-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Okay, TeamCG. Come own up to your foolishness. #trolljima
- Thread starter MormaPope
- Start date
Relaxed Muscle
Member
It should be on the OP.
Emily looks as real as santa
Definitely. Emily looks great and that was in 2008.
toddhunter
Member
Going to be so funny when CG is confirmed.
She has exactly the same mouth. Teeth don't open to expose the tongue. Wrap her in bandages, improve the eyes. Boom, done.
Relaxed Muscle
Member
TeamReal eats crow.
Uiki
Member
.......wait a minute.
all your presents are CG
is any of this clip cg without the other overlays? the last bit it actual footage, right?
At the end of this gif he's saying "We don't have anything to show today unfortunately." At that same moment he looks directly at the camera/audience. That would be a coy and hilarious thing for him to say if he was CG and made with the Fox Engine.
Rewatched the interview to catch that.
Is that a stretch? Of course.
CorySchmitz
Junior Member
I Googled "emily cgi"
last bit is actual footage
actual footage of a model with a shit ton of make up so basically her face cant wrinkle at all
Uiki
Member
OPEN YOUR EYES ALREADY!
I lol'd.
Relaxed Muscle
Member
Uiki
Member
I was reading an article about some of the stuff Weta were coming up with a while back and the most staggering part is that yeah photorealisitc imagery is getting closer but the rendering times are astronomical. Here's an example, they have a render farm of around 4,000 HP Blades which pump out about 8-9 gigs worth of data a second! That's just processing still frames mind and not in real time. Some how I don't think a PS4 is quite that meaty.
Mystic_Wanderer
Member
I wanna believe. #TeamCG
right. what i'm asking is, is there any bit that is cg without all the obvious cg overlays (specular, wireframe, etc)? hard to say how nice it matches real life when they don't show a direct comparison.
Huh? Emily's mouth is very fake looking to me. Not even close to looking the same as Joakim. Also you can see Joakim's tongue in places.
You can barely see it throughout the interview, the inside of his mouth is like a black hole. When Geoff speaks you can see flesh and saliva and such, Mogren has an abyss.
They haven't?
The Emily demo is... flawed, yes, but the bandages on Joakim seem to cover up most of the problem areas on Emily pretty effectively.
yeah watch the full video, it's posted above
Rickenslacker
Banned
toddhunter
Member
Her teeth are exactly the same in that they remain closed. Her lips don't move the same as Joakim's whilst talking because that is actually physically impossible.
Hence she is actually a little more realistic albeit still talking clearly with clenched teeth.
You're TeamCG?
nero2082
Member
everything coming together now
suttonmitchell
Banned
you already walk the path of enlightenment.
toddhunter
Member
Yep as posted before you can see his tongue for a few frames...overlapping his teeth.
Rickenslacker
Banned
That's because Geoff's maw has been exercised by Doritos stuffage.
Oh and Joakim's jaw is wrapped.
not only does it look like CG but that video is basically a CG coat of paint above a girl's face
she's the one acting, they just throw a wireframe in there and render her face with computerz
what'd be the point of doing that here? the PS4 could not pull it off in real time, nor it would be indicative in any way of what a videogame engine could do
I dont even understand the principle
The great division.
toddhunter
Member
So the jaw wrapping stops his teeth moving, but still lets him move his lips? How does that work?