• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

And, if Nintendo hadn't created the Wii...

chriskzoo said:
N64? That console sold FASTER than the Wii the first holiday season - so much so that the retailer I worked at was selling games for $80-100 and we couldn't keep them in stock. Once everyone got their Mario and Zelda fix and developers got tired of Nintendo's business model and the inadequacies of cartridges, it sunk like an anchor in sales.

The one challenge the Wii faces is that it already shot it's "casual gamer hook" load with Wii sports, whereas the DS did not start getting popular until about a year into launch after the re-design and the Brain games started getting hot. I don't doubt that the Wii will probably catch the 360 in sales by the end of the year (talking US only here) but I think it will start to plateau there, while something like the PS3 will start really ramping up starting next summer.

Agreed. A lot of people don't realize any more just how hyped the N64 was, and how well it sold too. It was a phenomena really, or at least for a couple of years. I can't but feel that the Wii is on the same track.
 
HyperionX said:
Agreed. A lot of people don't realize any more just how hyped the N64 was, and how well it sold too. It was a phenomena really, or at least for a couple of years. I can't but feel that the Wii is on the same track.
Sweet, you both have numbers.

Sharing is caring.
 
mj1108 said:
First off, I just want to say that this thread is a whole load of stupid. It's pretty much a happy dreamland for everyone who was glad when Nintendo was sidelined.

So what happened in 1996 is going to happen here, right? You're basing everything on that. Plus as it's been mentioned, this is JUNE. You're talking about November/December '06.

A lot of "this is what I wish would happen".

I'm just pointing to history that quick launches do not necessarily equal sustained long-term success, which everyone seems to buying into that is hitting the N-pipe.
 
chriskzoo said:
N64? That console sold FASTER than the Wii the first holiday season - so much so that the retailer I worked at was selling games for $80-100 and we couldn't keep them in stock. Once everyone got their Mario and Zelda fix and developers got tired of Nintendo's business model and the inadequacies of cartridges, it sunk like an anchor in sales.

The one challenge the Wii faces is that it already shot it's "casual gamer hook" load with Wii sports, whereas the DS did not start getting popular until about a year into launch after the re-design and the Brain games started getting hot. I don't doubt that the Wii will probably catch the 360 in sales by the end of the year (talking US only here) but I think it will start to plateau there, while something like the PS3 will start really ramping up starting next summer.

The N64 didn't sell faster than the Wii out of the gate. The reason why it sold more it's first fall was because it was launch in late September, whereas the Wii came out in late November, so it had more time on the market its first fall.

The GameCube did not have a quick start either, it was already tanking in Japan pretty much from the get go and was in big trouble in North America by its first January (2002).

The scenario you're hypothesizing for the Wii ... a console selling that strongly into its second year and then just flat lining into its third year has never happened (ever) in the game business.

If people like Wii Sports ... that's nothing. Nintendo can make Wii Music, Wii Health, Mii World, etc. etc. etc. It's not really a fad ... a lot of people simply don't relate or can't get into Sony/MS more complex brand of gaming period. That's not going to change in 6, 8, 12, or 24 months.
 
Ynos Yrros said:
Great article, as usual. I don't agree with N'Gals reasoning though.

PS3 and Xbox 360 are future proof, they well though out machines. PS3's price will fall fast, and by a large margin to, thanks to the technology they are using, as it always was, new technology is very expensive, but once it gets more popular it's dropping on price fast.

Wii on the other hand, is using older tech, that won't fall much in price (possibly it will be more expensive 5 years from now, since it won't revelant to manufacturers other than Nintendo).
HD adoption rate is also growing faster with each season, and with it grows need for HD systems.

Many publications are calling the "war" over, and they might as well be right, all we have to do is wait some time, and after the war is actually is over, and Wii ends up outselling PS3 and 360 5 to 1, HD defenders can always say "it's in a different market".

Personally, I look at this year's line up for both HD consoles, and at titles said to come next year, and suddenly I stop caring about all the sales BS, cause no matter what, sales don't make good games.

This needs to be quoted. Over and over.
 
Didn't someone, I think Square2005, make a chart in an MC thread comparing all the Nintendo launches and first years? I think N64 was ahead on one month.
 
Wii will be the first to $99 and probably the only console at that price this gen. It wins automatically.
 
