-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
1up Time Crisis 4 [PS3] Review.
- Thread starter AceBandage
- Start date
Metalmurphy
Member
Stumpokapow said:
What... the... hell... oO
Grizzlyjin
Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
Damn, that is a mega hit. But not that surprising. If this game was just $30 or something, I doubt they would have been so hard on it. But paying $90 for a mediocre game makes it that much worse.
D
Deleted member 17706
Unconfirmed Member
After playing the game in the arcades, I can't help but agree. The gameplay really hasn't improved since the first game and the graphics (at least in the arcade) were awful. They looked like a PS2 game and I doubt they did much upgrading for the PS3 port.
$90 for the game is just an insult.
$90 for the game is just an insult.
Stumpokapow
listen to the mad man
reilo said:
No.
Robobandit
Member
edited.
Sorry folks
Sorry folks
Robobandit
Member
reilo said:
Oops!
My bad.
Post edited
painful fart
Member
That´s a rather high score for a PS3 game coming from 1Up, should translate to about 7 in normal reviews.AceBandage said:
AdmiralViscen
Banned
Holy shit, was not expecting that.
DevelopmentArrested
Banned
chespace said:
Didn't you give PDZ a 9+?
Play CoD4 on Hardened if you can't stand Veteran.
I propose a new scoring system that should make EVERYONE happy.
It's based on AD&D strength stat STR
So, scores are 3-18, and if yr 18 you get that weird number in parenthesis.
So all great games get 18, like mario galaxy would be 18(64) and mass effect would be 18(52), so when they fight Mario has the technical advantage but it wouldn't matter and it would be a draw.
Shitty games would get 8's 9's and even 10s, which are actually pretty horrible scores, but publishers would be like "damn, my game got a 10!" and put in on their cereal box.
On rare occasions a game could go above 18, by equipping downloadable content. However, if you equip CURSED HORSE ARMOR you could go down to 2!
edit: drake still gets a 17.
It's based on AD&D strength stat STR
So, scores are 3-18, and if yr 18 you get that weird number in parenthesis.
So all great games get 18, like mario galaxy would be 18(64) and mass effect would be 18(52), so when they fight Mario has the technical advantage but it wouldn't matter and it would be a draw.
Shitty games would get 8's 9's and even 10s, which are actually pretty horrible scores, but publishers would be like "damn, my game got a 10!" and put in on their cereal box.
On rare occasions a game could go above 18, by equipping downloadable content. However, if you equip CURSED HORSE ARMOR you could go down to 2!
edit: drake still gets a 17.
B-Ri said:
It's a PS2-looking Light Gun Game without endless credits, a save system reminiscent of the stone age and a completely unfun additionnal mode that costs $90. LOL at you for thinking that 3.5 is not a fair score.
Edit: I sometimes think that 1Up are off with their reviews but in this one the 3.5 was completely justified by the text and the price. Except if you're a lightgun fanatic that is, but if you are you will buy TC4 no matter what 1Up scores it, this review is for everyone else.
Kildace said:
Its a light gun game
i enjoy light gun games
the graphics are fine, its just a light gun game
this game has been out forever, if you know TC4, you know what youre getting into
if you want a light gun game, whoaa this is a light gun game.
Get off my nuts and go away, meanwhile im going to play TC4 some more.
Visualante
Member
Visualante
Member
Or just make a decent game involving robots shooting lazers from their eyes. I'd buy that.impirius said:
OokieSpookie
Banned
Can't wait to see the scores for House of the Dead on wii.
The review sounds like it came from someonewho has never played a light gun game before.
The review sounds like it came from someonewho has never played a light gun game before.
test_account
XP-39C²
Damn.. thats a pretty low score :\ It kinda suprises me over how much "faith" people put into some reviews tho. I mean, since <insert reviewer here> gives <insert game here> a score of <insert score here> it means that the game sux. I've seen people saying they wont by a game based on a review. Sure, i can understand that people wont buy a game at full retail price if they dont have too much money to use on games, but to say a game is bad just because of a review? What happend to own opinions? :/
lol, what do they mean with this? That it doesnt look realisticly because you dont see a gun like in FPS?
After saying something like this it sounds like the reviewer hasnt played a single lightgun game in his/her life. But of course, people have different opinions about games, nothing wrong with that
impirius said:
lol, what do they mean with this? That it doesnt look realisticly because you dont see a gun like in FPS?
After saying something like this it sounds like the reviewer hasnt played a single lightgun game in his/her life. But of course, people have different opinions about games, nothing wrong with that MasterCharged
Member
COD4 on veteran was easy for me. all you had to do was do what you are suppose too and get the checkpoint lol. although this shit was a grenade fest. all the npc's did was throw fucking grenadeschespace said:
