• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Android, iOS, WP8 phone debate thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Isn't Xperia T supposed to have a shitty battery life (an early reviews suggested that at least: http://recombu.com/mobile/reviews/sony/xperia-t/ )

Check out the OT. Recombu is the only one that really had any problems withe the battery. It's a 1850 battery so it should last that one day of average use...

AT&T and I do not get along.

Oh right, coolio.

By the way, how is that Motorola phone a full-screen phone? My HD2 has a smaller bezel than that thing..

"It's the smallest bezel we made, so it must mean it's edge-to-edge"

or the Apple approach of

"Because we said so and now press will spread this lie like fire so it must be true."
 
I believe with "Prime Infinity" you mean either Asus Transformer Prime or Asus Transformer Infinity? Neither of them has received the official JB update so it might be too early to judge them.
Ah, very interesting. Yes, it's the Transformer Infinity and it was using a non-Asus version of JB, I believe.

It's a beautiful piece of hardware, though, but in the tablet space the Windows 8 x86 tablets are far and away the most interesting to me. Much more than the iPad or an Android tablet.
 
I rolled my eyes when I read those Nokia hardware spec ads. Nokia is the last company who can use hardware spec as a talking point. For years they are stuck in the 360X640 loser world. Who get me start on the cpu and screen size.

Who are they trying to preach to? Traditional Nokia users who for years have been buying low spec Symbian phones for superior battery life and build quality? Or the Xbox user who had never used a Nokia phone in their life?

What?
 
How do you guys get into this stuff? It's so childish and boring.

As much as the Mac ads sucked, at least they attempted personality and humor. This sort of thing is just bringing Internet commenter garbage to life.
It IS funny though. iOS 6 maps in general is a joke. I'm sure many others find this funny too. You have to be hard core Apple fan to find the Mac ads even bearable.
 
I don't get how the statement regarding iPhone 5's screen tech (Tim Cook) is justified by taking into account that the Lumia 920 isn't released yet. The iPhone 5 wasn't released when the conference was taking place was it now? Besides, the Nokia event was before the Apple event, so they confirmed the screen technology at an event prior to Apple's event.

There's straws being clutched, and nits being picked... Just roll with it..
 
That screen will be really nice during the winter since you wont have to take your gloves off in order to use the phone. Why the hell did the guy not place the camera straight above the phones though? That was a little annoying lol

Considering I'm going snowboarding this winter multiple times, this will be a godsend.
 
Check out the OT. Recombu is the only one that really had any problems withe the battery. It's a 1850 battery so it should last that one day of average use...
Ok, we'll have to see then. I've done some more researching and I'm waiting/hoping for the Motorola Droid Razr Maxx HD.
http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/motorola-droid-razr-maxx/4505-6452_7-35436500.html

There is no WinMo equivalent in terms of battery life, right (even if it's just an announcement)?
 
Ok, we'll have to see then. I've done some more researching and I'm waiting/hoping for the Motorola Droid Razr Maxx HD.
http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/motorola-droid-razr-maxx/4505-6452_7-35436500.html

There is no WinMo equivalent in terms of battery life, right (even if it's just an announcement)?

I've got a RAZR and honestly Moto's software optimisation sucks. The phone is very sluggish if I don't do a restart at least every 3 days, and I'm comparing it against my brother's Arc S which has inferior specs but runs much more smoothly.
 
Are there any phones out there, other than the iPhone, that have a screen painted on like the iPhone? It's been a few years since the iPhone 4 but no other phone I've seen has that awesome display. Does the new Nokia have it?
 
Are there any phones out there, other than the iPhone, that have a screen painted on like the iPhone? It's been a few years since the iPhone 4 but no other phone I've seen has that awesome display. Does the new Nokia have it?

I'm not sure what you mean? Like the bezel isn't position higher than the screen? if so I know Xperia Arc S has this and I think all the NXT Xperias follow suit.
 
Are there any phones out there, other than the iPhone, that have a screen painted on like the iPhone? It's been a few years since the iPhone 4 but no other phone I've seen has that awesome display. Does the new Nokia have it?

Yes, the 920 has it, the 900 has it, heck even my Samsung Focus has something that resembles that.
 
Are there any phones out there, other than the iPhone, that have a screen painted on like the iPhone? It's been a few years since the iPhone 4 but no other phone I've seen has that awesome display. Does the new Nokia have it?

Htc One X/ Htc EVO LTE are usually praised for having the best screen.
 
Are people championing the 920 still now that the HTC 8X is revealed? The 8X seems like the phone to beat.

