I can assure you that pedophilia does not find support or acceptance among the LGBTQ+ community.
First of all,
Sorry for my English, but take this statement seriously.
For now, the consensus wall still seems to be solid, but let's not forget that a pedophile has been nominated by the American Senate. Not only that, we also remember what Dr. Daniel Amen told CBN about the fact that in the fifth edition of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness" people spoke of pedophilia as "sexual orientation", a term then deleted by the American Psychiatric Association. According to the doctor, in fact, these people are ill and "need treatment". Above all, he must know that his inclination is abnormal because if pedophilia "is difficult to treat", according to the doctor's opinion, it is possible for a pedophile to change when he believes that his behavior is wrong and when he really wants it.
But they are just speeches that can not be done today, on pain of questioning the whole construct on which the normalization of homosexuality was also founded. Therefore it will be increasingly difficult to oppose the destructive thesis that "pedophiles are born".
The LGBT community condemns pedophilia publicly without being able to give theoretical justifications in this regard, except that "do not touch the children". But beyond believing or not, given the large amount of homosexual abuse on minors, this statement is not enough. Starting from their assumption, "people born gay", it is impossible to really condemn the statement of the MAPs.
This is stated by The Prevention Network, which should prevent child abuse, but which in fact calls into question the classification of pedophilia as a psychiatric disorder.
According to the network we should talk about these people as MAPs not necessarily dangerous:
http://www.thepreventionproject.org/maps/
It seems a seemingly good approach to these self-proclaimed children's defenders, where we try to help the offender to prevent the offense, but we are not naive: what would happen to use a language that is a good one? it would only be the normalization of attractions towards the little ones. Because making the perpetrators appear as the victims of the bigoted and closed system, little by little one would come to believe that this could be born. And what will be the next step if pedophilia is no longer seen as a serious and dangerous disorder to treat? Of course, admitting that it can be cured would remain a mole for the scientific / university ideology that maintains that sexual orientation is innate and unchanging regardless of biological sex, but the consequences would be devastating. Perhaps what makes us rest assured is that in the social imaginary, pedophilia is still considered an unacceptable perversion, but the problem that this intellectual movement is expanding more than is possible.
Stop saying that pedophilia is not natural but the result of a wound, perhaps a harassment, and that "we could all be born pedophiles" is not the beginning of prevention and liberation, but of the normalization of the pedophile. It is no coincidence that this is exactly what the LGBT movement has convinced the world to succeed in getting accepted. Even the victimization of those who try attractions for children is not the way to curb the damage, but only the fall of the umpteen post of natural law, the only barrier to human weakness and perversion.
Therefore it is very dangerous when one says that one should not stigmatize pedophilia, otherwise, for example, they are prevented from "telling their children that they can not go to the beach because there may be children in bathing suits ... they can never be completely honest with somebody else". For the new scientific-academic ideology, pedophiles can never change their orientation, therefore they must be understood. While we are asked to change our refusal for pedophilia. A beautiful contradiction, the umpteenth, consequence of a movement that rejects the objective and natural data, the wounds, the choices and the freedom and that denies the reality and the biological data as objective.
