• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Fabricated Notch/Mojang party escort allegations; Twitter monsters spring into action

Kimawolf

Member
You think the people AGAINST this are the mob? I think you should read the thread...

oh i'm talking about the general feeling of all of this that has been happening And I read the first three pages, and I had to post after someone questioned if people are "fucking human".
 

BluWacky

Member
Since this thread is such a shitshow for a number of reasons, it's kind of ruined any chance to talk about the IGDA party, where their use of paid scantily-clad female dancers caused a number of members to resign from the organization. Instead, we're talking about a giant party where nobody even knows if anything remotely untoward occurred.

Twitter is the worst.

I have to admit to being a bit confused. That's what I thought this thread was about last night, when I posted in it. Now it's about some developer party that's completely different, and the thread title has changed to make people who were uncomfortable with the IGDA party look like idiots.

Oh well.
 

jaxpunk

Member
I think everyone with a problem with this should show their solidarity and boycott all E3 news this year. Because there will be both MALE and FEMALE PAID spokespeople there. Some may even feign interest in products to get paid.
 

Amneisac

Member
Stepping aside from this particular issue, I find it alarming how many people on GAF seem completely incapable of realizing what could be wrong with a situation like this.
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
I think everyone with a problem with this should show their solidarity and boycott all E3 news this year. Because there will be both MALE and FEMALE PAID spokespeople there. Some may even feign interest in products to get paid.

I'm looking forward to the Booth Babe thread this year, seeing how many views it gets and seeing how many sanctimonious posters in this thread end up participating in that one.

Have none of you been to any kind of corporate party? Especially at a freaking convention?
 

Averon

Member
I'm all for gender equality, but some of this hyper white knighting going on is more hurtful than helpful for the cause in the long term.
 

jaxpunk

Member
I'm looking forward to the Booth Babe thread this year, seeing how many views it gets and seeing how many sanctimonious posters in this thread end up participating in that one.

Have none of you been to any kind of corporate party? Especially at a freaking convention?

You'd need to step away from the keyboard to do that... Such a silly question.
 

patapuf

Member
It's not about offended. It's about safe, and it's about a professional environment.

Everybody needs to wake up to the fact this isn't some Twitter-led feminism flash-in-the-pan. Everywhere that matters in games, sexism is now stinking up the place. People aren't going to back down. It's only going to get more "sensitive", it's only going to be more "uptight", it's only going to be more "hysterical".

So everybody that thinks this sort of thing isn't a big deal - things are going to get really confusing for you from now on.

*throws laptop through the wall*

It was a private party, in a club. It was not a professional environment.

it looked like this:

Qxtpmr6.jpg


It sure looks like everyone is really uncomfortable.
 

Amneisac

Member
I'm looking forward to the Booth Babe thread this year, seeing how many views it gets and seeing how many sanctimonious posters in this thread end up participating in that one.

Have none of you been to any kind of corporate party? Especially at a freaking convention?

I would imagine that most people would say that 'booth babes' being a common practice doesn't make it a good idea, or something that is benefiting our society.
 

Amneisac

Member
I'm all for gender equality, but some of this hyper white knighting going on is more hurtful than helpful for the cause in the long term.

To me, it isn't about being a hyper white knight, it's about being considerate and inclusive. I'm not even referring to this Notch situation, which I think was different from the IGDA party.
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
I'm wondering what kind of a chilling effect that this recent blitz of "women in gaming" furor is having on the actual hiring of women in gaming. If these companies are as horrifically sexist as everyone claims, why would they hire somebody who they fear is going to start a Twitter feed of their grievances against the company? I'm not saying its right or anything, I'm just wondering what the result might be.
 

daycru

Member
I mean, this is what models do. Why isn't the game industry allowed to employ them in the way that tons others do?

Stop making video games your religion.
 

marrec

Banned
I feel like I'm missing part of this story.

I'm as ready to take up pitchforks and torches as anyone when it comes to setting back the forward progress of gender equality. But if this is just about Notch hiring some dancers for a VIP party... I don't see the issue.

Dancer's gonna dancer, Dudes and Ladies gonna watch em.

I bet these people didn't like Magic Mike either.
 
I don't really see a problem with all this if they were just dancing.

Does it amaze anyone else how many feminist gaming blogs there are out there? It's absolutely astounding. I didn't know there was such a huge market for that.
 

