VibratingDonkey
Member
It sucks if DICE drags Metro along because people play that thing a lot to boost their score to unlock stuff faster in BF3's agonizingly tedious treadmill. While in actuality that map may be the worst Battlefield map ever. Or maybe on consoles with less players it's less intolerably static and dull? In any case, sucks. The general idea of remaking BF3 maps in BF4 is a very uninteresting one regardless. Back to Karkand was alright because we hadn't seen those maps since 2005. Remaking BF3 maps is just lazy and naff and boring. I don't want to keep playing the same maps I've been playing and gotten kind of tired of. That's just...bleh. Give me new stuff.
Second DLC idea has more potential. Granted it'll have actual ships and (drivable) carriers and stuffs.
Third sounds somewhat loopy. Most interesting indeed, if you care more for co-op horde mode things. DICE's previous attempts at a co-op mode haven't been great. But caveman combat vs dinosaurs will at the very least change things up. If this ends up actually being a thing this'll be the first BF co-op mode I bother trying out.
Second DLC idea has more potential. Granted it'll have actual ships and (drivable) carriers and stuffs.
Third sounds somewhat loopy. Most interesting indeed, if you care more for co-op horde mode things. DICE's previous attempts at a co-op mode haven't been great. But caveman combat vs dinosaurs will at the very least change things up. If this ends up actually being a thing this'll be the first BF co-op mode I bother trying out.