• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FRIDAYTON MK II: 5.5 million bears and salmon create unholy allliance to sack SONY HQ

Lord Error

Insane For Sony
PS4 OS entirely written in HTML/JavaScript, made by the same team that created the new PSN store.
Jeff Rigby redeemed yet again.
 

Drek

Member
This doesn't make any sense to me.

Originally the PS4 was destined to have 4GB GDDR5 RAM.

On the last minute, Cerny surprises everyone and we're blessed with 8GB. And now news has come to surface that 3.5GB is reserved for the OS.

How does something like this happen so quickly?

It quite literally doesn't.

Now, is it possible that the current PS4 development suite isn't designed to handle this much memory and Sony is effectively playing "catch up" trying to upgrade the suite but knows they won't be ready for launch? Sure, that'd make some sense. But that isn't 3.5GB reserved strictly for the OS, that's X for the OS, X for the development suite readily available, and another pool of completely untapped memory you can only get to likely via assembly to directly manage it yourself. That would almost make sense with Eurogamer's nonsense about a "non-trivial" extra 1GB, but it still doesn't explain how The Witness is using 5GB already since I really doubt Jon Blow and company are writing assembly code while talking about ease of use here.
 

quest

Not Banned from OT
Is GAF overreacting again?

Not at all if this is true I would say this is an under reaction. The PS4 would have less usable memory for games for fuck sakes than the Xbone. All for crappy OS features non of us give a fuck about. That is as much as god damn windows 7 32 bit can handle. I hope this is false because if true is a major fuck up by Sony.
 
Disappointing if true to say the least

Would much prefer higher RAM allotment for games in both systems as I don't value a lot of the OS features of either systems

Still not the end of the world though but definitely detracts from my original (incorrect) assessment of the PS4

Would love to see Sony's response if it ever comes out
 

davepoobond

you can't put a price on sparks
This doesn't make any sense to me.

Originally the PS4 was destined to have 4GB GDDR5 RAM.

On the last minute, Cerny surprises everyone and we're blessed with 8GB. And now news has come to surface that 3.5GB is reserved for the OS.

How does something like this happen so quickly?


its easy to reserve any number that you want. it doesnt mean that the OS is using 3.5GB at all times at the beginning. They add features etc over time and instead of being pigeonholded in only a "1GB" reserved RAM space, they have 3.5GB, which they can reduce over time as they improve the OS and figure out they dont need as much.

that's what they did with PS3, i thought.


but, yeah, the simple act of "reserving" is as easy as typing a new number.
 

coolasj19

Why are you reading my tag instead of the title of my post?
Is there a post somewhere here that confirmed this as true? Cause I missed it if so.
 

iceatcs

Junior Member
Eurogamer and DF have been wrong lately about various tech aspects.

Well, If i'm developers, I'm sure I won't be happy with DF because it can affect the sales. Someone who upsetted by them, must be playing with them by gave the false informations.
 

ironcreed

Banned
Welp, the PS4 was doomed from the start and finally there is irrefutable proof of that. 5.5GB GDDR5 is some weaksauce baby shit, and that's down from 8GB which isn't great in the first place. There's absolutely no way they can recover from this bombshell. Stick a fork in it fellas, it's done.

Might I suggest switching your pre-orders to the Xbox One? The sweet, sexy Microsoft exclusive cloud will provide all the magical internet RAM your little heart desires.

Ha, Ha.
 

RoadHazard

Gold Member
So in the end they both have the same amount? Fucking hilarious if true. All the dick waving some did over more ram availability next to the X1's lol

The PS4's RAM is still significantly faster and more suited for games though. So the PS4's advantage hasn't disappeared here, it has just gotten smaller. (Of course, the major GPU advantage is still there as well.)
 

Chris R

Member
Kinda bummed since I doubt I'd ever make use of much of what the OS is offering. Why couldn't they just put some cheap slower ram on the board as well that would be 100% for the OS at all times?
 

Globox_82

Banned
Honestly I don't care, just release the damn thing already.


PS.
for xbone fans. It still has faster memory and superious GPU, all of that for 100 bucks less.
 

Gestault

Member
If someone from the Sony camp said that then they are foolish. If someone thinks that there using that as a bullet point on a list is good then I scoff at it. Good things 7GB was never official so some are immediately discredited on that front.

So would you agree that people who assumed, with confidence, that the PS4 only used about a gigabyte of RAM for OS and had the remainder for games is discredited? I find that very interesting.
 