The 8X probably has better audio, has a slightly better PPI, and I personally prefer the matte finish (but the 8S's and 920's designs are both better IMO, but the 920 beats it on every other spec AFAIK.
 
Yes, the 920 has it, the 900 has it, heck even my Samsung Focus has something that resembles that.
Your Focus does not. Cool about the Nokias, though.

I'm not sure what you mean? Like the bezel isn't position higher than the screen? if so I know Xperia Arc S has this and I think all the NXT Xperias follow suit.
No. I mean that layer of air is thinner on the iPhone.

Htc One X/ Htc EVO LTE are usually praised for having the best screen.
They don't have that iPhone pop.
 
What's the iPhone pop?

It’s mentioned briefly in Apple’s promotional video about the design of the iPhone 4, but they’re using a new production process that effectively fuses the LCD and touchscreen — there is no longer any air between the two. One result of this is that the iPhone 4 should be impervious to this dust-under-the-glass issue. More importantly, though, is that it looks better. The effect is that the pixels appear to be painted on the surface of the phone; instead of looking at pixels under glass, it’s like looking at pixels on glass. Combined with the incredibly high pixel density, the overall effect is like “live print”.
http://daringfireball.net/2010/06/iphone_4

Well, I did say it has something that resembles it.

No, it doesn't.
 
There's virtually no glass on top of the iPhone 5 image. The iPhone 4 was the first time that effect really stunned me.
 
Hmm. It says that it looks very good, which is true for many phones. It's also mentioned that the viewing angles are good, which is also true for many, many phones. So is iPhone pop the new retina?

I... what?

It's the glass fused to the rest of the screen that makes it pop. But it's three years old, yet no other phone really has it. Except the Nokias, I guess.
 
I... what?

It's the glass fused to the rest of the screen that makes it pop. But it's three years old, yet no other phone really has it. Except the Nokias, I guess.
Isn't that the same for the Galaxy S3? source.

"The glass is fused to the display, and the display to the Galaxy S III's frame."
 
Try a Nexus 7? That might be your best bet? I find demo units of phones and tablets to run slow since people have fucked with them an ungodly amount of times.

Nexus 7s are laggy as well. Sometimes I think it might be a problem with the touch screen technology Android oems seem to use. More than enough missed swipes and inputs to make the whole system feel at fault
 
I... what?

It's the glass fused to the rest of the screen that makes it pop. But it's three years old, yet no other phone really has it. Except the Nokias, I guess.

http://www.stuff-review.com/2012-04...-by-the-original-corning-gorilla-glass-not-2/

The HTC One X’s screen is optically laminated to the glass, eliminating any gap between them and bringing the screen closer to the edge

HTC did that exact same thing with LCD2 tech earlier this year in the HTC OneX, thats what gives the screen that effect that makes it look like the image is floating on the surface of the screen. I think there is something else about the iPhone screen tech, something to do with the RGB pixel layout that supposedly is new, but its not the screen fusing thing, thats been done before. We will get more details on this soon when the tech sites really start to dig deep.
 
Nexus 7s are laggy as well. Sometimes I think it might be a problem with the touch screen technology Android oems seem to use. More than enough missed swipes and inputs to make the whole system feel at fault

Hearing complaints like this just makes me think you people are utterly crazy.
 
Hearing complaints like this just makes me think you people are utterly crazy.

Shrug those are my impressions from playing around with one for a day. Take a look at the Verge review and tell me how many missed swipes and swipe errors are in the video. Plenty is the answer if I remember correctly.
 
http://www.stuff-review.com/2012-04...-by-the-original-corning-gorilla-glass-not-2/



HTC did that exact same thing with LCD2 tech earlier this year in the HTC OneX, thats what gives the screen that effect that makes it look like the image is floating on the surface of the screen. I think there is something else about the iPhone screen tech, something to do with the RGB pixel layout that supposedly is new, but its not the screen fusing thing, thats been done before. We will get more details on this soon when the tech sites really start to dig deep.

I've never seen a One X up close. I'll have to take a look. It's surprising how no one but Apple had this tech for about two years. The iPhone 4 was just a huge leap in so many ways.

Yeah, there's something new with the digitizer or whatever in the new iPhone.
 
Shrug those are my impressions from playing around with one for a day. Take a look at the Verge review and tell me how many missed swipes and swipe errors are in the video. Plenty is the answer if I remember correctly.

Uhhh yeah no, if anything the touchscreen is too sensitive and the animation tries to keep up with slight movements in your finger which can make it look jittery.
 
Shrug those are my impressions from playing around with one for a day. Take a look at the Verge review and tell me how many missed swipes and swipe errors are in the video. Plenty is the answer if I remember correctly.

