ThoughtsOfSpeaking
Banned
UK is nobody's land, they are only loyal to their wallet.
Quoted for truth.
In the UK Sega dominated for two generations running. Our taste is better than most.
Also truth.
UK is nobody's land, they are only loyal to their wallet.
In the UK Sega dominated for two generations running. Our taste is better than most.
Nope.
It's because it objectively doesn't deserve to sell more, and is any easy summation of the Wii U's dire situation with an example of two games with comparable audiences.
I dont understand this thread.
It is not PS4's or Knack's fault that Wii U does not sell.
Otherwise, absolutely awesome numbers for Europe Sony.
Destiny is going to be bigger than Titanfall. It's on PS3 and PS4.
I know its hard to call the UK Sonyland just yet, but it is certainly a good trend for them. You have to consider that many Xbox preorder holders were given a free soccer game at launch. If you can beat a new console with a free copy of FIFA, then your truly a hot product.
Really happy for Knack and Cerny, the game is going to be one of the more under-appreciated games in recent years I think if only because so many were giving it 3s for some dumb shit reason. To see it also outsell Mario is too good.
UK is nobody's land, they are only loyal to their wallet.
Really happy for Knack and Cerny, the game is going to be one of the more under-appreciated games in recent years I think if only because so many were giving it 3s for some dumb shit reason. To see it also outsell Mario is too good.
I'm not trying to be a cynical fuck but seriously? Only 250k?
From the figures I just pulled, that's one in every 240 people, very approximately. Perhaps it was supply constrained over there?
I dont understand this thread.
It is not PS4's or Knack's fault that Wii U does not sell.
Otherwise, absolutely awesome numbers for Europe Sony.
Hasn't this been their approach all along? Aren't people in this thread and others criticizing them and hoping they fail BECAUSE they do that?
Yes, there are, but saying one is better than the other without having played them both borders to trolling and doesn't invite to meaningful discussion.
it objectively doesn't deserve to sell more?
what are you smoking?
You are assuming Destiny will be good. Remember Reach.
Oh, I know what it means. And my use of it is as valid as you can possibly get.
- The Mario franchise vs. a new IP.
- The Wii U install base vs. the PS4's (years vs. weeks)
- The quality of the titles, using any metric you wish.
Without considering opinion, Super Mario 3D World ought to be selling more.
You are assuming Destiny will be good. Remember Reach.
I'm not trying to be a cynical fuck but seriously? Only 250k?
From the figures I just pulled, that's one in every 240 people, very approximately. Perhaps it was supply constrained over there?
I would be cautious about EA gripping its claws into that game.
Destiny will be huge.
It has a bright future... so they need to get it day one?
How does that work exactly? How do you consider quality without an opinion in place?Oh, I know what it means. And my use of it is as valid as you can possibly get.
- The Mario franchise vs. a new IP.
- The Wii U install base vs. the PS4's (years vs. weeks)
- The quality of the titles, using any metric you wish.
Without considering opinion, Super Mario 3D World ought to be selling more.
Destiny is going to be bigger than Titanfall. It's on PS3 and PS4.
The souls series was perfectly doable past gen.oh i read it alright.
dont know about you but i got to play dragons dogma and the souls series this gen. couldnt of been done last gen. dogma was barely do able this gen.
if people approach games the nintendo way and dont go for life like visuals on these consoles. the complexity of ai and actions to partake in can become something interesting indeed. and in a few years well see life like complex ass scenarios to be engaged in.
i have a wii u had every nintendo console. alongside every sony and microsoft console. you fill dry parts of one with bliss moments of another.
im sorry you are hurting right now
This had to be done
The souls series was perfectly doable past gen.
Destiny isn't published by EA, EA isn't evil, etc etc etc. You are wrong in every way one can be wrong.
If it's good. Which it very well may not be - Remember Reach.
....you're kidding right?
You are assuming Destiny will be good. Remember Reach.
This had to be done
UK: 63,230,000 divided by 250,000 = 1 in every 253
North America: 528,700,000 divided by 1,000,000 = 1 in every 528
I believe UK numbers are far bigger.
I hope I'm doing the math right. I shall blame my sleepless night if I'm wrong!