.dmc said:
What platform is Dragon Quest IX on again? Don't make the mistake of assuming that when someone says "games go the the platform with the highest userbase" that they mean "FFXIII/MGS4 to Wii confirmed". This isn't about this years highest profile releases being ported to Wii, it's about future iterations of those franchises + new franchises going to the platform with the largest userbase. If that platform is Wii + games are built from the ground up for Wii it won't mean shit that it isn't as powerful as the 360 or PS3.

I think his general point is some games/genres/"specific developer's vision" may not carry over well to the Wii, much in the same way that Wii Sports appeal is sort of lost on traditional consoles/controllers. Looking back, even though the PS2 had uber-sales, Xbox still managed to have exclusive titles and was the preferred choice for certain genres.
 
Deku said:
Wii will be the first to $99 and probably the only console at that price this gen. It wins automatically.

Considering where the 360 and PS3 is at, we've got a loooooooooong way to go until we see a $99 Wii if Nintendo were to react to price drops.
 
The first 4 months (US): http://kotaku.com/gaming/nintendo/charticle-the-first-four-months-249629.php

Front bar is hardware, back bar is software:
firstfour2.JPG
 
soundwave05 said:
The scenario you're hypothesizing for the Wii ... a console selling that strongly into its second year and then just flat lining into its third year has never happened (ever) in the game business.

Though there is the N64, a fast start followed by a gradual erosion of support until it was done.

EDIT: PSP is more or less the same as the N64 too, though not as bad.
 
The N64 really wasn't a failure, it was a genuinely popular console in North America anyway ... it was an economic model that killed it.

If the N64 had even GameCube-level third party support and cartridges were cheaper to make it probably would've outsold the SNES (49 million). They should have just at least made the 64DD type discs the system's standard format.
 
HyperionX said:
Though there is the N64, a fast start followed by a gradual erosion of support until it was done.

EDIT: PSP is more or less the same as the N64 too, though not as bad.
The N64 was pretty much in the exact opposite situation to that which the Wii finds itself in. The PSP analogy is much more appropriate.
 
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."
 
The problem with comparing Wii's NA numbers to N64's numbers for example or PS2's or PSone's is you're comparing a staggered launch for all 3 legacy platforms to a simultaneous launch. Though not always plentiful during launch, the supply situation was less of an issue as manufacturer had a chance to build up inventory and spread out the huge spike of demand to one territory at a time. (Europe for PSone, PS2 and N64 was also staggered AFTER NA).

Wii sold only 600k in December in the US, and much of that pent up demand spilled in 2007 with huge numbers in January, February, March and April. The only worthwhile comparison to be made is with the PS3 or 360, both of which had some semblance of a global launch but I'm not surprised no one wants to make those comparisons.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."

If you're a new gamer you're not going to get *another* game system just a few months or probably even years after getting a Wii.

It could help Sony/MS ... like 5-10 years down the line. Some of them might even be able to afford a PS3 by then, lol.
 
I know lots of people are avoiding the MC threads these days because of the frequent and unfortunate injections of stupid into the discussion, but there is some great stuff posted in there on a regular basis. Just so happens this question of "How well has Wii performed compared to other Nintendo hardware?" came up in last week's MC thread. And a decent piece of analysis (with numbers!) was produced by Square2005. Here it is:
Square2005 said:
Guys this is a comparison of the months after all of NIntendo's past home console launches versus the Wii:
Now the NES & SNES are my estimates but I've done alotta research (reading old articles, etc.) to get an idea of how they were selling so it should be fairly accurate at least the LTDs are (NPD reported SNES broke past 1.5m in February '92).
The NES test launched in New York in October 1985 then in LA in Feb. '86 so it wasn't available nationwide until the following year after its test launch so it didn't 'really' launch until late 1986 nationwide.
(BTW this is not from ********).
The N64, GC is of course from the NPD. If anyone has more accurate NES, SNES data please share it and I'll update the graph if it's legit.

518489258_614bb0fc20_o.png


NES available nationwide: by Fall of 1986
SNES first available at limited chains (Toys 'R' Us): Aug. 1991, official launch: Sept. 9, 1991.
N64 officially launched nationwide: Sept. 29, 1996
GC " " " : Nov. 18, 2001
Wii " " " : Nov. 19, 2006

So Wii sales are extremely impressive in the States (and of course Japan) post-Christmas compared to the previous record selling Big N console the N64!
So there you go. Wii ass-kicking re-confirmed.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."

