• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PS4 fastest-selling console in UK history, outsells Wii U LTD in UK [250K PS4 in 48h]

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know its hard to call the UK Sonyland just yet, but it is certainly a good trend for them. You have to consider that many Xbox preorder holders were given a free soccer game at launch. If you can beat a new console with a free copy of FIFA, then your truly a hot product.
 

Derrick01

Banned
Really happy for Knack and Cerny, the game is going to be one of the more under-appreciated games in recent years I think if only because so many were giving it 3s for some dumb shit reason. To see it also outsell Mario is too good.
 

RaikuHebi

Banned
I know its hard to call the UK Sonyland just yet, but it is certainly a good trend for them. You have to consider that many Xbox preorder holders were given a free soccer game at launch. If you can beat a new console with a free copy of FIFA, then your truly a hot product.

"Free."

Dr-Evil-Air-Quotes.gif


Really happy for Knack and Cerny, the game is going to be one of the more under-appreciated games in recent years I think if only because so many were giving it 3s for some dumb shit reason. To see it also outsell Mario is too good.

Does it actually have substantial and challenging platforming segments? Everything I've seen looks like a simpler GoW and I don't even like the good games of that gameplay style.
 

Boke1879

Member
I'm not trying to be a cynical fuck but seriously? Only 250k?
From the figures I just pulled, that's one in every 240 people, very approximately. Perhaps it was supply constrained over there?

It's only the UK not all of EU, and it's the UK's biggest launch of a console EVER. This is pretty big.
 
Hasn't this been their approach all along? Aren't people in this thread and others criticizing them and hoping they fail BECAUSE they do that?

No. They still market the WiiU as a console that competes with Microsoft and Sony. That's a dead end for them. There's not enough space for three similarly powerful consoles. What they need to do is translate the fantastic WiiU games to their successful portable gaming platform. The 3ds isn't powerful enough but if it's successor could play WiiU games both on the go as well as via a HDMI out the lack of success of the WiiU suddenly becomes a non issue for their success as a games company.
 

Rocky

Banned
Yes, there are, but saying one is better than the other without having played them both borders to trolling and doesn't invite to meaningful discussion.

And how do you know who has played both and who hasn't? It seems like there's offenders on both sides of the debate who haven't played both games. And FYI, I own and have played both games. They are both fun in their own ways, but I don't think either game is particularly "mind-blowing" or "fantastic".
 

Certinty

Member
Pretty much exactly what I expected. No one cares about the Wii U here and we're definitely going back to Sonyland this gen.
 

Sneds

Member
Oh, I know what it means. And my use of it is as valid as you can possibly get.

- The Mario franchise vs. a new IP.
- The Wii U install base vs. the PS4's (years vs. weeks)
- The quality of the titles, using any metric you wish.

Without considering opinion, Super Mario 3D World ought to be selling more.

That is an opinion. There is no 'metric' to compare quality of video games other than opinion.

In terms of the install base, we might expect Mario to do better but that doesn't mean it should do better. What does 'should' even mean in that sense?
 
I'm not trying to be a cynical fuck but seriously? Only 250k?
From the figures I just pulled, that's one in every 240 people, very approximately. Perhaps it was supply constrained over there?

That's 2/3 more what the XB1 sold and beats every console launch by a significant amount

It is actually a higher per capita attach rate than the US+Canada numbers

It is very impressive
 

Interfectum

Member
I think the biggest story here is Sony actually listened to what gamers wanted and now it looks like they will reap the rewards. PlayStation 4 is going to be in beast mode next year.
 
Oh, I know what it means. And my use of it is as valid as you can possibly get.

- The Mario franchise vs. a new IP.
- The Wii U install base vs. the PS4's (years vs. weeks)
- The quality of the titles, using any metric you wish.

Without considering opinion, Super Mario 3D World ought to be selling more.
How does that work exactly? How do you consider quality without an opinion in place?
 
oh i read it alright.

dont know about you but i got to play dragons dogma and the souls series this gen. couldnt of been done last gen. dogma was barely do able this gen.

if people approach games the nintendo way and dont go for life like visuals on these consoles. the complexity of ai and actions to partake in can become something interesting indeed. and in a few years well see life like complex ass scenarios to be engaged in.

i have a wii u had every nintendo console. alongside every sony and microsoft console. you fill dry parts of one with bliss moments of another.

im sorry you are hurting right now
The souls series was perfectly doable past gen.
Dragon's Dogma and the rest of open world games have seen an evolution this generation, because the past one wasn't enough.
The problem is that we won't see that anymore. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see anything that couldn't be done in the past generation of consoles, playability-wise, because of lack of power.

We've reached a point where more graphics means less playability formulas available, because "more graphics" also means "more money invested" and this also means "less opportunities to launch a failed product" which also implies "go only for what's a certain success".

So the only gameplay novelties will be seen on the indie scene, because nobody expects and indie to make a graphical powerhouse. But as for finding retail-innovative games, I doubt we will see this anymore.
 

Corto

Member
Destiny isn't published by EA, EA isn't evil, etc etc etc. You are wrong in every way one can be wrong.



