Who are these people and why do we care what they think? At this point the only people who know much are MS or Sony insiders (i.e. 1st party) and no one is an insider to both. 3rd party devs are still in the dark on final specs.
Crytek knows.
Who are these people and why do we care what they think? At this point the only people who know much are MS or Sony insiders (i.e. 1st party) and no one is an insider to both. 3rd party devs are still in the dark on final specs.
SuperDAE on Twitter
That would mean both know about both consoles and their final specs, "secret" DSPs, etc. and I personally think that at least one of them knows absolutely nothing
Who are these people and why do we care what they think? At this point the only people who know much are MS or Sony insiders (i.e. 1st party) and no one is an insider to both. 3rd party devs are still in the dark on final specs.
It's too early to claim either is more powerful. There have been enough conflicting reports that it may just suggest both are about the same and have different strengths.
Or they can dynamically scale their OS (which they are doing with Vita) so when running during the game decrease OS overload to minimum just for message stuff and then come back full scale when you press PS button.
That's totally feasible, too.
ProElite agreed.
Who are these people and why do we care what they think? At this point the only people who know much are MS or Sony insiders (i.e. 1st party) and no one is an insider to both. 3rd party devs are still in the dark on final specs.
I don't remember that slide, but it sounds interesting. Everything else I've seen seems to be pretty heavy on 'scalability.'Rösti;46471175 said:Could it be that the "3TF" part accounts for the cloud computing plans of the "92821757-XBox-720-9-24-Checkpoint-Draft-1" leaked document from 2010? That proposition regards 2015, a 3TF machine (if that's even viable as a measure in a cloud context) could be a reasonable jump if Microsoft needs for some reason revitalize the format. It could perhaps be what Xbox LIVE was, when it launched, to the original Xbox.
Of course, it could all be bullshit. But when enough "sources" start pointing to a similar message...well it becomes hard to not start taking the message a bit more seriously.
Sony filed a patent for a chip with dual GPUs just a month ago. Not a single one of these latest rumors addresses this patent. Skeptics can argue that the chip can be for any of Sony's product lines (laptops, TVs) but I have a hunch Sony has released misinformation to gloss over this patent. Sony's new 4K TV is the only other plausible product for use of this patent, but I believe its for PS4.
IIRC that's no different than what Sony and MS do with their current OS. While in the dash, all the memory and processing is used, but while running a game, the cost goes down to their current cost.
I mean no offense to anyone but saying which system is more powerfully base on few posters seem to be crazy .
Aegies already said he hardly Knows anything about PS4 same for Karak .
Then there Proelite who say not judge stuff but all of sudden he is ?
What if these "sources" are using info from a faulty source? And then other sources get info from those sources and so on?Of course, it could all be bullshit. But when enough "sources" start pointing to a similar message...well it becomes hard to not start taking the message a bit more seriously.
The problem is what starts as a suggestion, idea, rumour on another forum becomes a "fact" here and the more users contributing to that - the more real this becomes.
As an example the secret DSP rumour, it seems some users now know for a fact that there will be a blitter in the 720 - originally an idea at the B3D forums. Where is the real confirmation not just a user post saying "hey a blitter might be a good idea".
What if these "sources" are using info from a faulty source? And then other sources get info from those sources and so on?
Also do people really think that only MS going to customize there GPU and not Sony .
I expect both of them to add stuff to it , Sony even customize Vita GPU .
Proelite has been throwing information and disinformation to avoid leaks going back to the "blah blah" source. It's all in fun for the discussion.
But the new proposal is that even the in game dash uses 1gb of memory, because as soon as its pulled up 1gb of ram is transferred from the game's use to the in game dash. This has got to be done super fast, and I don't know how the heck one would do it.
And who are these people?
Sweetvar why you troll so much.Here is a post from another forum.
lol 3rd party devs know what is expected in both systems. They know the targetted performance and designs, they have to know.
They know rough targets. Early dev kits are not the final hardware, unless you think the G5 PCs with ATI X800 fully represented the Xbox 360 and it custom eDRAM GPU? 1st party gets the latest dev kits first, followed by 3rd party. I don't know what is in the wild now, but I suspect 3rd do not have final dev kits.
And who are these people?
From a layperson's voew, this definitely looks like a reverse of the 360/PS3 power dynamic. Looks like Durango is the one that is more powerful but in order to exploit that increased power it will take a lot of work akin to Naughty Dog's work on the Uncharted games. So basically MS's first party exclusives will look better than anything Sony has to offer, but most multiplatform games will be roughly the same in terms of performance.
Glad to see MS step up is spec at least. I am pretty sure sony would be fine. There 1st party wont let them make a dud of a system.
Sweetvar why you troll so much.
Mistercteam is complete bullocks.
People with knowledge.
Just like this gen, it will come down to the design of the game and the art that carry the majority of the look. There really is no power dynamic this gen, just different strengths and weaknesses. May be the same next gen as well, just to a smaller degree.
