You simply do not want to entertain the possibility that she's fired precisely because of the nature of her second job?--which is, by the way, the main contention of this thread, the main reason of our discussion. That Nintendo appeared to have done nothing during her harassment was true (at least publicly), and yes, that was unfortunate, but that in itself probably has nothing to do with why she's fired.
"Alison Rapp was fired because she has a 2nd job that conflicted with Nintendo's values." You don't want to entertain the possibility that this has nothing to do with her involvement with GG, at least not directly?
We don't even know whether Nintendo gained that information from a GamerGate person or not (a person in here raised a good idea: if it was a GamerGate person that found out what she's been doing, why wouldn't they divulge that information cheerily for all the world to see? It seemed like such a GamerGate thing to do, after all) We just immediately assumed that the information was gained through a GamerGate person--we also just assumed that it was obtained illegally, and in a thread where the OP has stated in strong words that we must only push narratives based on the facts that we now, these assumptions without concrete proof are being pushed front, forward, and center as the fact that we all have to accept?
Again, the fact that Nintendo appeared to have done nothing to help Ms. Alison was really unfortunate--I am sure everyone, well, everyone that is sane anyways--would agree with this. But specifically talking about this termination, it seems strange to me that we would immediately put 100% of the fault towards Nintendo and simply dismiss the possibility that hey, maybe she did something that was in conflict with how Nintendo do things and that something was a sound enough reason for Nintendo to terminate her.
It seemed like so many in this thread are so eager to say "Nintendo buckles down to GamerGate and that's why they fired Alison" as the all-the-end-be that we should just 100% accept no matter what.