If it's good. Which it very well may not be - Remember Reach.

Reach sold great. This is a new multiplatform IP from Bungie with the whole weight of Activision behind it. It will be huge.
 

wizzbang

Banned
....you're kidding right?

Not in any way at all, sorry :/ yes I realise a HUGE portion of the 65 million google gave me are way old, way young, disabled, disinterested, etc - but ........ god 250k still seems small to me. (don't worry, I'm from a much smaller region, they'll be lucky to move 100k here)
 
UK: 63,230,000 divided by 250,000 = 1 in every 253
North America: 528,700,000 divided by 1,000,000 = 1 in every 528

I believe UK numbers are far bigger.


I hope I'm doing the math right. I shall blame my sleepless night if I'm wrong!

No, you are including Mexico for NA. Should be US+Canada only which is about 350,000,000. 1m sales is one per 350 people vs one per 250 in the UK.
 

JustinMay

Banned
Reach sold great. This is a new multiplatform IP from Bungie with the whole weight of Activision behind it. It will be huge.

Yeah, but Reach was bad. People may remember that. Destiny will be huge, IF it is good. Which it may not be, given Bungie's track record as of late.
 

Hoo-doo

Banned
Not in any way at all, sorry :/ yes I realise a HUGE portion of the 65 million google gave me are way old, way young, disabled, disinterested, etc - but ........ god 250k still seems small to me. (don't worry, I'm from a much smaller region, they'll be lucky to move 100k here)

It seems small to you, but it objectively isn't. It's the biggest UK console launch by a huge margin.

So either you are really bad with numbers, or your expectations were hilariously out of touch with reality.
 

EGM1966

Member
I'm not trying to be a cynical fuck but seriously? Only 250k?
From the figures I just pulled, that's one in every 240 people, very approximately. Perhaps it was supply constrained over there?

How can the largest launch ever be "only"? What possible reason would there be to expect more?

Now I will admit given PS4 was sold out everywhere in UK by approx 10 min after midnight they could probably have sold more if they had more stock.

But nonetheless 250k is a huge launch for the market going by historical performance so it is unfair to expect more - even if they could have sold more by the look of it.
 
I'm actually glad this thread was posted. PS4 is going to be a big player in the UK, Wii U is not(as yet). No more of Nintendo being thrashed around in a country where Sony and Microsoft will be duking it out.....
 
it looks like Nintendo (and the people buying games) redoing this to themselves.

just look at this top list in a store..

ByAkU2p.jpg


10th. place..? and 49.99£

now wonder it sells as low.

People still shop in GAME? I don't know anyone here who doesn't buy everything new games online now. £49.99...jesus.

Has there even been any advertising for SM3DW? I haven't seen a single ad for it yet. If it wasn't for the fact that I actually follow video game news, I probably wouldn't even know the game exists. :(

I'm not surprised the PS4 is selling so well. Their marketing has been insanely aggressive, perhaps more so here than in other territories. Sony seem determined to claw back what they lost to Microsoft last gen, and I think they have nothing to worry about this time around. Mind you, MS pretty much handed things over on a plate.
 

Sneds

Member
The souls series was perfectly doable past gen.
Dragon's Dogma and the rest of open world games have seen an evolution this generation, because the past one wasn't enough.
The problem is that we won't see that anymore. I hope I'm wrong, but I can't see anything that couldn't be done in the past generation of consoles, playability-wise, because of lack of power.

We've reached a point where more graphics means less playability formulas available, because "more graphics" also means "more money invested" and this also means "less opportunities to launch a failed product" which also implies "go only for what's a certain success".

So the only gameplay novelties will be seen on the indie scene, because nobody expects and indie to make a graphical powerhouse. But as for finding retail-innovative games, I doubt we will see this anymore.

The bolded is a valid point. The more money at stake, the more risk averse publishers seem to be.

That being said, Nintendo are risk averse too.
 

wizzbang

Banned
I think people in here figured out it's a better rate than for NA, which isn't bad. There's definitely a lack of supply as well though.

It's going to be the same here for AU, I mean I guess all launched are supply constrained (duh on me) but.... regardless 250k just seems like a small number to brag about. I'm sure mathematically it's great but it just doesn't play as exciting news to me? Wouldn't just saying "holy shit PS4 sold another million for the EU launch!" be more exciting?
Great news, good on themfor breaking records, hope people like it but .... yeah just doesn't feel exciting to pimp as news!
 

Curufinwe

Member
Yeah, but Reach was bad. People may remember that. Destiny will be huge, IF it is good. Which it may not be, given Bungie's track record as of late.

It's bizarre that you think your personal opinion of Halo Reach is any indicator of how well Destiny will do.

Reach reviewed well and sold well.
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
Yeah, but Reach was bad. People may remember that. Destiny will be huge, IF it is good. Which it may not be, given Bungie's track record as of late.

New IP and large install bases across several platforms should be invigorating instead of pumping out Halo after Halo.

