No, u mad?
You're lifting this discussion to a great level here. Thanks.
No, u mad?
I mean, there's nothing inherently "flawed" about this study. The goals are pretty clear, they are testing for CTE in "165 individuals who, before their deaths, played football either professionally, semi-professionally, in college or in high school," and 79% of those football players had CTE.
The only thing that is flawed is the sweeping condemnation of football because of this study and others like it. As others have already said, it's a condition that we still know little about and can't even clinically diagnose it. It's obvious that playing football long-term will fuck your shit up, though, and the more these studies garner attention the more the worst league in professional sports will be forced to keep paying attention to it.
The fact that the study is fundamentally flawed and completely non-actionable renders it essentially useless as a measure of how dangerous football is.
I'm sure they learned tons of other super useful stuff though, so I'm not saying it wasn't worthwhile.
It's flawed because the people who donated their brains did so because they thought they were suffering from the disease. You can't draw any conclusions on the sport as a whole from this study.
I wonder if other sports have similar issues with CTE? I mean hockey players highlight-hit each other given the opportunity.
Seems likely to me. Though I doubt it's to the same extent as with gridiron football.I wonder if other sports have similar issues with CTE? I mean hockey players highlight-hit each other given the opportunity.
I wonder if other sports have similar issues with CTE? I mean hockey players highlight-hit each other given the opportunity.
No, u mad?
The conclusion is that there is a definite link to playing the sport and the debilitating disease. It doesn't have to mean every player gets it. It's a big risk to take for parents of kids wanting to play the sport.
Most research suggests that it's not the big hits, but the accumulation of lesser sub-concussive blows. Hockey players don't get as many regular hits to the head as a NFL linemen who is banging his head in the trenches.
I wonder if other sports have similar issues with CTE? I mean hockey players highlight-hit each other given the opportunity.
It doesn't need to be the head taking the blow directly. The force of contact elsewhere on the body can still cause brain trauma.
Unfortunately, no it doesn't. We don't know how prevalent it is in non-players to form any intelligent comparison.
Also, all of these guys were pre-disposed to "fail" the study. It doesn't prove anything tenuously, much less definitively.
What it will prove is that the NFL is awful, as I'm sure they'll ignore the entire study out of hand.
It's flawed because the people who donated their brains did so because they thought they were suffering from the disease. You can't draw any conclusions on the sport as a whole from this study.
I don't think that matters. Bashing your head and body against other huge human beings, often at high rates of speed, is not good for the brain, like not even once.
Well I think it is easy to link the repetitive concussions and head trauma from football to CTE, and thus derive that link. We don't currently have the technology to recognize the disease in living people, but we do know what appears to cause it, getting hit in the head repeatedly. Denial because of absolute data is sort of like conservatives clinging to denying climate change because we don't have absolute proof.
I get that the narrative of the study is flawed, but the study itself set out to confirm CTE in suspected cases from a population of football players and that's what it did.
We'll never be able to draw definitive conclusions when they keep doing intentionally biased studies and comparing them to other bias studies in a bubble. I don't understand why the NFL keeps side-stepping this stuff, though, when literally the only thing they can and should do is educate people about it. Especially their players.
You can't conclude that from this study. If you took 100 football players who thought they had lung cancer and found the majority did have lung cancer it wouldn't demonstrate a link between football and lung cancer.The conclusion is that there is a definite link to playing the sport and the debilitating disease. It doesn't have to mean every player gets it. It's a big risk to take for parents of kids wanting to play the sport.
How common is CTE for us regular folk?
But lung cancer isn't caused by blunt trauma to the head.You can't conclude that from this study. If you took 100 football players who thought they had lung cancer and found the majority did have lung cancer it wouldn't demonstrate a link between football and lung cancer.
oh no what ever will the billion dollar business do?!!!?!??!?!?
im so glad you're here to defend them. they need all the help they can get.
Remember when they used to do weigh ins in public at the combine? Bunch of people waiting to make offers for guys in underwear. Totally doesn't bring to mind anything similar from history. Nope, not at all...