DarkKyo

Member
Don't quite understand the problem I guess. Women get paid to look hot all the damn time. This isn't something exclusive to notch, lol
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
I'm really looking for something to get outraged about but it's just not here.

Maybe cause I wasn't invited?

Yap.... there it is. The rage.

Some of the people in this thread should go picket strip clubs and night clubs with their local church groups.

And I pray that they never walk through a Vegas casino.
 

Amneisac

Member
He hired dancers... to a private party...

What's the big fucking deal?

Basically you have people who come in and say it's a bad idea to have female dancers at a party if you're trying to be inclusive of all your guests.

People see that and disagree and say that he should be able to hire whom he wants for a private party and it happens all the time if women don't like it they should leave, etc.

People see that and say that if you're being inclusive no gender should be put in a situation where if they 'don't like it they can leave' and other such things...

It keeps going back and forth with each side getting a little more away from center until eventually it's a complete fucking mess.
 

Trigger

Member
I'm wondering what kind of a chilling effect that this recent blitz of "women in gaming" furor is having on the actual hiring of women in gaming. If these companies are as horrifically sexist as everyone claims, why would they hire somebody who they fear is going to start a Twitter feed of their grievances against the company? I'm not saying its right or anything, I'm just wondering what the result might be.

I'd think it would be the opposite. If I was a corporate CEO or something, I'd hire more girls to improve our company's image.
 

Kimawolf

Member
I would imagine that most people would say that 'booth babes' being a common practice doesn't make it a good idea, or something that is benefiting our society.

I understand why people may be offended by "booth babes" but honestly since when does videogames ever benefit society? And again, go to any convention with people selling things and you'll have a pretty face pushing the product, rather it's perfume, or movies, videogames, it's the nature of selling, people like to look at attractive people. And this has NOTHING to do with a work environment being completely harassing, it's totally different.
 

kodt

Banned
They're probably not there against their will, they're being paid. But the bigger problem here is how the video games industry (some men in all industries) view women as objects to be bought and thrown around for men to oogle over. There is NO way a woman would feel safe here.

Fixed that for you
 

Sub_Level

wants to fuck an Asian grill.
I think it would probably make some other industry women at the party feel a bit uncomfortable, with the suggestion that women are there just to look pretty and make the men feel good.

This is where this whole debate stems from - there is a big debate going on at the moment about women in the industry and whether the industry is welcoming towards women or not, takes them seriously or not.

I would hope that most men are able to differentiate between a working girl and a "working girl". Theres tons of guy who watch porn or go to strip clubs but dont let that influence their perception towards the entirr female gender.
 
Everybody needs to wake up to the fact this isn't some Twitter-led feminism flash-in-the-pan. Everywhere that matters in games, sexism is now stinking up the place. People aren't going to back down. It's only going to get more "sensitive", it's only going to be more "uptight", it's only going to be more "hysterical".

I don't doubt it. But unfortunately, I think that's when it's going to lose mainstream support and thus run out of steam. This can't always be about raw, unbridled passion, focusing on smiting all the non-believers. At some point, we have to put the emotion to one side and look at this in a pragmatic way, and come up with real solutions and initiatives to fix things. Now is the time to do it: video game companies want to be seen to be inclusive to women, and I think they're more receptive now that they ever have been (or ever will be again). A set of sensible, non-draconian guidelines, that companies could voluntarily sign up to would go a long way.
 
Stepping aside from this particular issue, I find it alarming how many people on GAF seem completely incapable of realizing what could be wrong with a situation like this.

Good looking people being paid to be good looking. If you're really, really, really ridiculously good looking, use it.

Shit, I wish I was good looking enough to get paid $300/hr to walk around and talk with people.

It's an asset, use it.
 

marrec

Banned
Don't quite understand the problem I guess. Women get paid to look hot all the damn time. This isn't something exclusive to notch, lol

Both women and men get paid to look hot and dance. Is it degrading for them? Maybe about as degrading as any paper pushing job that crushes your soul in it's monotony. As I said in the IGDA thread, someone dancing with their naughty bits hanging about in repose is not an inherently backwards idea. That's a puritanical view.

The CONTEXT of the dancing is what's important. In the other thread, it was obviously a mistake and possibly even sexist, in this situation it's perfectly fine.
 
That's okay, come to me anytime and I'll piss in your porridge and charge you for the privilege.

I'll pay you double your rates to stop posting like an overworked teacher who's dealing with a remedial class.

