• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

So Target shipped someone an Xbox One already? [Update: console-banned until launch]

Blueblur1

Member
It's amazing how much a lot of you know something, about something you know nothing about.

Go and get a copy of Gran Turismo 6 and start uploading gameplay and images across all social media sites. Include your PSN username. See how long that lasts.

Oh the irony.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
Someone should tweet one of the Xbone head honchos to tell them they're being dumb about this. It's at least worth a try.
 

hornetpie

Neo Member
ok want to know how you know sony wouldn't do this?


they preloaded GTA5 3 weeks before it came out in Europe. People hacked the shit out of it, got files up, posted storylines, sound etc

sony probably could have traced back to who it was and banned them but they chose not to. That potentially could have been a valid ban due to reverse engineering but they didnt do it

im not a sony fan, i have both preordered but thats just sonys perspective imo
 

Xater

Member
Nothing new here, MS always have the banhammer ready, a couple friends were banned because they got games early and they could do nothing to unban the console, in fact, once a console is banned there's no way to unban, even if you have proof that you did nothing wrong, my friends had the receipts of the games with the date printed on it where it says the games were sold to them before launch and they got the middle finger from MS.

I remember getting Gears of War 3 like 3 days before launch and I just let it sit the in my desk waiting for launch.

Man I must have been extremely lucky back in the day when I got Halo 3 4 days early and was posting about it here on GAF.
 

Petrae

Member
I imagine Microsoft themselves didn't actually ban the console. It's most likely a temporary ban auto-initiated by preventive software on their end to stop leaks. As crappy as Microsoft has been lately, I don't think there's a guy twirling his mustache in front of a big red button waiting to ban anyone who activates a console pre-launch.

An automated ban is what I keep hearing is at play here. I don't necessarily think it was meant to be punitive, but it sure comes off that way.
 

PirateKing

Junior Member
I streamed Uncharted 2 in its entirety a whole week before it's release on my main PSN name. I'm still using that name.

Same goes for Arkham Asylum, but that's not a Sony game.

I think this needs to be quoted every time someone comes up with an ''argument'' that Sony does it too.
 

hornetpie

Neo Member
prediction

Microsoft PR comes out and says it was automated, wasn't supposed to happen and it sbecause Live is in final testing (aka he isn't on whitelist)

they will remove 22.11

damage is done though
 
Things that don't work, he mentions it, GAF starts 3 threads in 23 seconds, 2 get locked, the other one gets 5k posts of hate.

And this is the uphill battle MS must endure. There could be 15 cool features the guy unlocked but the one that isn't will garner the most attention. They did this to themselves but it still represents how leaks often play out.

I think this needs to be quoted every time someone comes up with an ''argument'' that Sony does it too.

On Youtube and is that video still there?
 

antitrop

Member
so everyone on the 22/11 who tweets should be banned? this is your logic by the way

he has signed no nda, nothing. he should be allowed to tweet all he fucking wants.
He agreed to Xbox Live's Terms of Service, that's for sure. Obviously it's shitty that they banned his system, and the right thing to do would be to unban it (as it was Target's error), but let's be honest here, his console getting banned was the only possible outcome from this situation.
 

FStop7

Banned
So you're telling me that if I were to get a Xbox one game about a week before release I'd get banned?? That's terrible especially since stores around my way are constantly breaking street dates by a good amount of time.

Yes, you potentially could be banned. It didn't happen often in the past but last year there were GAF members who had their gamertags and consoles banned for playing legit copies of Halo 4 before release. Frank O'Connor from 343 posted that he would fix it for one particular user, but then something happened and he stopped commenting on it, and the user's gamertag and console were never unbanned.

Stuff like this is why nobody will ever trust Microsoft in an all digital format.
 

Petrae

Member
prediction

Microsoft PR comes out and says it was automated, wasn't supposed to happen and it sbecause Live is in final testing (aka he isn't on whitelist)

they will remove 22.11

damage is done though

You might be right, except for that last bit.
The damage is definitely done.
 

BigDug13

Member
And this is the uphill battle MS must endure. There could be 15 cool features the guy unlocked but the one that isn't will garner the most attention. They did this to themselves but it still represents how leaks often play out.



On Youtube and is that video still there?

This thread really isn't about what youtube did. It's what MS did. And his point was that Sony doesn't ban for shit like this so it applies.
 

BigDug13

Member
He agreed to Xbox Live's Terms of Service, that's for sure. Obviously it's shitty that they banned his system, and the right thing to do would be to unban it (as it was Target's error), but let's be honest here, his console getting banned was the only possible outcome from this situation.

Can you point out the specific clause in the TOS that applies here?
 

hornetpie

Neo Member
He agreed to Xbox Live's Terms of Service, that's for sure. Obviously it's shitty that they banned his system, and the right thing to do would be to unban it (as it was Target's error), but let's be honest here, his console getting banned was the only possible outcome from this situation.

its not in xbox lives TOS to not upload shit to youtube. It IS to not use a modified console

he triggered the modified console ban system, it automatically banned him.

thats what has happened
 

Kerned

Banned
He agreed to Xbox Live's Terms of Service, that's for sure. Obviously it's shitty that they banned his system, and the right thing to do would be to unban it (as it was Target's error), but let's be honest here, his console getting banned was the only possible outcome from this situation.