I hope they find a way to help these guys who receive deferential treatment their whole lives, roll through college for free, and get a shot to make six figures minimum.
I played at a D3 college - so no scholarship for me. I wasn't talented enough to make it to the NFL - so no shot at making six figures for me. Still, I suffered several diagnosed concussions throughout high school and college - and probably many more un-diagnosed ones...
I did not "roll through college" nor did I receive deferential treatment my whole life.
Get off your high horse and take your bullshit sarcasm with you...
I hope they find a way to help these guys who receive deferential treatment their whole lives, roll through college for free, and get a shot to make six figures minimum.
So sorry. I don't mean to make light of it, but the avatar is perfect.
How is it their whole lives? Most of these guys are out of work permanently by age 25. In terms of their six figures, that has to last them their entire life so it doesn't go very far when they lose half of it up front to taxes and have to give their agents a cut.
It makes it all the more frustrating that Concussion will go soft on the NFL.
This is a solved problem guys. Equipment is better, there are rules and protocols to keep concussed players off the field, and the players themselves know all the risks which is why many are choosing to retire early. The NFL has even paid for their past transgressions on this issue, to the tune a $1 billion+. What else do you want? The league isn't going away, young kids will still grow up playing it, and it's not going to become flag football.
Okay let's say Parkinson disease instead. The point remains that this study does not establish a causal relationship, it does however demonstrate that the majority of football players that think they have CTE do have brain damage.Most report that it's incredible rare, though additional study is needed.
But lung cancer isn't caused by blunt trauma to the head.
Have studies been done with other sports as well? Especially boxing, hockey, rugby. Or even soccer? Would be cool to compare.
Nothing on ESPN about this
It's a hollywood movie trying to make money... I could be wrong, but don't they need the cooperation of the NFL to use it's logo and stuff to even put the movie out to begin with?
Nothing on ESPN about this
That raises something that I'm not entirely certain of. What are the limits of using logos, names, and other information associated with a company, if a company might not approve of the information in the film. What allowed Frontline to have its damning special on concussions that really laid into the NFL, but not a movie like Smith's? Are documentaries simply protected? I have no clue.It's a hollywood movie trying to make money... I could be wrong, but don't they need the cooperation of the NFL to use it's logo and stuff to even put the movie out to begin with?
You greatly underestimate the power of concerned mothers.It's solved to the greatest degree in which it can be solved by the NFL. Like I said, people aren't going to stop playing football and the NFL isn't going to become flag football.
Oh, never mind. I shouldn't even be addressing this guy.Also, no one understands what CTE is or what actually causes it.
Not worth it. But the NFL continues to grow, so I don't see this making any dent.
You even have sportscasters saying these athletes know what they're signing up for when they choose to play the game.
I haven't watched a football game this season because of concerns with CTE.
No, you can't. You can only assure us that it's very popular right now.
None of those other sports have a high premature death rate like the NFL does.No, you're the one who sounds like someone with an ax to grind. CTE isn't a new thing, we've known about it for nearly a century, when it was associated primarily with boxing. Getting new samples from people who suspect they have it doesn't promote our scientific understanding of what causes it. It does however, promote the agenda of people who want to crucify the NFL.
The NFL has a concussion protocol, spent millions on research to improve equipment while collaborating with the military, and implemented rule changes which reduce the number of collisions per game. What have hockey, UFC, and NASCAR done? What has society at large done? Pinning CTE on one league from one sport does nothing to help diagnose it or limit it's impact.
I have spoken to a chiropractor who used to treat football injuries. The players bodies get constantly destroyed. Pretty much by mid to end season, there bodies are bruised and the bruising does not disappear untill a while after the season ends.
The body has trouble repairing itself game after game week after week.... As a result you have essentially old blood that pools in your tissue longer than it should and repeatedly.
The next best thong would be probably larger team sizes in which they rotate players for each game, or the players play 2 games every month with a week of resting the body for a week after every game.