Auto_aim1

MeisaMcCaffrey
Serious question: Could this have something to do with the OS and its apps needed to run at 4K Native Res at a later date?
4K isn't a big priority for them since it's only for movies and photos, and I really doubt it has to do something with this. Even if they enable that functionality, it probably won't be reliant on massive amount of RAM.
 

velociraptor

Junior Member
It's not. Removing 4 GB would leave at most 3.5 for games. Also, this would certainly change with time, just like the PS3.
0.5GB out of 4GB = 12.5% usage
3.5GB out of 8GB = 43.75% usage

Madness.

I know the 1GB limit was somewhat optimistic, but I would have assumed even 2GB would be enough for all Sony's OS needs.

How can you reserve so much RAM? We need Jeff_Rigby or another tech wizard in this thread, stat.
 
Welp, the PS4 was doomed from the start and finally there is irrefutable proof of that. 5.5GB GDDR5 is some weaksauce baby shit, and that's down from 8GB which isn't great in the first place. There's absolutely no way they can recover from this bombshell. Stick a fork in it fellas, it's done.

Might I suggest switching your pre-orders to the Xbox One? The sweet, sexy Microsoft exclusive cloud will provide all the magical internet RAM your little heart desires.

Man, the opening paragraph was gold, but you gave it away with the last sentence. You need to work on being more subtle when doing joke posts.
 
Please post a link where Sony states 1GB is reserved for the OS.

It's even in the article...it's not like he's fooling anyone either way.

The news that the PS4's OS reservation is in the same ballpark as Xbox One's equivalent 3GB allocation is sure to surprise many, especially bearing in mind that previously leaked Sony docs have only spoken of a 512MB allocation for the system software - though this information hails from the era where the new PlayStation was slated to ship with only 4GB of memory.
 
This doesn't make any sense to me.

Originally the PS4 was destined to have 4GB GDDR5 RAM.

On the last minute, Cerny surprises everyone and we're blessed with 8GB. And now news has come to surface that 3.5GB is reserved for the OS.

How does something like this happen so quickly?

My guess is they looked at some of the fast app switching that MS does, and realized they needed that feature in a post iPad world. If they didn't, the PS4 would have seemed painfully slow in comparison.

MS did a shitty job showing why that functionality is awesome by only showing it with Live TV. But the real awesome thing is being able to switch between stuff like HBO, Netflix, Hulu, Youtube like you're changing channels.

edit: of course it still seems a little up in the air whether this news is true?
 
If Digital Foundry is wrong again, that makes three things where they failed their readers in one month. That's pretty shoddy for place that is talking about one of the few things in gaming that are objective: tech analysis.

DF has never been objective though. Look at any multi platform comparison that includes pc, they show the console versions in their best light, but tone down the pc version to the "comparative" setting to lessen the blow.
 
Just because DF gaffes, doesn't mean much.

Besides, europeans are typically slanted in Sony's favour so I doubt this would be made up.

What's really funny is that Sony knew during E3, that the extra RAM they were adding was lost to additional OS functions, while everyone else was just cheering them on completely unawares.
 

daveo42

Banned
If they want similar functionality they need similar quantities. Do you disagree?

If they were similar, I could agree with it. Though it seems that MS wants to use Windows functionality in their console and load in Win8 apps from their store.

I'm not saying that Sony won't have apps, but I'm sure most of them will be simlar to what they have now and won't need to take up system resources in the background. The only things that should/will would be any streaming service like uStream and then the DVR function for playback. Everything else should be available in some state where it takes up next to no resources and is available instantly, similar to what Sony has already done with the Vita.

Lots of unanswers here so far in what Sony ultimately plans on doing with their system, but I don't think they are going the full shebang with running games, movies, and skype calls all at the same time all on the same screen. That's becoming a very Windows thing with their Metro interface.
 
How can anyone be stupid enough to think that if this is true it means that before the upgrade devs could only access 512mb for games?

What kind of logic is that?

If it's true, it means that the OS' footprint grew overtime.
 

Bundy

Banned
Gafs reaction.

Xbox one requires 3 gigs "ooooo wtf why" "lol get stuck with inferior graphics"

ps4 requires 3 gigs " 5 gigs is more than enough" " 5 gigs should be enough early on"

You are the second guy in this thread who's posting this crap.
Stuff like that should be bannable.
Just read the damn thread!
 
going to wait for confirmation or a source that's not Eurogamer, pretty disappointing if true.

doraps4.gif

:lol amazing
 
Wow the neogaf kiddies love to throw their toys out of the pram don't they?