So by playing Wii Sports he aquires the gift of vision and with it appreciation for HD visials. Seems VERY likely.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."
No, it's been brought up before. Believe me.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."

This has been brought up a million times. Seriously. It's like step 4 of the Graphic Whore Crybaby Anonymous 12 Step Program.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."
Err, I made that argument in this very thread because it describes me exactly. Except for the "move up" thing. More "game on this console too." Wii rekindled my interest in consoles, and now I want a 360 too. Excite Truck wouldn't be the same on 360. Earth Defence Force wouldn't be the same on Wii. They are both awesome.

Segata Sanshiro said:
Fred, given Square's "affiliation", I'm extremely hesitant to put much stock in his numbers.
Really? He says its all from NPD except for NES/Genesis.
 
Now I should note that Square2005 isn't forthcoming on his sources for some of the older data on that chart I just posted, so feel free to take it with a grain of salt.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."

Been brought up many times.

Speaking of which, I remember a friend of mine who was a total Nintendo fanboy. Got a PS1 anyways, caused he wanted to play FFVII (still was a Nintendo fanboy at that time). Just to show you, the lead the Wii has right now probably doesn't mean anything.
 
HyperionX said:
Been brought up many times.

Speaking of which, I remember a friend of mine who was a total Nintendo fanboy. Got a PS1 anyways, caused he wanted to play FFVII (still was a Nintendo fanboy at that time). Just to show you, the lead the Wii has right probably doesn't mean anything, nor does any of this rhetoric either.

It means something in Japan for sure .... Sony is in big, big trouble there and will have problems catching Nintendo in Japan.

The Wii could coast off Nintendo + Japanese 3rd party + EA support for years. Winning Japan alone pretty much ensures 4-5 years of support for the platform.
 
HyperionX said:
Been brought up many times.

Speaking of which, I remember a friend of mine who was a total Nintendo fanboy. Got a PS1 anyways, caused he wanted to play FFVII (still was a Nintendo fanboy at that time). Just to show you, the lead the Wii has right now probably doesn't mean anything.

True. Your friend's inclination can be effectively extrapolated to represent millions of people.
 
Deku said:
My logic is quite sound.

Your point was that the Wii will win because it will be the first and only console to $99. That logic did not hold up last generation.

Come again?

I'm not arguing with you that the Wii will or won't win, I'm just pointing out the gigantic holes in your logic.
 
Segata Sanshiro said:
The divorce from reality here is absolutely staggering.

It's one of the coping mechanisms when there's cognitive dissonance. :) And ironically, the smarter the person is, the more likely they are to come up with elaborate rationalizations for the dissonance.
 
chriskzoo said:
Here is maybe a long-term view that I haven't heard anyone bring up - could the fact that Wii is bringing in people who were not previous gamers actually HELP 360 and PS3 in the long-term? Seriously, if I'm a casual gamer that gets brought in and kindles an interest in gaming (not just the waggle), is it possible that those gamers (who are likely older with plenty of disposable income) might think "Man, now THOSE systems look incredible" and "move up."
I thought your long-term view was that the Wii would lose steam? Sounds like you're really reaching here. So is the Wii going to continue to be a massive success and magically convert them into 360/PS3 owners or is it going to just suddenly stop selling and "fizz out"? Both sound extremely unlikely... but take your pick.
 
Segata Sanshiro said:
The divorce from reality here is absolutely staggering.

The Sony/MS defense force has basically become the GameCube fans circa 2002 who were kinda in their own bubble detached from the reality of the market. It's kinda of eerie how quickly the situation reversed.
 
TheLegend said:
I thought your long-term view was that the Wii would lose steam? Sounds like you're really reaching here. So is the Wii going to continue to be a massive success and magically convert them into 360/PS3 owners or is it going to just suddenly stop selling and "fizz out"? Both sound extremely unlikely... but take your pick.

Sell well through this year and then plateau next summer.

soundwave05 said:
The Sony/MS defense force has basically become the GameCube fans circa 2002, pretty much. It's kind of eerie how quickly how it changed.

LOL - more like PSP owners. Then again, there is MUCH more I'd rather play on my PSP right now than my DS, just as there is MUCH more coming out for 360/PS3 that I'd rather play than what is coming out on Wii.
 
Tristam said:
True. Your friend's inclination can be effectively extrapolated to represent millions of people.

