£8.99 on Amazon, babes.
You'll probably like Ghost in the Shell and Jin-Roh.And what others anime movies are like this?
Yep.. shame on you.Am I the only 1 who thought of the Pornstar after reading the title? :s
How does it look in HD? I have the two disc DVD version that has both the original and remastered version already.
If you love the movie, then I highly, highly recommend you read the manga. While the movie is still great in its own right, the original material is much detailed and extensive.
I don't know whether to read this as you not understanding when people say Akira is "Disney quality" they mean in terms of framerate or if you just wanted an opportunity to criticize Disney's historic animation pedigree.Btw: "Disney-quality animation" is a laughable term, because the only Disney animation ever had over the animation in Lantz and WB productions was smoothness, technical feats that meant little to characterization and acting, and massive budgets that allowed for an epic scale for each production. Akira, if anything, used the stylized nature of Japanese animation in place of actual actors, both a crutch and a performance-boosting prosthetic.
also, as far as just phenomenal animation, I highly recommend The Wings of the Honneamise
sure, it's a slow burn purely based on character development, but it's a beautiful story with an extreme level of detail that (almost) rivals AKIRA. Wonderfully realized fictitious world.
Well, it depends on what you view as decent animation. I think the first step into attaining a better appreciation of anime is to rid yourself of the mentality that smooth and lots of frames = good and nothing else. Certainly, that is one type of good animation but it's good to diversify. Working with limited frames forces animators to convey a good sense of motion and expression with what they have to work with, which leads to some serious visual creativity. Art through adversity or something.You're a goddamn troll yet I love you.
But you get what I mean. Anime doesn't normally have decent animation quality, even the best stuff out of places like Ghibli. It's all about the art. Akira had both the art and the framerate to go with it.
also, as far as just phenomenal animation, I highly recommend The Wings of the Honneamise
sure, it's a slow burn purely based on character development, but it's a beautiful story with an extreme level of detail that (almost) rivals AKIRA. Wonderfully realized fictitious world.
everyone should do themselves a favor and read the manga.
Oh, I know. I was talking in strictly technical terms. There are fantastic animation artists working in the anime field, obviously.Well, it depends on what you view as decent animation. I think the first step into attaining a better appreciation of anime is to rid yourself of the mentality that smooth and lots of frames = good and nothing else. Certainly, that is one type of good animation but it's good to diversify. Working with limited frames forces animators to convey a good sense of motion and expression with what they have to work with, which leads to some serious visual creativity. Art through adversity or something.
Yeah, this is true. Well, almost. For years on DVD the only English subtitles available were for hard of hearing folk, so you'd get:-Listening to any audio track other than the Japanese one is Doing It Wrong. Unlike most anime, the voices in Akira were recorded prior to the animation production and characters were animated with lipsync to the JP voiceactors.
Why? Some animators build their entire style around a limited number of frames. Look at Mitsuo Iso.Oh, I know. I was talking in strictly technical terms. There are fantastic animation artists working in the anime field, obviously.
... I just wish a lot more of them used a Western framerate. It's no artistic accident that an anime film with a high framerate is also still one of the best looking, nearly three decades on.
everyone should do themselves a favor and read the manga.
If an animator genuinely builds his style around limited frames and does it well, sure.Why? Some animators build their entire style around a limited number of frames. Look at Mitsuo Iso.
I bought this blu-ray a while back but haven't watched it.
Judging by this thread, im assuming I should?
As a kid I bought Akira on VHS at a yard sale from future me
I bought this blu-ray a while back but haven't watched it.
Judging by this thread, im assuming I should?
I always liked how mysterious the actual character of Akira was in the anime vs. the manga.
The reveal ofwas great.his body parts in the frozen containers
I'd train him in limited frames because he would be more unique!If an animator genuinely builds his style around limited frames and does it well, sure.
But, say you could take a man and train him to be an artistic genius. You have the option of training him in limited frames or lots o' frames. In both cases, he will be a 'master' of that technique.
I would say it would be preferable that he be trained in using a lot of frames.
I'm not saying that limited frames means bad art, because it obviously doesn't. I'm just saying that if an animator can use them well, giving them a good frame 'budget' will let their art soar.
lolMy ceiling for individual releases is $20.
Why is this mofo $99 on Amazon?
State of the art Japanese animation.
Still love the original dub quite a bit, awesome soundtrack too.
[edit - Also, as far as cheap blu-rays go, there are bootlegs. My old boss had a big batch of Oldboy BR copies that were identical to the Tartan release.]
the movie poster was pretty badass, also hand drawn anime is best anime.
the movie poster was pretty badass, also hand drawn anime is best anime.
anime is still hand drawnThere were a few CGI elements, but yeah.
Someone should make an official GAF thread of oldschool hand drawn anime goodness.
I've got an even better idea - let's make a Golden Age anime thread where we can reminisce about the good ol' days, guyz!
Love this score. One of my favorites. It sounds so otherworldly.