To those upset by this, what exactly do you think is happening here? Do you think Sony is planning to steal the RAM to beef up their execs personal PCs via the cloud? Because it is obvious that you do not believe this will make the PS4 better in anyway, so why do you think Sony did it?

There are some simple truths here that people are forgetting:

4.5GB of RAM is still HUGE for a console. Take a look at games like The Last of Us on PS3 to see what can be done with a small fraction of a GB.

Multitasking takes RAM. If you want stuff actually happening in the background then programs need to be running that take RAM. There is no way around it.

And the biggest point that everyone seems to miss is that once you let a single game use X amount of RAM then the OS can never have that RAM back. But like we saw this generation with the PS3, Sony can give it back from the OS. I am sure they will launch with a buffer to keep their options open, see what works, what gamers want (because such a large amount of RAM allows this luxury), then decide what they can axe/add optimise and eventually either reduce the OS footprint or add amazing things.. Games will still look amazing with 5GB, except now they look amazing whilst not limiting future OS options.

It is the smart thing to do. Not that you would know it from the reaction.
okay, some people need to be adressing specific people. Not Gaf as a whole.
 

Tom Penny

Member
I don't know about fanboystic meltdowns but if 3.5 GBs reserved for OS turn out to be true it will affect the decisions of a number of people (and have them possibly moving to PC gaming). Noone wants an AppStation.

It doesn't add up. I run window's 7 with 4GB total of ram and can play nearly every game with an old GTX 460. 3.5 for an OS is absurd.
 
Jusr realized that this is just as bad as removing 4 GB from the system.

Lol, no.

You can't add more memory to launched systems (not without expansion cards anyway), but you can reduce the OS footprint over time and get progressively better looking titles.
 

Amir0x

Banned
So where is the official statement from Sony? And no other website or magazine has published a story confirming this? (If they did I missed a link)
 
Gafs reaction.

Xbox one requires 3 gigs "ooooo wtf why" "lol get stuck with inferior graphics"

ps4 requires 3 gigs " 5 gigs is more than enough" " 5 gigs should be enough early on"

Well, yeah, ps4 has tons left so why should anyone care?

xbone is using 3 gigs for three os's though. that's stupid, but the ram allocation makes sense and seems fairly reasonable. for ps4, it either means an os with a ridiculous amount of bloat, or loads of memory leaks....or the article is just flat out wrong. seems way too much to reserve.
 
I am not expecting to see a tremendous difference in exclusives. PS4 will still have the edge, but I don't think it will be mind blowing.

Far superior console should come out with far superior games/performance on multiplats especially. I want to see wins in every digital foundry comparison.

Best wait it out either way. I don't want to hear no more "on par", "not much difference between the two" "wait until devs get to grips with it" talk, that's blasphemy based on what we've been hearing about the PS4 so far :p
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
So would you agree that people who assumed, with confidence, that the PS4 only used about a gigabyte of RAM for OS and had the remainder for games is discredited? I find that very interesting.

I just want to laugh at those who laughed at MSFT. Just like the one's who laugh here. No sense in having a double standard as I don't think the 3GB Xbone OS is bad like I don't think this rumor is bad.

Some did believe that the the system use would be 7GB. It was never confirmed though. Just like this.
 

Alx

Member
Playing it safe? Reserving that much space for the OS is far past that point, I think.

Well, it may be another lesson they learnt from the current gen. They started the PS3 with a specific amount of memory reserved for the OS, and later on they found it difficult to make it evolve and add new features.
So many gigs of RAM seem huge indeed, but since MS is using the same amount of memory, maybe they don't want to be left behind again and prepare at least for feature equality, in case so much RAM proves to be useful.
It's easier to reserve it now and eventually reduce that requirement later, than let developers use 7G and be stuck with a 1G OS forever.

I just want to laugh at those who laughed at MSFT. Just like the one's who laugh here. No sense in having a double standard as I don't think the 3GB Xbone OS is bad like I don't think this rumor is bad.

That's true. 7-8 months ago, people were predicting consoles with 2G of RAM, and considered anything more unrealistic. Now we're acting like it's impossible to decently run a game with 5G. :D
 
Top Bottom