On a consumer level, yeah, it is.This isn't even close to the best technology money can buy.
Not even close. And I mean that in a good way.
The PS4 is rumoured to have something similar to a 7970m. That is nowhere near this in terms of performance, probably twice as fast as the future PS4 at least.
This isn't even close to the best technology money can buy.
Not arguing that, I was just correcting this part; "performance far beyond a 690."Yep, but it's also a single GPU with far lower wattage.
As others said in this thread, if it's actually 85% of a GTX690 then this thing is a monster.
900 dollars of something that will never be used to it's full potential.
But hey you can get like 600FPS in HL2 right?
900 dollars of something that will never be used to it's full potential.
But hey you can get like 600FPS in HL2 right?
It is a limited run enthusiast card. So don't see what's bad timing about it. You have direct benefit as well. With some downsampeling or multi monitor setup.Bad timing, and not worth it thanks to Moore's law, unless you're an extreme enthusiast.
Similar performing GPUs will be available for 1/4th the price by the time you'd actually start seeing any benefit from this.
Then again, this beast will probably drop to about 1/2 to 1/3rd its price, too.
This isn't even close to the best technology money can buy.
Full potential? You don't use your PC a lot do you.
I can crush my 680s in no time with some downsampling, AA and cranking up the details in most games.
It is a limited run enthusiast card. So don't see what's bad timing about it.
Nothing wrong with it imo. If I where rich, I'd rather buy a Golf than a BMW 5 series and buy me some of them Titan cards.People who buy it also have too much money to throw at stuff anyways.
That's CPU limited, IIRC.Able to play Witcher 2 60fps 1080p with UberSampling?
Rough Comparison:But how does this compare to Orbis and Durango??
Amount of SMX are not fixed yet.Jump from 1536 Cuda Cores in gtx680 to 2688 in titan, lower clocks for core and memory, but higher bandwith [from 256bit to 384bit].
some idiots will buy this.
dont worry, that'll be the price of nvidia's mid-range gpu when the fanboys get their wish and amd is dead.
It is a limited run enthusiast card. So don't see what's bad timing about it. You have direct benefit as well. With some downsampeling or multi monitor setup.
I would hate to see your power bill with this monster.
I would hate to see your power bill with this monster.
I would hate to see your power bill with this monster.
Yeah. It looks sexy. :< It is to be admired from afar though. xDTrue. If my job paid 2x more than it does, I'd honestly be tempted to just get one or two. I'd be OK for gaming for years.
Isn't it less wattage than a 690?
Well that's not bad then as long as your not running SLI. Then again if you can run this SLI, your power bill means jack shit to you,If its the same card as the Tesla model it won't have a tdp higher than 250w
Edit: 235W http://www.anandtech.com/show/6446/nvidia-launches-tesla-k20-k20x-gk110-arrives-at-last
Timing is completely irrelevant in these cases.Bad timing, and not worth it thanks to Moore's law, unless you're an extreme enthusiast.
True. If my job paid 2x more than it does, I'd honestly be tempted to just get one or two. I'd be OK for gaming for years.
SO POWERFULLL, but, why you would need it ?
Sorry Nvidia, ill stick a little more with the 480 SLi
Just sayin...there are situations out there where a card like this is welcomed. Downsampling, 3D Surround, 1440p/1600p on 3 monitors etc. Benchmarking too.
You buy this, in 5 years it will be worthless.
If you buy 2 $200 gpu, you will be better performance by the end of the 5 years.
SO POWERFULLL, but, why you would need it ?
Sorry Nvidia, ill stick a little more with the 480 SLi