Yeah true, it was soley for context as the percentage quoted yesterday doesn't seem that far away from what we assumed was reasonable fact. It sorta lines up slightly. There is so many numbers being thrown around, 30%, 40%, 50%.
It was more of a question I suppose as while highlighted, were the other 10% was coming from to achieve full 50% power. Its getting a little old now though.
Edit: BenouKat, made a good point, its more than likely just a random assumption (altho I thought better from a relatively recognized dev)
PS4 @ 50% advantage with no optimization aka brute force as you say.
X1 + PS4 after optimization = advantage turned into a "little" as if saying the optimizations on X1 is putting out more than 50% performance + what optimization PS4 puts out.
It's an American thing. Geography is not our forte. Like George Lopez told that joke once "my friend asked me where I was from so I told him Honduras. He then asked me what part of Mexico that was!" (to paraphrase)
I would like to clarify that I am well aware that the EU is many countries and not one, and that Honduras is also it's own country. This much I know.
Not really, even PC games that were left to die by publishers' marketing departments still almost always look better. Considering how popular PS4 currently is I think it's a given that PS4 development will be very important to them.
Does 150Mhz even make any difference? This seems like one of those things where if I were to ask in the "I need a new PC thread" that if I should shell out the money for an extra 150GMhz people would tell me that it would make no noticeable difference and to save my money and/or to use it on another component.