He was a pretty big fanboy. It just means no one has any sort of vice-grip hold on gamers.
 
dammitmattt said:
Your point was that the Wii will win because it will be the first and only console to $99. That logic did not hold up last generation.

Come again?

I'm not arguing with you that the Wii will or won't win, I'm just pointing out the gigantic holes in your logic.
The whole point of my argument is that given the advantages Wii already enjoy right now at $250 and the disadvantages it of its rivals, it will be able to get to the psychologically significant $99 mark sooner and will be the only one to get there this generation, giving it a significant advantage in the coming years.

I draw no conclusions as to what happened in the past. In fact, I've also been discussing in parallel the folly of comparing numbers from staggered launches with the new regime of global launches. What is happening now is new, insofar as the strategic picture is concerned. I draw no comparisons with the past on these two points - pricing and American numbers at launch.
 
chriskzoo said:
Sell well through this year and then plateau next summer.



LOL - more like PSP owners. Then again, there is MUCH more I'd rather play on my PSP right now than my DS.


By next summer it'll be far too late ... if it sells through this year and into the early part of next year, it'll have a userbase north of 20 million because it's also basically got Japan all to itself.

And when that happens ... it's too late for a turnaround. If the system was going to slow it has to happen within the next 2-3 months really.

The window is closing. We should have started to see cracks in the armor by Feb/March/April like with the N64/GC/DC etc. If the system sells stellar into next year ... all the 3rd parties like Square-Enix, EA, Sega, etc. are already going to have new projects well under development for it. These scenarios become less and less plausible every month that goes by and the Wii's userbase continues to grow at a rapid clip.

If it was going to happen, honestly it should have happened already during those really dry months of Jan-March 2007 ... but nothing ... nada.
 
Right. That can be said about the transition going from generation to generation.

As can be seen, those 120 million Sony faithful are starting to transfer to the Wii.
 
HyperionX said:
He was a pretty big fanboy. It just means no one has any sort of vice-grip hold on gamers.

You're absolutely right, Sony has proven that no one has a vice grip on gamers. Most of my friends have purchased Wii's.
 
soundwave05 said:
By next summer it'll be too late ... if it sells through this year and into the early part of next year, it'll have a userbase north of 20 million because it's also basically got Japan all to itself.

And when that happens ... it's too late for a turnaround. If the system was going to slow it has to happen within the next 2-3 months really.

The window is closing. If it was going to happening we should have started to see cracks in the armor by Feb/March/April. If the system sells stellar into next year ... all the 3rd parties like Square-Enix, EA, Sega, etc. are already going to have new projects well under development for it.

The folly in your argument is that the console user base is pretty much fixed at around 150 million or so (the impact of Wii may expand this significantly, but it's too early to tell) - and history shows that 80% of those units get pushed in years 3-5 after launch. What happens 7 months after launch is inconsequential.

As for publishers, yes, they will want to put games on Wii to make quick money - but is that console attracting the type of gamer that will want to play (and BUY) those games (FF for example)?
 
FlightOfHeaven said:
Right. That can be said about the transition going from generation to generation.

As can be seen, those 120 million Sony faithful are starting to transfer to the Wii.

Did you get up to your elbow to pull that out of your ass? Proof?
 
chriskzoo said:
The folly in your argument is that the console user base is pretty much fixed at around 150 million or so (the impact of Wii may expand this significantly, but it's too early to tell) - and history shows that 80% of those units get pushed in years 3-5 after launch. What happens 7 months after launch is inconsequential.

As for publishers, yes, they will want to put games on Wii to make quick money - but is that console attracting the type of gamer that will want to play (and BUY) those games (FF for example)?

Actually the key year for consoles is that year 2. That's what builds the foundation for year 3/4/5, that second year tells you a lot about how a console is going to fair over the long haul.

What happens 7 months after launch is not inconsequntial ... the game is on *right now*, just because Sony is snoozing sitting on the bench, doesn't mean the other guys are just sitting back doing nothing. Sony's net is getting scored on.

No one gives a crap about Sony's excuses about a 10 year console cycle or the fact that MS has serious problems selling in 2 of the 3 major global markets. Today it's Sony and MS making excuses ... five years ago it was Nintendo making excuses. If you're making excuses rather than selling systems, in my experience watching this business for a lot of years ... you are in trouble.

Month 1/2 you can maybe write off as launch period honeymoon period ... but month 3, month 4, month 5, etc .... the race is on by then, those months absolutely do matter.
 
Top Bottom