The souls series was perfectly doable past gen
Reach sold great. This is a new multiplatform IP from Bungie with the whole weight of Activision behind it. It will be huge.
Not in any way at all, sorry :/ yes I realise a HUGE portion of the 65 million google gave me are way old, way young, disabled, disinterested, etc - but ........ god 250k still seems small to me. (don't worry, I'm from a much smaller region, they'll be lucky to move 100k here)
I'm not trying to be a cynical fuck but seriously? Only 250k?
From the figures I just pulled, that's one in every 240 people, very approximately. Perhaps it was supply constrained over there?
it looks like Nintendo (and the people buying games) redoing this to themselves.
just look at this top list in a store..
10th. place..? and 49.99£
now wonder it sells as low.
The souls series was perfectly doable past gen.
Dragon's Dogma and the rest of open world games have seen an evolution this generation, because the past one wasn't enough.
The problem is that we won't see that anymore. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see anything that couldn't be done in the past generation of consoles, playability-wise, because of lack of power.
We've reached a point where more graphics means less playability formulas available, because "more graphics" also means "more money invested" and this also means "less opportunities to launch a failed product" which also implies "go only for what's a certain success".
So the only gameplay novelties will be seen on the indie scene, because nobody expects and indie to make a graphical powerhouse. But as for finding retail-innovative games, I doubt we will see this anymore.
I think people in here figured out it's a better rate than for NA, which isn't bad. There's definitely a lack of supply as well though.
Yeah, but Reach was bad. People may remember that. Destiny will be huge, IF it is good. Which it may not be, given Bungie's track record as of late.
Yeah, but Reach was bad. People may remember that. Destiny will be huge, IF it is good. Which it may not be, given Bungie's track record as of late.
Destiny isn't published by EA, EA isn't evil, etc etc etc. You are wrong in every way one can be wrong.
If it's good. Which it very well may not be - Remember Reach.
People still shop in GAME? I don't know anyone here who doesn't buyeverythingnew games online now. £49.99...jesus.
I reedited my post to clarify. Sorry, but it always feels like I have to be on the defensive in these damn threads. Seems lately like people are more about being smug than about actually having a conversation.
It's bizarre that you think your personal opinion of Halo Reach is any indicator of how well Destiny will do.
I have high hopes and lots of interest in what I've seen. One thing Bungie is good at is shooters and this looks like it's going to be pretty epic.
If anyone needs to accept reality it's the people celebrating Nintendo's struggles and promoting further danger. There are going to be some major regrets if Nintendo gets driven out of this industry and there is no around this time to pick up the pieces when the inevitable crash comes from less visionary companies becoming too popular too quickly through sheer marketing and advertising saturation without establishing an undergirding philosophy that creates the superstructure of a sustainable gaming marketplace.There are very vocal hardcore Nintendo fans. The average age of forum users here is also higher than the general gaming public, and many older gamers (myself included) grew up with Nintendo being literally synonymous with gaming; my mother used to tell me to "stop playing Nintendo and come eat dinner" even well into the PlayStation era.
People in the United States and Japan of a certain age grew up in a culture of Nintendo. There were Mario cartoons (multiple), breakfast cereals, a feature-length film (two, if you count The Wizard), etc. Back in the days before the internet, Nintendo Power was a thing - a big thing, no less, with serious circulation.
As a result, it's hard for some people to see a market where Nintendo is becoming less and less relevant. People may have fond memories of the X-Box, but it was hardly a cultural institution; they never even managed to get their shit together and push a Halo movie through to theaters. People are only just now getting to the point where they have the same nostalgic associations to PlayStation, and even then it's hampered by the fact that when people think of genre-defining "PlayStation" brands they're actually thinking about third party products (Final Fantasy, MGS, etc.) most of the time.
I mean, I think the diehards need to accept the reality of the situation and start looking into triage rather than perpetual denial, but it's easy to see where they're coming from.
I know its hard to call the UK Sonyland just yet, but it is certainly a good trend for them. You have to consider that many Xbox preorder holders were given a free soccer game at launch. If you can beat a new console with a free copy of FIFA, then your truly a hot product.
Does it actually have substantial and challenging platforming segments? Everything I've seen looks like a simpler GoW and I don't even like the good games of that gameplay style.