This just doesn't happen for me. Ever. The screen is super-accurate and the hardware never hiccups.
 
I get quite a few input problems. Delays and general jerkiness/hiccups. There's a level of fluidity in iPhone that is likely difficult to reproduce because of Android's nature; flexibility, openness. But it's light years ahead of 2.X Android.
 
The hyperbole in all these phone threads are amazing. I'm still rocking an old GS2 on Gingerbread because I used Odin to upgrade to that and can't be arsed doing it again to upgrade to ICS or JB and snappiness wise, it's still comparable to the tonne of iPhone 4s and 4Ss I've played with (and had to fix, thanks to my dumb family). It's starting to glitch though - every few days the screen will go blank and it requires me to take the battery out and restart it.

Saying that, my Asus Transformer has always been horrible though and ICS didn't help it much at all - I can't wait to be rid of it.
 
Are people championing the 920 still now that the HTC 8X is revealed? The 8X seems like the phone to beat.

Reasons why I want the 920 instead of the 8X:

-Better camera with optical image stabilization enabling smoother videos and low-light shots
-Wireless charging
-Super-sensitive touch
-32GB included instead of 16GB (neither has an SD slot)
-Better audio recording quality

It's heavier and thicker, but those two negatives don't outweigh the positives for me.
 
I think I'm going with the 920 for the camera and simple UI. I don't want to do a ton with a smart phone yet. If I want to mod stuff and I find WP8 too "walled garden", I'll switch to droid in 2 years.

Problem is Verizon doesn't even have it? Eh, guess I'll wait.
 
I got an Evo when it first came out, I think I am going to go for the Lumia 920 now. Feel the need for some change.
 
Reasons why I want the 920 instead of the 8X:

-Better camera with optical image stabilization enabling smoother videos and low-light shots
-Wireless charging
-Super-sensitive touch
-32GB included instead of 16GB (neither has an SD slot)
-Better audio recording quality

It's heavier and thicker, but those two negatives don't outweigh the positives for me.

This.
 
Just had an epic iPhone 5 vs Galaxy S3 comparathon with all my cousins etc present. Pretty much a unanimous win for the S3, but the weirdest thing was I was there defending the iPhone 5.

I think the biggest selling point is the screen size. Coupled with the actual blacks as oppose to greys (comparatively) of the 5, vids just look much better. Using the YouTube app the vids are much bigger and more detailed on the S3. Loaded N***as in Paris Live and for some reason it was letterboxed on the 5 and full screen on the S3.

Video loading speed was much quicker on the S3, with the 5 stalling a lot.

Crunchyroll vids looked better on the S3, I think they may have been direct flash vs iPhone specific.

Speaker wise I think the 5 is ever so slightly louder, but I expected it to be much louder. With both on at max volume, you can't really hear one especially over the other. It's close, at least it was in our already fairly noisy environment.

Camera quality wise, the 5 is a bit brighter in low light, and might be a touch less noisy too, but the S3 shots seem a tad more detailed. 5 was a touch softer in low light.

Video quality (again low light only) S3 seemed better. Slightly less bright but far more detailed and better much wider angle. Both seem smooth.

Both mess up on white balance camera vid wise. The 5 is too saturated and warm, the S3 too cool and less colourful.

Panorama overall was better on S3. With the 5 you're stuck with portrait, S3 you have landscape too. Again, S3 is slightly darker but seemed to pick up more detail. Both stitched really well.

Web wise, S3 was only on ICS and I think the 5 was marginally quicker, both being very quick. S3 showed more info, but whites were less bright, with blacks superior. 5 had more accurate whites but less accurate blacks.

We only tested one other app, auto rap, and I think it processed faster on the S3, but I fully expect it to be a software update thing for the 5.

In the time we used both phones, the S3 used about 4% less of its battery. Both lost little. Was not really a valid battery comparison.

I think the video at the same time as Web browsing thing was an impressive feature of the S3, as was smart stay which seemed to help. Main thing was that media just seemed more impressive on the bigger and what looked to be more detailed screen (at least with the media we played).

I think both are amazing though, but my pick will remain the S3. I expected more from the 5's camera and speakers tbh, but it might just be the conditions.
 
I think at this point it comes down to what theindividual prefers, every single review I have seen of the Nexus 7 has said it is as smooth as the iPhone yet a poster above says no.

PS that speed comparison above really ought to throw in the Galaxy Nexus and jelly bean not a Touchwiz infused S3, or at least an S3 with a clean Jellybean ROM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom