CreateNowSleepLater
Member
Can't say they aren't listening but I feel like the things on the table to be changed were limited. There were obvious things that were non negotiable, Sprint, ADS.
Especially with thruster being included, too. All this brings up another issue, too: having all these abilities work with the various control schemes fans have become used to. Cutting sprint would free up a button, just sayin.Yeah, I feel you. But I think if you're going to nerf sprint and increase the base speed, it's making the mechanic more redundant than it already is.
What isn't how it works?Thats not how it works
Yes.Have you even played Halo 5?
Please tell me you were going around trying to shoot peoples nades because thats priceless.
Its because your shoving your angry opinion down everyone's throat. You don't even know how the new movement/strafing options and a reduced sprint feels.
Of course no one is going to listen to you... nobody has even tried the new settings.
Calm down, take a breather and wait and see if it still plays bad when we try/see the new settings in action.
Genuinely, you're the first person I've heard who's said that. A few of my friends are COD diehards, and they stopped playing Ghosts within weeks of launch - and even those weeks were more 'trying to get into it'. They enjoy AW, and the review scores demonstrate that it's a fairly common opinion to hold.
All anecdotal, but hey.
I've heard that same "wait and see" from 343 for 4 years. So I'm not really patient when it comes to obvious game breaking mechanics.
The simplest and best way to assess performance within a team sport, is the teams success.
Punish quitters with CSR penalties and matchmaking bans
It breaks enemy encounters (run away, run or gun) and map layout (significantly larger maps)Why is it obvious? Someone explain why sprint is broken without using arguments like "We didn't have it in the previous games".
Why is it obvious? Someone explain why sprint is broken without using arguments like "We didn't have it in the previous games".
When MCC gets fixed. Maybe.has 343 been redeemed yet
lol
That's not true. The X1 subreddit is filled with rabid fanboys for the Xbox but almost every too comment on a story about the MCC is how it sucks.Halo absolutely has one of the most toxic fanbases for any console game I've ever known. But then it goes the other way - because 343 are first party, people make ridiculous excuses for them. The Xbox One subreddit, for example, is awful for any discussion surrounding Halo. If you think the MCC was bad, it's sour grapes, and you should just enjoy the campaigns (which don't even work properly in co-op).
343 is a good studio who gets way too much hate from a fanbase that may in fact be more stubborn than those Smash Bros Melee loyalists.
Shame about Master Chief Collection but hey, that's what happens when you outsource the game to like 4 different developers. You get a Ubisoft quality product in the end.
89% of the halo community are idiots, confirmed.
My issue with the poll is that polls are always selective biased. There could be a question like this (this is an example not an actual question)
Please answer:
I do NOT like sprint at all
I do not prefer sprint
I do not mind sprint
I like sprint.
So where is 343 choosing the results from?
Compare the map sizes from H1-Reach bs H4-5.Why is it obvious? Someone explain why sprint is broken without using arguments like "We didn't have it in the previous games".
Really?Video game fans have become a bunch of spoiled teenage brats. Just play the game and enjoy it
It breaks enemy encounters (run away, run or gun) and map layout (significantly larger maps)
It ruins map flow. It increases the size of the maps. It creates a situation where players don't have to think about map movement. It creates a get out of jail free card when people can simply run away. Especially with games including shields, when people run away, cleaning up kills becomes a chore.
That's just off the top of my head. There are essays on this topic.
Compare the map sizes from H1-Reach bs H4-5.
H4-5 sometimes feels like BF 64 player conquest.
Wow, this is amazing.
![]()
So, a map has to be designed for it. Fights are different as there's more mobility and people have more escape options, meaning people have to be aware of engaging knowing their opponent can try to escape.
So, all opinions, opinions that are entirely reasonable to have, but not factual reasons that automatically make it suck.
I think the majority of people who don't mind sprint or think it needs to be included for the game to be modern and sell don't really understand how it affects so many aspects of gameplay. Does anybody have a link to that one essay that breaks down how sprint has caused changes to map design, melees, etc?
So, a map has to be designed for it. Fights are different as there's more mobility and people have more escape options, meaning people have to be aware of engaging knowing their opponent can try to escape.
So, all opinions, opinions that are entirely reasonable to have, but not factual reasons that automatically make it suck.
Recon was perfectly fine.I hope they fix the Recon control scheme. Played the beta at a friend's house and hated using X to sprint.
343 says a lot of things and they make lots of promises that never, ever pan out because of malice or incompetence, and this current session looks to be more of the same.
How much of these will they go back on or screw up this time?
Halo 4.what are you talking about?
Not really. You had more action going on because everyone was close and had to fight or get killed.
Now? I gotta sprint to where the action is. I'm dying? Welp, I can sprint away! Suckas!
Take a look at Halo 2, for example. This is a game littered with problems, but the one thing that broke combat for years afterward was the lack of power that the battle rifle had compared to the pistol. It took literally more than twice as long to kill an opponent with perfect shooting, but if you were shooting someone in the back or at an unfortunate angle, you now had to blow an entire clip just to kill that one enemy. That, along with the change in map design philosophy, completely altered the way that Halo was played...for the worse, as most of us would tell you.
Recon was perfectly fine.
How the hell is ADS more of a connection than actually having the scope show up in your visor?
"With the introduction of our new Smart-Link aiming system weve given all weapons the ability to zoom. This new system creates a more natural feel and reinforces the connection between Spartans and their weapons. The advantages of a zoomed weapon are balanced by the ability to de-scope and force your opponent out of zoom if you land your shots first. Our goal is to balance all weapons to be equally effective both in and out of zoom while continuing to respect the function of each mode."
"Some of the other improvements that well be making to weapons in the game follow:
halo 2 rocket launcher
Sniper Rifle: improve scope experience to making it less clunky and faster to scope
DMR: adjust position of the scope to improve visibility
Bring back the SPNKr Rocket Launcher as a legendary version of the weapon
Reduce bonuses for automatic weapons in Smart-Link & w/ headshots
Remove grenade detonation in mid-air based on weapon fire
Ability to turn on/off vibration feedback for weapons
General tuning and bug fixing for all weapons"
Fuck this person. Seriously.
Halo 4.
Promises of balance updates. Came way too late. 4-6 months late.
Among other promises.
Fuck opinions!
the game isn't even out yet and there's more than 6 months till release...'
again, I ask: wut?
I didn't say anything about where action was going on or anything about that. I said only that if sprint exists, maps must be designed with it in mind and players must choose how they play and engage with it in mind.
Saying a map is shit because of sprint which enables x, y, z is fine, but that's more hating on the map than it is on sprint.
Saying it's impossible to make a map due to sprint would be more what you're trying to say, but that also seems rather closeminded.
the game isn't even out yet and there's more than 6 months till release...'
again, I ask: wut?
Maybe you should follow your own ideology here.
Fuck opinions! And actual reasoning!
Anyone who has dealt with 343 in the past should have little or no faith in these guys. They lied about many things in Halo 4, they shipped a broken ass game in MCC...
if MCC is broken still in 6 months I can see the reasoning... but it just doesn't make sense and is a concept based on no facts or prior events.
If you are honestly sitting there telling me all of these changes won't be in place by launch then we have nothing further to discuss