I have high hopes and lots of interest in what I've seen. One thing Bungie is good at is shooters and this looks like it's going to be pretty epic. Outside of Drive Club and Infamous, this is the only other next gen game I have pre-ordered. Most of my Q1 2014 eggs are in the awesome indies coming to PS4 so no dry spell for PS4.
 

sestrugen

Member
Destiny isn't published by EA, EA isn't evil, etc etc etc. You are wrong in every way one can be wrong.



If it's good. Which it very well may not be - Remember Reach.

I was talking about Titanfall and no they aren't evil but they make some very questionable decisions that affect games
 

RaikuHebi

Banned
People still shop in GAME? I don't know anyone here who doesn't buy everything new games online now. £49.99...jesus.

My friend was shopping around for COD Ghosts on Friday. We went to GAME. £59.99 of course. (£5 MORE than digital!). His local Tescos and Asdas didn't stock any PS4 stuff, so we tried Toys R Us expecting nothing there either.

£47.00. Their store is usually a ghost town and creepy, but credit on that price.
 

Honey Bunny

Member
I reedited my post to clarify. Sorry, but it always feels like I have to be on the defensive in these damn threads. Seems lately like people are more about being smug than about actually having a conversation.

No worries. I do think that packing in Fifa has helped them - their numbers would probably be a tad worse without it. But like Ramzas said, we vote with our wallets in the UK, and an XB1 with free Fifa is still more expensive than a PS4 with a full price Fifa. So it just isn't that compelling unless you were already leaning towards the XB1.

You mentioned earlier how the PS3's price was a huge problem for it - do you know the XB1's launch price in the UK? It's actually 4 quid higher than the premium PS3's price was. You also claimed that Playstation is synonymous with gaming in the Uk, and that just isn't true anymore - last generation the terms Xbox and Wii became just as if not more commonly used as the term 'Playstation' when referring to the generic games console. I even remember noticing silhouettes of the Xbox controller replacing silhouettes of the dualshock when being used as a sign for 'generic video game controller' in articles or textbooks or whatever. And all of that is small fry compared to the real fact that there were just fewer PS consoles in the UK than either Xbox or Wiis this past gen.

The reason these numbers look like they do is really far more complex than brand name.
 

JustinMay

Banned
It's bizarre that you think your personal opinion of Halo Reach is any indicator of how well Destiny will do.

It's a pretty much universally accepted opinion.

I have high hopes and lots of interest in what I've seen. One thing Bungie is good at is shooters and this looks like it's going to be pretty epic.

Bungie is good at shooters, this is more of an MMO. Everyone else who tried this failed hard. Anyway, this isn't the place for this discussion.
 

benjipwns

Banned
There are very vocal hardcore Nintendo fans. The average age of forum users here is also higher than the general gaming public, and many older gamers (myself included) grew up with Nintendo being literally synonymous with gaming; my mother used to tell me to "stop playing Nintendo and come eat dinner" even well into the PlayStation era.

People in the United States and Japan of a certain age grew up in a culture of Nintendo. There were Mario cartoons (multiple), breakfast cereals, a feature-length film (two, if you count The Wizard), etc. Back in the days before the internet, Nintendo Power was a thing - a big thing, no less, with serious circulation.

As a result, it's hard for some people to see a market where Nintendo is becoming less and less relevant. People may have fond memories of the X-Box, but it was hardly a cultural institution; they never even managed to get their shit together and push a Halo movie through to theaters. People are only just now getting to the point where they have the same nostalgic associations to PlayStation, and even then it's hampered by the fact that when people think of genre-defining "PlayStation" brands they're actually thinking about third party products (Final Fantasy, MGS, etc.) most of the time.

I mean, I think the diehards need to accept the reality of the situation and start looking into triage rather than perpetual denial, but it's easy to see where they're coming from.
If anyone needs to accept reality it's the people celebrating Nintendo's struggles and promoting further danger. There are going to be some major regrets if Nintendo gets driven out of this industry and there is no around this time to pick up the pieces when the inevitable crash comes from less visionary companies becoming too popular too quickly through sheer marketing and advertising saturation without establishing an undergirding philosophy that creates the superstructure of a sustainable gaming marketplace.

Even though no one then will admit their past role in the whole affair coming into existence after reality reasserts itself. Ignorant circle jerks by deniers won't do anything to halt the runaway market failure "modern" gaming has created.
 
I know its hard to call the UK Sonyland just yet, but it is certainly a good trend for them. You have to consider that many Xbox preorder holders were given a free soccer game at launch. If you can beat a new console with a free copy of FIFA, then your truly a hot product.

They gave them the choice of Fifa14 or Forza5 thrown in with the console and outspent Sony in adverts by quite a large margin in the UK. Still got beat in sales. Sony did pretty well I'd say.
 

Derrick01

Banned
Does it actually have substantial and challenging platforming segments? Everything I've seen looks like a simpler GoW and I don't even like the good games of that gameplay style.

No because it's not a platformer. It's not a very deep game either but it is difficult and requires some decent dodging, timing and studying the different attacks of enemies since on Hard most can and will kill you in a single hit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom