• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Angry Joe - Angry Rant on Tomb Raider

I hope those of you name calling and insulting him realise he is a gaffer.

Not only do I remember that he's a gaffer, but I really hope he's reading this.

The juvenile 'rants' that he goes on in character are embarrassing. Some people find it entertaining just like some people find Transformers entertaining...

...he's a talented editor though.
 
I totally forgot about this-- and after SoulCalibur II had taken the series out of platform exclusivity, too.

I'm trying to remember if we were as pissed back then as we are now. I wasn't; I had a PS2, so I didn't miss a thing.
PS2 owners probably bitched about Resident Evil 4 until Capcom caved and announced the port before the GC version released. It happens.

Anyways, the point is him calling the Bayonetta situation "unprecedented" is fucking absurd. If the game is getting moneyhatted, all that means is that the dev team is getting paid and the platform holder gets an exclusive.
 
Not only do I remember that he's a gaffer, but I really hope he's reading this.

The juvenile 'rants' that he goes on in character are embarrassing. Some people find it entertaining just like some people find Transformers entertaining...

1063153.gif
 
Tomb Raider. Target platform was originally Saturn. Sony inked a deal with Eidos to be console exclusive.

From wikipedia:
"In September 1997, Sony Computer Entertainment America signed a deal with Eidos to make console releases for the Tomb Raider franchise exclusive to the PlayStation, preventing the Sega Saturn or the Nintendo 64 from having any Tomb Raider game released for it until 2000, a deal that would prove very beneficial to Sony both in terms of revenue dollars and also in further cementing the PlayStation's growing reputation as the go-to system for must-have exclusive titles."

What a waste of money apparently playstation sold 5 times as many Saturns in that period (in America) and Saturn got discontinued months after TR2's release anyway.
 
Not fully on topic but this guy just seems to have such low intelligence. I'm not talking about his opinion themselves but the way he portrays and acts. I remember when he tried to act all 'angry' and tough with Major Nelson after the initial Xbox announcement and he couldn't string thoughts together or hold a conversation.

Also he just comes off as lame.

he's not an interviewer, but wanted to branch out to that since his audience is over a million.

I'm not really a fan of the yelling angry gamer stuff, since it gives off a man child image, but it's popular. He's got some funny stuff up though.
 
Last time I checked up on it, Angry Joe was always being accused of being an MS fanboy. And also, I don't remember the videos being censored.

Also also, people getting angry at games going exclusive.

In my memory the dude pretty much shits on most of the games in his review. He just happened to shit on KZSF and Infamous SS extremly hard in his current gen reviews.

Kinda amazed that he didn't totally destroy TR in his original review though...
 
This is how Microsoft has to compete due to its inferior hardware (permanent) and inferior first party studios (would take at least 4-5 years to catch up, barring a wholesale acquisition). Maybe if they made Xbox Gold free and dropped the console's price to $300, but neither of those things will happen.
 
Not only do I remember that he's a gaffer, but I really hope he's reading this.

The juvenile 'rants' that he goes on in character are embarrassing. Some people find it entertaining just like some people find Transformers entertaining...

...he's a talented editor though.
No, I'm saying this because I received a ban for insulting an Internet entertainer who happened to be a gaffer here. A general heads up.
 
I don't always like the "yelling rant" style he does, but I tend to agree with him 90% of the time with the topics he discusses. And hell, its a more entertaining video than watching some boring guy. The "anger" sometimes help drive the point home. Im subbed to his channel but don't watch everything.
 
People getting angry at Angry Joe getting angry is funny.

Especially when he's the one with hundreds of thousands of views. Like it or not, guys, his getting incensed and making a video about a pertinent issue may be as important as all the NeoGAF threads on it when it comes to spreading the word. NeoGAF is a pretty widely regarded forum, but his non-overlapping audience merely adds to NeoGAF's strength here. Why whine about that?
 
I might not agree on Joe´s behaviour in these videos he make, but I do agree that it´s a scummy move by CD and everyone involved. Stealing such a long time franchise and making it exclusive.

Thankfully its a timed exclusive, so PS4 people will get to experience it in the end any way, but still a bad move and stuff like this needs to go away, its ruining gaming!
 
Accepting financial stability and free marketing from a console manufacturer rather than take on all the risk and hope the market is healthy enough to recoup your costs and turn a profit.

Those bastards!
 
Joe is back. I love Joe!

Also crystal Dynamics sold out! wonder how much MS paid them

who cares how much they got paid.

hopefully they're putting that money towards developing the game, which will still benefit everyone when the timed exclusivity is up.

pc/ps4 will get a better looking game on better hardware, it'll be the goty whatever edition with dlc, and probably cheaper too. Just have to wait a little longer, big deal.
 
I'm always amazed at how many people seem to hate on Angry Joe for his shtick and completely ignore that he's one of the best game reviewers out there and goes into depth about issues in the industry.

because his schtick is fucking stupid and annoying
i'm not gonna sit through his annoying as fuck character just for some insightful commentary
there's plenty of other places i can get that without having to deal with an annoying youtube character
 
because his schtick is fucking stupid and annoying
i'm not gonna sit through his annoying as fuck character just for some insightful commentary
there's plenty of other places i can get that without having to deal with an annoying youtube character

We are probably no longer the target audience.

5 year ago-me was all about internet rhetoric and fuckityfuckfuck, but i am truly becoming an old man.

Angry Joe should get off my lawn.
 
I'm always amazed at how many people seem to hate on Angry Joe for his shtick and completely ignore that he's one of the best game reviewers out there and goes into depth about issues in the industry.

I'll disagree, but truth be told I only watched one of his reviews.
Completely missed the point of the game he was reviewing focused on gameplay, and nothing else. Mentioned story, but didn't focus on it and switch back to the gameplay.

