Angelus Errare
Banned
So weird to read folks talk about how GAF "used to be" a big dog pile as they dog pile in this thread whose express purpose was asking for civility.
How's the weather in Denmark, Illinois, Lime.
So weird to read folks talk about how GAF "used to be" a big dog pile as they dog pile in this thread whose express purpose was asking for civility.
Oh, so now your channeling your inner tolerant left? Man, hell did freeze over.
W-what is this a reference to?
Oh, so now your channeling your inner tolerant left? Man, hell did freeze over.
So weird to read folks talk about how GAF "used to be" a big dog pile as they dog pile in this thread whose express purpose was asking for civility.
If pointing out irony makes me the bad guy. Then I'll let it rock.
Bu-bu-but his post history?!So weird to read folks talk about how GAF "used to be" a big dog pile as they dog pile in this thread whose express purpose was asking for civility.
I agree with the message, but boy is it the wrong messenger.
If old gaf was years old personal grudges and passive aggressive snark against members regardless of what they have to say, its obviously still alive and well
Nonsensical straw man like this is a very good representation of the old NeoGAF. You'd have people dogpiling the guy you quoted and he would probably be too banned to call you out on this bullshit, so you'd feel like you won the discussion even though your argument makes no fucking sense.
That's why you guys feel safe in a heavily moderated echo chamber. Not because it's "humanly decent" or respectful or anything like that, but because it's easy to beat opposing views.
Dude, you are the irony.
This whole thing is like a bunch of kids shitting up the sandbox, leaving it for another one and then coming back complaining how it's crap now after they left. I don't know if it's hilarious or sad.
You keep framing this as some sort of reasonable debate between people who just have differing opinions. But one side has their identity and lived experience at stake, and the worst that can happen to the "other side" of this false dichomtomy is that someone might laugh at them and revoke their posting privileges on a web forum.
This isn't an academic forum or the floor of a debate. It's a private message board community where moderators can toss whomever they please for being too hurtful or too stupid to abide by community standards.
Apparently, many people here (predominantly young cishet white gamebros who "don't want to talk about politics all the time") never had the experience of being told their opinion isn't uniquely interesting or important. I'd hope that getting mocked on NeoGAF would be a good learning experience for themmaybe cause them to wonder about what it's like to be ignored and shunned all the timebut nope. Tears and impotent rage about "dogpiles" and "bullying." Way to self-actualize.
I dont think thats happening in this thread. You have many people reacting to the OP, but thats expected, its his thread, and he seems to have left and isnt continuing the discussion. What happens in a lot of threads is one post within the thread gets picked up and quoted over and over and over again. Thats dog piling. For the most part it doesnt look like any poster in here has been quoted more than 3-4 times. That isnt dog piling, thats discussion.
The problem was you had to believe 100% or you were branded as literally Hitler.
Pretty much this, no room for discussion.
Like claims to be from different areas of the world depending on what kind of victim he wants to be that day. He's full of shit about everything, this op included.W-what is this a reference to?
Half the thread is unsubtle, passive aggressive snipes at Lime.
Half is an exaggeration, but like I said its his thread, of course people are going to respond to him. He made a thread and he didnt stay around to have discussion, which is totally fine, but you cant have a two sided discussion when one side leaves.
Except there's nothing heartfelt about it. He's a literal troll.Bet.
No clue who OP is, but I don't see why he's deserving of such nasty responses after crafting such a heartfelt post. Smfh GAF.
If pointing out irony makes me the bad guy. Then I'll let it rock.
Pretty much.The problem was you had to believe 100% or you were branded as literally Hitler.
So weird to read folks talk about how GAF "used to be" a big dog pile as they dog pile in this thread whose express purpose was asking for civility.
Man, this x100I agree with the message, but boy is it the wrong messenger.