Serious question: can you quote for me the part of the XBL TOS that he violated? Is there a part that forbids users from sharing details of unreleased hardware and software on social media, or forbids players from using unreleased software and hardware early?
 

hornetpie

Neo Member
So you're telling me that if I were to get a Xbox one game about a week before release I'd get banned?? That's terrible especially since stores around my way are constantly breaking street dates by a good amount of time.

i'm telling you that 99.9% sure yes indeed you would be.

I have seen it to many times for it not to be a policy and like i said i always have to give my GT early.
 

FStop7

Banned
Serious question: can you quote for me the part of the XBL TOS that he violated? Is there a part that forbids users from sharing details of unreleased hardware and software on social media, or forbids players from using unreleased software and hardware early?

Wouldn't Major Nelson's Xbox One unboxing video have been in violation of the TOS? I don't think Microsoft would post videos of their employees breaking the rules.
 

Eric C

Member
MS you're so ban happy all the time, not only this, but many other things as well.

stop it.

It doesn't make me want to buy your consoles, or digital content on your consoles
 
But it did function before the agreed date. Therefore the BUYER did nothing wrong.
Ya, I would have no issue with MS if when he first connects to Live and it says something like 'Come back November 22ⁿᵈ and check out the possibilities!' or something like that.

Don't fucking say 'Cool you're here, hang on... you'll need this patch! Wait, I forgot to check my list, I'm sure you're on here somewhere...'
 

hornetpie

Neo Member
Wouldn't Major Nelson's Xbox One unboxing video have been in violation of the TOS?

wat

you cant copyright infringe your own copyright

its not against the Live TOS to do an unboxing, that is not what got him banned. All that would have been is a copyright infringe on YT.

the automated system triggered
 
He agreed to Xbox Live's Terms of Service, that's for sure. Obviously it's shitty that they banned his system, and the right thing to do would be to unban it (as it was Target's error), but let's be honest here, his console getting banned was the only possible outcome from this situation.

they can block live services for non whitelisted gamertags. not banning the whole damn thing
 

Briarios

Member
Here's a case study to help Microsoft understand how to appropriately handle these kinds of situations:

Against their rules, a filmmaker snuck into the Magic kingdom and filmed a horror film on Disney property. Very subversive stuff, very much against the manufactured world of Disney. It's called Escape from Tomorrow. Everyone was prepping for a big legal fight, Disney trying to stop the release, etc. in fact, the distributor and filmmaker counted on it - controversy would drive up their sales!

So, how did Disney respond? They didn't. They ignored it. Completely. Utterly.

The film has faded into obscurity. Almost no one saw it, and few people have heard of it.

When you're a giant, attacking the little guy fails -- hard.

Proper MS response -- directly contact the guy, thank him for his kind words, offer him a year of Live and a copy of a game if he holds off reporting for a couple weeks. Explain that they really want to make a concerted marketing push, and his coverage dilutes it a bit. Ask for his help, don't make him the enemy. Friends are better.
 

FStop7

Banned
wat

you cant copyright infringe your own copyright

its not against the Live TOS to do an unboxing, that is not what got him banned. All that would have been is a copyright infringe on YT.

the automated system triggered

What copyright was infringed? How do you know it was automated?
 
So Penello, would you say you gave him a chance for a rational conversation?

15c8c16b70e846529e0669780f118795@2x.gif
 

Mugatu

Member
It's amazing how much a lot of you know something, about something you know nothing about.

Go and get a copy of Gran Turismo 6 and start uploading gameplay and images across all social media sites. Include your PSN username. See how long that lasts.
Even if they block the video, I doubt they would ban my PS3.

And this argument by speculation really needs to stop. I think we all realize that many things can possibly happen in the world, but let's stick to talking about things that did happen.
 

hornetpie

Neo Member
What copyright was infringed? How do you know it was automated?

because Microsoft software engineers are smart enough to code a system that checks the hardware of a system and bans if modified. its entirely possible LIVE is viewing xbox ones not on the whitelist as modified 360s (because of One Live not being widely out)

yes its connecting to One Live but its triggering the automatic system. You honestly think microsoft has engineers watching the connections 24/7 to ban systems? nope

this is probably why they won't give you a reason. theres probably 5000 things coded that equal a ban in their automated service.
 
That target warehouse is less than a 1 minute drive from my parents lol. You can hear them loading and unloading stuff from their yard. Anyone want to break in with me? =P (I'm joking)
 

pompidu

Member
An automated ban is what I keep hearing is at play here. I don't necessarily think it was meant to be punitive, but it sure comes off that way.

If it was automated it would have been instant ban as soon as he connected. Unless the program was very poorly made.
 

XenoRaven

Member
Is it just me or do all these stories break late Friday/early Saturday when less people are in the office to try and fix it (if they are going to fix it)?
 

Mugatu

Member
because Microsoft software engineers are smart enough to code a system that checks the hardware of a system and bans if modified. its entirely possible LIVE is viewing xbox ones not on the whitelist as modified 360s (because of One Live not being widely out)

yes its connecting to One Live but its triggering the automatic system. You honestly think microsoft has engineers watching the connections 24/7 to ban systems? nope

this is probably why they won't give you a reason. theres probably 5000 things coded that equal a ban in their automated service.
But then all of the early deliveries would be banned.
 
It would be a pretty snarky move if they sent him a PS4.

Better yet, Sony should send him a PS4.

This thread really isn't about what youtube did. It's what MS did. And his point was that Sony doesn't ban for shit like this so it applies.

The topic started to discuss Youtube and others mentioned how they were able to upload PS3 stuff early without punishment. So I was just curious to see if those videos were still up.
 
Top Bottom