I can find a 2.2 ghz pentium 4. Must be equally as fast as my i7. They have the same clockspeed 'n shit. Honestly I don't understand this fail of a chart.I guess it was important to be specific about the CPU clock and nothing else.
I can find a 2.2 ghz pentium 4. Must be equally as fast as my i7. They have the same clockspeed 'n shit. Honestly I don't understand this fail of a chart.I guess it was important to be specific about the CPU clock and nothing else.
But then we would be doing their job, and they'll feel slighted that a bunch of nerds on the internet once again exposed how useless they are and there will be self back pats and shit and fuck it.
There is, and there's also one with 512MB.Isn't there a 4GB Xbox 360?
There is, and there's also one with 512MB.
I can find a 2.2 ghz pentium 4. Must be equally as fast as my i7. They have the same clockspeed 'n shit. Honestly I don't understand this fail of a chart.
Jesus. This reads like a joke fanboy comparison. A column for video chat but no details on the GPU, the defining hardware spec of a game console?
God damn, what is this shit with non tech specs posted by big gaming sites? CPU might as well say "Yes", same for GPU, without any real technical specs in there.
Is it really impossible for these sites to even once get the RAM names all the way right? In what universe is this difficult?
And lol at the CPU and GPU comparisons.
If these sites aren't intentionally trying to be deceptive, then they are just straight up daft. I don't know which is more damning.
Is it really impossible for these sites to even once get the RAM names all the way right? In what universe is this difficult?
And lol at the CPU and GPU comparisons.
If these sites aren't intentionally trying to be deceptive, then they are just straight up daft. I don't know which is more damning.
I thought this thread was going to be about comparing systems that have failed at market over the years.
Does it remind you of anything?So the Xbox One is more powerful??
1.75 Ghz >> 1.60 Ghz
I'm kidding, but casuals can easily fall into this.
That would be an interesting article.
Is it really impossible for these sites to even once get the RAM names all the way right? In what universe is this difficult?
And lol at the CPU and GPU comparisons.
If these sites aren't intentionally trying to be deceptive, then they are just straight up daft. I don't know which is more damning.
Better comparison:
PS3:
Yes
PS4:
Probably yes
360:
Very much yes
Xbone:
Maybe Yes.
Stealth Edit Wii U:
Probably not but maybe with Mario?
I mean, Nintendoomed
Since when did the 360 not have an optical drive?
Hey now keep the sexism out of this.This shit happens when they hire people for their looks and not their competence.
It's DDR3 not GDDR3, they don't mention the ESRAM and there's no discussion of instructions per cycle
Instructions per who?
That's what your average mainstream buyer would say. Ultimately they'll look at the games and make comparisons. If great looking games like NBA 2K14 look comparable, that's all that would matter to them. Whoa Killzone, Whoa Ryse Son of Rome... both systems are delivering next gen even if one a little more than the other.
Instructions per who?
That's what your average mainstream buyer would say. Ultimately they'll look at the games and make comparisons. If great looking games like NBA 2K14 look comparable, that's all that would matter to them. Whoa Killzone, Whoa Ryse Son of Rome... both systems are delivering next gen even if one a little more than the other.
By the way, they changed GDDR3 to DDR3, secretly.
But, they still haven't addressed some of the other issues. This isn't really an objective comparison. It's basically picking and choosing what to show.
Not to be against the bone, but no one is going to gleam any kind of understanding about the resolution discrepancy from looking at this chart.