Wow it must be SO difficult for you to see people pointing out how misogynistic Quiet is as a character, or for people to point out that you're being catered to all the time. You poor marginalized individual. /s You're a perfect example of the link below. I and many others don't have the advantage of expressing apathy when we aren't represented, nor are we "one of the good ones" who sit quiet and throw our hands up as if things can't improve. Look where we are, look at the past e3, the medium IS improving, because of people like Anita Sarkeesian who spoke up and then got harassed for doing so.
Great post Lime. No one deserves to be harassed because they bother to speak up about aspects of video games like representation. This is one of the greatest threads in the history of this forum because of how true it is.
That is the same logic as questioning why a black athlete cannot take a knee. For many, especially minorities, women, en gays, the notion of Know your place and do not disturb us is a painful reminder that you are not seen as an equal. This invisible glass ceiling and oppressive stance has quietly been festering in the dark right in front of us for years, that is why racial profiling, sexual assault, and racism has been rampant because people have been abusing their positions and it been quietly accepted. When somebody stands up and says no more, they are labeled as ungrateful and often threatened by degrading them, go back to the kitchen, go back to your country, keep you gay believes to yourself all the while trampling on their rights to speak, protest, and question the status quo.Lime, since you're very respectful in your post I'll try to be as respectful as possible too but I'll have to mention some hard truths also. People like you are the reason we can't have nice things, you were constantly word policing and derailing every discussion with your agenda.
It has become less about diversity nowadays and more about forcing your ideology to others and shoving identity in every issue, especially gaming. It's not a discussion, it's a demand, that's the problem.
Pretty much.
There was no room for discussion, either you agreed or got fucked.
This never happens.I think you mistake what people want to discuss.
What most peeps are talking about is this.
Person 1: Captain America should be black
Person 2: I disagree, make a new character that is black.
Moderater bans person 2 for racism
or
Person 1: Cammy's outfit is pure male gaze and designed for misogynists
Person 2: I think Cammy's outfit makes her look sexy and powerful and I like it.
Moderator bans person 2 for being a sexist.
That is what people are talking about when they say they want to discuss things, not obviously bigoted stuff like should gay people have rights, or why do we need more blacks in games.
Try Harder People!! Youre not meeting the standards I have set for you!!! Oh please. Head off to the website you all created and leave GAF alone.It can't be said enough: everyone lambasting Lime for their tone is being wholly disingenuous and/or callous and needs to take a moment to self-reflect, because you're completely missing the point.
The scale of things is entirely different here. Having one's entire identity marginalized because it's not the default is on an entirely different class of oppression from someone being... rude... to opinions that continue to marginalize said identity. This shouldn't be so difficult to understand, but obviously it is, or else you guys wouldn't keep posting such obvious BS.
I don't have anything nice to say to you people because you're not even trying. Not even trying! TRY HARDER, PEOPLE!
This never happens.
Stop making things up to support your agenda (oh hey, I can do that too)! Point to actual examples or just don't bother. It's really not helping your case when you resort to hyperbole like this to try to make things seem worse off than they really were.
Which personal opinions of yours do you feel you were unable to say before? Like, go ahead now.
My standards aren't even particularly high. If you can't meet them, consider what that says about the level of discourse you're perpetuating here."Try Harder People!! You're not meeting the standards I have set for you!!!" Oh please. Head off to the website you all created and leave GAF alone.
But you are part of the problem. Attempting to shut down all discourse relating to the diversity of representation in video games by excluding it as non-gaming discussion is absolutely an unambiguous form of oppression. Why even pretend otherwise? Who are you fooling?What a deceptive thread title. In reality the OP is just a defense of GAF's social justice heyday wrapped in sanctimonious victimhood. In particular I found the argument that those who prefer to talk about games first are somehow part of the problem ludicrous but illuminating. It explains why skeleton-GAF treats us games-first posters so poorly.
This. If there were views they were unable to air it's probably because it was an opinion they knew people wouldn't like.Which personal opinions of yours do you feel you were unable to say before? Like, go ahead now.