You've touched upon the fact that the majority of the users on this board (and by extension, the internet) have a dire lack of empathy for their fellow human beings, and almost no ability or interest in interpreting criticism for it or recognizing that it's a small facet of how society marginalizes women - and that's great!

So what the fuck do the theatrics in that post accomplish, aside from framing yourself as some enlightened human being - exhausted from explaining the obvious to the ignorant and resistive masses - who looks forward to watching a wave of confusion and terror wash over their faces as more and more people start to do the right thing?

You pull this shit in almost every thread about sexism in the gaming industry - you show up, squeeze out a pithy post, and go back to lurking. This is arguably the first thread on Gaming side you've popped into in a long time where you do anything but go after easy targets. Granted, it's not the responsibility of every poster with a grounded perspective on an issue to show up in a thread and post, but you - and other posters like you, of which there are many - have a way of posting that irks me from the first sentence I scan.

It's usually one post - one marker that [poster] was in the thread.
Well reasoned, but overwhelmingly righteous.
Illustrative and constructive, but with a sense of conviction that's borderline toxic, and almost always coupled with an undercurrent of contempt.

It's like some sort of half measure between being too tired of seeing this shit repeat itself in thread after thread to have any desire to set the record straight, and wanting to make a piercing witticism in order to summarize the tone of the thread. Shit's tiresome.
 

Amneisac

Member
I understand why people may be offended by "booth babes" but honestly since when does videogames ever benefit society? And again, go to any convention with people selling things and you'll have a pretty face pushing the product, rather it's perfume, or movies, videogames, it's the nature of selling, people like to look at attractive people. And this has NOTHING to do with a work environment being completely harassing, it's totally different.

Well, there is a difference in the "product" of video games benefiting our society and the actions of the professional organizations that create the product and hire employees to manage the services and products associated with video games.

I didn't mean to say that making a Tomb Raider game with a less sexualized protagonist would change the world, I'm just saying that the company that makes the game would want to make sure they're being inclusive of both genders when they host events / hire employees / give raises / etc.

Again, this isn't directly related to the Notch situation either, this was all in response to someone's sarcastic comment about booth babes.
 

ultron87

Member
Good looking people being paid to be good looking. If you're really, really, really ridiculously good looking, use it.

Shit, I wish I was good looking enough to get paid $300/hr to walk around and talk with people.

It's an asset, use it.

The people being paid aren't the ones it is potentially offensive to.
 

Relix

he's Virgin Tight™
Basically you have people who come in and say it's a bad idea to have female dancers at a party if you're trying to be inclusive of all your guests.

People see that and disagree and say that he should be able to hire whom he wants for a private party and it happens all the time if women don't like it they should leave, etc.

People see that and say that if you're being inclusive no gender should be put in a situation where if they 'don't like it they can leave' and other such things...

It keeps going back and forth with each side getting a little more away from center until eventually it's a complete fucking mess.

So if I understand right the whole deal is that.....

Mojang fucked up and should have invited guy dancers too to even it out? Equality?
 

Amneisac

Member
Good looking people being paid to be good looking. If you're really, really, really ridiculously good looking, use it.

Shit, I wish I was good looking enough to get paid $300/hr to walk around and talk with people.

It's an asset, use it.

How does that make hiring attractive people to dance at a hosted event a good idea? I'm not begrudging anyone a paycheck, but that doesn't mean we need to hire them to dance at the half-time show for a Jr. High basketball game or at the after party for the Girl Scout merit badge celebration.

(obvious exaggeration for clarity)
 
The people being paid aren't the ones it is potentially offensive to.

It's none of their business. It's a private party and the guy can do whatever he wants.

How does that make hiring attractive people to dance at a hosted event a good idea? I'm not begrudging anyone a paycheck, but that doesn't mean we need to hire them to dance at the half-time show for a Jr. High basketball game or at the after party for the Girl Scout merit badge celebration.

(obvious exaggeration for clarity)

Are they private events? Then they can do what they want as long as it isn't breaking any law. I have no say with what people do. If this was in the middle of a park with strippers dancing around throwing candy at 7 year olds then yeah, we have a problem.

It's a private event. I don't see why it's ANYBODY's business what goes on as long as it's not breaking any laws.

Also, you need to realize that most of the discussion in this thread has very little to do with this specific situation and a lot more to do with the IGDA party or just how women are excluded in work functions in general.

