Anyone got any insight into how deeply involved the ICE team are in the design of Omni?
if thats the real name than I am calling Om Nom Ni as a nickname right now.
they have to be pretty deeply involved. they provide support to all first party partners. im sure kojima even learned from the ICE team during his visit to naughty dog.
Proelite said:People have been expecting 8850 / 8870 equivalent cards to be in Durango. I think 8750/8770 is more likely the case for Durango, and 8830/8850 for Orbis. Orbis gpu has 50% more compute units.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1694092&postcount=18491People have been expecting 8850 / 8870 equivalent cards to be in Durango. I think 8750/8770 is more likely the case for Durango, and 8830/8850 for Orbis. Orbis gpu has 50% more compute units.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1694092&postcount=18491
few hours ago he said Durango>Orbis>WiiU and now he says this.
he also said prepare for a meltdown.
I still stand by Durango > Orbis, only by the slimmest of margins.
0.00001% ?
How is that even possible if (according to you) Orbis gpu has 50% more compute units?I still stand by Durango > Orbis, only by the slimmest of margins.
Memory related?5-10%.
5-10%.
The GPU difference? Or something else? I'm losing track the speed all these rumours are appearing at. Not that that's a bad thing...Is Proelite playing us all?
SuperDaE seems legit. He called this one.
The GPU difference? Or something else? I'm losing track the speed all these rumours are appearing at. Not that that's a bad thing...
5-10%.
It seem Orbis will have higher GPU, and Durango will have 2 systems in one.
I still stand by Durango > Orbis, only by the slimmest of margins.
Why ??
Because of ram set up ?
More customize parts (GPU , CPU ) from MS .
Wondering what Sony did for there GPU still 5-10 % is really small and won't matter much in the long run .
What's an Omni?
Will be slightly disappointed if Durango is more powerful than Orbis, only because I want Sony's first party to have the absolute best they can to show of that tech, that and I generally prefer buying multi platform titles on PS3 due to free online. Be annoying if Microsoft has the edge on multi titles again due to a slight performance edge.
Ram
Esram
More CPU power
More customization
GCN2
Ram
Esram
More CPU power
More customization
GCN2
Thought that wasn't true.
Ram
Esram
More CPU power
More customization
GCN2
Will be slightly disappointed if Durango is more powerful than Orbis, only because I want Sony's first party to have the absolute best they can to show of that tech, that and I generally prefer buying multi platform titles on PS3 due to free online. Be annoying if Microsoft has the edge on multi titles again due to a slight performance advantage.
SO I don't get it. Why would there be a melt down if it's 5-10 percent better then orbis?
Interesting seem MS went all out with customization while Sony did not .
SO I don't get it. Why would there be a melt down if it's 5-10 percent better then orbis?
Will be slightly disappointed if Durango is more powerful than Orbis, only because I want Sony's first party to have the absolute best they can to show of that tech, that and I generally prefer buying multi platform titles on PS3 due to free online. Be annoying if Microsoft has the edge on multi titles again due to a slight performance advantage.
Will be slightly disappointed if Durango is more powerful than Orbis, only because I want Sony's first party to have the absolute best they can to show of that tech, that and I generally prefer buying multi platform titles on PS3 due to free online. Be annoying if Microsoft has the edge on multi titles again due to a slight performance advantage.
Pretty much Sony is considered the Game company out of the 2. With their stable of devs people want their hardware to be the best to show the most.
Because there's this insane believe that some (SOME, not all, not even a majority) Sony fans believe that they are the company who cannot fail at providing bleeding edge tech and whatnot.
Pretty much Sony is considered the Game company out of the 2. With their stable of devs people want their hardware to be the best to show the most.
MS customized but its still not as broken up or customized as the PS3 and those customizations are, for the most part, easier to take advantage of than the stuff that was in the PS3 upon release.
Because there's this insane believe that some (SOME, not all, not even a majority) Sony fans believe that they are the company who cannot fail at providing bleeding edge tech and whatnot since they're the most "hardcore friendly" between MS and Sony.
That wouldn't make sense for people to go crazy over that then. Tho I could see it.
It would basically be ps2 vs xbox round 2 then in terms of power.
Will be slightly disappointed if Durango is more powerful than Orbis, only because I want Sony's first party to have the absolute best they can to show of that tech, that and I generally prefer buying multi platform titles on PS3 due to free online. Be annoying if Microsoft has the edge on multi titles again due to a slight performance advantage.
Interesting seem MS went all out with customization while Sony did not .
Because there's this insane believe that some (SOME, not all, not even a majority) Sony fans believe that they are the company who cannot fail at providing bleeding edge tech and whatnot since they're the most "hardcore friendly" between MS and Sony.
yields should be low if true.Ram
Esram
More CPU power
More customization
GCN2
They must not be Sony fans if they think Sony has to release these overly powerful machines. Look at the PS1 and PS2.
They must not be Sony fans if they think Sony has to release these overly powerful machines. Look at the PS1 and PS2.
Even PS3 as well.
Sorry I wasn't trying to make it make sense. Just explaining how it occurs.