It's clear he didn't like the game, but at least good reviewers talk about the story in games they don't like.
 
he's not an interviewer, but wanted to branch out to that since his audience is over a million.

I'm not really a fan of the yelling angry gamer stuff, since it gives off a man child image, but it's popular. He's got some funny stuff up though.

Angry Joe really isn't an angry persona 90% of the time, and he seems to genuinely want to get along with the industry people.

Just look at his reaction to Spoony at E3:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nF_Ca45JRFs
 
This is the guys gimmick to get viewers but it's ridiculous. Making video games isn't easy and making money on them for a long period of time is really hard. Just look at all of the game companies that shut down every year. I'm not going to blame a company for securing financial responsibility to its employees. This guy needs to get a real job and understand how the world works. Just because they made money on the first doesn't mean these guys will have a job in 5 years.
 
This is the guys gimmick to get viewers but it's ridiculous. Making video games isn't easy and making money on them for a long period of time is really hard. Just look at all of the game companies that shut down every year. I'm not going to blame a company for securing financial responsibility to its employees. This guy needs to get a real job and understand how the world works. Just because they made money on the first doesn't mean these guys will have a job in 5 years.

Ah, so much condescention concentrated in a single post, incredible.
 
I was disappointed in the Angry Joe Tomb raider rant video, but it is what is an entertainment video. I still enjoy his show but his stock dropped for sure.
 
I could have sworn Tomb Raider II and III were exclusive for awhile on consoles (and still is) to the PlayStation brand?

Double standard all up in the ass, here.
 
Christ some of the comments in the video even after Phil Spencer confirmed that the exclusivity deal has a duration, they are still defending Joe and saying that we are spreading lies.
 

I was thinking more of Editor's blog: I am sexist because apparently the cream of intellectual journalism is there. But each to his own.

I would go even further but this is not a thread about sexism within the intellectuals of game journalism.

Lol, I'm pretty sure the majority here couldn't give a sweet fuck if he's a gaffer. Oh, man. What in the world made you decide to write that?

So you are intentionally derailing a thread with insults and ad hominem content instead of offering critique relevant to his arguments?

The fact is AJ, Jim and TB give you raw material. They are not wearing suits and they are not walking suits either. Think you can do better? Grow some balls, step up your game and put yourself out on the NET. Because whether you like it or not, when it comes to alternative/independent "journalism" that is what we have and that is what they can give. Being raw and being true. It maybe be the worse, because apparently again being straight forward and as genuine as possible; you know no PR make up, you know being yourself, is not good enough; it is better off having an Oxy (short for Oxford) boy giving you a lecture and not taking sides because the content is "entertaining" or because they are too trained in diplomacy (which most of it is public relations talking) to think otherwise. But the thing is you don't have to be a philosopher or an academic to call out bullshit. In this year we have enough shit on our plate already; game trailers with no gameplay ( what "game" are you "trailing"), early access, and so on and so forth, and now "time exclusive" is something to be bragged, praised, defended and accepted as something logical?

Either way, the only reason this is happening is simply because Microsoft put more money into it and money won. It is really simple. In fact it is child's logic. That does not mean that as a gamer who supported a game or a franchise you should never criticize it because everything to you must seem as another "it is either this or we are going to close" scenario.

If this was the case, if it was that they wouldn't have made it time exclusive. It would have been exclusive from start. I will stop because I really do not want to draw you a picture.
 
Did Joe rant about Bayonetta 2 being WiiU exclusive? Curious, I actually don't know

Apparently he did, because, in the video, he does mention Bayo 2 being a Wii U exclusive and being pissed off about it (He shows a scene from a rant about it that he never uploaded) . He does however acknowledge (In this video) that without Nintendo funding it, it wouldn't exist in the first place.
 
Man, this 'but tomb raider 2!' has got to be a new talking point or something. It's neat how it keeps getting mentioned, with no context as to the gaming market at the time, or the fact it was still on the PC (iirc).

The only folks who got screwed were the Saturn folks, and they were SOL already by that time. The PC and PS1 were both far healthier and larger markets.

This time, it was a clear sellout by SE. PC and Ps3/4 were major purchasers of the previous game, left out in the cold for quick MS cash. It would be like if TR2 had gone to Sega, leaving out the PC and ps1.
 
He is a entertaining person who vents his views. I have no problem with this. Sometimes people need to relax or either ignore.
 
In my memory the dude pretty much shits on most of the games in his review. He just happened to shit on KZSF and Infamous SS extremly hard in his current gen reviews.

Kinda amazed that he didn't totally destroy TR in his original review though...

to be honest, KZ SF was a mixed bag and did deserve a bit of lashing. I dont think he reviewed Infamous SS. he may have done a lets play but not a proper review. he recenlty reviewed TLOU R and gave it a 10/10. I think hes extremely fair in his reviews. he aknowlged that DMC was not true to the franchise and understands the fan outcry, but did say it was a decent game and not the 1/10 some would have had you beleive.
 
Accepting financial stability and free marketing from a console manufacturer rather than take on all the risk and hope the market is healthy enough to recoup your costs and turn a profit.

Those bastards!

Don't you know they are supposed to send their game to die vs uncharted 4 so people can feel better about their console purchase. Get with the program dude who cares if sales tank because it is over shadowed by uncharted 4 and they end the series.
 
What's so bad about exclusives? Want it bad enough? Buy that system. Don't? Well move on.

There is nothing that requires any company to release across the board, they can release their product however they want.
 
I loved his rant. I have no problem with console exclusives, except when the original game came out what...less than 2 years ago on EVERY console, and now the sequel is exclusive to the worst selling next gen console currently? Just stupid. Tomb Raider originated on playstation and should be on the newest ones.
 
Top Bottom