Ah, so this is more of an overflow from another heated thread? I'm not speaking of 'using women' or glass ceilings, I'm talking about the right for a person to do what they want (within the law) with a private function.
 

Amneisac

Member
So if I understand right the whole deal is that.....

Mojang fucked up and should have invited guy dancers too to even it out? Equality?

No, and I'm glad you brought that up because lots of people have a fundamentally flawed concept of equality. You don't balance out equality by doing things that might alienate the other gender, you just try to make smarter decision in the first place.

Also, you need to realize that most of the discussion in this thread has very little to do with this specific situation and a lot more to do with the IGDA party or just how women are excluded in work functions in general.
 
Were these people who were paid to dance/party "escorts" or hookers or anything untoward like that?

Were they scantily clad, or paid specifically to be scantily clad?

I get that the "real solution" would be to not hire any dancers/partiers of any gender at all, but I just want to know.
 

Calamari41

41 > 38
Well, there is a difference in the "product" of video games benefiting our society and the actions of the professional organizations that create the product and hire employees to manage the services and products associated with video games.

I didn't mean to say that making a Tomb Raider game with a less sexualized protagonist would change the world, I'm just saying that the company that makes the game would want to make sure they're being inclusive of both genders when they host events / hire employees / give raises / etc.

Again, this isn't directly related to the Notch situation either, this was all in response to someone's sarcastic comment about booth babes.

As somebody who works a lot in HR, I can assure you that the labor laws with regards to gender equality are incredibly robust. Every time we let an employee go, we have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt to a government panel that it had nothing to do with gender or race or what have you. We have a government audit every year where they go over the race and gender ratios of our workforce, as well as the salary distribution. If there is sexism going on in hiring, firing, and raises, then somebody needs to sue. It will work. How much more powerful would it be to see "Anderson v Electronic Arts" on CNN versus an enraged twitter feed on NeoGAF?
 

marrec

Banned
How does that make hiring attractive people to dance at a hosted event a good idea? I'm not begrudging anyone a paycheck, but that doesn't mean we need to hire them to dance at the half-time show for a Jr. High basketball game or at the after party for the Girl Scout merit badge celebration.

(obvious exaggeration for clarity)

Right absolutely.

But I don't think that hiring female dancers should be reserved exclusively for male only events. If someone is uncomfortable with the idea of women prancing about nude, they should make sure to let someone know who can potentially help alleviate their concerns. Communication at that juncture is the most important thing, posting about it on Twitter afterwards (or even during) is a juvenile way to handle the situation.

No, and I'm glad you brought that up because lots of people have a fundamentally flawed concept of equality. You don't balance out equality by doing things that might alienate the other gender, you just try to make smarter decision in the first place.

Also, you need to realize that most of the discussion in this thread has very little to do with this specific situation and a lot more to do with the IGDA party or just how women are excluded in work functions in general.

These two events couldn't be better for future examples of what NOT to do. IGDA and the context surrounding it made it stupidly obvious that they shouldn't hire go-go dancers. Notch taking some pictures with hot ladies who were dancing is completely innocuous comparatively.
 
The people being paid aren't the ones it is potentially offensive to.

Considering it didn't happen, it does strike me as people stirring shit up. Hell, even if it did happen, that's pretty much par for the course for an event with Skrillex on the posters.
 

Amneisac

Member
As somebody who works a lot in HR, I can assure you that the labor laws with regards to gender equality are incredibly robust. Every time we let an employee go, we have to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt to a government panel that it had nothing to do with gender or race or what have you. We have a government audit every year where they go over the race and gender ratios of our workforce, as well as the salary distribution. If there is sexism going on in hiring, firing, and raises, then somebody needs to sue. It will work.

Thanks for this, and I appreciate that! I didn't mean to insinuate that these companies are treating women unfairly in their hiring/firing practices, I was just listing that as a part of the 'spectrum of consideration' - if that makes sense. Companies need to always be mindful of how they treat their employees and clients/customers.
 

kswiston

Member
Sort of confused as to whether these were strippers, or just attractive women paid to be at the party and act like they are having fun.

If it is the latter, I don't know how this differs any to hiring celebrities to be at your social event. Something that happens quite often.
 
People see that and say that if you're being inclusive no gender should be put in a situation where if they 'don't like it they can leave' and other such things...

Since we are speaking about escorts and not strippers here how is hiring some girls which you wouldn't know are hired offensive ?
 
Top Bottom