According to Leadbetter a 40% difference in GPU power is negligeable while a 9% advantage in CPU power is a massive advantage.50%? That's close to 30%. And as everyone knows, a 30% difference is negligible. Case closed, nothing to see here.
According to Leadbetter a 40% difference in GPU power is negligeable while a 9% advantage in CPU power is a massive advantage.50%? That's close to 30%. And as everyone knows, a 30% difference is negligible. Case closed, nothing to see here.
But MS invented DirectX. I don't think this Adrian guy gets it. They literally made a proprietary graphics API for their own OS. They made the Xbox. They made the Xbox 360. And now they've made the Xbone. Two whole consoles centered around gaming, and one box that also happens to play games. And there's no way they'd give a 30% advantage to Sony.
The time is NOW to activate Major Nelson's GAF account.
if true (50% and not 30%) well at least Major Nelson wasn't lying
Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
Isn't this old news? I thought it was always known the PS4 is more powerful since Sony announced the specs?
But xbox was better than ps2
So that is where the DirectX meme comes from.
I could have sworn it was only 30% this morning.
Hope it will be nearing 100% by the time I wake up tomorrow..
I thought we knew 40% not 50% (admitted, I get confused with big numbers and shiny things, so maybe those numbers are for other things).
Let me tell you guys about 400hp porche and 700hp corvette
And it showed. Multiplats that were released on both were almost always better on Xbox.
GPU advantage although the faster RAM probably doesn't hurt either.What does 50% speed mean? Post is very vague, is he talking about RAM speed or what?
360 had a better GPU, toolset, and unified memory which all made development considerably easier on the platform. This time PS4 has all of those advantages over XBO but to an even larger degree.Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
How many is that now?
Jonathan Blow reporting on their dev friends saying the same.
NFS guy.
The DICE guy.
Avalanche guy.
People Can Fly guy.
Did I miss anyone?
"but Sony do you even program?" MS execs
Major said otherwise so obviously this former dev is a Sony shill and an alien.
LOL.., Wait till the dual GPU
The 360's CPU wasn't as powerful as the PS3's, but its GPU was much more capable than the PS3's outdated GPU. The solid number crunching ability of the cell SPEs was able to take some GPU work to help get better visuals but it required more work to do.Does this even matter? The 360 was less powerful than the PS3 and the multiplatform games for both performed the same and in some cases better on the 360.
Update #2:
Adding to OP...
Not really. I am surprised it's such a surprise. Even pure comparison of some hardware specs can tell you that much.
LOL, he's been gaf'dUpdate #2:
Adding to OP...
Avalanche? What did they say?How many is that now?
Jonathan Blow reporting on their dev friends saying the same.
NFS guy.
The DICE guy.
Avalanche guy.
People Can Fly guy.
Did I miss anyone?
Update #2:
Adding to OP...
Great now show me the 50% better Games....
LOL, he's been gaf'd
So he is already doing damage control, that didn't take long.
"come on guys, everyone knew that already! Right guys ? ... right ?..."