There was a large gap in power between the PS2 and xbox but GT4 still looked better than Forza, showing how much great art and experience can pay off.
From a layperson's view, this definitely looks like a reverse of the 360/PS3 power dynamic. Looks like Durango is the one that is more powerful but in order to exploit that increased power it will take a lot of work akin to Naughty Dog's work on the Uncharted games. So basically MS's first party exclusives will look better than anything Sony has to offer, but most multiplatform games will be roughly the same in terms of performance.
I don't expect the disparity between Orbis and Durango to be as pronounced, Reiko...
Exclusives will look roughly the same even if the PS4 is weaker because Sony's studios are notorious tech wizards. GG, Polyphony, Santa Monica, and Naughty Dog are all incredibly talented at getting the most out of hardware.
They know rough targets. Early dev kits are not the final hardware, unless you think the G5 PCs with ATI X800 fully represented the Xbox 360 and it custom eDRAM GPU? 1st party gets the latest dev kits first, followed by 3rd party. I don't know what is in the wild now, but I suspect 3rd do not have final dev kits.
I agree that we honestly have nothing to worry about. Both systems will deliver.
I don't know why some gaffers can't comprehend the impossibilty of Sony to compete on a hardware leve. Not only is the state of their finances a hindrance, especially compared to the much richer adversary, but the latter has proven its ability to design more balanced and effective architectures. I would be shocked if Sony could come up with something as edgy as the expeted Durango, honestly. But the reality of it is that they do not need to; just make sure the difference is minimal and concentrate on improving OS, libraries and tools. The great first party team will take care of the rest!
According to Proelite - they will be a quantum leap better and both use 8xxx GPus ;-)
That's more like it.Sweetvar why you troll so much.
Mistercteam is complete bullocks.
I don't know why some gaffers can't comprehend the impossibilty of Sony to compete on a hardware leve. Not only is the state of their finances a hindrance, especially compared to the much richer adversary, but the latter has proven its ability to design more balanced and effective architectures. I would be shocked if Sony could come up with something as edgy as the expeted Durango, honestly. But the reality of it is that they do not need to; just make sure the difference is minimal and concentrate on improving OS, libraries and tools. The great first party team will take care of the rest!
Not only is the state of their finances a hindrance, especially compared to the much richer adversary,
interesting. i dont see vgleaks PS4 road map article on their page anymore
interesting. i dont see vgleaks PS4 road map article on their page anymore
interesting. i dont see vgleaks PS4 road map article on their page anymore
Developer skill and power still plays a role though. Rallisport Challenge 2 was made by DICE and looked better (And a bit more advanced) than both Forza 1 and GT4 while running in 60fps at the time.
Sony finances don't mean they can't make a system as edgy as Durango but as you said it will be if they want to .
The enemy of these system is Size and TDP more than money to tell the truth .
I expect if one system more powerfully it will be small compare to each other .
So what was that post that sweetvar quoted saying? I tried to makes heads or tails of it and all I got out of it was PS4>Durango unless I'm looking at it wrong.
I got something like "PS4 > Durango is true if Durango = this, but it also has this too"... or something.
We're confusing Durango specs. The current Durango specs being quoted are a jumbled conglomeration of different sub-systems. In 'layman speak' the 'Full Durango™' is something closer to 3TF.
Which sounds like lunacy. I'm just wondering why sweetvar quoted it -_-
Taking a very simplistic approach:
Well, essentially it's saying that Durango, as in the final console that we consider to be the Next gen Xbox is made of 2 Blocks. There will be 2 versions of Xbox, like it has been rumored before, and the one that is meant to be used as a set up box for cable companies will be packing just 1 block. The Xbox that will be sold for core gaming, will pack the 2 blocks combined.
And apparently, the numbers we have from the rumors that are out there, are mixing parts of Block 1 with Block 2 instead of the whole picture.
Sweetvar why you troll so much.
Mistercteam is complete bullocks.
Someone just PM me the info already so I can rest in peace!!
*dies slowly inside*
Karak stated Durango>Orbis>Wii
I just like discussions. I shared in the past threads what I have, now I'm sharing stuff what others did. Anything technical so we can have a discussion. :LOL
New console launch is always exciting. However, I wasn't excited for Wii U as I normally would for a launch.
On another note, didn't I give some information in the past saying how there could be two GPU's, one like a dedicated card and one as in APU solution? Now it looks like we have one big APU? I'm as confused as you guys are...
Those documents of the specifications that I had hold on in the past are as confusing as they can ever be. Then again, I'm not technical, so that explains.
If only it is that simple brother.
On B3D, there is talk that SuperDAE, the guy allegedely in possession of a newer version of the Durango dev kits, will be detailing the specs pretty soon. Also, he suggested VGleaks will be revealing some info on orbis as well...
Not sure if reliable, but could be fun!
If only it is that simple brother.