away of our rights. To guns videogames.
 

FGMPR

Banned
I grew up playing violent games, and I have never really seen the issue with them until recently during E3 2012 when I felt utterly disgusted by the amount of people cheering at the extremely graphic shotgun blast to the face in the gameplay demo of The Last of Us. However, I believe violent games are merely a symptom of an already violent society, not the other way around. Restricting the consumption of violent games is not going to help alleviate the underlying problem. Conversely, that can not be the full explanation either given the general popularity of violent games around the world, yet the varying degree of actual violence by region.

So did I. Same with the God of War presentation. Those two instances definitely opened my mind to the possibility that there may a cultural issue within gaming itself. That in itself may not even suggest any kind of links between gun violence and on-screen violence, but it did perhaps suggest that maybe as gamers we have been getting a little too comfortable with the idea of seeking pleasure out of disturbing imagery.
 
It seems to be largely driven by emotion rather than scientific research. I'd hope that the subject needs a better argument than that.

Do you in fact have a side-business manufacturing and selling flaming torches and pitchforks, or something?

No, the concept that simply discussing something is by any shape or form "an admission of guilt" is obsessively juvenile.
 

Ranger X

Member
Less guns and more videogames = less shooting.

Otherwise I don't see why the industry should talk about guns with the vice president.
 

Lime

Member
While I don't think there is any convincing evidence right now that consumption of violent media causes or triggers violent behaviour, I do think that gaming has a real problem with violence nonetheless. One that starts with the fact that most gamers and people in the industry seem completely unwilling to even discuss the level of violence present in video gaming, and how dominant violent games are both commercially and critically. Yes, there are of course major exceptions, and film share the problem to a degree, but it's certainly worth having the discussion rather than making dismissive remarks and ignoring it yet again.

Why is it we so readily accept that a huge portion of the best selling and highest budgeted video games are incredibly violent, or that escalating the level and detail of violence ever further is a major selling point?

Good post.
 

mclem

Member
They're not going to take away your precious video games.

Jesus. It's like we've turned into NeoGUN going crazy over the imaginary taking away of our rights. To guns videogames.

The whole Comics Code Authority thing... happened. I think it's reasonable to at least be wary if you're interested in a newish medium that many people still view with distrust.

Of course, it's no longer the 50's.
 
So did I. Same with the God of War presentation. Those two instances definitely opened my mind to the possibility that there may a cultural issue within gaming itself. That in itself may not even suggest any kind of links between gun violence and on-screen violence, but it did perhaps suggest that maybe as gamers we have been getting a little too comfortable with the idea of seeking pleasure out of disturbing imagery.

It's not a gamer thing. It's an entertainment thing. Just look at horror movies. I'm not even talking about torture porn, i'm just talking about traditional slashers. A big part of that genre is in how people will be killed. Or look at action movies. How many times have you seen people lose their shit because a sequel for a movie was announced to be PG-13 when the previous movie was R? The main reason for that is because the violence would have to be toned down.
 
The whole Comics Code Authority thing... happened. I think it's reasonable to at least be wary if you're interested in a newish medium that many people still view with distrust.

Wasn't the CCA a self regulating entity that was borne out of hearings in Washington? There was some pretty bad shit being depicted in comics prior to that (baseball with human organs on the cover of a horror mag comes to mind). That was a self regulating authority because the comics industry wanted to be actively involved in what they were distributing. There is nothing wrong with that.

The ESA already has its self regulating system with the ESRB. So I don't see the comparison.
 

Interfectum

Member
I think the problem with what Joe Biden is doing is it leads to misplace blame and creates a very easy target. Having a 'discussion' on violent video games after a school shooting is like putting a bandaid on a gaping head wound.

I mean what are they going to discuss? Biden: "Hey guys why so many guns?"

Why not discuss how people with mental health issues can get guns so easily or why is it that guns are tied to patriotism in America? Why is it the rest of the world can enjoy violent content and not shoot each other up? What is different about them vs. America?
 

FGMPR

Banned
The whole Comics Code Authority thing... happened. I think it's reasonable to at least be wary if you're interested in a newish medium that many people still view with distrust.

Circling the wagons is not an appropriate response. Open discussion and the opportunity to state your case are infinitely more valuable in the fight against ignorance.
 

Alucrid

Banned
I think the problem with what Joe Biden is doing is it leads to misplace blame and creates a very easy target. Having a 'discussion' on violent video games after a school shooting is like putting a bandaid on a gaping head wound.

I mean what are they going to discuss? Biden: "Hey guys why so many guns?"

Why not discuss how people with mental health issues can get guns so easily or why is it that guns are tied to patriotism in America? Why is it the rest of the world can enjoy violent content and not shoot each other up? What is different about them vs. America?

Once again you failed to read the article. Biden is speaking with a lot of people and a lot of groups of which the video games industry is one.
 
I think the problem with what Joe Biden is doing is it leads to misplace blame and creates a very easy target. Having a 'discussion' on violent video games after a school shooting is like putting a bandaid on a gaping head wound.

I mean what are they going to discuss? Biden: "Hey guys why so many guns?"

Why not discuss how people with mental health issues can get guns so easily or why is it that guns are tied to patriotism in America? Why is it the rest of the world can enjoy violent content and not shoot each other up? What is different about them vs. America?

The rest of the civilized world has universal health care which to me = better access for mental patients. That's just my opinion though.
 
Top Bottom